Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Rhey S.

Veloria

III BSE – ENGLISH

Marxist Literary Critique: The Necklace

Marxism is a major element in the novel, which is illustrated by the fact that Mathilde belongs to the
Politariet class in her society. This indicates that she will attempt to fit in or join the upper social classes.
In order to attend the ball, Mathilde is motivated by this feeling to borrow the necklace and purchase a
new fancy attire. But it creates a conflict in the narrative because she thought she couldn’t attend the
ball in her everyday, casual attire. She had the impression that she needed to belong to the upper strata
of society. She is only made aware of her status when she loses the necklace.

Additionally, there is a theme of class differences in The Necklace because Mathilde is conscious that
she is from a lower class. When she lost the necklace, she understood she would have to work hard to
save money to pay Madame Forestier back for the lost necklace. For ten years, until she runs into
Madame Foretier again to pay back the jewelry, she even downsized to a smaller home and her life
became more difficult. Because the necklace belongs to Madame Forestier, a member of the
Bourgeoisie, a higher class of person, she assumed it would be quite expensive.

In conclusion, The Necklace depicts the reality of the Politariet and Bourgeoisie classes of humanity.
Mathilde, a member of the Politariet class, has a difficult life compared to Madame Forestier, a member
of the Bourgeoisie, a high class society. Even if Mathilde wouldn’t lose the necklace, if she purchases a
false necklace due to her status, everything will remain the same for her. She lacks the resources to live
a life befitting someone of a higher social class. She must therefore be honest with Madame Mathilde if
she wants the situation to be fixed.

You might also like