Cost-effectiveness analysis of trifluridine/tipiracil in the treatment of heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer from the perspective of Chinese healthcare system

BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 7;14(11):e080846. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080846.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) for heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.

Designs: Based on the overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) data from the Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer (TAGS) trial (NCT02500043), a three-state Markov model (PFS, progressed disease and death) was constructed to analyse the cost-effectiveness of FTD/TPI compared with the placebo in heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer. Cost and utility were from pricing records and the literature. The model was simulated for 5 years with monthly cycles. Costs and health outcomes were discounted by 5%. We then conducted sensitivity analyses to evaluate the robustness of the parameters. The model results were from the Chinese healthcare system.

Outcome measures: The output results were the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).

Results: According to the model results, FTD/TPI generated an additional cost of US$26 855.66 and 0.88 QALYs compared with the placebo. ICER of FTD/TPI compared with the placebo was US$30 494.89 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses revealed that the utility value of the PFS stage and FTD/TPI adverse event costs were the main influencing parameters, and the results were stable. At a threshold of three times per capita gross domestic product of China (US$35 559.34 in 2022), the probability of FTD/TPI being cost-effective compared with placebo was 99.2%.

Conclusion: From the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, FTD/TPI is a more cost-effective option compared with the placebo for the treatment of heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer in patients who have received at least two prior advanced treatment regimens.

Trial registration number: The Chinese population registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2400080940) and clinical trial (NCT05029102).

Keywords: China; Gastrointestinal tumours; Health Economics.

MeSH terms

  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / economics
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use
  • China
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis*
  • Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
  • Drug Combinations*
  • Humans
  • Markov Chains
  • Progression-Free Survival
  • Pyrrolidines* / economics
  • Pyrrolidines* / therapeutic use
  • Quality-Adjusted Life Years*
  • Stomach Neoplasms* / drug therapy
  • Stomach Neoplasms* / economics
  • Stomach Neoplasms* / mortality
  • Stomach Neoplasms* / pathology
  • Thymine* / therapeutic use
  • Trifluridine* / economics
  • Trifluridine* / therapeutic use

Substances

  • Trifluridine
  • Pyrrolidines
  • Thymine
  • Drug Combinations
  • trifluridine tipiracil drug combination

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT05029102