Legislature(2023 - 2024)
2024-03-12 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf2024-03-12 Senate Journal Page 1874 SSCR 10 Senator Giessel moved the joint session consider SENATE SPECIAL CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 10 Disapproving Executive Order No. 133. SENATE SPECIAL CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 10 was before the joint session on final passage. The question being: "Shall SENATE SPECIAL CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 10 Disapproving Executive Order No. 133, pass the Joint Session?" The roll of the House was taken with the following result: HOUSE SSCR 10 Final Passage YEAS: 0 NAYS: 40 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Nays: Allard, Armstrong, Baker, Carpenter, Carrick, Coulombe, Cronk, Dibert, Eastman, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Galvin, Gray, Groh, Hannan, Himschoot, C.Johnson, D.Johnson, Josephson, McCabe, McCormick, McKay, Mears, Mina, Ortiz, Prax, Rauscher, Ruffridge, Saddler, Schrage, Shaw, Stapp, Story, Stutes, Sumner, Tilton, Tomaszewski, Vance, Wright The roll of the Senate was taken with the following result: 2024-03-12 Senate Journal Page 1875 SENATE SSCR 10 Final Passage YEAS: 0 NAYS: 19 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Nays: Bishop, Bjorkman, Claman, Dunbar, Giessel, Gray-Jackson, Hughes, Kaufman, Kawasaki, Kiehl, Merrick, Myers, Olson, Shower, Stedman, Stevens, Tobin, Wielechowski, Wilson Excused: Hoffman TOTALS: YEAS: 0 NAYS: 59 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 and so, SENATE SPECIAL CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 10 failed and was referred to the Senate Secretary for engrossment.