Optimizing CT portography: a prospective comparison of injection into the splenic versus superior mesenteric artery

Radiology. 1994 Dec;193(3):651-5. doi: 10.1148/radiology.193.3.7972803.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate whether computed tomographic arterial portography (CTAP) is best performed with injections in the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) or the splenic artery.

Materials and methods: Seventy-one studies were performed with injection into the SMA (n = 37) or splenic artery (n = 34) of 150 mL of contrast material at 1.5 mL/sec and 20-second delay for both groups. Images were reviewed for location and type of nontumoral perfusion abnormalities. The degree of liver parenchymal enhancement with each technique was compared.

Results: Fewer nontumoral perfusion defects were seen with splenic artery (65%) versus SMA (78%) injection. Visual differences in contrast enhancement with greater attenuation in dependent portions of the liver were seen with greater frequency with SMA (41%) than with splenic artery (24%) injection. Contrast enhancement that obscured detail in the right lobe was seen only with SMA injections (16%). Greater parenchymal enhancement (up to 18 HU) at all time intervals was seen with splenic artery injection.

Conclusion: Because of greater parenchymal enhancement and fewer nontumoral perfusion abnormalities, splenic artery catheterization is the preferred technique for CTAP.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Controlled Clinical Trial

MeSH terms

  • Catheterization, Peripheral
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Injections, Intra-Arterial
  • Iopamidol / administration & dosage
  • Liver Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging*
  • Male
  • Mesenteric Artery, Superior
  • Middle Aged
  • Portography / methods*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Splenic Artery
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed / methods*

Substances

  • Iopamidol