Background: Increasing competition has eroded the patient base of many university hospitals and may jeopardize their teaching programs.
Methods: We questioned all private surgeons (PS), university surgeons (US), and resident surgeons (RS) in our state. Chi-squared analysis was used.
Results: Most PS, US, and RS, respectively, answered "yes" when asked to respond to the following items: whether teaching hospitals were the best way to educate new surgeons (77% versus 96% versus 87%), whether surgery residencies should be based at a university hospital (72% versus 96% versus 91%), and whether PS should refer complicated clinical cases for teaching purposes (75% versus 87% versus 68%). Differences appeared when the groups were asked whether the university should take the lead in guaranteeing the quality of surgical care in the state (67% versus 100% versus 77%, p = 0.002) and whether PS are better teachers of surgery than US (40% versus 4% versus 59%, p = 0.0001). An unexpected and disturbing trend was observed in RS when groups were asked whether practicing surgeons had any obligation to the state's university (57% versus 74% versus 22%, p = 0.0001) and whether surgeons had an obligation to repay society for their education (77% versus 83% versus 56%, p = 0.005).
Conclusions: Despite recent changes in medical economics, most PS still feel residency programs should be university based. A significantly smaller percentage of RS feel an obligation to their university and to society than do either PS or US.