Professional Documents
Culture Documents
River Poem Notes 1
River Poem Notes 1
A K RAMANUJAN
A.K. Ramanujan’s ‘A River’ is of his finest poem taken from his magnum
opus, The Striders (1965). Here the poet has compared and contrasted the attitudes
1
of the old poets and those of the new poets to human suffering. He has come to the
conclusion that both the groups of the poets are indifferent to human sorrow and
suffering. Their poetry does not reflect the miseries of the human beings. He has
proved this point in the present poem.
2
Analysis of A River
Stanza One
In Madurai,
city of temples and poets,
(…)
shaven water-buffaloes lounging in the sun
The poets only sang of the floods.
In the first stanza of this piece, the speaker begins by setting the scene. He
is going to be describing how the city of “Madurai” is described by poets. It
is a place that is made up of “temples and poets” and these poets have
always sung of the same things. Every summer in the city the river basin is
emptied. The river “dries to a trickle” and the sand is bared. The shapes and
objects that are revealed are dark and somewhat ominous. The are “sand
ribs” and “straw and women’s hair”. These things clog up the “watergates,”
made of rusty bars.
Ramanujan makes use of consonance in these lines with the repetition of
the “g” sound. Rhythm is also created through the use of reuse of the word
“sand” in lines six and seven. Then, in general, the repetition of words
3
beginning of “s,” or words that carry the “s” sound. This is especially true
for the first half of the stanza.
Everything about the drainage system is old and in need of repair. The
bridge is in patches, a fact that is revealed when the waters recede. In the
last lines of this stanza, Ramanujan uses two metaphors to compare the
stones to animals. The wet ones appear like crocodiles sleeping and the
dry as lounging water-buffaloes. Despite all of this, the poets “only sang of
the floods.” There is so much more to the city that the poets are ignoring.
Stanza Two
The second stanza of ‘A River’ is only eleven lines. The “He” in the first line
is a reference to a poet, perhaps the speaker himself. He states that he was
only in the city for “a day”. It is in this stanza that a number of the more
complicated and personal details are revealed. The details were not hidden,
they were easily learned by the poet featured in this stanza.
Everywhere the people spoke about the flood and the terrible things which
resulted. It is not just a simple natural occurrence. It “carried off three
village houses” as well as a pregnant woman and “a couple of cows”. The
4
cows have names, making these lines lighter in tone than some of the
others. The list-like way in which this section of the poem is conveyed
makes it clear that these are not uncommon occurrences. The people are
used to them.
Stanza Three
The problem that the speaker has with poets is made clearer in the third
stanza of ‘A River’ as he speaks of the similarities between “old poets” and
“new poets”. Both spoke about the floods, yet ignored the tragedies which
5
resulted. In fact, to make it worse, the new poets copied what the old ones
did. There was no evolution in style or subject.
In the fifth and sixth lines of this section, the speaker states that it is
possible that the woman who died was going to give birth to twins,
increasing the life lost. This is a very interesting contrast to the flooding of
the river in the first place. The waters are meant to fertilize the land and
make it possible for the next crop to grow. Life is destroyed as it is being
created.
Stanza Four
He said:
the river has water enough
to be poetic
about only once a year
(…)
6
with no moles on their bodies,
with different coloured diapers
to tell them apart.
In the final stanza, the speaker relays the words of the poet again. He said
that the poet complained of how “the river has water enough / to be
poetic / about only once a year”. It is only once a year that the poets pay
attention to it, and even then they don’t want to speak about the loss of
property or life.
The speaker repeats a section of the second stanza again, restating what
was lost. There are additional details added. Now, he says that the woman
believed she was “expecting identical twins”. They were going to be
perfectly the same, with no way to tell them apart except through dressing
them in “coloured diapers”. This is another humorous line, but it has a
darker undertone. It speaks to the lack of care with which the poets
approached the land and people. There is no desire to know who these
people are or quest to adequately depict their suffering.