Corporate Governance
Corporate Governance
Corporate Governance
Chapter One
Introduction
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
1.1. Introduction
The need for corporate governance arises from the potential conflicts of interest among
stakeholders in the corporate structure. These conflicts of interest often arise from two main
reasons. Firstly, different stakeholders have different goals and preferences. Secondly, the
stakeholders have imperfect information as to each other’s actions, knowledge, and
preferences.
Corporate governance (CG) is an important effort to ensure accountability and responsibility
and is a set of principles, which should be incorporated into every part of the organization.
Corporate governance is the system of internal controls and procedures used to define and
protect the rights and responsibilities of various stakeholders.
The need for corporate governance arises from the potential conflicts of interest among
stakeholders in the corporate structure. These conflicts of interest often arise from two main
reasons. First, different stakeholders have different goals and preferences. Second, the
stakeholders have imperfect information as to each other’s actions, knowledge, and
preferences. Though it is viewed as a recent issue, there is, in fact, nothing new about the
concept. Because it has been in existence as long as the corporation itself-as long as there has
been large – scale trade, reflecting the need for responsibility in the handling money and the
conduct of commercial activities.
Corporate governance also takes into account audit procedures in order to monitor outcomes
and how closely they adhere to goals and to motivate the organization as a whole to work
toward corporate goals. By using corporate governance procedures wisely and sharing
results, a corporation can motivate all stakeholders to work toward the corporation’s goals by
demonstrating the benefits, to stakeholders, of the corporation’s success.
Corporate governance may include: Control and direction processes, Regulatory compliance,
Active ownership and investment in a company. Primarily, though, corporate governance
refers to the framework of all rules and relationships by which a corporation must abide,
including internal processes as well as governmental regulations and the demands of
stakeholders. It also takes into account systems and processes, which deal with the daily
working of the business, reporting requirements, audit information, and long-term goal plans.
Corporate governance provides a roadmap for a corporation, helping the leaders of a
company make decisions based on the rule of law, benefits to stakeholders, and practical
processes. It allows a company to set realistic goals, and methodologies for attaining those
goals.
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
Corporate governance is based largely on trust – the trust, by the stakeholders, that revenues
will be fairly shared, and that those directly involved in running the company is running it in
an aboveboard, honest, and open manner, and that they represent the best interests of the
company and of the shareholders. Therefore, key elements of corporate governance are
honesty, trust and integrity, openness, responsibility, and accountability. Recent new
governmental regulation has attempted to reinforce these elements.
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
It also works to achieve the goal of the organization and manages the relationship among the
stakeholders including the board of directors and the shareholders. It also deals with the
accountability of the individuals through a mechanism which reduces the principal-agent
problem in the organization. Fine corporate governance is an essential standard for
establishing the striking investment environment which is needed by competitive companies
to gain strong position in efficient financial markets.
The scope of the report is limited to the overall descriptions of corporate governance of the
bank, its services, its position in the industry, and its competitive advantage. The scope is also
defined by the organizational set-up functions, and performances. Here Janata BankLimited
has been compared in different aspects. I have no more scope to work in outside the branch.
The information which will provide by the bank is very small of area which can’t cover all
the sides of reporting. Corporate Governance obviously a broad things of concerning. Most
cases I have taken secondary sources of information for completion of my report.
There are some limitations that I have faced in preparing this report. Basically I faced
difficulties in collecting data from the different sources. To collect primary data some
individual showed no interest in interviewing them. For secondary data, I faced problem of
unorganized record of documents keeping by different sources. Preparing the report I faced
some difficulties which are:
Time will be a major constraint in accumulating all sorts of information in an
organized way.
Scope of our study is so wide that analytical and comprehensive study is not possible.
Acquiring the absolute raw information will be a difficult and large-scale research
will not be possible due to constraints and restrictions of both time period and by the
organization as well.
The information sources regarding this study are not so much large. It would be more
correct if the study conduct with large information sources.
As the data, in most cases, are not in organized way, the bank failed to provide all
information.
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
Chapter Two
The Organization
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
Bangladesch
Chief Financial Officer (CFO) Mr. Md. Nurul Alam FCA, FCMA
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
(GM)
Domestic Network
Number of AD Branch 56
Overseas Network
Number of Branch 04
Subsidiaries
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
E-mail [email protected]
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
Bangladesh Domestic
Do
technology and
2015
Operations Bank of the Year
Do
Bangladesh Domestic Project
Finance
Overseas employment,
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
Bangladesch
01 Special Corporate 02
02 Corporate -1 28
03 Corporate -2 77
04 Grade -1 209
05 Grade -2 223
06 Grade -3 275
07 Grade -4 92
08 Overseas 04
Total 910
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
change. The strategy is integrated into the core business objectives and competencies of the
organization, and embedded in day-to-day business culture and operations. JBL has
characterized its CSR activities and contributed the significant amount of the yearly allocated
budget in the following sectors:
1. Education & Research: Considering the benediction of education in national progress and
development of human resource, the main allocation of CSR budget has been targeted to the
development of education. JBL contributed BDT 125.04 million from 2014 to 2018 under
above Category.
2. Health & Treatment : JBL sets top priority on health initiatives and provides assistance in
buying equipment for infra-structure development of the government and non-govt. hospitals.
Besides, emphasis is given on the treatment of sick, poverty-stricken freedom-fighters and
their families as well as famous persons those who feel shy to disclose their financial crisis
even in time of treatment. JBL contributed BDT 128.76 million from 2014 to 2018 under
above category.
3. Poverty Reduction & Rehabilitation: Being a socially responsible bank, JBL comes
forward for humanitarian cause with passion and affection. For poverty reduction and
rehabilitation, the bank individually and in co-operation with other private or volunteer
organizations provides financial support. JBL contributed BDT 111.58 million from 2014 to
2018 under above category.
4. Combat against Natural Calamity: Under the program, Janata Bank Limited stretches its
helping hand to the people who are affected by flood, cyclone, earth-quake, winter, fire etc.
JBL contributed BDT 20.30 million from 2014 to 2018 under above category.
5. Helping the Poor and Marginal Farmers: The number of population affected by Sidr,
Aila and Monga of the northern belt of the country has been brought under rehabilitation
program. In this case, interest of the loans and other expenses will be adjusted from CSR
fund. The quintessence of the scheme is to make the deprived population free from the high
interest charged by the Mohajons and NGOs, with a view to making them self-depended
gradually. Likewise, assistance is provided from the CSR fund of the bank for the small
leather goods producers in a healthy atmosphere for producing quality products.JBL
contributed BDT 10.00 million from 2014 to 2018 under above category.
