Once you have prepared your team for consensus, you can start the facilitation process, which typically involves four stages: explore, propose, evaluate, and agree. The explore stage should involve gathering and sharing information, perspectives, and ideas from all team members. You can use techniques such as brainstorming, surveys, interviews, or focus groups to elicit input. Additionally, tools such as SWOT analysis, affinity diagrams, or mind maps can be used to organize and visualize data. The goal is to create a common understanding of the situation and the options available. For the propose stage, you want to generate and present possible solutions or recommendations based on the input from the previous stage. Techniques such as voting, ranking, or dotmocracy can help narrow down the options and identify the most preferred or feasible ones. Tools such as pros and cons lists, decision matrices, or criteria weighting can also be used to compare and contrast the options. The goal is to create a shortlist of viable alternatives that can meet the needs and interests of the group. During the evaluate stage, you want to test and refine the shortlisted options and address any concerns or objections from team members. Techniques such as feedback loops, pilot testing, or scenario analysis can assess the strengths and weaknesses of each option and identify any gaps or risks. Tools such as fishbone diagrams, root cause analysis, or force field analysis can help identify and resolve any causes of resistance or disagreement. The goal is to create a consensus draft that can satisfy the criteria and constraints of the decision. Finally, for the agree stage you want to finalize and confirm the consensus draft and ensure that all team members can accept and support it. Techniques such as check-in, restatement, or confirmation questions should be used to verify understanding and agreement of each participant. Additionally tools such as action plans, timelines, or accountability charts can be used to outline the next steps and responsibilities for implementing the decision. Ultimately this will result in a consensus statement that can document and communicate both the outcome and process.