Greg Mussallem 11-09-16
Greg Mussallem 11-09-16
From:
Submitted by:
Subject:
Recommendation:
Continue the application with a request for changes.
Application:
Block:
Location:
Applicant:
DS 16-403
APN:
010-272-017
K
Lot:
1&3
Casanova Street, S/W corner of 10th Avenue
Greg Mussallem
Property Owner: Greg Mussallem (owner/contractor)
111
DS 16-403 (Mussallem)
November 9, 2016
Staff Report
Page 2
Staff has scheduled this application for conceptual review. The primary purpose of this meeting is
to review and consider the site planning, privacy and views, mass and scale related to the project.
However, the Commission may provide input on other aspects of the design.
PROJECT DATA FOR A 4,000 SQUARE FOOT SITE:
Site Considerations
Allowed
Existing
Proposed
Floor Area
1,800 sf
NA
1,800 sf
Site Coverage
Trees
556 sf
3 Upper /1 Lower
(recommended)
NA
3 Acacia
3 Coast live oak
556 sf
N/A
18/24
NA
12/ 18
NA
Setbacks
Minimum Required
Existing
Proposed
Front
10 1
NA
27 (residence)
3 (detached garage)
10 (25%)
NA
Min: 14
NA
Rear
15
Min: 5 6
Staff analysis:
Forest Character: Residential Design Guidelines 1.1 through 1.4 encourage maintaining a forested
image on the site and for new construction to be at least six feet from significant trees.
The site currently contains three Acacia trees that will be removed, and two Coast live oaks (18
and 44 diameter at breast height (DBH)). Oaks are protected and the proposed residence is
setback a minimum of 6 feet from these trees. It does not appear that these trees will need to be
pruned to accommodate the new residence. One 26-inch Eucalyptus and one 42-inch Cypress are
located in the Casanova Street right-of-way.
1
10-foot setback for Re-subdivided Corner Site CMC 17.06.020.J and Table 17.10 Setback Standards for R-1
District.
112
DS 16-403 (Mussallem)
November 9, 2016
Staff Report
Page 3
City code (CMC Section 17.34.070 - Landscaping Standards for Residential Districts) requires that
upper and lower canopy trees be planted as a component of development projects, if needed. The
City Forester does not recommend that additional trees be planted in this case. However, staff will
confer with the City Forester regarding the potential to add an additional upper or lower canopy
tree on the site.
Privacy & Views: Residential Design Guidelines 5.1 through 5.3 state that designs should preserve
reasonable solar access to neighboring parcels and maintain privacy of indoor and outdoor spaces
in a neighborhood and maintain view opportunities.
Staff has not identified any view impacts that would be created by the new residence. However,
with regard to privacy, on the south side of the subject property is a residence with windows and
sliding door facing north towards the subject property. Of concern is the proposed second floor
Juliet balcony that will overlook the adjacent residence to the south. Potential privacy issues can
be partially resolved by planting trees at the south boundary line. It remains to be seen if there will
be a privacy issue that the neighbor will address. Staff notes that the adjacent neighbor to the
west has no windows facing east towards the subject property and so privacy issues do not appear
to be an issue at this elevation.
With regard to privacy and views, in staffs opinion, the proposed residence meets the objectives of
Residential Design Guidelines 5.1 through 5.3.
Mass & Bulk: Residential Design Guidelines 7.6 states an objective to avoid design treatment that
produce a top-heavy appearance such as large cantilevered building elements and low, horizontal
building forms that appear to hug the ground are encouraged.
The subject parcel is located on a corner and so is highly visible from two public rights-of-way.
The neighborhood has a mix of one- and two-story residences and a two-story residence at the
subject location is appropriate. However, in staffs opinion the proposed design may present a topheavy appearance. Staff notes that the proposed second story is 644 square feet in size and
constitutes approximately 36% of the total floor area. The second story includes two bedrooms
and two bathrooms. Contributing to the top-heavy appearance is the proposed two-story plate
height, which is at a maximum of 20 feet and must be lowered to 18 feet in order to meet code
requirements. In addition, the east side of the second story and staircase is cantilevered, which is
discouraged by the Design Guidelines. If the Commission has concerns with the mass of the
building, it could require that in addition to reducing the plate height, that the second story be
reduced in size and/or that the cantilevered elements be eliminated.