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
6. Preservation of History, Tradition, Culture and Sports: For the purpose of building a
tyranny-free society and flourishment of culture with the concept of liberation war,
preservation of primitive history with archaeological places, expansion of sports, Janata Bank
CSR fund is on the move. Besides, the financial assistance for arranging programmes for
celebration of different Red Letter Days having the enzyme of nation-building, the CSR fund
of the Bank loves to leave a footstep. Above all, according to the instruction of Bangladesh
Bank, Janata Bank Limited is inspiring publishing books and making of films/advertisement
on anti-terrorism (Jongibad). JBL contributed BDT 135.75 million from 2014 to 2018 under
above category.
8. Expansion of Technology: For building technology based skilled human resource, the
bank allocates handsome amount of money. Computer is one of the marbles of modern
technology. For building the “Digital Bangladesh” outlined by the government, full set of
computers are being provided to govt./ non-govt./ educational institutions, non-profitable
organizations from CSR fund. JBL contributed BDT 40.41 million from 2014 to 2018 under
above category.
9. Invention: Besides the categories cited, any invention that can influence the development
of the nation by the growth of agricultural production, processing environment friendly foods,
technology, Janata Bank Limited goes for helping the project financially. JBL contributed
BDT 0.70 million from 2014 to 2018 under above category.
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
10. Others: JBL has given BDT 1.23 million under above category in 2016 to establish a day
care center for children of employees of JBL and other banks in joint collaboration with
partner banks.
2.5 Products and services of JBL There are many state owned and private commercial
Bank in Bangladesh. Among all JBL is the second largest state owned commercial Bank. JBL
provide both corporate and retail banking services with a strong focus on socio economic
development of the country. The bank typically provides short term working capital loan and
limited long term credit exposure. Moreover, JBL offers micro enterprise and special credit
as well as rural banking. Under corporate banking services, JBL provides trade finance,
consumer finance, project finance and syndicate finance. On the other hand, various deposit
scheme and remittance facilities are delivered through retail banking.
Deposits
Current Deposit
Call Deposit
Deposit in Foreign Currency
Resident Foreign Currency Deposit
Deposits in FC (WES)
Convertible Taka A/C (D)
2 Savings Bank Deposits
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
Fixed Deposit
JB Double Benefit Scheme
JB Monthly Benefit Scheme
Retirement Savings Scheme
JBL Retirement Savings Scheme
Continuous Benefit Account
5 Special Notice Deposit
1 Term Loan
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
3 Continuous Loan
Crop Loan
Fishery Loan
Animal Husbandry Loan
Agricultural Machineries Loan
Rural Transport Loan
Flower cultivation
5 Poverty Alleviation Program
Cyber Café
Service holders Loan
Doctor's Loan Scheme
Special Credit Program for Women Entrepreneurs
7 Micro & Cottage industries loan
Dairy/Poultry/Fish Culture
Loan for Handicrafts/Disabled People
NGO linkage loan
Weavers’ Credit
Swanirvar Loan
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
Transport
Loan to Diagnostic Centers
Loan to Travel Agencies
Loan for Salt Production
Services
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
Pay Order
Pay Slip
Security Deposit Receipt (SDR)
Other Services
1 Utility Services
Cash withdrawal
Balance inquiry
Mini statement of accounts
Point of Sale (POS)
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
Mobile recharge
Tax payment
3 Welfare Service
Locker Service
SMS banking
Sale of Lottery Ticket
Foreign Currency Buying and Selling
Bangladesh Electronic Fund Transfer
Network(BEFTN)
Bangladesh Automated Clearing House (BACH)
Debit Card Service
Credit Card Service
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
6 Customer Care
Help/Information Desk
Inquiry Desk
Counseling
Internet based Foreign Remittance Cash Payment Services:
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
Chapter Three
Theoretical Background
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
A Theoretical Background is a clear and logical presentation of the relevant research work
done before in the same area of investigation and the documentation of a comprehensive
review of the published and unpublished work from secondary sources of data in the areas of
specific interest to the researcher.
3.1.1. Literature Review of Corporate Governance
Berle and Means (1932) and the even earlier Smith (1776) Corporate governance importance
arises in modern corporations due to the separation of management and ownership control in
the organizations. The interests of shareholders are conflicting with the interests of managers.
The principal agent problem is reflected in the management and direction related problems
due to the differential interests of firm’s stakeholders. There is not a single definition of
corporate governance rather it might be viewed from different angles.
Zalecki, P.H, (1993).defines corporate governance as “allocation of ownership, capital
structure, managerial incentive schemes, takeovers, board of directors, pressure from
institutional investors, product market competition, labor market competition, organizational
structure, etc., can all be thought of as institutions that affect the process through which
quasi-rents are distributed”.
Garvey and Swan (1994) assert that “governance determines how the firm’s top decision
makers (executives) actually administer such contracts (p. 139)”. Shleifer and Vishny (1997)
define corporate governance as “the ways in which suppliers of finance to corporations assure
themselves of getting a return on their investment (p.737)”. OECD in 1999 defined corporate
governance as "Corporate governance is the system by which business corporations are
directed and controlled. The corporate governance structure specifies the distribution of rights
and responsibilities among different participants in the corporation, such as, the board,
managers, shareholders and other stakeholders, and spells out the rules and procedures for
making decisions on corporate affairs. By doing this, it also provides the structure through
which the company objectives are set, and the means of attaining those objectives and
monitoring performance.”
Oman (2001) defined corporate governance as a term refers to the private and public
institutions that include laws, regulations and the business practices which govern the
relationship between the corporate managers and the stakeholders. The Ministry of Finance,
Singapore (corporate governance 2001) defines corporate governance as “the processes and
structure by which the business and affairs of the company are directed and managed, in
order to enhance long term shareholder value through enhancing corporate performance and
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
accountability, whilst taking into account the interests of other stakeholders. Good corporate
governance therefore embodies both enterprise (performance) and accountability
(conformance).” (Fin, 2004, pp 13-14).
La Porta, Silanes and Shliefer (2000, 2002) view corporate governance as a set of
mechanisms through which outside investors (shareholders) protect themselves from inside
investors (managers). The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
provides another perspective by stating that “corporate governance is the system by which
business corporations are directed and controlled. The corporate governance structure
specifies the distribution of rights and responsibilities among different participants in the
corporation, such as the Board, managers, shareholders and other stakeholders, and spells out
the rules and procedure for making decisions on corporate affairs. By doing this, it also
provides the structures through which the company objectives are set, and the means of
attaining those objectives and monitoring performance.
