M5CIA2 Dela Pena BSN1L 1
M5CIA2 Dela Pena BSN1L 1
M5 CIA2
BSN1L
A) What is the alternative hypothesis? Assume there is sufficient basis for a directional hypothesis.
C) Using the Mann-Whitney U Test and a = 0.051 tail, what do you conclude?
Solution:
20 42
21 35
33 30
40 53
24 57
43 26
48 37
31 30
22 51
44 62
30 59
A university counselor believes that hypnosis is more effective than the standard treatment given to
students who have high test anxiety.
• The alternative hypothesis is Ha is more effective than the standard treatment in reducing test anxiety.
• The null hypothesis is Ho is not more effective than the standard treatment in reducing test anxiety.
For computing, I used the Mann-Whitney U Test. The scores are grouped together and ranked. These
procedures have been carried out for the data and are entered in the table below:
Dela Pena, Richie Haze C.
M5 CIA2
BSN1L
20 1 42 14
21 2 35 11
33 10 30 7
40 13 53 19
24 4 57 20
43 15 26 5
48 17 37 12
31 9 30 7
22 3 51 18
44 16 62 22
30 7 59 21
n1 = 11 R1 = 97 n2 = 11 R2 = 157
Equation:
n1 (n1+1)
Uobt = 11 n1 n2 + – R1
2
n2 (n2+1)
Uobt = 11 n1 n2 + – R1
2
11 (11+1)
a = 11 x 11 + – 97 = 90
2
11 (11+1)
b = 11 x 11 + – 156 = 31
2
• Evaluating Uobt (31) < Ucrit (34) and Uobt (90) > U crit (87). Reject Ho and accept H1.
• I conclude that the hypnosis is more effective than the standard treatment in reducing test anxiety.