Sir Winston Churchill - Imperialism
Sir Winston Churchill - Imperialism
Sir Winston Churchill - Imperialism
Churchill was an imperialist,[600] with the historian Edward Adams characterising him as an
adherent of "liberal imperialism".[601] Churchill exhibited a romanticised view of the British
Empire,[602] and believed British imperialism was a form of altruism that benefitted its subject
peoples; early in his parliamentary career he expressed concern for the welfare of various
African groups.[603] According to Addison, Churchill believed "that by conquering and dominating
other peoples, the British were also elevating and protecting them", holding to the conviction that
"civilization must necessarily triumph over barbarism, however tragic the process" of conquest
might be for the conquered.[604] According to Adams, Churchill's writings display a "cavalier tone
and militarist ideology" in defence of "imperial war".[601] The idea of dismantling the Empire by
transferring power to subject peoples was anathema to Churchill.[605]
During Churchill's lifetime, belief in the racial superiority of the British was widespread, including
among liberals and socialists, and Churchill also subscribed to such ideas.[606] In 1952 he told
Lord Moran that "When you learn to think of a race as inferior beings it is difficult to get rid of that
way of thinking; when I was a subaltern in India the Indians did not seem to be equal to the white
man."[607] However, noting that "Churchill had no theory of race as a biological entity", Addison
considered it misleading to describe Churchill as a racialist, arguing that that term "has many
connotations which were alien to Churchill."[606] He believed that Churchill would have never tried
"to stoke up racial animosity against immigrants, or to persecute minorities".[606] Churchill opposed
anti-Semitism,[606] and was well disposed to Zionism throughout his career:[608] in 1920, he called it
an "inspiring movement".[609]
Although Churchill upset both Edward VII and George V during his political career, he was a
firm monarchist,[610] displaying a romanticised view of the British monarchy.[602] Jenkins described
Churchill's opposition to protectionism as being based on a "profound conviction",[611] although
during his political career many questioned the sincerity of Churchill's anti-protectionist
beliefs.[612] Although as Home Secretary he found sanctioning executions to be one of his most
emotionally taxing tasks, he did not endorse the abolition of the death penalty.[613] Around 1912
he became briefly enthusiastic regarding the eugenicist idea of sterilising the disabled, but it was
not a recurring interest of his.[606]