113
DS 16-403 (Mussallem)
November 9, 2016
Staff Report
Page 4
Building & Roof Form: Residential Design Guidelines 8.1 through 8.3 state that "Shallow to
moderately pitched roofs are appropriate on one-story buildings. More steeply pitched roof with
low plate lines can be used on two-story buildings." The Guidelines emphasize using
restraint and simplicity in building forms, which should not be complicated, and roof lines,
which should avoid complex forms.
The proposed design includes a two-story residence with an attached garage. The gable roof
system incorporates two pitches: 5:12 and 3:12, with six rooflines on the east elevation, and five
rooflines on the north side elevation, inclusive of the detached garage. In staffs opinion, the roof
design is simple and complements the building style and neighborhood context.
Site Coverage: Per Municipal Code Section 17.10.030.C, site coverage shall be limited to a
maximum of 22 percent of the base floor area allowed for the site (Note: on a 4,000 square-foot
site this equals 396 square feet or 10 percent of the site). In addition, if at least 50 percent of all
site coverage on the property is made of permeable or semi-permeable materials, an additional
amount of site coverage of up to four percent of the site area may be allowed. For this 4,000
square foot lot the total amount of coverage is allowed to be 396 square feet; the project plans
indicate there is 204.5 square feet of impervious surfacing and 164 square feet of pervious
surfacing, for a total of 368.5 square feet of site coverage. Note that 556 square feet of site
coverage is allowed but only if 50% of the 396 square feet of impervious site coverage is reduced
by 50% - i.e., 198 square feet. The applicant is not requesting more than 396 square feet of site
coverage.
Garage & Driveway: Design Guideline 6.3 states, consider using paving strips, or tire tracks,
for a driveway, and that driveways should not be over nine feet wide.... Design Guidelines 6.5 and
6.6 states, Position a garage to maximize opportunities for open space, views and privacy, and
Locate a garage to minimize its visual impacts. Locating a garage under a house or detached at
the back of the lot is encouraged. Also, Design Guideline 6.7 states that in limited circumstances a
garage may be located under a structure when the visual impacts will be minimized and the
driveway may not dominate the front garden and may not create a ramp effect or introduce tall or
massive retaining walls. A sense of front yard must be maintained.
In staffs opinion, the proposal to place a detached garage at the front of the residence is
appropriate for the topography and the garage would appear subordinate to the main residence as
encouraged by the aforementioned guideline. Landscape areas would not be intruded upon.
114
DS 16-403 (Mussallem)
November 9, 2016
Staff Report
Page 5
Finish Details: Finish details are not typically reviewed at the Concept stage; however, the Planning
Commission can provide input during the concept review. The most prominent features of the
proposed finish details include white stucco walls and red clay tile roofing. In addition, the design
incorporates faux horizontal lentils above doors and windows that will consist of stucco rather than
wood. Design Guideline 9.5 encourages to use natural materials such as wood in conjunction with
stucco and Guideline 9.4 states, Architectural details should appear to be authentic, integral
elements of the overall building design concept; specifically, details that appear to be applied as
superficial elements should be avoided. In staffs opinion, the applicants proposal to use stucco
accents above the doors and windows that matches the proposed stucco is not true to the
Spanish-colonial style of architecture. Staff recommends that the lentils consist of wood in order
to be consistent with the above noted guidelines.
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission also review the proposed roofing, which consists
of flat-shaped red tiles. The Commission may consider requiring an S-shaped tile, which is more
consistent with Spanish Revival architecture.
Public ROW: The portion of the City Right-of-Way (ROW) between the property line on Casanova
Street and edge of paving is approximately 12 feet wide. Therein are concrete steps and two
sections of low landscape walls (18 feet and 24 foot sections). The applicant proposes to remove
these walls and steps.
Alternatives: Staff has included draft findings that the Commission can adopt if the Commission
accepts the overall design concept, including the architectural style of the building. However, if the
Commission does not support the design, then the Commission could continue the application with
specific direction given to the applicant.
Environmental Review: The proposed project is categorically exempt from CEQA requirements,
pursuant to Section 15303 (Class 3) New Construction or Conversion of Small Units. The project
includes the construction of one single-family residence in a residential zone, and therefore
qualifies for a Class 3 exemption. The proposed residence does not present any unusual
circumstances that would result in a potentially significant environmental impact.