McColgan (2001) gave a very broader view of agency theory and corporate governance. The
major interest of his research was to cover the area that where the interests of managers
diverge from those of the interests of shareholders. He kept in view the agency relationship
and the agency cost which arises from these relationships. He extended the work of Jensen
and Meckling (1976) who defined the agency relationship as a type of contract in which the
principal keep the agent to carry out the services of the firm on his behalf. The agency
problem arises due to the different interest and the conflict between the ownership and
control as principal delegate some decision making authority to the agent.
Jensen and Meckling (1976) argued that this delegation authority reduces the value
maximizing decisions taking by the manager in the firm. Himmelberg,, Hubbard and Palia.
(1999), argued Jenson and Meckling (1976) by saying that principal agent problem are not
similar in all firms rather they are different in different firms, different industries and also in
different cultures.
Himmelberg et al. (1999) said that Jenson original theory “nexus of contract’ suggest the
same. McColgan (2001) agreeing with the authors said that agency problem can be reduces
by the help of effective corporate governance mechanism which can be important in reducing
the agency cost and the ownership problems in the firms.
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
Robert E. Wright argues in Corporation Nation that the governance of early U.S.
corporations, of which there were over 20,000 by the Civil War, was superior to that of
corporations in the late 19th and early 20th centuries because early corporations were run like
"republics" replete with numerous "checks and balances" against fraud and usurpation of
power of managers or large shareholders.
In the 20th century in the immediate aftermath of the Wall Street Crash of 1929 legal scholars
such as Adolf Augustus Berle, Edwin Dodd, and Gardiner C. Means pondered on the
changing role of the modern corporation in society. From the Chicago school of economics,
Ronald Coase introduced the notion of transaction costs into the understanding of why firms
are founded and how they continue to behave.
US expansion after World War II through the emergence of multinational corporations saw
the establishment of the managerial class. Studying and writing about the new class were
several Harvard Business School management professors: Myles Mace (entrepreneurship),
Alfred D. Chandler, Jr. (business history), Jay Lorsch (organizational behavior) and Elizabeth
MacIver (organizational behavior). According to Lorsch and MacIver "many large
corporations have dominant control over business affairs without sufficient accountability or
monitoring by their board of directors." In the 1980s, Eugene Fama and Michael Jensen
established the principal–agent problem as a way of understanding corporate governance: the
firm is seen as a series of contracts.
Over the past three decades, corporate directors’ duties in the U.S. have expanded beyond
their traditional legal responsibility of duty of loyalty to the corporation and its shareholders.
In the first half of the 1990s, the issue of corporate governance in the U.S. received
considerable press attention due to the wave of CEO dismissals (e.g.: IBM, Kodak,
Honeywell) by their boards. The California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS)
led a wave of institutional shareholder activism (something only very rarely seen before), as a
way of ensuring that corporate value would not be destroyed by the now traditionally cozy
relationships between the CEO and the board of directors (e.g., by the unrestrained issuance
of stock options, not infrequently back dated).
In the early 2000s, the massive bankruptcies (and criminal malfeasance) of Enron and
WorldCom, as well as lesser corporate scandals, such as Adelphia Communications, AOL,
Arthur Andersen, Global Crossing, Tyco, led to increased political interest in corporate
governance. This is reflected in the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
This theory prescribes that people or employees are held accountable in their tasks and
responsibilities. Employees must constitute a good governance structure rather than just
providing the need of shareholders, which maybe challenging the governance structure.
Stewardship theory has its roots from psychology and sociology and is defined by Davis,
Schoorman & Donaldson as “a steward protects and maximizes shareholders wealth through
firm performance, because by so doing, the steward’s utility functions are maximized”. In
this perspective, stewards are company executives and managers working for the
shareholders, protects and make profits for the shareholders. Unlike agency theory,
stewardship theory stresses not on the perspective of individualism, but rather on the role of
top management being as stewards, integrating their goals as part of the organization. The
stewardship perspective suggests that stewards are satisfied and motivated when
organizational success is attained.
Agyris argues agency theory looks at an employee or people as an economic being, which
suppresses an individual’s own aspirations. However, stewardship theory recognizes the
importance of structures that empower the steward and offers maximum autonomy built on
trust. It stresses on the position of employees or executives to act more autonomously so that
the shareholders’ returns are maximized. Indeed, this can minimize the costs aimed at
monitoring and controlling behaviors. On the other end, Daly et al. argued that in order to
protect their reputations as decision makers in organizations, executives and directors are
inclined to operate the firm to maximize financial performance as well as shareholders’
profits. In this sense, it is believed that the firm’s performance can directly impact
perceptions of their individual performance.
Indeed, Fama contend that executives and directors are also managing their careers in order
to be seen as effective stewards of their organization, whilst, Shleifer and Vishny, insists that
managers return finance to investors to establish a good reputation so that that can re-enter
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
the market for future finance. Stewardship model can have linking or resemblance in
countries like Japan, where the Japanese worker assumes the role of stewards and takes
ownership of their jobs and work at them diligently. Moreover, stewardship theory suggests
unifying the role of the CEO and the chairman so as to reduce agency costs and to have
greater role as stewards in the organization. It was evident that there would be better
safeguarding of the interest of the shareholders. It was empirically found that the returns have
improved by having both these theories combined rather than separated.
Stakeholder theory was embedded in the management discipline in 1970 and gradually
developed by Freeman incorporating corporate accountability to a broad range of
stakeholders. Wheeler et al argued that stake holder theory derived from a combination of the
sociological and organizational disciplines. Indeed, stakeholder theory is less of a formal
unified theory and more of a broad research tradition, incorporating philosophy, ethics,
political theory, economics, law and organizational science.
Stakeholder theory can be defined as “any group or individual who can affect or is affected
by the achievement of the organization’s objectives”. Unlike agency theory in which the
managers are working and serving for the stakeholders, stakeholder theorists suggest that
managers in organizations have a network of relationships to serve – this include the
suppliers, employees and business partners. And it was argued that this group of network is
important other than owner-manager-employee relationship as in agency theory. On the other
end, Sundaram & Ink pen contend that stakeholder theory attempts to address the group of
stakeholder deserving and requiring management’s attention. Whilst, Donaldson & Preston
claimed that all groups participate in a business to obtain benefits. Nevertheless, Clarkson
suggested that the firm is a system, where there are stakeholders and the purpose of the
organization is to create wealth for its stakeholders.
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
Freeman contends that the network of relationships with many groups can affect decision
making processes as stakeholder theory is concerned with the nature of these relationships in
terms of both processes and outcomes for the firm and its stakeholders. Donaldson & Preston
argued that this theory focuses on managerial decision making and interests of all
stakeholders have intrinsic value, and no sets of interests are assumed to dominate the others.
