Scribd Logo
Hochladen

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Discuss The Importance of Archaeological Sources in Reconstructing The History of Ancient India.

    Uploaded by

    Abhinandan Sarkar
    1K views2 pages
    Archaeological sources are extremely important for reconstructing the history of ancient India. They help substantiate and provide context to literary sources by reflecting what people were actually doing. Archaeological evidence includes artifacts, ecofacts, and sites that provide information about past human activities and organization. Additional insights come from techniques like dating methods, archaeogenetics, and analyses of remains. Inscriptions and coins are also important archaeological sources, as they provide dateable political, administrative, religious, and economic information to supplement historical understanding. However, archaeology only provides a selective view, so written evidence is also needed to fully understand archaeological discoveries and past societies.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Archaeological Sources

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Archaeological sources are extremely important for reconstructing the history of ancient India. They help substantiate and provide context to literary sources by reflecting what people were actually doing. Archaeological evidence includes artifacts, ecofacts, and sites that provide information about past human activities and organization. Additional insights come from techniques like dating methods, archaeogenetics, and analyses of remains. Inscriptions and coins are also important archaeological sources, as they provide dateable political, administrative, religious, and economic information to supplement historical understanding. However, archaeology only provides a selective view, so written evidence is also needed to fully understand archaeological discoveries and past societies.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    1K views2 pages

    Discuss The Importance of Archaeological Sources in Reconstructing The History of Ancient India.

    Uploaded by

    Abhinandan Sarkar
    Archaeological sources are extremely important for reconstructing the history of ancient India. They help substantiate and provide context to literary sources by reflecting what people were actually doing. Archaeological evidence includes artifacts, ecofacts, and sites that provide information about past human activities and organization. Additional insights come from techniques like dating methods, archaeogenetics, and analyses of remains. Inscriptions and coins are also important archaeological sources, as they provide dateable political, administrative, religious, and economic information to supplement historical understanding. However, archaeology only provides a selective view, so written evidence is also needed to fully understand archaeological discoveries and past societies.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    Discuss the importance of archaeological sources in reconstructing the history

    of ancient India. [10]


    Answer- The human history from its beginnings to the present, particularly, of the preliterate past
    owes its reconstruction to its material evidences. Substituting and substantiating literary sources,
    archaeological records help us develop a balanced understanding of the past.
    Colin Renfrew and Paul Bahn argues that archaeology is the ‘past tense of cultural anthropology’.
    Clive Gamble asserts that archaeology is the study of the past through material remains. Archaeology is
    concerned with the full range of past human experience – how people organized themselves into social
    groups and exploited their surroundings; what they ate, made, and believed; how they communicated and
    why their societies changed.
    An archaeological culture includes the study of ‘artefacts’ i.e. objects used, modified or made by
    people such as stone tools, pottery, etc. and non-artifactual organic and environmental remains known as
    ‘ecofacts’. Similar artefacts comprise an ‘industry’; all industries found at a site form its assemblage and
    similar assemblages comprise a culture. These remains are found together on ‘sites’, which are grouped
    together into ‘regions’. To reconstruct past human activities on a site, it is important to understand the
    ‘context’ of the find. A find’s context consists of its immediate ‘matrix’ (material surrounding it),
    ‘provenience’ (position within the matrix) and its ‘association’ with other finds. Artefacts are studied
    through their ‘attributes’.
    Traditionally, archaeological excavations are conducted to acquire data. However, the dominant
    role of excavation in archaeology has faded away and non-invasive surveys are conducted using remote-
    sensing devices like magnetometer, radar etc.
    Dating methods are based directly or indirectly on the principle of radioactive decay. They
    include Carbon-14, thermoluminescence, potassium-argon, electron spin resonance, uranium series, and
    fission-track dating.
    Archaeology within a state of flux has developed specialisms and sub-disciplines. Marine
    archaeology explores and analyses remains from the sea particularly shipwrecks. Archaeometry uses
    scientific techniques to analyze archaeological materials. Palaeontology i.e. the study of the remains of
    dead organisms help us understand hominid evolution. Faunal and Trace-element analysis tell us about
    the animals hunted and domesticated. Paleo-pathology studies the diseases suffered by early historic
    people. Cognitive archaeology deals with ways of thinking, beliefs and religion. Ethno-archaeology
    studies human behaviour and practices, filling gaps in history by reflecting women’s role in past societies.
    Archaeogenetics, the study of the human past using the techniques of molecular genetics, is a rapidly
    expanding field.
    Dilip K. Chakrabarti argues that in India, archaeology developed as an adjunct of ancient historical
    studies with the bureaucratic machinery of the Archaeological Survey of India. It lacks the scientific
    temper of the processual school and the rational subjectivity of the post-processual school.
    Inscriptions and coins come under the general umbrella of archaeological sources. An inscription is any
    writing that is engraved on something—stone, wood, metal, ivory plaques, bronze statues, bricks, clay,
    shells, pottery, etc. Epigraphy includes deciphering the text of inscriptions and analysing the information
    they contain. Inscriptions can also be classified based on content and purpose into donative, dedicative,
    and commemorative inscriptions. The Lumbini pillar inscription of Ashoka is a royal commemorative
    inscription, recording a specific event—the visit of the king to the Buddha’s birth-place. Among donative
    inscriptions, royal land grants record grants made by kings to Brahmanas and religious establishments.
    Royal inscriptions include prashastis (panegyric) devoted to eulogizing the kings. The Hathigumpha
    inscription of Kharavela is an example. Unlike literary sources, inscriptions reflect what people were
    actually doing. It reconstructs political structures and administrative and revenue systems. Inscriptions
    provide dateable information on the history of religious sects, institutions, and practices. Richard
    Solomon cautions historians that these sources lack objectivity and precision and needs critical judgement
    in evaluation. Inscriptions must be studied within its structures of power, authority, and social status.
    Numismatics studies coins and their historical context. In India advent of coinage coincided with the
    barter system. As important royal message-bearing media, coins form a vital source of political history.
    The area of circulation of dynastic issues is used to estimate the frontiers of empires. Coins reflect the
    political history of India between c. 200 BCE and 300 CE. Coins offer information on the Parthians,
    Shakas, Kshatrapas, Kushanas, and Satavahanas. Sometimes, coins provide biographical details. Coins
    have helped prove that a Gupta king named Ramagupta ruled between Samudragupta and Chandragupta
    II. The depiction of deities on coins provides information about the personal religious preferences of
    kings, royal religious policy, and the history of religious cults. For instance, representation of Balarama
    and Krishna in Agathocles’ coins.
    Archaeological evidences are not sacrosanct. As Ebenhard Sauer argues, archaeology gives us a
    selective insight to human past. The limits become obvious if we try to investigate social structures,
    individual biographies or the spiritual culture. We need written evidence to understand archaeological
    discoveries, and archaeological discoveries to understand the literary sources.

    You might also like