Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Petition PIL
Petition PIL
Versus
WITH
PAPER BOOK
5. Annexure P-2 22
Buddy Duties.
SYNOPSIS
officers in the army who have scant regard for the Rule of Law
and human values, which they have witnessed first hand, have
institution.
the same can make the grievances even more deep rooted and
pervasive.
jawans and their families, got involved from the time the dead
it as a suicide.
The officers deputed from Deolali Camp where the dead body of
Roy Matthew was found and others acting at their behest made
witness.
camp, visited the scene of crime and on the basis of what they
system and the Rule of Law. The photographs of the dead body
2017, that the scribe who carried out the sting has filed a Writ
and in the present case are uniquely positioned and armed with
sustain the abiding faith in the rule of law. Petitioners feel that
by fear and a sinking feeling that tomorrow their body may also
deceased Matthew stating that the soldier took his own life
Even with this feeling our brave heart soldiers serve dedicatedly
hope will abide for ever, which can only happen, if the hope for
justice survives.
right to life, which includes right to live with dignity. That vide
the present petition the petitioners are not only seeking the
suicide by the army which does not seems to be the case. The
reasons that the Rule of law should not only be upheld but also
that the deceased Gunner Roy Mathew and his family members
get justice. It is submitted that the issue which arise in the
officers.
LIST OF DATES
Date PARTICULARS
future.
certain extent.
individual.
postmortem.
to commit suicide.
later on.
the family.
the following:-
deliberately
and understand
case of suicide.
written in Marathi.
statements as a witness.
Eranakulam.
IN THE MATTER OF
1. Chandrasekhara Pillai.s
General Secretary,Welfare Association
Of Ex Army Aviation Technicians
s/o of Sivasankara Pillai,
Age 54 years Occ. Ex. Serviceman
/ Businessman R/o TC 31/1173 (1)
ThazhasseryPettah, P.O. Trivandrum,
Kerala 695024 Petitioner No.1
Versus
1. Union of India
Through Secretary
Ministry of Defence
South Block, New Delhi ...Respondent No.1
4. State of Maharashtra
Through Secretary
Department of Home, MantralayaRespondent No.4
Mumbai.
TO:
Litigation.
them.
Home.
Constitution of India.
They also told the petitioner no.1 that there must have
for one hour at the airport to get body from Army to local
second postmortem.
who told Petitioner no.1 that there was no reason for Roy
and told the family members that they have to sign all the
the petitioner no.1 that on same day one army man took
refused to sign the form for the reasons that it was filled by
i. That the room where body was found was bare and
back.
for him so how could his body not be found for 4 days
understand
deceased wife will get a job and other benefits from the
army within 3 months.From Commandants office the
understand.
deceased wife told the Petitioner no.2 that here too she was
Devlali.
GROUNDS
officers in the army who have scant regard for the Rule of Law
and human values, which they have witnessed first hand, have
institution.
pervasive.
veteran jawans and their families, got involved from the time the
dead body of Roy Matthew was found and others acting at their
2 as a witness.
to the army camp, visited the scene of crime and on the basis of
what they witnessed first hand are more than convinced that
wrongdoing.
on April 11, 2017, that the scribe who carried out the sting has
Court.
law.
only prevents them from airing their grievances, their minds are
the case of deceased Matthew stating that the soldier took his
own life (extreme step) due to the guilt factor of letting down his
glory of our army, which Petitioners pray and hope will abide for
ever, which can only happen, if the hope for justice survives.
case.
i. That the room where body was found was bare and
back.
for him so how could his body not be found for 4 days
understand
for protection of ones own fundamental rights but also for the
system and had also failed to prevent its misuse and ill-
wherein it has been clearly mandated that the Sahayaks are not
taking care of Pets, nor look after children and in addition not to
law.
X) That the Sahayak system is in violation of Article 14, 21
and exploitation.
Sahayak is given below:- (i) One for every field officer and above.
(ii) One for every two officers of the rank of captain and below
(iii) One for every subedar major (iv) One for every two Junior
the residence of some of the senior officers for domestic work and
need to stress that Jawans are recruited for serving the nation
Delhi reported in (1981) 1 SCC 608 had held that the right to
Constitution.
sense of pride that a person has when joining Army and as such
suicide which does not seem to be the case and the facts and
Petitioners have firm belief that truth shall not come out form
Court shall sub serve the interest of justice and shall unravel
the truth.
arguments.
Cour t.
PRAYER
to:
Armed Forces.
the case.
AND FOR THIS ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER AS
TRUE COPY
ANNEXURE P-2
HQ 27 Mtn Div
Pin 908427
C/o 99 APO
6413/15/A3 19
Jan, 2017
List A, B, C, E & F
DIGNITY OF SERVING SOLDIER : BUDDY DUTIES
1. Ref recent social media outburst by serving soldier and
media statement issued by the COAS thereto.
Sd/-
(Bhawesh Malhotra)
Lt. Ocl
AAG
For GOC
Copy to :-
HQ 33 Corps (A) - For info wrt telecom betn Col A your HQ and
AAG HQ of 18 Jan 17.
Internal
List D - For info strict compliance please.
TRUE COPY
MD SHAHID ANWAR
Advocate ON-Record
M.No. 9811898482
Dated : 22.04.2017
AUTHORITY LETTER
To,
The Registrar
New Delhi
Ors.
Sir,
letter.
Thanking You,
Yours Sincerely,
Petitioners
Vs.
AFFIDAVIT
I, Mr.ChandrasekharaPillai.s s/o
under:
originals.
Litigation.
5. That the contents of my above affidavit are true and
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION
2017
DEPONENT.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Petitioners
Vs.
AFFIDAVIT
originals.
Litigation.
DEPONENT
VERIFICATION
I, the above named deponent, do here by verify
2017
DEPONENT.