ATTACHMENTS:
115
116
Recommendations/Draft Conditions
No.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
The applicant shall reduce the two-story plate height to 18 feet as required by
code.
The applicant shall revised the second story as determined by the Planning
Commission.
The applicant shall revise the lentils above the window to consist of natural
wood.
The applicant shall apply for a Tree Removal permit to remove three existing
Acacia trees prior to Final Design Review.
A landscape plan that includes plant species compatible with the canopy trees is
required as a condition of approval and shall be included on plans for Final Design
Review.
117
FLAGSTONE: MOUNTAIN
BLEND
S H L ARCHITECTURE
SURVEY
OWNER
PROJECT DATA
GREG MUSSALLEM
PO BOX8305
SAN JOSE, CA. 95155
( 408) 265 - 4200
T 4 1 ~ .1\~ .~014
E:f'.l "'.JL. >WlllN"<:ho<!'l;lua.tt..uu
FLOOR AREA
CASA~OVA -ST
Q _____ _
--~--
...,..--I
FAR ALLOWED
1800 SF
PROPOSED
MAIN HOUSE- 1st
MAIN HOUSE- 2nd
DETIACHED GARAGE
956SF
644SF
200SF
1800 SF
45%
45%
.----96----.
SITE COVERAGE
-- - ~---- - -~ -- -~- - ~
,/
/
l{)
II
LANDING 1
LANDING 2
LANDING 3
LANDING4
LANDING 5
L~~~NOTPAATOF
./
556SF
ALLOWED
THIS PERMIT
24 SF
65SF
21 SF
82.5 SF
15SF
204.5 SF
----1----
WALKWAY 1
WALKWAY2
DRIVEWAY
105 SF
32SF
27 SF
0
0
c)
164 SF
DATE
I SS UE
09/27/16
PLANNING
SUB MTITAL
10119/16
PLANN fNG
RE-SUBMTITAL
I.{)
=
0
- -
~ '
o o
~~
a.. G
CI) Z
.,
< ::::.
<(
(!)
;j;
~--~~----------'1 - --~- --
w
a..
0
())
a..
0::
..-----..
SCOPE OF WORK
PROJECT #
1.
16-09
DRAWNBY
LS
CHECKED BY
Sl
UJ
~ ( N)
368.5 SF
SHEET INDEX
lANDSCIJ'ING
THIS PERMIT NOT PART OF '---~. .
(!)
0::
<li-s;
La..i
~ ---~=
RECEIVED
UL. 2
2016
City o~ Cannel-by-the-Sea
~
,-_
<(
OJ
REFERENCE
SHEET NUMBER:
118
A1.01
S H L ARCHITECTURE
T;4L5.235.2034
EMAIL: s:tml...,o.tcl1(<ijgm11il.com
'i'\1>\lEL H.(('
~ LICENSED "-$
PROFESSIONAL
ARCHITECT
NO.C-29476
cA., u.s.~>-
NOTES:
10TH AVENUE
+97.6:
+95.4
SUBJECT PROPERTY
APN: 010-272-017-000
DOC.NO. 2013065357
3995 SQ. FT. FOUND
4000 SQ. FT. RECORD - -
~---~~---
"''f
~
-t,-----r----------L __
'
'
"!'
",
-;:
'-
:~
g~'A
~jr"
110,2
---___.J~,
APN: 010-272-018-000
DOC. NO. 2011044027
'
~~
,._
'.
t\
I
~l~~~~!i:-+::i9~3=.5i;g'=~~::=;;:=::;=::;::::::;::::::::;::~~:::::;:=;;;;;;i+;,;9:i5~.5~==!~~
__Jr----,
50.oJ'o
TOPOGRAPHIC
SITE MAP
',
ABBREVIA llONS:
PGE = PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC UTILITY BOX
SP
SIGN POST
SSCO = SANITARY SEWER CLEAN OUT
WV = WATER VALVE UTILITY BOX
F3X3 = FOUND OLD REDWOOD 3"X3" AT LOT AND BLOCK CORNER
~-,
I
ss
:~
',,
:~
"']
J
+98.5
\1
v __
~:
= SEWER MANHOLE
ISSUE
SUBMTITAL
10119/16
RESUBMTITAL
PLANNING
PLANNING
= STONE WALL
'THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR 'THIS ~AP IS NOR'TH, AS SHOWN ON V. 1. C&T, PG.