Suppliers Customers
FIRM
Trade associates
Employees Communities
Transaction cost theory was first initiated by Cyert and March and later theoretical described
and exposed by Williamson. Transaction cost theory was an interdisciplinary alliance of law,
economics and organizations. This theory attempts to view the firm as an organization
comprising people with different views and objectives. The underlying assumption of
transaction theory is that firms have become so large they in effect substitute for the market
in determining the allocation of resources. In other words, the organization and structure of a
firm can determine price and production. The unit of analysis in transaction cost theory is the
transaction. Therefore, the combination of people with transaction suggests that transaction
cost theory managers are opportunists and arrange firms’ transactions to their interests.
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
him/herself (which makes it much more difficult for the institutional owners to "fire"
him/her). The practice of the CEO also being the Chair of the Board is fairly common in large
American corporations. While this practice is common in the U.S., it is relatively rare
elsewhere. In the U.K., successive codes of best practice have recommended against duality.
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
out of the 49 banks operating in Bangladesh, 9 belong to the public sector, 30 are local
private and 10 are foreign owned banks (Bangladesh Bank, 2003).Despite the expansion, the
operational efficiency of the banking institutions has continued to be dismal . The sector
witnessed decreasing profitability, increasing non-performing assets, provision and capital
shortfalls, eroded credit discipline, rampant corruption patronized by political quarters, low
recovery rate, inferior asset quality, managerial weaknesses, excessive interference from
government and owners, weak regulatory and supervisory role etc. Internal control system
along with accounting and audit qualities are believed to have been substandard. Many of the
problems have been attributed to lack of sound corporate governance among the banks. The
reports by the Banking Reform Commission and BEI (2003) raises serious concerns on the
banking sector and criticize the quality of governance that prevails in the banking sector in
Bangladesh.
Notification
07 August 2012
No. SEC/CMRRCD/2006-158/134/Admin/44: Whereas, the Securities and Exchange
Commission (herein after referred to as the “Commission”) deems it fit that the consent
already accorded by the Commission, or deemed to have been accorded by it, or to be
accorded by it in future, to the issue of capital by the companies listed with any stock
exchange in Bangladesh, shall be subject to certain further conditions, on 'comply' basis, in
order to enhance corporate governance in the interest of investors and the capital market;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the power conferred by section 2CC of the Securities and
Exchange Ordinance, 1969 (XVII of 1969), the Commission hereby supersedes its earlier
Notification No. SEC/CMRRCD/2006-158/Admin/02-08 dated 20th February, 2006 and
imposes the following further conditions to the consent already accorded by it, or deemed to
have been accorded by it, or to be accorded by it in future, to the issue of capital by the
companies listed with any stock exchange in Bangladesh: Provided, however, that these
conditions are imposed on 'comply' basis. The companies listed with any stock exchange in
Bangladesh shall comply with these conditions in accordance with the condition No. 7.
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
Chapter Four
Corporate Governance Practices
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
Conditions.
4.1 Board of Directors:
4.1.1 Board's Size
The number of the board members of the company shall not be less than 5 (five) and more
than 20 (twenty): Provided, however, that in case of banks and non-bank financial
institutions, insurance companies and statutory bodies for which separate primary regulators
like Bangladesh Bank, Insurance Development and Regulatory Authority, etc. exist, the
Boards of those companies shall be constituted as may be prescribed by such primary
regulators in so far as those prescriptions are not inconsistent with the aforesaid condition.
4.1.2 Independent Directors
All companies shall encourage effective representation of independent directors on their
Board of Directors so that the Board, as a group, includes core competencies considered
relevant in the context of each company. For this purpose, the companies shall comply with
the following: -(i) At least one fifth (1/5) of the total number of directors in the company’s
board shall be independent directors.(ii) For the purpose of this clause “independent director”
means a director)
a) Who either does not hold any share in the company or holds less than one percent
(1%) shares of the total paid-up shares of the company;
b) Who is not a sponsor of the company and is not connected with the company’s any
sponsor or director or shareholder who holds one percent (1%) or more shares of the
total paid-up shares of the company on the basis of family relationship. His/her family
members also should not hold above mentioned shares in the company: Provided that
spouse, son, daughter, father, mother, brother, sister, son-in-law and daughter-in-law
shall be considered as family members;
c) Who does not have any other relationship, whether pecuniary or otherwise, with the
company or its subsidiary/associated companies?
d) Who is not a member, director or officer of any stock exchange?
e) Who is not a shareholder, director or officer of any member of stock exchange or an
intermediary of the capital market?
f) Who is not a partner or an executive or was not a partner or an executive during the
preceding 3 (three) years of the concerned company’s statutory audit firm;
g) Who shall not be an independent director in more than 3 (three) listed companies;
h) Who has not been convicted by a court of competent jurisdiction as a defaulter in
payment of any loan to a bank or a Non-Bank Financial Institution (NBFI);
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
i. Who has not been convicted for a criminal offence involving moral turpitude?
ii. The independent director(s) shall be appointed by the board of directors and
approved by the shareholders in the Annual General Meeting (AGM).
iii. The post of independent director(s) cannot remain vacant for more than 90
(ninety) days.
iv. The Board shall lay down a code of conduct of all Board members and annual
compliance of the code to be recorded.
v. The tenure of office of an independent director shall be for a period of 3
(three) years, which may be extended for 1 (one) term only.
4.1.3 Qualification of Independent Director (ID)
i. Independent Director shall be a knowledgeable individual with integrity who is able
the person to ensure compliance with financial, regulatory and corporate laws and can
make meaningful contribution to business.
ii. The person should be a Business Leader/Corporate Leader/Bureaucrat/University
Teacher with Economics or Business Studies or Law background/Professionals like
Chartered Accountants, Cost & Management Accountants, and Chartered Secretaries.
The independent director must have at least 12 (twelve) years of corporate
management/professional experiences.
iii. In special cases the above qualifications may be relaxed subject to prior approval of
the Commission.
4.1.4 Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
The positions of the Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer of the companies
shall be filled by different individuals. The Chairman of the company shall be elected from
among the directors of the company. The Board of Directors shall clearly define respective
roles and responsibilities of the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer.
4.1.5 The Directors’ Report to Shareholders
The directors of the companies shall include the following additional statements in the
Directors' Report prepared under section 184 of the Companies Act, 1994 (Act No. XVIII of
1994):-
a. Industry outlook and possible future developments in the industry.
b. Segment-wise or product-wise performance.
c. Risks and concerns.
d. A discussion on Cost of Goods sold, Gross Profit Margin and Net Profit Margin.
e. Discussion on continuity of any Extra-Ordinary gain or loss.
