Hardesty LA - Search Results

1

Is maximum positive predictive value a good indicator of an optimal screening mammography practice?

Hardesty LA, Klym AH, Shindel BE, Chough DM, Sumkin JH, Gur D. Hardesty LA, et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 May;184(5):1505-7. doi: 10.2214/ajr.184.5.01841505. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005. PMID: 15855105

2

Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system.

Gur D, Sumkin JH, Rockette HE, Ganott M, Hakim C, Hardesty L, Poller WR, Shah R, Wallace L. Gur D, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Feb 4;96(3):185-90. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh067. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004. PMID: 14759985

3

Optimal reference mammography: a comparison of mammograms obtained 1 and 2 years before the present examination.

Sumkin JH, Holbert BL, Herrmann JS, Hakim CA, Ganott MA, Poller WR, Shah R, Hardesty LA, Gur D. Sumkin JH, et al. Among authors: hardesty la. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Feb;180(2):343-6. doi: 10.2214/ajr.180.2.1800343. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003. PMID: 12540430

4

Recall and detection rates in screening mammography.

Gur D, Sumkin JH, Hardesty LA, Clearfield RJ, Cohen CS, Ganott MA, Hakim CM, Harris KM, Poller WR, Shah R, Wallace LP, Rockette HE. Gur D, et al. Among authors: hardesty la. Cancer. 2004 Apr 15;100(8):1590-4. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20053. Cancer. 2004. PMID: 15073844 Free article.

5

Computer-aided detection performance in mammographic examination of masses: assessment.

Gur D, Stalder JS, Hardesty LA, Zheng B, Sumkin JH, Chough DM, Shindel BE, Rockette HE. Gur D, et al. Among authors: hardesty la. Radiology. 2004 Nov;233(2):418-23. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2332040277. Epub 2004 Sep 9. Radiology. 2004. PMID: 15358846

6

Trends in recall, biopsy, and positive biopsy rates for screening mammography in an academic practice.

Gur D, Wallace LP, Klym AH, Hardesty LA, Abrams GS, Shah R, Sumkin JH. Gur D, et al. Among authors: hardesty la. Radiology. 2005 May;235(2):396-401. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2352040422. Epub 2005 Mar 15. Radiology. 2005. PMID: 15770039

7

Detection of masses and clustered microcalcifications on data compressed mammograms: an observer performance study.

Good WF, Sumkin JH, Ganott M, Hardesty L, Holbert B, Johns CM, Klym AH. Good WF, et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Dec;175(6):1573-6. doi: 10.2214/ajr.175.6.1751573. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000. PMID: 11090378

8

The ability of helical CT to preoperatively stage endometrial carcinoma.

Hardesty LA, Sumkin JH, Hakim C, Johns C, Nath M. Hardesty LA, et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Mar;176(3):603-6. doi: 10.2214/ajr.176.3.1760603. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001. PMID: 11222188

9

The effect of routine use of a computer-aided detection system on the practice of breast imagers: a subjective assessment.

Klym AH, King JL, Hardesty L. Klym AH, et al. Acad Radiol. 2004 Jun;11(6):711-3. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2004.02.007. Acad Radiol. 2004. PMID: 15172373 No abstract available.

10

Effects of lesion conspicuity on visual search in mammogram reading.

Mello-Thoms C, Hardesty L, Sumkin J, Ganott M, Hakim C, Britton C, Stalder J, Maitz G. Mello-Thoms C, et al. Acad Radiol. 2005 Jul;12(7):830-40. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2005.03.068. Acad Radiol. 2005. PMID: 16039537

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My Custom Filters

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

41 results

Search Page

Filters