Julius AI

Julius AI

Software-Entwicklung

San Francisco, CA 5,129 followers

AI Data Scientist: Easily analyze, visualize and transform data

Über uns

Your AI Data Scientist: Easily analyze, visualize and transform data

Website
https://julius.ai
Industrie
Software-Entwicklung
Größe des Unternehmens
2-10 Mitarbeiter
Hauptsitz
San Francisco, CA
Typ
In Privatbesitz

Standorte

Employees at Julius AI

Aktualisierungen

  • View organization page for Julius AI, graphic

    5,129 followers

    We're excited to roll out Custom Containers, a powerful new way to tailor your Julius workspace. With options for extended sessions and increased memory, Custom Containers lets you tackle complex, data-intensive tasks with ease.

  • View organization page for Julius AI, graphic

    5,129 followers

    "Some new data analysis tools such as (the impressive) Julius AI can run complex and sophisticated statistical analysis, thus enabling advanced statistical analysis without specialized training." We appreciate the mention Avi Staiman!

    View profile for Avi Staiman, graphic

    AI in Scholarly Publishing, Bridge Between Researchers and Publishers, Author Services Expert, CEO Academic Language Experts, Entrepreneur

    I see trouble brewing....76% of #researchers report using #Ai tools in their research, while only 27% say they understand how to use these tools responsibly. #Researchintegrity warning bells should be ringing all around us... Meanwhile, all #scholarlypublishers require from authors is to declare, declare, declare, and .....declare. But how can authors declare issues if they don't know they exist? Do publishers have any idea what kinds of tools exist and what risks they pose? I suggest 8 actions publishers must take to better understand how AI tools for #research actually work and get ahead of research integrity issues. 1️⃣ Create a risk register for different kinds of tools 2️⃣ Differentiate between different AI categories & substantive versus non-substantive use 3️⃣ Set up transparent inclusive governance 4️⃣ Encourage experimentation and learning within individual organizations 5️⃣ Work together to create a global standard framework 6️⃣ Make sure guidelines are live and continuously updated 7️⃣ Define who is in charge and whether authors can act as content generators, reviewers, or both 8️⃣ Consider the ability to monitor and enforce policies Read more in my latest from The Scholarly Kitchen. ________________________________________ A big thanks to Christopher Kenneally, Thad McIlroy, Ann Michael, William Gunn, David Crotty, Tommy Doyle, Peter Gorsuch & Chhavi Chauhan for their invaluable comments. The final version looks much better than the initial draft, trust me.

    Woefully Insufficient Publisher Policies on Author AI Use Put Research Integrity at Risk - The Scholarly Kitchen

    Woefully Insufficient Publisher Policies on Author AI Use Put Research Integrity at Risk - The Scholarly Kitchen

    https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org

  • Julius AI reposted this

    View profile for Victor Paytuvi, graphic

    CRO Specialist at @DtcPages | Helping Shopify Stores to increase their Revenue per Session through data-driven tests 🚀 | CRO Nerd 🤓

    I use Julius AI to analyze and visualize large data sets when doing research for CRO clients at DTC Pages. The most powerful and important prompt I use before running any analysis is the following: "Find data inconsistencies and improve data quality. - Find data inconsistencies - Improve data quality. - Generate a new CSV file with the data corrected." Thank me later, but this will help you're not working with trash data.

  • Julius AI reposted this

    View profile for Julia Scott, graphic

    Lawyer / Founder of Due

    A constant complaint from law firm clients is that M&A due diligence reports are too long. However, there are many obstacles for firms to overcome this. For example, it is extremely difficult for firms to process the volume of information and data (often provided by the seller as a ‘data dump’) in a concise report using the current method of manual reporting in a Word document. Furthermore, reports are usually prepared under extreme time pressure and budget constraints. Plus, it’s always hardest to present something complex, in a simple, understandable way so often this is overcome by including more detail, rather than less. When I was at Gilbert + Tobin, one of the ways we tried to make the reports shorter and easier to digest was by adding visualizations to break up the text. We would visualize the insights uncovered from the document review. They weren't ground breaking - mostly bar or pie charts and tables - but it made the information easier to read and we received good feedback from clients on this approach. However, one of the issues we still encountered was presenting the visualizations so that the information contained within it was still understood by the reader. Working with Word reports, it has significant limitations and visualizations have to be included as static images, rather than being interactive. Another example was when we would use a table to summarize the top customer contracts and each column was used to summarize a key term. Sometimes there were so many columns in a Word table that each column became so narrow that you could hardly read the content. To try to make reports shorter and more interactive, I have been playing around with Julius AI to visualize contract data. I uploaded a spreadsheet of metadata from key clauses (including termination and change of control) of 100 material contracts reviewed by 10 document reviewers using Due. I asked Julius AI certain questions about the data and asked it to visualize the results. It converts the data into visualizations within seconds that can be added to digital reports. The key step here was to have a checklist of all the data points to be extracted from the documents so all the reviewers were extracting the key information consistently. It might be possible to do this analysis in Excel, however Julius AI also gave analysis on the results (for example, it understood that the joint venture decision-making threshold was about which joint venturer could pass decisions on its own and/or veto decisions). This is exactly the sort of analysis that clients are wanting when considering an acquisition of a joint venture interest. I have prepared a short video using Arcade showing a few examples of the visualizations I prepared that can be added to a digital report, instead of long passages of text. Feel free to reach out if you have any other examples of data that can be visualized in a DD report (I am sure there are lots more!)

Ähnliche Seiten

Finanzierung

Julius AI 1 total round

Letzte Runde

Pre seed

US$ 500.0K

Investoren

Y Combinator
Siehe mehr Informationen auf crunchbase