Classics in Spine. Surgery literature revisited

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Feb 1;21(3):259-63. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199602010-00001.

Abstract

Study design: This article reviews the criteria for evaluating the quality of clinical trials.

Objectives: To outline the current methodologic standards by which the validity of controlled trials need to be evaluated.

Summary of background data: Weber's study, published in 1983 in Spine, is the only randomized trial comparing surgery and conservative management of sciatica in herniated lumbar discs.

Methods: Weber's article is revisited to illustrate basic principles in the design of clinical trials.

Results: Weber's study is a classic in spine surgery and has changed thinking regarding the benefit of surgery in sciatica related to herniated lumbar discs. However, the authors found potentially critical flaws in this study: a large number of crossovers, inadequate sample size, and insensitive outcome measurements.

Conclusions: A randomized, controlled trial is the most rigorous way to evaluate health intervention. Despite the difficulties of performing such studies, investigators should use the most appropriate scientific methodology.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Clinical Trials as Topic / methods*
  • Clinical Trials as Topic / standards
  • Evaluation Studies as Topic
  • Humans
  • Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care*
  • Quality of Health Care*
  • Spine / surgery*
  • Vereinigte Staaten