Professional Documents
Culture Documents
His 418 Sinenkosi
His 418 Sinenkosi
FACULTY OF HUMANITIES
DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY
Before 1884, German interest in this area was limited. The idea of conquest came from an
individual known as Carl Peters. He was a German explorer, ruler, politician and he was known
to be the founder of the German colony of East Africa. This essay intends to critically examine
It is imperative to note that Peters was one of the leading lights in the Society for German
called Carl Peters who in 1884 established the Society for German Colonization.1 This was an
independent body created after the German government failure to acquire colonies. In as much as
it was seen as propagandist, it served a huge role of reporting the colonial life and the colonial
agenda to residents of Germany. This society was credited for the popularization of colonialism
in German. Moreover, its goal was also to accumulate capital for the acquisition of German
colonial territories in the overseas countries 2. With inadequate private funding the society
Carl Peters visited East Africa late in 1884 and obtained ‘treaties’ over land on which Germans
could settle.3 He and his companions arrived in Zanzibar in November 1884 disguised as
mechanics and they crossed to the mainland, obtained treaties with “chiefs” in the interior before
returning to Berlin in February 1885.4 He travelled and persuaded both the Arabs and African
chiefs to sign away exclusive rights to land and trade route. These treaties were of great
significance in Peters colonial expedition because they offered the Africans “territory with all its
1 L.H. Gann, The rulers of German Africa, 1884-1914 (Stanford: Stanford university press, 1977), p. 11.
2 Ibid. p12.
3 John Ilife, Tanganyika under German rule 1905-1912 (New York: Cambridge University press, 1969), p 11.
4 Robert Maxon, East Africa, an introductory history (West Virginia: West Virginia press, 2009), p 133.
civil and public privileges to Peters Carl”5. This basically meant that they were giving away their
An example of one treaty signed by Africans was one known as the “ treaty of eternal
friendship” of 29 November 1884 signed between Germany and Sultan Mangungu 6. Worth
noting is that these treaties were attained through trickery in the sense that most historians agree
that Mangungu had no idea that through signing such treaty, Peter would turn the territory into
part of Germany7. Moreover, this was also the case with Khalifa who was not fully aware of that
the treaty he had signed with Peters had granted the company virtually all administrative powers
on the coast. It is estimated that Within a period of three weeks, Carl Peters and his companions
had managed to collect twelve "treaties" covering 140,000 kilometers of African territory 8.
Within a month, Bismarck’s government had made these treaties the basis of a German
protectorate, the administration of which was to be entrusted to Peters’s society. This German
action brought to an end the British policy of dominating East Africa through her influence over
Zanzibar.9
After securing the treaties, Carl Peters left for Germany in 1885, and he was able to convince
Bismarck to recognize the treaties that he had made the rulers to sign. In actual sense, Peters was
able to convince Bismarck and his government to accept the idea of acquiring colonies in East
Africa. What came after that was the granting of a Protectorate over the area inland of Sadani in
5 Chris. McIntyre, Zanzibar: Pemba (Guilford: The globe Pequot Press, 1993).pg22.
6 Woodruff D. Smith, “The Ideology of German Colonialism, 1840-1906” The Journal of Modern History, Vol. 46, No.
4 (Dec., 1974), pp. 641-662.
7 Jonathan. Glassman, Feast and Riot: Revelry, Rebellion, and popular consensus on the Swahilli Coast, 1856-1888
October 1884 and this consecutively led to German acquiring a number of areas as sphere of
influence11. It is because of this then that Peters organized the German East African Company as
At the Conference, which was convened by Bismarck, the African continent was effectively
divided, at least on paper, amongst the various European powers 12. Immediately following the
Conference, Bismarck granted Peters' organization (now the German East African Company, or
DOAG) an imperial protectionary charter. This therefore meant that Germany had now formally
In 1888, he forced the Sultan of Zanzibar to grant him the right to govern the coast. The German
government assisted Peters, but did not want the responsibility itself. However, the government
was compelled to intervene when the coastal people resisted in 1888, in what was called the ‘the
Arab revolt’13, a rebellion of slave traders in a bid to save their economic position in the coast.
This was partly true, but the movement was really a popular resistance by the coastal peoples to
foreign rule, just as they had resisted Portuguese and Arabs before.
The resistance began in Pangani in August 1888 and quickly spread along the whole coast. On 1
January 1891, the German government replaced the Company as ruler of German East Africa.
African resistance forced the German government to replace the Company. It would be wrong to
think that the European occupation of East Africa was easy, that the Europeans had complete
military superiority, or that Africans did show some sort of resistance against foreign rule.
10 P. Freeman-Grenville, The medieval history of the coast of Tanganyika (London, Macmillan, 1962), p. 205.
11 John. Ilife, Tanganyika under German rule 1905-1912 (New York: Cambridge University press, 1969), p 22.
12 Ibid.p22.
13 Ibid. p 23.
Moreover, Peters was able to open up administration stations in East Africa. Such administrative
stations were essential because they later provided a base for German colonial administration.14
These administration stations were found in Ulunguru, Usagara, and Uvinza. Also, Carl ensured
that other rivals were put off such that Germany would have to competition over its colonies 15.
For instance, Peters was able to scare off the Imperial British East African Company
In 1896, Carl Peters was dismissed from the colonial service on accusations of being cruel to
Africans. The German explorer Carl Peters did a number of unpleasant deeds which made him
very infamous among the Africans. He killed Some of the natives and some of their villages
were burned 16. He also launched bloody surprise attack against tribes with whom he’d made a
peace treaty with. Peter’s “discipline” was so brutal that in 1897, after being assigned imperial
commissioner in German East Africa, his own colonial administration brought him to trial and
In conclusion the above essay has critically examined the role of Carl Peters, he was one of the
leading lights in the society for German colonization. He established The Society for German
Colonization. He also visited East Africa late in 1884 and obtained ‘treaties’ over land on which
Germans could settle. After getting the treaties to be signed he left for Germany in 1885 and he
was able to convince Bismarck to recognize the treaties that he had made the rulers to sign.
Moreover, he was able to open up administration stations in East Africa. However, in 1896 Carl
Peters was dismissed from the colonial service on accusations of being cruel to the Africans.
14 Bradley. Narach, German colonialism in a global age (London: Duke university press, 2014), p 97.
15 Ibid.p 19.
16 John Gray and Carl Peters, “Anglo-German Relations in Uganda, 1890-1892”, The Journal of African History1960,
Gann, H. The rulers of German Africa, 1884-1914. Stanford: Stanford university press. 1977.
Glassman, Jonathan. Feast and Riot: Revelry, Rebellion, and popular consensus on the Swahilli
Coast, 1856-1888. Portsmouth: Heinemann. 1995.
Harmon, Daniel. Exploration of Africa: The emerging nations central and East Africa 1880 to
the present Philadelphia: Chelsea house publishers.2002.
Ilife, John. Tanganyika under German rule 1905-1912. New York: Cambridge University press.
1969.
Maxon, Robert. East Africa, an introductory history. West Virginia: West Virginia press.2009.
McIntyre, Chris. Zanzibar: Pemba. Guilford: The globe Pequot Press, 1993.
Narach, Bradley. German colonialism in a global age. London: Duke university press.2014.
Smith, Woodruff. “The Ideology of German Colonialism, 1840-1906” The Journal of Modern
History, Vol. 46, No. 4 (Dec., 1974), pp. 641-662.
Good attempt
7.8/10.0