Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

The Analysis of the Text

«ART FOR HEARTS SAKE»


By R. Goldberg

The Art for Heart’s sake was written by Reuben Lucius Goldberg
(1883-1970). He was an American cartoonist, sculptor, author,
engineer, and inventor, was born in San Francisco. He is famous
for a series of popular cartoons he created depicting complex
devices that perform simple tasks in indirect way. His books
gained popularity among the readers and among his best works
are Is There a Doctor in the House? (1929), Rube Goldberg’s
Guide to Europe (1954) and I made My Bed (1960).
The title of the book reveals the problem of art and its meaning
and value in our society.
The author focused his attention on the problems of art and its
value, money and their influence on people and the world in
total. The idea of this text is everything can be bought for money.
Value of art will vanish if everyone foists his god-awful smudge as
an eternal work of art.
The style of the author is very expressive and ironic. The typical
feature of the author`s style is his using a great number of the
high –flown words to describe the personalities of the characters
and their behavior. The dialogues are very intensive and dynamic.
The dynamism of the narration is created by a great number of
short sentences the majority of which are exclamatory,
imperative and interrogative. Many author’s remarks reveal the
character’s traits – good or evil. The interior monologue renders
the thoughts and feeling of the character. A lot of lexical and
stylistic devices were used in this text. The author managed to
depict all his characters with genuine skills. Koppel, doctor
Caswell, Swain and Ellsworth were described not direct but
through their behavior, speech and dialogues.
The first character who was introduced to the reader was the
male nurse Koppel. The author describes the lady as anxious and
uneasy. The author described how hard it was. He used gradation
to reveal the male nurse’s despair (He won’t take his pineapple
juice. He doesn’t want me to read to him. He hates the radio. He
doesn’t like anything!). Koppel couldn’t do a thing with the old
man.
Doctor Caswell was introduced to the reader as calm and gentle.
He is a professional and thinks a lot about his patients (He had
done some constructive thinking since his last visit. Making
proposition to the old man he took his stethoscope ready in case
the abruptness of the suggestion proved too much for the
patient’s heart. In spite of rude and vigorous Ellsworth’s answers
like Rot and Bosh Caswell managed to persuade him to take up
art with his professional calm). He understood Ellsworth was no
ordinary case. Further unintentionally the old man’s diagnosis
was described. The author used zeugma for the irony (All his
purchases of recent years had to be liquidated at a great sacrifice
both to his health and his pocketbook).
Frank Swain was introduced to the reader as 18 years old and a
promising student. He has some simile with the doctor. Swain was
also patient. The author used such simile (there was a drawing on
the table which had a slight resemblance to the vase) to underline
the Swain’s reaction (Not bad, sir. It’s a bit lopsided). Swain is
professional too. As his visits grew more frequent he brought a
box of water-colors and some tubes of oils. He was no indifferent
to the Ellsworth and worried about the picture Trees Dressed in
White. He was forced to sneak into the Gallery and see the
picture his own eyes.
Ellsworth behaved like a child. The author used many slang words
(rot, bosh, by gum, poppycock) to display that the old man’s
attitude to the Koppel, Swain and Doctor, to emphasizes.
I think that the author`s attitude to the main characters is rather
ironic, but objective.

You might also like