Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PA Corman Application For Leave To File Amicus Brief
PA Corman Application For Leave To File Amicus Brief
COUNTY OF FULTON, :
FULTON COUNTY BOARD :
OF ELECTIONS, STUART L. : No.: 3 MAP 2022
ULSH, in his official capacity as :
County Commissioner of Fulton :
County and in his capacity as a :
resident, taxpayer and elector in :
Fulton County, and RANDY H. :
BUNCH, in his official capacity :
as County Commissioner of :
Fulton County and in his capacity :
as a resident, taxpayer and elector :
of Fulton County, :
:
Petitioners/Appellees, :
:
v. :
:
SECRETARY OF THE :
COMMONWEALTH, :
:
Respondent/Appellant. :
Corman, III and Senator Cris Dush submit this application for leave to file
Senators Corman and Dush request that the Court accept the brief as if it
Respectfully submitted,
2
Exhibit 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
COUNTY OF FULTON, :
FULTON COUNTY BOARD :
OF ELECTIONS, STUART L. : No.: 3 MAP 2022
ULSH, in his official capacity as :
County Commissioner of Fulton :
County and in his capacity as a :
resident, taxpayer and elector in :
Fulton County, and RANDY H. :
BUNCH, in his official capacity :
as County Commissioner of :
Fulton County and in his capacity :
as a resident, taxpayer and elector :
of Fulton County, :
:
Petitioners/Appellees, :
:
v. :
:
SECRETARY OF THE :
COMMONWEALTH, :
:
Respondent/Appellant. :
I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................1
i
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
RULES
CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS
CASES
ii
I. INTRODUCTION
In this and other cases, the Secretary of the Commonwealth has taken
from the Secretary to the Senate is, “Why do you want that information?”
authority. The correct analysis for the Secretary, and this Court, instanter is
whether the Senate, or its constituent parts, has the authority under law to
that proper question is yes, Senate President Pro Tempore Jacob Corman
III and Senator Cris Dush ask the Court to deny the Secretary’s Emergency
Application to Stay.
serving the 34th Senatorial District and Senate President Pro Tempore. He
1
addition to having direction over the duties of the Secretary-
Code which expanded the availability of mail-in voting and their impact on
hard drives of several Dominion voting machines that are the subject of the
2
Together, Senators Corman and Dush have an interest in both formal
information and data that they, in their legislative judgment, believe may
interests. No person or entity other than Senators Corman and Dush or his
counsel paid in whole or in part for this brief, nor authored it in whole or in
III. ARGUMENT
Senators Corman and Dush raise three points for the Court’s
consideration:
informal requests from Majority and Minority committee chairs – and even
3
straightforward means of allowing Senators and Senate committees to
individuals. Indeed, the Secretary recently argued (in Costa v. Corman) that
inappropriate because the Committee had less formal means at its disposal
would have practical impacts on both the legislative and judicial branches.
On the legislative side, any suggestion that only subpoenas are legitimate
prolong the legislative process, requiring that committees meet and vote to
informal request. On the judicial side, the dockets have the potential to
legislative subpoenas become the norm, as the normal ebb and flow of
4
negotiated informal information production between the Legislative and
Executive departments (or private entities and individuals) is shut off. Such
can do with electronic voting machines. But Directive 1, and the supposed
the cost of new machines to replace those that were decertified. That
asked to image the hard drives of already decertified voting machines that
will not be used in future elections. Thus, the Secretary’s assertion that
Directive 1 justifies overriding Senator Dush’s request for the hard drive
Finally, the Secretary demands the right to know why Senator Dush
and the Committee want data from the Dominion hard drives, and how the
5
data will be reviewed, as a predicate to allowing the hard drives to even be
imaged (that is, copied). Underscoring this demand is the notion that the
General Assembly, and in this case a Senate Committee, has to justify its
6071796, at *26 (Pa. 2021). In short, because the Committee already has
Corman, further inquiry into why the Committee desires any particular
request that this Court opine on the policy choices made by the Committee.1
IV. CONCLUSION
1The Committee’s interest in the Fulton County voting machines is manifest in any
event - Fulton County Commissioner Ulsh testified before the Committee on the
subject of the voting machines and Fulton County’s litigation.
6
this Court to be complicit in the Executive Branch’s disregard of the
Legislature. But this Court respects the balance between the branches of
be denied.
7
Respectfully submitted,
KLEINBARD LLC
Three Logan Square
1717 Arch Street, 5th Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Ph: (215) 568-2000
Fax: (215) 568-0140
Eml: [email protected]
[email protected]
8
WORD COUNT CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the above principal brief complies with the word
count limits of Pa.R.A.P. 531(b)(3). Based on the word count feature of the
word processing system used to prepare this brief, this document contains
1572 words, exclusive of the cover page, tables, and the signature block.