Own Your Own Intelligence (OYOI)

Own Your Own Intelligence (OYOI)

Why world power is at an inflection point

By Dr. John Sviokla and Paul Baier, GAI Insights

The Industrial Revolution was built on three forms of assets (or capital): natural, human, and financial. 

The digital revolution created three new forms of assets (or capital) (See Everson & Sviokla, 2018):

  • behavioral

  • network

  • cognition or intelligence

For the last two decades, countries, companies, and individuals have been willing to give up their behavioral assets (e.g. behavior data mined by Facebook and location services) and network assets (e.g. human connection data used by LinkedIn and Instagram) in exchange for free services. During this time, market participants lost control of these two assets. All Western countries, except South Korea in social media, have allowed the US giants to dominate.

GenAI now offers the ability to codify and amplify the third asset, intelligence. Since GenAI is even more powerful than social media, countries, companies, and individuals must act if they want to influence ownership and control; otherwise, big tech firms will gladly take it.

To frame and foster this discussion, we introduce the concept of Own Your Own Intelligence.

Cui Bono?  

High-tech giants garnered the lion’s share of value and power from behavioral and network assets due to their impressive innovations, aggressiveness, and clever blunting of almost any major regulation or antitrust actions. 

One measure of their influence is market capital. Five high-tech firms have $15T in market capitalization (Jul 2024) v. combined GDP of the third and fourth largest economies of the world, Germany and Japan, with $9T (2023)

Facebook now has 3 B members, way more than any single country has citizens.

As we enter this age of digital intelligence, countries, companies, and individuals have a choice: will they cede their intelligence assets to the tech titans, as they did in the past with behavioral and network assets, or will they take steps to “own their own intelligence”? This involves building digital intelligence in an ethical and humanistic way, incorporating the world’s best human dialogue and interface, security, data and creative ownership, and stewardship; all of which prevent the exploitation of intelligence on a global scale.

What does OYOI Mean?

In 2000, Toys "R" Us, the dominant toy and baby products retailer in the United States, signed a ten-year partnership with Amazon to establish their online presence. In exchange, Toys "R" Us became Amazon’s exclusive supplier of toys and baby products. However, in 2002, Amazon began allowing other competitors to sell toys and baby products. Toys "R" Us sued Amazon and eventually recovered $51 million in damages, but by then, it was too late to catch up with the e-commerce trend.

Don’t let your organization’s intelligence fall behind like Toys "R" Us. All market participants will be better off if high-tech firms do not dominate digital intelligence.

We are at an Inflection Point

Now is the time for countries, companies, and individuals to summon the leadership, to exercise the will, and to build the means to own their own intelligence.

Companies that partner with high tech and make their products available using closed proprietary platforms are making a Toys "R" Us bet. They should carefully consider which types of intelligence are key to their success and create both short- and long-term strategies to gain the benefits of GenAI without giving away their core assets. Without action, a handful of, profit-driven, high-tech firms will extract and monetize the digital intelligence of market participants.

Components of an alternative path such as open source, new partnerships, and innovative products are emerging, but they are not yet sufficient.

Step 1: Join the discussion

Sovereign countries, companies, and individuals need to join this discussion and debate on forward paths. Current regulatory mechanisms are useful but not sufficient. Awareness needs to be raised, alliances formed, and laws enacted.

We, the global community, did not have a meaningful dialogue about social media, and we have seen its downside. GenAI is more powerful. We need to coordinate at this inflection point and find ways to own our intelligence and avoid even more digital servitude.


“I am afraid that our eyes are bigger than our stomachs, and that we have more curiosity than understanding. We grasp at everything, but catch nothing except wind.” - Montaigne

Onward

Paul

John Sviokla Tim Andrews John Werner Ted Shelton Toby Eduardo Redshaw Bruce Richardson Jeffrey F Rayport Chunka Mui Christopher Brock Jon Salisbury Pete Blackshaw Jim Reardon Ted Morgan Ian Robertson Badri Raghavan Kate Reichenbach Karen Beck Stroup Bill Fandrich Mamoon Yunus Raman Sud Gordon M. Goldstein

Alex Kouchev

Workspace Innovator: I inspire people to embrace AI at work 🚀 | Connecting HR and Tech | 12+ Years Leading People & Product Initiatives | opinions expressed are my own

2mo

No wonder governments like France, are increasingly investing in their own ecosystems. Dependency on frontier models that are coming from Silicon Valley would undermine the country's sovereignty.

Wie
Antwort
Alex Velinov

CTO @ Tag Digital | Helping Humans Understand AI | AI Solutions for Marketing and Opps | Keynote Speaker | All Views Are My Own

2mo

Very good points, Paul Baier. The whole concept sounds right. Need more guidance on what that means on a very practical level. This is a good start anyways.

Mark Evans

AI Strategist & Ecosystem Builder | Innovation & Partnerships Leader | Driving Collaboration Between Startups & Enterprises

2mo

The concept of "owning your intelligence" is much more abstract and complex than understanding something like behavioral data. How do we simplify and make it more tangible?

Benjamin Newman

AI Champion Bridging Tech & Learning Gaps | Storyteller | Consultant

2mo

1. Companies quickly found that it would be hard to own their own data-centers so they outsourced to 3rd party cloud providers because of scale/cost/maintenance requirements. Despite initial fears this has largely been a positive move. What is the key distinction that makes GenAI more like social media versus cloud outsourcing? 2. What are the three prescriptions for governments or enterprises to protect their data, especially those that lack the funds to compete with big-tech? Proprietary or open-sourced models, RAG?

Jeremy Fritzhand

Director, Startup Services ● Ecosystem Enabler ● Startup Catalyst ● Social Entrepreneur

2mo

Is it too late to control our digital destiny? Some say we should unplug AI completely (Terminator, Transcendence), while others dream of using all computing power for global good (PeaceRise). Is the truth somewhere in between??? We need smarter tech regulations, public AI investment, better AI education, and global teamwork on AI rules. There's definitely a need for balance as we shape our future with AI (or maybe not???). Interestingly, the UN's "AI for Good" initiative is already working on similar ideas to use AI responsibly for a better world. Next session June 2025 - https://aiforgood.itu.int/summit24/

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Others also viewed

Explore topics