Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) Blenders Tax Credit

Policy Overview

The sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) blenders tax credit was proposed under the Biden Administration’s 2022 Inflation Reduction Act and is under the remit of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Starting in 2023, the SAF-blenders tax credit will award airlines blending SAFs with jet fuel with a monetary credit. To achieve the credit ($1.25/gallon) SAFs must achieve a 50% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions compared to conventional jet fuel. Fuels achieving GHG emissions reductions exceeding the 50% threshold will receive greater tax credits up to $1.75/gallon, incentivizing fuels with lower emissions.

Background

To determine whether a fuel meets the 50% threshold for the SAF blenders tax credit, a fuel’s GHG emissions must be estimated as accurately as possible. However, emissions from land-based fuels (biofuels) cannot be measured directly but are estimated through models that simulate how agricultural systems react to increased fuel demand and changes in land-use.

The UN body for aviation, the International Civil Aviation Organization, (ICAO) devised a methodology for estimating fuel emissions under the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA). The proposed methodology for calculating a fuel’s emissions under the SAF blenders tax credits is ICAO’s CORSIA methodology, or “any similar methodology”.

The Greenhouse Gases, Regulated Emissions and Energy Use in Technologies (GREET) methodology is an alternative methodology used for calculating fuel emissions. GREET often produces widely divergent results to ICAO’s CORSIA methodology, as agricultural systems are assumed to have more optimistic responses to biofuel growth under some models in GREET.

The consequence of these optimistic assumptions is that GREET estimates far smaller emissions from SAFs derived from corn ethanol compared to estimations by ICAO’s CORSIA methodology. In fact, ICAO’s CORSIA methodology finds that corn ethanol’s emissions are almost equal to fossil jet fuel. Lower estimations of a fuel's emissions may meet policy thresholds and translate to larger tax credits under federal policy, incentivizing the fuels. However, these assumptions are more likely to underestimate GHG emissions from fuel production.

ICAO’s CORSIA methodology also sets additional sustainability criteria, including land use rights, food security, biodiversity and water, to prevent negative trade-offs commonly associated with biofuels. ICAO and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have warned against the expanded use of crop-based biofuels, as it risks converting natural lands to croplands with resulting GHG emissions.

See InfluenceMap’s July 2023 US Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) Policies and Corporate Engagement report for further details on fuel emissions calculations and the advocacy of the aviation and biofuel industries.

Policy Status

While the SAF blenders tax credit came into effect in January 2023, implementation of the credit is still being reviewed by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The primary issue in current policy debates appears to be the methodology for calculating fuel emissions. In December 2023, the IRS issued guidance determining that the current GREET methodology does not “satisfy the applicable statutory requirements for the SAF credit” and stating that an updated GREET model will be developed in 2024. In April 2024, the updated GREET model was released, alongside guidance on the use of climate-friendly agricultural practices. The guidance stated that corn-ethanol derived SAFs can reduce estimated emissions if producers use three agricultural practices in conjunction: no-till, cover cropping and efficient fertilizer application. Soybean-derived SAFs can reduce estimated emissions if producers use a combination of no-till and cover cropping.

Policy Status

Passed: Undergoing implementation by the Internal Revenue Service.

In April 2024, the Biden Administration released its updated ‘GREET’ model and guidance on the use of climate-friendly agricultural techniques.

Evidence Profile

Key

opposing not supporting mixed/unclear
supporting strongly supporting

Policy Engagement Overview

The US aviation and biofuel industries have clearly supported the federal SAF tax credit.

  • In a February 2023 public consultation response, Airlines for America (A4A) strongly supported the SAF blenders tax credit.

  • In a November 2022, a senior executive at the Renewable Fuels Association (RFA), the leading industry association for the US ethanol industry, supported the US SAF blenders tax credit.

  • Southwest, JetBlue, American, Delta, United, Airlines for America (A4A) and the Renewable Fuels Association (RFA) signed a joint letter to policymakers in April 2022 which described the SAF blenders tax credit as the “most important action Congress can take to support the decarbonization of the aviation sector”.

Despite endorsing the SAF blenders tax credit, the US aviation, biofuel and oil and gas industries advocated for amendments to fuel emissions calculations. Such amendments likely weaken the integrity of the sustainability criteria for SAFs under the federal tax credit and increase the likelihood that crop-based SAFs become eligible for tax credits.

  • A4A and RFA advocated for GREET to be recognized as a ‘similar methodology’ to ICAO’s CORSIA methodology, making it an accepted methodology for fuel emissions calculations under the SAF blenders tax credit. Marathon Petroleum, the American Petroleum Institute (API) and American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM) also advocated for GREET to be recognized under policy.

  • In a February 2023 consultation response, American, United, Delta, Southwest, A4A and RFA worked together through the ‘SAF BTC Coalition’ to advocate for assumptions under GREET that are favourable to crop-based SAFs and are more likely to underestimate GHG emissions from fuel production.

  • The SAF BTC Coalition also appeared to push for less stringent criteria for sustainability audits of SAF producers in a February 2023 consultation response.

  • In February 2023, RFA, API and AFPM advocated for an estimation under GREET which directly reduces the calculated emissions of corn-ethanol derived SAF when compared to ICAO’s CORSIA methodology. Through this amendment, corn-ethanol is far more likely to meet the 50% emissions threshold for the SAF tax credit. In January 2024, RFA sent a letter to the Interagency Working Group tasked with updating the GREET model to meet statutory requirements. In the letter, RFA appeared to maintain its advocacy for elements of the GREET model that differ from ICAO CORSIA and likely result in significantly lower estimations of corn-ethanol emissions.

  • American, Delta, United, JetBlue, Southwest and Boeing signed a joint letter in November 2023 which urged modifications that will likely reduce the calculated emissions of crop-based biofuels, thus incentivizing such fuels under the SAF tax credit.

Following the April 2024 announcement of the updated GREET model and guidance on climate-smart agricultural practices, the ethanol industry has pushed for further amendments favorable to crop-based biofuels.

  • In an April 2024 press release, RFA CEO, Geoff Cooper supported the modifications because they will ‘help position ethanol-based SAF for takeoff’, while calling for ‘more flexibility, and additional low-carbon…practices’ in emissions calculations. Cooper further stated that RFA will engage on the upcoming Clean Fuel Production Credit to ensure it is ‘implemented in a way that truly swings the door wide open for farmers and ethanol producers’.

Policy Status

Passed: Undergoing implementation by the Internal Revenue Service.

In April 2024, the Biden Administration released its updated ‘GREET’ model and guidance on the use of climate-friendly agricultural techniques.

Evidence Profile

Key

opposing not supporting mixed/unclear
supporting strongly supporting

Entities Engaged on Policy

The following table lists companies and industry associations that have engaged on the SAF blenders tax credit. Click on an entity name to view the full profile on its climate policy engagement.

Influencemap Performance BandOrganizationEngagement Intensity