Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

March 17, 2021

The Honorable Andrew Cuomo


Governor of New York State
Executive Chamber
State Capitol
Albany, New York 12224

The Honorable Andrea Stewart-Cousins The Honorable Carl Heastie


Majority Leader Speaker
New York State Senate New York State Assembly
State Capitol – Room 330 932 Legislative Office Building
Albany, New York 12247 Albany, New York 12248

RE: Adult Use Cannabis, Worker Safety, Testing and “Scaffold Law” Ramifications

Dear Governor Cuomo, Majority Leader Stewart-Cousins and Speaker Heastie:

As negotiations proceed to legalize adult use cannabis in New York State, the construction
industry is gravely concerned about the ramifications of worker safety, worker impairment, drug
testing and scaffold law related insurance claims.
The legalization of adult use cannabis in New York State is particularly troubling for the
entire construction industry due to the safety concerns for workers. Cannabis and its derivatives
are potent drugs that impair an individual’s judgement posing a significant danger to themselves,
co-workers, and the public. While a construction safety supervisor or law enforcement
professional may be able to smell an individual that recently smoked cannabis, its derivatives such
as vaping and edibles are not as easily detectable.

Current unregulated cannabis testing technologies and drug recognition methods do not
provide a clear indication of worker impairment which will jeopardize workplace safety. The
unregulated testing technologies can only detect the presence of cannabis for a short period of time
and drug recognition experts are limited to highly skilled law enforcement professionals.
Furthermore, the adult use cannabis proposals from the Executive and Legislature do not establish
a standardized impairment level complicating an employers’ duty to provide a safe working
environment.

Adult use cannabis poses an unmanageable insurance risk for contractors, property owners,
and governmental entities because of New York’s “Scaffold Law.” The tremendous costs and
limited availability of the commercial general liability insurance have an impact across New York
because construction costs go up, fewer workers are hired, consumers pay higher prices for goods
and services, and the economy suffers. The “Scaffold Law” (NYS Labor Law sections 240/241)
imposes absolute liability for gravity-related injuries on contractors, property owners and
governmental entities engaged in construction, repair, or demolition work. Absolute liability
means that the contributing fault of an injured worker, such as consuming cannabis at the
workplace will be virtually irrelevant in court.

The current standard of “absolute liability” must be replaced with a standard of


comparative negligence—generally or at a minimum in cases where the worker had cannabis or
another impairing substance in their system at the time of the accident. Under this standard,
liability is apportioned by a judge or jury, in proportion to actual fault. This common-sense
reform would not prevent injured workers from bringing lawsuits for their injuries. It would
simply give New York contractors, property owners, and governmental entities the chance to
defend themselves in court when a worker’s own negligence or impairment is a contributing factor
in an accident. This is the way every other state and virtually every other area of our civil justice
system functions.

We strongly urge you to include “Scaffold Law” reform in the final agreement on adult use
cannabis.

Very truly yours,

A.J. Baynes, CEO/ President Scott Hobson, Assistant Vice President,


Amherst Chamber Of Commerce Government Relations
Big I New York
Michael J. Elmendorf II, President & CEO
Associated General Contractors of Grant Loomis, Vice President, Gov’t Affairs
New York State Buffalo Niagara Partnership
Aaron Hilger, President Mitchell Pally, Chief Executive Officer
Builders Exchange of Rochester Long Island Builders Institute

Brad Walters, Executive Director Marc Herbst, Executive Director


Builders Exchange of the Southern Tier Long Island Contractors’ Association

John O’Hare, Managing Director Randy Wolken, President


Building Contractors Association MACNY, The Manufactures Association

F. Matthew Pepe, Executive Director Greg Biryla, NY Senior State Director


Building Contractors Association of Westchester National Federation of Independent Business
and Mid-Hudson Region
Lewis A. Dubuque, President
Earl R. Hall, CEO New York State Builders Association
Building Industry Employers of NYS
Lindsey Mills, Chairman
Thomas J. O’Connor, Vice President, New York State Council of NECA
Government Relations
Capital Region Chamber Mark Dorr, President
New York State Hospitality & Tourism
Alan Seidman, Executive Director Association
Construction Contractors Association
Rita Ferris, President
Earl R. Hall, Executive Director Northeastern Retail Lumber Association
Construction Employers Association of CNY
Michael Misenhimer, Executive Director
Joseph Benedict, Executive Director Northeastern Subcontractors Association
Construction Exchange of Buffalo & WNY
Bradford J. Lachut, Director of Gov’t &
John T. Cooney Jr, Executive Director Industry Affairs
Construction Industry Council of Westchester Professional Insurance Agents
and Hudson Valley Inc.
Earl R. Hall, Executive Director
Todd G. Helfrich, President & CEO Syracuse Builders Exchange
Eastern Contractors Association
Kendra Hems, President
Mike Durant, President & CEO Trucking Association of New York
Food Industry Alliance of New York State
Justin Wilcox, Executive Director
Robert Wessels, Executive Director Upstate United
The General Contractors Association of
New York, Inc. Ken Thomas & Jason Cintron
Co-Managing Directors
Stacey Duncan, President & CEO Minority & Women Contractors and
Greater Binghamton Chamber of Commerce Developers Association

Bob Duffy, President


Greater Rochester Chamber of Commerce

Tom Stebbins, Executive Director


Lawsuit Reform Alliance of New York
Courts have repeatedly ruled worker impairment is not a
valid defense to a claim brought under the Scaffold Law.

Keane v. Sin Hang Lee (188 A.D.2D 636)


• “None of the defendants’ assertions concerning the plaintiff’s contributory
negligence, including his use of marihuana on the afternoon in question, can
be interposed as a defense to a claim of liability under Labor Law §240(1)”

Samuel v. Simone Development Company (13 A.D.3D 112)


• “Plaintiff’s alleged drug use amounts, at most, to comparative negligence
which is not a defense to a §240(1) claim.”

Hodge v. Crouse Hinds Div. of Cooper Indus. (207 A.D.2D 1007)


• “None of the defendant’s assertions concerning the plaintiff’s contributory
negligence, including the plaintiff’s ingestion of prescription drugs on the
afternoon of the accident, constitutes a defense to a Labor Law §240(1) cause
of action.”

Tate v. Clacy-Cullen Storage Co, Inc (171 A.D.2D 292)


• “Could plaintiff Harold Tate’s alleged intoxication as a contributing cause of
the happening of the accident be a defense to the cause of action? The short
answer is ‘no.’”

You might also like