Scribd Logo
Hochladen

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 8 views

    Rodney Sylvester Smith v. John N. Brown, Warden, 861 F.2d 266, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished court case from 1988 in which Rodney Sylvester Smith appealed the denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. The appeals court affirmed the district court's denial, finding no merit to Smith's appeal based on its review of the record and district court opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    Rodney Sylvester Smith v. John N. Brown, Warden, 861 F.2d 266, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views1 page
    This document is an unpublished court case from 1988 in which Rodney Sylvester Smith appealed the denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. The appeals court affirmed the district court's denial, finding no merit to Smith's appeal based on its review of the record and district court opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1988-10-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 861 F.2d 266 Docket: 88-6723

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is an unpublished court case from 1988 in which Rodney Sylvester Smith appealed the denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. The appeals court affirmed the district court's denial, finding no merit to Smith's appeal based on its review of the record and district court opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views1 page

    Rodney Sylvester Smith v. John N. Brown, Warden, 861 F.2d 266, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished court case from 1988 in which Rodney Sylvester Smith appealed the denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. The appeals court affirmed the district court's denial, finding no merit to Smith's appeal based on its review of the record and district court opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    861 F.

    2d 266
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Rodney Sylvester SMITH, Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.
    John N. BROWN, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 88-6723.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Aug. 26, 1988.
    Decided Oct. 4, 1988.

    Rodney Sylvester Smith, appellant pro se.


    John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Richard Bruce Rosenblatt,
    Office of Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before ERVIN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Rodney Sylvester Smith appeals from the district court's order refusing habeas
    corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the
    district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly,
    we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Brown, C/A No. 88123-S (D.Md. May 25, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like