[Ureteroscopy versus in situ extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the treatment of calculi of the distal ureter]

Prog Urol. 1996 Aug-Sep;6(4):535-8.
[Article in French]

Abstract

In a retrospective study from a unique center (St. Luc Hospital, Montreal) stone clearance of 88 consecutive distal ureteral calculi (below pelvic brim) treated by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in situ were compared to a group of 94 distal ureteral calculi treated by ureteroscopy during the same period. Our results show 84% success rate for ureteroscopy which is clearly superior than 58% stone clearance rate at 3 month follow-up for ESWL Success rate was influenced by stone size in the ESWL group but not in the ureteroscopy group. This study reveals similar success rate for calculi smaller than 6 mm but for larger calculi, success rate of ureteroscopy is significantly superior.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • English Abstract
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Lithotripsy* / methods
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Quebec
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Ureteral Calculi / pathology
  • Ureteral Calculi / therapy*
  • Ureteroscopy* / methods