45 1/2.. AS FOUND MONU~ENTED BY AN OLD REDWOOD 3'XJ" AT 'THE N.E.
CORNER OF BLK. K. AND A 3/4' PIPE TAGGED LS.2369 AT 'THE S.E. CORNER OF
BLK. K. 'THE DISTANCE MEASURED BETWEEN ABOVE SAID MONUMENTS, WAS
399.5' VERSUS 'THE RECORD Or 400' (RECORD PER: V.1, C&:T,PG.45 1/2.). A
PRORATION WAS APPUED TO ALL N./S. LOT DIMENSIONS, YIELDING A 79.9' N./S.
DIMENSION OF 'THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. FUR'THERMORE, AN OLD REDWOOD
3X3"' WAS FOUND AT THE S.W. CORNER OF BLK. K, WHICH FIT WITH THE SAME
N./S. PRORATION, AND DEMONSTRATED 'THAT 'THE E./W. DIMENSIONS OF BLOCK
K MATCH THE RECORD AND THAT NO E./W. PRORATION IS REQUIRED.
AODillONAL POiNTS, RECORDED AND UN-RECORDED WERE FOUND DURING 'THE
COURSE or SURVEY, WHICH FIT WELL l'll'TH 'THE BOUNDARY SCHE~E DESCRIBED
ABOVE. V.27 or SURVEYS, PG. 9, SHOWS A SIMILAR PRORA liON OF SAID BLK. K.
y \_,
1 jS;.
= UTILITY POLE
DATE
09/17/16
BASIS OF BEARINGS:
l!'i
I
<0.>
~::::~~
:!;l::;
42"C
ACACIA
CYPRESS
OAK
UNKNOWN TREE
l ..
98
PROJECT#:
1609
DRAWN BY:
LS
CHKKED BY:
SL
",
+97. 9
,f
107.9
+99.5
\J \, ',\\
-------,___
r
II
'
\
N90"00'0Q"E
I
/
~o ~~~~TONE
s s
~I
',,\;
;"./
',
\I
;I
e1 1
'
'6
I !J
\ \~
'-
' '1oo,
'\
{ec :
''
II
I \\
OWY
\
1
/)
I
I
'I
I
;; ~ \
'
r/
,,J'
(_:::iccll
\
,/
I
I
16070
\I
\
\
\
'-.
\ \{_).1B~K ' l\
l,,,
+94.5
,'5P \
-...."
'---..
PROJECT NO.
UNDERGROUND UllLITlES, IF ANY, WERE NOT LOCATED. INFORMATION REGARDING UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOULD
BE OBTAINED FROM THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES OR
PUBLIC AGENCIES.
sp
1 \"
ROOF PEAK
-...
'
''
---..
'
+94.6/"\:A \ \
.':>
+100.7
\
'
...t;.
\
t
..._\ .- ......
_ _ ~~ _ _ _ _
\ 2_10.: ~- _FJXJ \
-...""\
, N90'00'00"E '50 00
.'}
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"'"'
-W~.Qf\PA'!~tfl: ___
-----
I ----.......___
+93.9
THIS MAP PORTRAYS THE SITE AT THE TIME OF THE SURVEY AND
DOES NOT SHOW SOILS OR GEOLOGY INFORMATION, UNDERGROUND
CONDITIONS, EASEMENTS, ZONING OR REGULA TORY INFORMATION
OR ANY OTHER ITEMS NOT SPECIFICALLY REQUESTED BY THE
PROPERTY OWNER.
100.9
SMH
L...--
ROOF PEAK
+97.5
APN: 010-272-002-000
DOC.NO. 2014017463
CIJ~~~c~
~L-~-P_~RE
_P~-y_N_______________________________
RLS
SHEET NUMBER:
119
A1.02
l>
""U
:::0
r
0
0
"T1
-I
(/)
:::0
"T1
>
N
_.,..
"'
i.!l
FIRST FLOOR
PLAN
T ITLE:
Li..i
00
OJ
"
'-!
