302BSS Global Leadership Assn 2017
302BSS Global Leadership Assn 2017
Use only the sources provided. Do NOT conduct research on the Internet.
Any internet sources or materials will be discarded for grading purposes.
Assessment Criteria:
Hogan, R. and Kaiser, R.B. (2005) What We Know About Leadership. Review
of General Psychology Vol. 9, No. 2, 169180
This assignment must be submitted via the module web (Moodle) by 23.55 on
the above deadline.
Please note:
1. All work submitted after the submission deadline without an approved valid
reason (see below) will be given a mark of zero. (This is not the same as a
non-submission, as a late submission counts as an attempt and a mark of
zero may allow you to resit the coursework.).
2. The University wants you to do your best. However we know that
sometimes events happen which mean that you cant submit your
coursework by the deadline these events should be beyond your control
and not easy to predict. If this happens, you can apply for an extension to
your deadline for up to two weeks, or if you need longer, you can apply for
a deferral, which takes you to the next assessment period (for example, to
the resit period following the main Assessment Boards). You must apply
before the deadline.
3. You will find information about the process and what is or is not considered
to be an event beyond your control at
4. https://share.coventry.ac.uk/students/Registry/Pages/Deferrals-and-
Extension.aspx
Coursework Submission
Students are required to attempt all assessed aspects of their course at the
first opportunity. If you don't, and you do not have a valid deferral, you will not
be allowed a re-sit.
Any student who submits a first piece of work late, without an authorised
extension (or deferral) will receive a mark of 0%. However, if you miss a
deadline it is still worth submitting a piece of coursework late for a zero mark
so that you do not automatically lose any re-sit opportunity.
you use information from other sources you must document the source in two
ways:
1. Provide an in-text citation of the source in the main body of your writing
2. Enter the source in the List of References at the end of your document
You must cite and reference every piece of information that you borrow from
another source because it is the intellectual property of the individuals or
groups of people who have produced it. All statements, opinions, conclusions,
images, etc. which you have taken from someone elses work (books,
journals, lectures, videos, TV programmes, newspapers, internet pages, etc.)
should be acknowledged, whether the work is mentioned, described,
reproduced, summarised, paraphrased or directly quoted by you. If the
source is produced by an organisation or an official body instead of authors,
this is known as a corporate author and must be treated in the same way.
For example, most websites are produced by a corporate author.
You will find information about the process and what is or is not considered to
be an event beyond your control at
https://share.coventry.ac.uk/students/Registry/Pages/Deferrals-and-
Extension.aspx.
The answer will contain few errors and little, if any, irrelevant
material. It will show evidence of reading from a variety of sources
(i.e. more than 3 or 4) but not so many sources that the discussion
loses focus and becomes unclear or irrelevant. All sources should
be of some academic merit (e.g. books, journals, reports, media
publications). Unreferenced material from non-credible internet
sources MUST be avoided.
written up essay.
- bears little relation to the assignment topic.
- shows a poor understanding of theories, concepts and issues
relating to Principles of Strategy and to the learning outcomes
detailed in this document.
- contains some or many fundamental errors and
misunderstandings of the academic or other material used. For
example many of the facts cited are incorrect.
- uses literature or other material which is largely irrelevant or has
no academic value
- is poorly structured and poorly presented. For example,
sentences may be hard to understand and contain many
spelling or grammatical mistakes.
- contains no references.
0 - 19%
Work within this mark range shows a complete failure to meet the
requirements of the assignment. A mark in this range will be given
for an essay which:
- bears no link to the question chosen and shows very little or no
knowledge or understanding of any of the theories, concepts
and issues relating to Principles of Strategy. The answer may be
fundamentally wrong or trivial.
- contains no references and/or evidence of relevant reading.
- shows little understanding of the requirements of the assignment
and only a vague knowledge of the subject area.
- includes numerous fundamental errors in the understanding or
presentation of the material discussed. There is a general lack
of facts/evidence and what is provided is mostly incorrect and/or
irrelevant.
- is poorly structured and poorly presented. Spelling and grammar
are poor. Many sentences are incomprehensible.
- the examiners do not feel could be described as a serious
attempt by any reasonable standards.