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
f. Basis for related party transactions- a statement of all related party transactions
should be disclosed in the annual report.
g. Utilization of proceeds from public issues, rights issues and/or through any others
instruments.
h. An explanation if the financial results deteriorate after the company goes for
Initial Public Offering (IPO), Repeat Public Offering (RPO), Rights Offer, Direct
Listing, etc.
i. If significant variance occurs between Quarterly Financial performance and
Annual Financial Statements the management shall explain about the variance on
their Annual Report.
j. Remuneration to directors including independent directors.
k. The financial statements prepared by the management of the issuer company
present fairly its state of affairs, the result of its operations, cash flows and
changes in equity.
l. Proper books of account of the issuer company have been maintained.
m. Appropriate accounting policies have been consistently applied in preparation of
the financial statements and that the accounting estimates are based on reasonable
and prudent judgment.
n. International Accounting Standards (IAS)/Bangladesh Accounting Standards
(BAS)/International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)/Bangladesh Financial
Reporting Standards (BFRS), as applicable in Bangladesh, have been followed in
preparation of the financial statements and any departure there-from has been
adequately disclosed.
o. The system of internal control is sound in design and has been effectively
implemented and monitored.
p. There are no significant doubts upon the issuer company's ability to continue as a
going concern. If the issuer company is not considered to be a going concern, the
fact along with reasons thereof should be disclosed.
q. Significant deviations from the last year’s operating results of the issuer company
shall be highlighted and the reasons thereof should be explained.
r. Key operating and financial data of at least preceding 5 (five) years shall be
summarized.
s. If the issuer company has not declared dividend (cash or stock) for the year, the
reasons thereof shall be given.
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
t. The number of Board meetings held during the year and attendance by each
director shall be disclosed.
u. The pattern of shareholding shall be reported to disclose the aggregate number of
shares (along with name wise details where stated below) held by:-
i. Parent/Subsidiary/Associated Companies and other related parties (name wise
details);
ii. Directors, Chief Executive Officer, Company Secretary, Chief Financial
Officer, Head of Internal Audit and their spouses and minor children (name
wise details);
iii. Executives;
iv. Shareholders holding ten percent (10%) or more is voting interest in the
company (name wise details).
Explanation: For the purpose of this clause, the expression “executive” means top 5 (five)
salaried employees of the company, other than the Directors, Chief Executive Officer,
Company Secretary, Chief Financial Officer and Head of Internal Audit.
v. In case of the appointment/re-appointment of a director the company shall
disclose the following information to the shareholders:-
i. A brief resume of the director;
ii. Nature of his/her expertise in specific functional areas;
iii. Names of companies in which the person also holds the directorship and the
membership of committees of the board.
4.2 Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and Heads of Internal Audit and
Company Secretary (CS):
4.2.1 Appointment
The company shall appoint a Chief Financial Officer (CFO), a Head of Internal Audit
(Internal Control and Compliance) and a Company Secretary (CS). The Board of Directors
should clearly define respective roles, responsibilities and duties of the CFO, the Head of
Internal Audit and the CS.
4.2.2 Requirement to attend the Board Meetings
The CFO and the Company Secretary of the companies shall attend the meetings of the Board
of Directors, provided that the CFO and/or the Company Secretary shall not attend such part
of a meeting of the Board of Directors which involves consideration of an agenda item
relating to their personal matters.
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
ii. Chairman of the audit committee shall remain present in the Annual General
Meeting (AGM).
4.3.3 Role of Audit Committee
Role of audit committee shall include the following:-
i. Oversee the financial reporting process.
ii. Monitor choice of accounting policies and principles.
iii. Monitor Internal Control Risk management process.
iv. Oversee hiring and performance of external auditors.
v. Review along with the management, the annual financial statements before
submission to the board for approval.
vi. Review along with the management, the quarterly and half yearly financial
statements before submission to the board for approval.
vii. Review the adequacy of internal audit function.
viii. Review statement of significant related party transactions submitted by the
management.
4.3.4 Reporting of the Audit Committee
4.3.4.1 Reporting to the Board of Directors
i. The Audit Committee shall report on its activities to the Board of Directors.
ii. The Audit Committee shall immediately report to the Board of Directors on the
following findings, if any:-
a) report on conflicts of interests;
b) suspected or presumed fraud or irregularity or material defect in the internal control
system;
c) suspected infringement of laws, including securities related laws, rules and
regulations;
d) Any other matter which shall be disclosed to the Board of Directors immediately.
4.3.4.2 Reporting to the Authorities
If the Audit Committee has reported to the Board of Directors about anything which has
material impact on the financial condition and results of operation and has discussed with the
Board of Directors and the management that any rectification is necessary and if the Audit
Committee finds that such rectification has been unreasonably ignored, the Audit Committee
shall report such finding to the Commission, upon reporting of such matters to the Board of
Directors for three times or completion of a period of 6 (six) months from the date of first
reporting to the Board of Directors, whichever is earlier.
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
ii. There are, to the best of knowledge and belief, no transactions entered into by the
company during the year which are fraudulent, illegal or violation of the company’s
code of conduct.
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
4.8 Directors
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
a) signed and filed with the Registrar a consent in writing to act as such director;
b) in the case of companies having a share capital –
I. signed the memorandum for a number of shares not less than his
qualification shares; or
II. taken from the company and paid or agreed to pay for his qualification
shares; or
III. signed and filed with the registrar a contract in writing to take form the
company and pay for his qualification shares; or
IV. Made and filed with the Registrar any affidavit to the effect that a number
of shares not less than his qualifications share are registered in his name.
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
In view of the above, rescinding the previous instructions8 the specific demarcation of
responsibilities and authorities among the board of directors, its chairman, Chief Executive
Officer (CEO) of an adviser to the private bank in respect of its overall financial, operational
and administrative policymaking and executive affairs including overall business activities,
internal control, human resources management and development thereof, income and
expenditure etc., along with lending and risk management issues, is outlined as follows:-
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
e) Financial management:
i. The annual budget and the statutory financial statements shall finally be prepared
with the approval of the board. It shall at quarterly rests review/monitor the
positions in respect of bank's income, expenditure, liquidity, non-performing
asset, capital base and adequacy, maintenance of loan loss provision and steps
taken for recovery of defaulted loans including legal measures.
ii. The board shall frame the policies and procedures for bank's purchase and
procurement activities and shall accordingly approve the distribution of power for
making such expenditures. The maximum possible delegation of such power shall
rest on the CEO and his subordinates. The decision on matters relating to
infrastructure development and purchase of land, building, vehicles etc. for the
purpose of bank's business shall, however, be adopted with the approval of the
board.
f) Formation of supporting committees:
For decision on urgent matters an executive committee, whatever name called, may be
formed with the directors. There shall be no committee or sub-committee of the board other
than the executive committee and the audit committee. No alternate director shall be included
in these committees.
g) Appointment of CEO:
The board shall appoint a competent CEO for the bank with the approval of the Bangladesh
Bank.
