Despite the introduction of JAK inhibitors, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant remains the only potentially curative treatment for patients with myelofibrosis but has considerable treatment-related complications. Whether the incorporation of JAK inhibition into the transplant algorithm leads to improved outcomes is still unclear. Here, we analyzed different transplant platforms in myelofibrosis patients undergoing a first transplant, comparing immune profiles and outcomes of (1) 33 patients continuing JAK inhibition at start of conditioning until stable engraftment (PERI-group), (2) 38 patients receiving JAK inhibition prior to transplant until start of conditioning (PRE-group), and (3) 38 patients that had never received JAK inhibition (NON-group). Patients in the PERI-group showed significantly higher early B-cell recovery as well as significantly increased late recovery of gamma-delta T cells and NK cells. We observed excellent neutrophil and platelet engraftment (100% for both) in the PERI-group and no hematotoxic effects or increased rates of infections following peri-transplant JAK inhibition. Cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) grade II-IV at day 100 after transplant was 15% in the PERI-group versus 29% in the PRE-group versus 34% in the NON-group. Cumulative incidence of relapse at 1 year after transplant was 9% in the PERI-group compared with 16% in the PRE-group and 18% in the NON-group. In conclusion, peri-transplant JAK inhibition was feasible with promising engraftment and acute GvHD rates, though deserves further investigation.
Keywords: JAK inhibition; allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant; myelofibrosis.
© 2024 The Author(s). American Journal of Hematology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.