An in depth look into what our future will look like one million years from now when technology takes over, for better or worse.An in depth look into what our future will look like one million years from now when technology takes over, for better or worse.An in depth look into what our future will look like one million years from now when technology takes over, for better or worse.
- Nominated for 1 Primetime Emmy
- 2 nominations total
Browse episodes
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaThe Matrix is mentioned several times during the show. Laurence Fishburne, who narrates the show, actually starred in The Matrix films.
Featured review
A science-fiction show at best, not bad but it's not a science show either.
The show had great potential but it is lacking in several areas to be great.
I think the biggest problem -maybe my expectations were too high- is the lack of actual science, you get interviews and interventions from a lot of people who are completely unfamiliar with robotics, engineering, economics, etc. It's like asking your neighbor's opinion and frankly it's quite tiring. I believe the show would gain from explaining the different technologies they present in greater details.
Because of that, the show doesn't know where to go, is it science- fiction, is it actual science? Based on facts or assumptions? Trying to tangle the lives of fictional characters with a documentary is tricky and it sometimes feel like a cheap feeling grab to get the viewers involved. If I wanted drama, I'd watch a drama, I don't understand the need for the character's story arc, it feels forced. Because you simply jump from their story that serves the purpose of introducing the technologies to the audience, it doesn't feel (pardon the pun) organic and ruins the story-telling.
Finally, the show suffers from what could be called "americanisms" : everything is tremendous, crazy, on the verge of a massive discovery, etc. The use of constant superlatives actually weakens the viewers' understanding of what is important and what might be less important. "This is science and not science-fiction", "It's a question of when an not if". I could go on but you get the gist of it. What am I watching, a sales pitch? In the end this is probably the biggest disservice to the series.
So, I'm not strongly against it, the message is interesting and I believe it comes from good intentions. But this is not a science show, there is a lot of prediction and telling you how something will happen but very little factual explanations. A lot of people who give their opinions instead of sticking to facts or fact-based insights.
I just hope we'll have something better in the future.
P.S : Lose the comedian(s), they're supposed to be the "relatable" audience member, they just seem out of place and their interventions are strangely paced as well.
I think the biggest problem -maybe my expectations were too high- is the lack of actual science, you get interviews and interventions from a lot of people who are completely unfamiliar with robotics, engineering, economics, etc. It's like asking your neighbor's opinion and frankly it's quite tiring. I believe the show would gain from explaining the different technologies they present in greater details.
Because of that, the show doesn't know where to go, is it science- fiction, is it actual science? Based on facts or assumptions? Trying to tangle the lives of fictional characters with a documentary is tricky and it sometimes feel like a cheap feeling grab to get the viewers involved. If I wanted drama, I'd watch a drama, I don't understand the need for the character's story arc, it feels forced. Because you simply jump from their story that serves the purpose of introducing the technologies to the audience, it doesn't feel (pardon the pun) organic and ruins the story-telling.
Finally, the show suffers from what could be called "americanisms" : everything is tremendous, crazy, on the verge of a massive discovery, etc. The use of constant superlatives actually weakens the viewers' understanding of what is important and what might be less important. "This is science and not science-fiction", "It's a question of when an not if". I could go on but you get the gist of it. What am I watching, a sales pitch? In the end this is probably the biggest disservice to the series.
So, I'm not strongly against it, the message is interesting and I believe it comes from good intentions. But this is not a science show, there is a lot of prediction and telling you how something will happen but very little factual explanations. A lot of people who give their opinions instead of sticking to facts or fact-based insights.
I just hope we'll have something better in the future.
P.S : Lose the comedian(s), they're supposed to be the "relatable" audience member, they just seem out of place and their interventions are strangely paced as well.
Helpful•324
- nathan_furnal
- Jun 11, 2017
- Permalink
- How many seasons does Year Million have?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Sprache
- Also known as
- El mundo del futuro
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime47 minutes
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
![Year Million (2017)](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BYTg3ZWY3ZDAtNDFlZS00YTQyLTk2MWMtYzMxYzliNDdkM2NhXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNTAyODkwOQ@@._V1_QL75_UY133_CR2,0,90,133_.jpg)