Lecture Notes Chapter 7
Lecture Notes Chapter 7
Lecture Notes Chapter 7
CHAPTER 7
ENTREPRENEURSHIP: VALUE ADDED
VENTURES
INTRODUCTION
This chapter outlines approaches to social entrepreneurship by grounding its argument in Polanyis
three economic systems. As these interact in accordance with prevailing socio-political systems, we
link them to arguments for different schools of social entrepreneurship. By examining their
socio-economic origins, a deeper understanding of internal and external social value creation can
be presented. We identify early developments that frame social entrepreneurship with reference to
social innovation, social purpose, and socialization. As the chapter develops, an argument is made
for a hybridization perspective that more closely reflects practice.
In the remaining sections of the chapter, we explore how responsible management practices can be
grounded in the challenges associated with a given starting point. We examine three journeys: 1)
from Third Sector to Social Economy; 2) from Private to Social Economy, and; 3) from Public
Service to Social Entrepreneurship. Each initiating context requires a responsible manager to identify
bodies of knowledge that inform the development of new skill sets. The journey from Third Sector to
Social Economy requires a shift from the mindset of philanthropy (helping only others) to mutuality
(helping self and others). Outlining a pathway from Private to Social Economy requires a shift from
profit-maximizing for shareholders to wealth-maximizing for stakeholders. Lastly, the transition
from public servant to social entrepreneur requires a new capacity to select and commission nonprofit, public-private, or mutual/co-operative solutions to satisfy public policy.
CHAPTER OBJECTIVES
After reading this chapter, students should be able to
. . . analyze an organizations relationship to the social economy.
. . . select social entrepreneurial strategies.
. . . create value-added ventures.
CHAPTER OUTLINE
Opening Case: Mondragon Co-operatives: This case provides a living example of the way
social innovation, social purposes and socialized ownership and control can give rise to an enduring
value-added venture:
Social innovation: identifying the heroes behind social change in institutions
Social purpose and mission: identifying social objectives and creating social
transformation.
Socialized ownership and control: identifying how mutuality and co-operation can
turn individual initiatives into coordinated collective actions.
I.
B.
follows:
asserts, cannot be treated as commodities. If they are, each will be degraded and their value
destroyed or distorted.
Real and Fictitious Goods: introduces the difference between householding,
production for market and identifies fictitious goods.
Four approaches to social entrepreneurship: identifies non-profit, CSR, more-thanprofit and multi-stakeholder approaches to social entrepreneurship.
Types of Hybridisation: the synthesis of different exchange systems.
A multistakeholder model based on social economy principles is put forward as a socially
rational approach to integrating economic systems. In this model, there are a number of
variants where integration of different systems of exchange is partial rather than complete:
A. Nonprofit: Redistribution and Reciprocity
B. Corporate Social Responsibility: Redistribution and Market
C. More-than-Profit: Reciprocity and Market
D. Multistakeholder (Social Economy): Reciprocity, Redistribution, and Market
III.
C.
Social entrepreneurship describes the discovery and sustainable exploitation of opportunities to create social and environmental benefits.
The goal of the social entrepreneurship process is to create a value-added venture that at the
same time socializes the organization internally and creates social value systemically externally.
The market is only one type of economic system. There are alternatives.
The nonprofit model of social entrepreneurship emphasizes reciprocity and redistribution
facilitated by voluntary and political action.
The corporate social responsibility model of social entrepreneurship emphasizes redistribution through new types of market exchange.
The more-than-profit model of social entrepreneurship emphasizes market exchanges that
encourage reciprocity.
The social economy model of social entrepreneurship emphasizes the hybridization of reciprocity, redistribution, and market exchange to maximize human well-being.