Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Dela Pena, Richie Haze C.

M5 CIA2
BSN1L

A) What is the alternative hypothesis? Assume there is sufficient basis for a directional hypothesis.

B) What is the null hypothesis?

C) Using the Mann-Whitney U Test and a = 0.051 tail, what do you conclude?

Solution:

Hypnosis Treatment Standard Treatment

20 42

21 35

33 30

40 53

24 57

43 26

48 37

31 30

22 51

44 62

30 59

A university counselor believes that hypnosis is more effective than the standard treatment given to
students who have high test anxiety.

• The alternative hypothesis is Ha is more effective than the standard treatment in reducing test anxiety.

• The null hypothesis is Ho is not more effective than the standard treatment in reducing test anxiety.
For computing, I used the Mann-Whitney U Test. The scores are grouped together and ranked. These
procedures have been carried out for the data and are entered in the table below:
Dela Pena, Richie Haze C.
M5 CIA2
BSN1L

Hypnosis Rank Standard Rank


Treatment Treatment

20 1 42 14

21 2 35 11

33 10 30 7

40 13 53 19

24 4 57 20

43 15 26 5

48 17 37 12

31 9 30 7

22 3 51 18

44 16 62 22

30 7 59 21

n1 = 11 R1 = 97 n2 = 11 R2 = 157

Equation:
n1 (n1+1)
Uobt = 11 n1 n2 + – R1
2

n2 (n2+1)
Uobt = 11 n1 n2 + – R1
2

11 (11+1)
a = 11 x 11 + – 97 = 90
2

11 (11+1)
b = 11 x 11 + – 156 = 31
2

• Uobt = min (90,30) =31 and Uobt max (90,30) =90.

• Evaluating Uobt (31) < Ucrit (34) and Uobt (90) > U crit (87). Reject Ho and accept H1.

• I conclude that the hypnosis is more effective than the standard treatment in reducing test anxiety.

You might also like