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
The adviser, whatever name called, shall advise the board of directors or the CEO on such
issues only for which he is engaged in terms of the conditions of his appointment. He shall
neither have access to the process of decision-making nor shall have the scope of effecting
executive authority in any matters of the bank including financial, administrative or
operational affairs.
The CEO of the bank, whatever name called, shall discharge the responsibilities and affect
the authorities as follows:
a) In terms of the financial, business and administrative authorities vested upon him by
the board, the CEO shall discharge his own responsibilities. He shall remain
accountable for achievement of financial and other business targets by means of
business plan, efficient implementation thereof and prudent administrative and
financial management.
b) The CEO shall ensure compliance of the Bank Companies Act, 1991 and/or other
relevant laws and regulations in discharge of routine functions of the bank.
c) The CEO shall report to Bangladesh Bank of issues violate of the Bank Companies
Act, 1991 or of other laws/regulations and, if required, may apprise the board post
facto.
d) The recruitment and promotion of all staff of the bank except those in the two tiers
below him shall rest on the CEO. He shall act in such cases in accordance with the
approved service rules on the basis of the human resources policy and sanctioned
strength of employees as approved by the board. The board or the chairman of any
committee of the board or any director shall not get involved or interfere into such
affairs. The authority relating to transfer of and disciplinary measures against the
staff, except those at one tier below the CEO, shall rest on him, which he shall apply
in accordance with the approved service rules. Besides, under the purview of the
human resources policy as approved by the board, he shall nominate officers for
training etc.
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
Board of
Directors
Effectiveness
Financial Study
Reporting
Framework
Entrepreneur
Risk
Corporate
Governance
Review of
Financial
Management Control &
Process
Performance
Review
Shareholders
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
Chapter Five
Corporate Governance in Janata Bank Limited
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
Appointment of Directors
Under section 15(4) of the Bank Company Act, 1991 (amended up to 2013), every banking
company, other than specialized banks, at the time of taking prior approval from Bangladesh
Bank for appointing/reappointing directors should furnish the following documents along
with the application:
a. Personal information of the nominated person;
b. Nominated person’s declaration;
c. ‘Declaration for confidentiality’ by the nominated person;
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
d. In case of Independent director, the approval letter from Security and Exchange
Commission;
e. In case of Independent director, a declaration of the directors concern
f. CIB report of the nominated person
g. Updated list of the directors.
The members of the Board of Directors of JBL are appointed as per the provision of the
companies Act-1994, the Bank Company Act-1991 (Amended in 2013) and Memorandum
and Articles of Association of the Bank. JBL always complies with the guidelines of
Bangladesh Bank regarding appointment of directors.
Independent Director
All the members of the board, as nominated by the Government, are professionally and
financially literate and experienced. In line with the requirement of the notification of
Bangladesh Securities and Exchange Commission guidelines, all of the directors of JBL are
justifiably considered as independent director. It is because:
i. Each of the directors holds less than one percent (1%) shares of the total paid up
capital of the bank.
ii. On the basis of family relationship, the directors are not connected with the bank’s
shareholders who hold one percent (1%) or more shares.
iii. The directors are not sponsors of the company.
iv. The members of the family of the directors also do not hold any share of the
company.
Board members’ independence
Members of the board actively take part in deliberations in board meetings on various issues
as they are independent in expressing their views and opinions freely. They do not have any
sorts of business relationship or involvement with the bank management.
Bank Management
Credit and risk management
i. The policies, strategies, procedures etc. in respect of appraisal of loan/investment
proposals, sanction, disbursement, recovery, rescheduling and written-off thereof are
made with the Board’s approval under the purview of the existing laws, rules and
regulations. The board specifically distributes the power of sanction of
loan/investment among the CEO and his subordinate executives as much as possible.
No director, however, interferes directly or indirectly in the process of
loan/investment sanctioning.
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
ii. The board establishes efficient risk management policies, administers its compliance
and monitors at quarterly intervals.
Executive Committee
As per the BRPD circular No. 11 of 27 October 2014, an executive committee has been
formed with Directors for quick decision on urgent matters and execution of routine work in
between the board meeting. Executive committee performs according to their terms of
reference determined by the board of directors in line with Bangladesh Bank guidelines.
Audit Committee
As per Bangladesh Securities and Exchange Commission notification no. SEC/ CMRRCD/
2006-158/ 134/ Admin/ 44 of 07 August 2012, JBL has an Audit Committee as a sub-
committee of the board of directors in order to strictly observe the terms of references issued
by Bangladesh Bank BRPD circular No. 11 or 27 October 2014. The Audit Committee assists
the board of directors in ensuring internal control system. It also certifies that the financial
statements reflect true and fair view of the state of affairs of the company. It issues guidelines
for ensuring a good monitoring system within the business.
The role of Audit Committee:
The Audit Committee of the Board plays significant role to ensure implementation of
policies, guidelines etc. provided by Bangladesh Bank, other regulatory bodies and the Board
of Directors of the Bank. The committee also reviews the policies, audit plan and its
execution, financial statements, audit reports, internal control and compliance report etc. In
the year 2012, eleven meetings of Audit Committee were held. The Audit Committee of the
Board plays significant role in proper functioning of the Bank, some of which are as follows:
Reviews the implementation status of guidelines, provided by Bangladesh Bank and
other regulatory bodies;
Reviews Bank’s own policies and procedures; such as Credit Policy, Foreign
Exchange Policy, Human Resources Policy etc.;
Reviews the Bank’s audited and un-audited Financial Statements, discusses and
exchanges views with the External Auditors and Tax consultants on the adequacy of
disclosures of Financial Statements
Reviews the corrective measures taken by the Bank’s Management as recommended
by the Board Audit Division, Internal Control and Compliance Division, Bangladesh
Bank’s Inspection Team and External Auditors relating to deficiencies in internal
control or other similar issues;
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
Management Committee
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
Role of MANCOM:
MANCOM of the Bank is primarily responsible to:
Formulate procedures to identify, measure, monitor and control all risks;
Assign clear responsibility, authority and reporting relationship;
Monitor adequacy and effectiveness of the internal control system;
Review overall effectiveness of the control system of the Bank;
Recommend/ rectify alternatives in case of any deviation from desired goal.
Risk management Committee
Organization Structure:
Members of the committee are nominated by the board of directors from themselves;
The Risk Management Committee comprises of maximum four members;
Members are appointed for a 03 years term of office;
Company secretary of the bank is the secretary of the Risk Management Committee.