Nt~
"~~
_,5'-Q"
Aill
CLG
25'-6"
11'-~"
WD
9-0
BDRM 3
.-,o
5'-6"
5'-4i"
'
!~'
~~--~
LIVING
9'=0tccG
I
I
I
I
"'
'I
8'-0"
i~
[!1
"'~
!E
Cl
\:"
2
i;i
Cl
i~
~ I~
~
"r "
OJ
G. B. MUSSALLEM
RESIDENCE
12'-7"
8'-6"
~~-
I ~ ---------'lo-"l
I
I
I
,,--,._
__,
--l
rj ~ ~ l'.j! l. l
. - / - . - . - . - . - . - . -=. ~.
6'-6"
.~
!~SIA
I
I
~~
a_
0:::
ll..
>-
_.~
....................
__________________
SHEET
ffil
120
,,/...__
'&fa
~ ~
~~
2'!'i:::
g~
s~~
00
,,
l:I:
~
~ ~
-~~
;t,
~~~ n
H~
l:I:
r
0
N
>
N
Cll
....
:I
SH EET
0
,.,..,
::tl
;:il
m~2
s;:
"'U
0
0
;a
11
()
(J)
----'
121
...
N;~ N~
t- -
3:12
4'-6;}"
3'-7"
6'-3~"
e!oG -
6'-oi"
/\~
-st.OPES
WD
BDRM1
IF.F.E. = 106.65' I
3'-2"
3:12
3'-1i"
1-
lc:
1I
il
:1
il
:1 l:1
G_ _1 '=----'
2'-7"
I
I
I
I
I
Ffl
BB
<B>
2'-~"
[X !if'a.
LB.=
AA
<3>
2'-a!"
::0
I
I
I
I
I
'I
L~ .
~~:
'
~---J
9'-'1"
WD
BDRM2
SLOPED CLG
~,-- ----- -
L1-1~
IV
5:12
1'-11"
:i
I I
L ___ ~
I
I
I
I
.f-11"
I
I
I
II
:1
:1
~7 Je
1:
I I I
I I I
II
4'-11~"
16 15 14 13 12111 1.&
ON
0 2li li s
1: 1:
I I
I I
4'-11"
;;= IT I
D_[LINEN
D
D
_____ j
I
II
3'-7"
0
1 J IV(u
1{
2'-11"
t~
2'-11"
BATH 1
<9> II~~
<8>
4'6:l"
9-~
I=
11'-7"
7'-0"
"~~
'"~~
N~~
"~~
I
I
I
I
I
u:
[-<
"'
tJ
;:,
:;;
>-l
tr'J
tJ
>
~C'l
~C'l
"'
ai ~
~
;:
.. ~" ~~
::Jz
3
~
G. B. MUSSALLEM
RESIDENCE
L--- ---------J
I
I
I
I
I
~I
a..
~I
w.
::::J'
:I
z
SECOND FLOOR
PLAN
TITLE:
c:;
"~~
N~~ 9
6'-6"
aGl
m-
::0
L ___1 - - - _ j
3:12
-I- -
I
I
I
I
I
- -
"--- --------l
I " 0\
~,,;~
i,.
~ ~
g '~
~i!~
;.,
q~
~!~ trl
~~~ ~
H~
Mn
"'
:I:
't'"
S H L ARCHITECTURE
.aCH!11:CTf/RE.L'VPUNSING
T:415.235.2034
EMAIL: [email protected]
Cil.JFOMJ.<.C-11<1?0
~'-"'I)El H. t.~
t;;,
LICENSED
(!"
PROFESSIONAL
ARCHITECT
NO.C-29476
-c4., u.s.~
EXP: 04302017
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
L
-- -- -- -- -- -- --
-- -- -- -- -- -- -
-- -- --
~t
UJ
(')
3:12
'---
RIDGE
3:12
~I
I
I
I
I
I
w
z
I >I a...w
a...
I
I
I
I
::r:~
f-<0\
-<
::::>
u ou
z
<~
~ <t;lfl
>fl1
Q o::t
z
<
r./J.
r./J.
::E
;z;f-<
r./J.
<>-<
r:rJo::l
<.....:~
Uf:Ll
~~
(/)<
cj
DATE
ISSUE
1.()
..
PLANNING
09/27116
10119116
::::i
SUBMTITAL
PLANNING
RF.-SUBMTIT AL
I-
0:::
0:::
"
'\"
H
H
0
0
~~
;.;I
t"l
::E
Nl
~<?
~t
RIDGE
)-
~t
~I
3:12
,,
PITCH
BREAK
--
,..----
-- -
~t
0::
UJ
(')
-3:12
;;::
-3:12
RIDGE
~I
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -.ooa :3N11
~=
PROJECTff:
16-09
DRAWN BY:
LS
CIIECKED BY:
SL
_j
A1~3dO~d
z
j
p..
~
"'
..J
0
0
OJ
ROOF PLAN
SCALE: 1/4" ~ 1'-0"
Nm -
"'
"'
:r:
"'
REFERENCE
SHEET NUMBER:
122
A2.03
S H L ARCHITECTURE
T-+1 5.2l$.20J-+
f'M,\11..:
CHlEYCAP
+ 17'63'4"
/F,:-~~2NDFL~OO-I !i'4 ~
~ 14'-1:J4'
c~ -- u.s.~-
ilb'-/1'4
9'- t
IIFjiiH I HI_
I
utDU !
1
!
I
~~f~Llt.._
, _ ,._,.~ ,
DATE
ISSUE
PLANNING
09127/16
~~~__F,:.IOCE
10/19116
,.:nJF,
SUBMTITAL
PLANNING
RE-SUBMTITAL
-- '-
-$~~~~~~DGERJ- 1 11fl"
PROJECT H:
$ ~~~~~PLATE
16-09
DRAWN BY:
LS
CHECKED BY:
SL
15 _ 1rr_
C/)
~
~
~
OJ
"'_,
....
-....
....
STUCCO: BENJAMIN
MOORE OC-51 INTENSE
WHITE
~
~
~
~
~
C/)
"'
"'
"'
SHEET NUMBER:
123
A3.01
CarnbridgeSco:n:e
S H L ARCHITECTURE
WINDOW SCHEDULE
r:415.2)5.zm.:
EMAIL:sanllee.m:b:?gnail.c"m
lWll'' . ...
.,~~
..-
--
6ft
WOOD
CSMT
2'-4" X 6'-0"
WOOD
CSMT
4'-8" X 6'-0"
WOOD
FIXED
2'-4" X 6'-0"
WOOD
CSMT
2'-4" X 4'-0"
WOOD
CSMT
1'-10" X 3'-0"
WOOD
CSMT
1'-10" X 3'-0"
WOOD
CSMT
2'-0" X 3'-0"
WOOD
CSMT
NOTES
~~~~~~~~
PROFESSIONAL
ARCHITECT
NO.C29476
~~
2ND FLR
25WATIBULB
r ...
TYPE
1ST FLR
-_-_ .
_. A~l L..
MATERIAL
AA
2'-4" X 4'-0"
WOOD
FIXED
BB
1'-10" X 3'-0"
WOOD
CSMT
~_,,..,,t...,kono:<.- I """~'"'"'O<!""'"'""'to,-.1010.16
>~foooot<IIM-.evia~
9'-7"
B"
2'-11<1"
'-o"
0 0 0
cc
1'-10" X 3'-0"
WOOD
CSMT
DD
2'-0" X 4'-0"
WOOD
CSMT
EE
2'-2" X 3'-6"
WOOD
CSMT
FF
2'-2" X 3'-6"
WOOD
CSMT
GG
WOOD
CSMT
HH
1'-10" X 3'-0"
WOOD
CSMT
II
WOOD
CSMT
JJ
3'-4" X 5'-4"
WOOD
FIXED
DATE
IS SUE
09127116
PLANNING
SUBMTITAL
DOOR SCHEDULE
PROJECT#:
3'-0"
6'-{)"
6'-0"
!>\
MATERIAL
THKNESS
NOTES
16-'19
DRAWN BY:
LS
CHECKED BY:
SL
1ST FLR
101
WOOD
1-3/4"
102
WOOD
1-3/4"
103
WOOD
1-3/4"
104
WOOD
1-3/4"
105
WOOD
1-3/4"
.:,
2ND FLR
'-5;\"
3'-1"
s-~
1'-11'
111
WOOD
1-3/4"
112
WOOD
1-3/4"
27'-6"
REFERENCE
SHEET NUMBER:
124
A7.01