As per the Bank Company Act 1991, and BRDP circular No. 11 of 27 October 2013, the Risk
Management Committee has been formed with 04 members which are given below:
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
Exchange Risk, Equity Risk, and Commodity Risk. MBL’s strategies to address these risks
are as under:
A. Managing Interest Rate Risk
Interest rate risk is the risk (variability in value) borne by an interest-bearing asset, such as a
loan or a bond, due to variability of interest rates. Bank faces various types of Risks including
Basis Risks, Yield Curve Risk, Re-pricing Risk, Option Risk and Model Risk.
JBL’s Interest Rate Risk Management Strategies
Market Trend Analysis
Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis
Gap Analysis
B. Managing Foreign Exchange Risk
Foreign exchange risk or exchange rate risk is a form of financial risk that arises from the
potential change in the exchange rate of one currency in relation to another.
JBL’s Foreign Exchange Risk Management Strategies
Policies and Manuals with a view to reducing the foreign exchange risk
Treasury division of the Bank manages and controls day-to-day trading activities under the
supervision of ALCO that ensures continuous monitoring of the level of assumed risks. All
the transactions are carried out on behalf of the customers, i.e. JBL’s foreign exchange
trading exposures are principally derived from customer driven transactions, and major risk
arises from movement of price.
C. Equity Price Risk Management
Equity price risk is the risk that one's investments will depreciate because of stock market
dynamics causing one to lose money. Equity price risk may arise from general or specific risk
or for both.
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity Risk is the potential for loss to an institution arising from either its inability to meet
its obligations or to fund increases in assets as they fall due without incurring unacceptable
cost or losses. Liquidity risk is considered a major risk for banks. It arises when the cushion
provided by the liquid assets are not sufficient enough to meet its obligation.
JBL’s Liquidity Risk Management Strategies
i. Acceptable assets and liabilities mix
ii. Diversified sources and stability of liabilities
iii. Scientific cash flow projections
iv. Various ratios to maintain liquidity and to create limits for liquidity management
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
v. Ratios are used in conjunction with more qualitative information about borrowing
capacity.
Operational risk
Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes,
people and systems or from external events. It is a very broad concept which focuses on the
risks arising from the people, systems and processes through which a company operates. It
also includes other categories such as fraud risks, legal risks, physical or environmental risks.
JBL’s Board of Directors and Senior Management have established an organizational culture
that places a high priority on effective operational risk management and adherence to sound
operating controls. Senior Management transforms the strategic direction given by the Board
through operational risk management policy.
Advisory Committee
Under Pillar-2 of Basel-II (Supervisory Review Process), all banks are required to design
their own Supervisory Review Process to ensure maintenance of adequate capital to fully
cover all risk exposures. As per Guidelines on Supervisory Review Evaluation Process, the
level of Capital Adequacy will be determined after evaluation and dialogue between
Bangladesh Bank and the Advisory Team.
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
Other material risks, etc.); Risks deriving from external factors (such as, change in economic
and regulatory environment); Adequate capital against comprehensive risks of the Bank. SRP
Team of the Bank will attend on the dialogue arranged by BB’s SREP Team. BB’s SREP
Team will also evaluate the Bank’s SRP findings. In the SRP findings capital allocation
against each category of risks is to be disclose
SRP Team of the Bank will discuss and allocate capital against above-mentioned Risks. SRP
Team of the Bank will also describe the assessment procedures for these risks and rationale
for selecting any particular method and discuss the assessment techniques used (model based,
scenario analyses, and stress testing) and quantitative results of each risk. SRP Team will
discuss and explain present challenges faced by the Bank to improve the risk management
framework and will develop action plans with suitable timeline to adopt/develop the
sophisticated advanced techniques or assessment and measurement of all material risks.
Interest Committee
With a view to achieve diversification in asset portfolio and generating a healthy revenue (as
income from buy/sale of shares through secondary market), MBL has formed an Investment
Committee, which is primarily responsible to take investment decision in shares.
Responsibilities of Investment Committee
The Committee will sit for meeting at least once in a week, or as and when necessary
after having consent from the Chair;
The Committee will take primary decision for investment in shares;
The Committee will ensure compliance of investment policy while maintaining
portfolio of shares;
The Member Secretary will prepare a weekly report on status of investment and report
the same to Managing Director & CEO through Chairman;
The Committee will determine buy range, sale range and loss limit for every share in
the portfolio and Member Secretary will convey the same to the Front Office.
Regulatory Authorities
Role of Regulatory Bodies
The role of regulatory authorities is very important in respect of corporate governance
practices of Janata BankLimited. The bank is pledge-bound to comply with all the
requirements of regulatory authorities. Their continuous support and cooperation to the bank
are highly valued by the bank’s board and the management.
Audit by Bangladesh Bank
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
Apart from Bank’s internal audit, Bangladesh Bank also conducts audit and inspection of the
banks. Their reports are extensively reviewed by the bank’s board of directors in a single-
agenda meeting in which officials of the Department of Banking Inspection (DBI) of
Bangladesh Bank also remain present to apprise the Board of their findings and their
implications.
Independent External Auditor
Khan Wahab Shafique Rahman & Co., Chartered Accountants and K. M. Hasan & Co. have
been appointed as the External Auditors of the Bank in the 13th AGM of the Shareholders.
They audited the Financial Statements of the Bank namely, Balance Sheet, Profit and Loss
Account, Cash Flow Statement, Statement of Changes in Equity, Statement of Liquidity
Analysis and put explanatory notes to financial statements. External Auditors were entitled to
enquire from the Bank’s employees such information and explanation as they thought
necessary for the performance of their duties as External Auditors. Bank employees provided
accurate, timely information and explanations as and when required by the External Auditors.
Employees
The employees who are working in this organization take active role in decision making.
They strictly follow the principles of corporate culture. They do not engage themselves in any
sort of sub-culture and counter culture. The banks encourage their individuality and drive
them to exploit their full potential and creativity for the greater good of the bank. It gives
them adequate training to enhance their competence and capability. As a member of the
wining team, they have learned to believe that working together in a team multiplies strength
of individual.
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
environment technology such as recycling companies and nature conservation projects. JBL
always encourages projects which take care of following points while financing them viz., (a)
sustainable development and use of renewable natural resources (b) protection of human
health, bio-diversity, occupational health and safety, efficient production, delivery and use of
energy (c) pollution prevention and waste minimization
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
Chapter Six
Analysis
Status of Compliance : SEC & Bangladesh
Bank
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
x. Remuneration to
directors including independent
directors.
Stated in
xi. The financial statements
Annual
prepared by the management of
Report
the issuer company present fairly
its state of affairs, the result of
its operations, cash flows and
changes in equity.
xii. Proper books of account
of the issuer company have been
maintained.
xiii. Appropriate accounting
policies have been consistently
applied in preparation of the
financial statements and that the
accounting estimates are based
on reasonable and prudent
judgment.
xiv. International Accounting
Standards (IAS) / Bangladesh
Accounting Standards (BAS) /
International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRS) / Bangladesh
Financial Reporting Standards
(BFRS), as applicable in
Bangladesh, have been followed
in preparation of the financial
statements and any departure
there-from has been adequately
disclosed.
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
b) Directors, Chief
Executive Officer, Company
Secretary, Chief Financial
Officer, Head of Internal Audit
and their spouses and minor
children (name wise details);
c) Executives;
d) Shareholders holding ten
percent (10%) or more votes’
interest in the company (name
wise details).
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
treated as
Independe
nt Director.
iii. All members of the Audit
Committee should be financially
literate ’ and at least 1 (one) Stated in
member shall have accounting or their CV
related financial management
experience.
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
i. Appraisal or valuation
4. services of fairness opinions.
External/ ii. Financial information
Statutory systems design and
Auditors iii.implementation.
Book-keeping or other
services related to the accounting
records or financial statements.
v. Actuarial services.
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
company.
i. They have reviewed
financial statements for the year
and that to the best of their
knowledge and belief:
a) These statements do not
6. contain any materially untrue
Duties of statement or omit any material
Chief fact or contain statement that
Executive might be misleading;
Officer b) These statements
(CEO) and together present a true and fair
Chief view of the company’s affairs
Financial and are in compliance with
Officer existing accounting standards
(CFO) and applicable laws.
ii. There are, to the best of
knowledge and belief, no
transactions entered into by the
company during the year which
are fraudulent, illegal or
violation of the company’s code
of conduct.
i. The company shall
obtain a certificate from a
practicing Professional
Accountant / Secretary
7. (Chartered Accountant / Cost &
Reporting Management Accountant /
and Chartered Secretary) regarding
compliance compliance of conditions of
of Corporate Corporate Governance
Governance Guidelines of the Commission
and shall send the same to the
shareholders along with the
Annual Report on a yearly basis.
ii. The directors of the
company shall state, in
accordance with the Annexure
attached, in the directors’ report
whether the company has
complied with these conditions.
Source: Annual Report 2015 Figure 15: Status of Compliance Bangladesh Securities and Exchange
Commission (BSEC) Guidelines for Corporate Governance for the year December 2015
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
The bank fulfils all of the guidelines of Bangladesh Securities and Exchange Commission
(BSEC) as well as Bangladesh Bank. Now the compliance is given below:
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
Chapter Seven
Findings, Recommendation, Conclusion
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
7.1. Findings
The current situation of corporate governance practice of Janata Bankis good but in
some cases they wouldn’t comply with the some guidelines.
The bank practices all the guidelines by BB and BESC. Like as, number of board
member, appointment of director, auditor and independent direction etc.
Through the overall study of the topics I personally get more knowledge about the
theoretical aspects of Corporate Governance.
The bank complied with all guidelines issued by Bangladesh Bank but it is unable to
comply with all the guidelines issued by Bangladesh Securities and Exchange
Commission (BSEC).
The non-compliance of corporate governance activities in this bank are as follows:
These 7 guidelines are not complied in the Directors’ Report to shareholders
1. A discussion on Cost of Goods Sold, Gross Profit Margin and Net Profit
Margin.
2. An explanation if the financial results deteriorate after the company goes for
Initial Public Offering.
3. If significant variance occurs between Quarterly Financial Performance and
Annual Financial Statements the management shall explain about the variance
on their Annual Report
4. There are no significant doubts upon the issuer company’s ability to continue
as a going concern. If the issuer company is not considered to be a going
concern, the fact along with reasons thereof should be disclosed.
5. Significant deviations from the last year’s operating results of the issuer
company shall be highlighted and the reasons thereof should be explained.
6. If the issuer company has not declared dividend (cash or stock) for the year, the
reasons thereof shall be given.
7. Parent / Subsidiary / Associated Companies and other related parties (name
wise details);
These 4 guidelines should be regarding External/ Statutory Auditors.
1. The Audit Committee of the holding company shall also review the financial
statements, in particular the investments made by the subsidiary company.
2. The minutes of the Board meeting of the subsidiary company shall be placed
for review at the following Board meeting of the holding company.
3. The minutes of the respective Board meeting of the holding company shall
state that they have reviewed the affairs of the subsidiary company also.
4. Provisions relating to the composition of the Board of Directors of the holding
company shall be made applicable to the composition of the Board of
Directors of the subsidiary company.
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
7.2. Recommendations
The directors should be reported to shareholders about the financial results deteriorate
after the company goes for Initial Public Offering and if significant variance occurs
between Quarterly Financial Performance.
JBL should maintain a remuneration committee with other committee.
The management has to be providing independency to audit committee as the
committee is able to provide a true and fair report on subsidiary company.
JBL have to follow and implement the rules and regulations according to BSEC
Bangladesh Bank (BB) and company act 1994.
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
7.3. Conclusion
The Janata BankLtd. is one of the banks for the future planning and succession in terms of
achieving “The Vision” within the on-going competitive environment, this report could be
treated as a guideline up to some extent in establishing corporate governance within the bank.
Bank always contributes towards the economic development of a country. JBL has always
played its’ leading role in socio-economic development of our country. Besides its’
traditional function such as deposit mobilization, deployment of fund in trade, commerce,
industry, agriculture, import and export business, outward and inward remittance, also being
a promising pioneer of all the Bangladeshi commercial bank, the JBL has always given lead
from the front.
In this report it can easily understood that the JBL maintains all the OECD principals. It can
comply with the SEC notification, the Company Act 1994. The Bank’s corporate governance
structures which they maintained are complying with the SEC Notifications and also they
follow status of compliance with BRPD (Banking Regulation and Policy Department). Their
activities audit by Bangladesh Bank. Their controlling mechanism is working well and has
further strengthened by the bank day by day.
This study was conducted on the proceeding of the activities carried out by Janata
BankLimited (JBL) concerning the corporate governance. As the study was concentrated
towards the management efficiency and the stakeholder and investors services so it may have
some limitations. In spite of having many challenges, adverse economic conditions and
market pattern during the years, the bank tried to maintain its growth trend through the
indicators like strong management efficiency, proper corporate governance and their timely
services to their clients.
On the basis of convincing reasons, the management of Janata Bank Limited do believe that
in the coming years the bank will try it’s level best to sustain good corporate governance and
maintain rest of the years.
.
Corporate Governance Practices: A Study on Janata Bank Limited
References
1. Ahmed, S., Dilli, R. K., (2007). “Service Trade in Developing Asia: A Case Study of the Banking
and Insurance Sectors in Bangladesh” Asia –Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade
Working Paper series, No.38, July 2007.