Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sonnet 29 Analysis
Sonnet 29 Analysis
Sonnet 29" is a poem written by the English poet and playwright William Shakespeare. It
was most likely written in the 1590s, though it was not published until 1609. Like many of
Shakespeare's sonnets, "Sonnet 29" is a love poem. It is also traditionally believed to
have been written for a young man. Unlike some of Shakespeare's other love poems,
however, which are concerned with physical beauty and erotic desire, "Sonnet 29" is
about the power of love to positively affect one's mindset, as the poem argues that love
offers compensation for the injuries and setbacks one endures in life.
"Sonnet 29" is, in part, a poem about isolation, envy, and despair. In the first
eight lines, the speaker lists a series of anxieties and injuries, comparing himself
negatively to more prosperous, successful, and beautiful people. The speaker
thus suggests that his sense of self-worth depends on others: his social status
and his emotional life are inextricably braided together, a combination the poem
argues breeds only further isolation and discontent.
The poem begins with the speaker listing a series of misfortunes he has suffered.
He describes himself as “disgrace[d]” and an “outcast,” and implies that he is
hopeless, untalented, and ugly; that he lacks political influence; and that he no
longer takes pleasure in the things he once enjoyed. It might seem, then, that the
poem is responding to some catastrophe—say, a bankruptcy or a death in the
family. But the speaker opens the poem with the word “when,” a conditional
structure that frames the rest of the list of misfortunes the speaker supplies. He is
not responding to a specific event but, instead, reflecting on something that
happens to him often. This suggests that he often suffers from despair and
anxiety; he often feels like an outcast and a hack.
Importantly, each of his complaints places the speaker in relation to other people.
He compares his own beauty, wealth, and status to those around him—noting his
“disgrace” in “men’s eyes,” wishing he were “featured [attractive] like him,” and
envious of “this man’s art and that man’s scope.” The speaker clearly measures
his own self-worth in relation to others. Given that he is so frequently
despondent, the poem thus implicitly suggests that comparison is an unwise
endeavor that results primarily in self-pity.
This self-pity, in turn, only serves to further separate the speaker from the rest of
society; indeed, he bemoans how he “all alone” cries about his “outcast state”
and resents those “with friends possessed.” Perhaps this is understandable; it’s
difficult to deeply bond with people when relationships are plagued by envy and
resentment. He also describes his relationship with other people in competitive
terms: he does not want to share or collaborate with others, but instead wants to
have more power, money, and influence than them.
The first eight lines of the poem thus pose an implicit question as to whether
there are values that do not rely on hierarchy and competition to validate and
assign worth. Regardless of the answer, it’s clear that defining oneself solely in
relation to others does little to boost contentedness, confidence, or camaraderie.
"Sonnet 29" is not just a poem about disappointment and despair: it’s a poem
about the way that love comforts, soothes, and repairs the many injuries that one
endures in life. After the poem’s bitter opening eight lines, the speaker reflects on
the love he shares with his beloved (traditionally believed to be a young man).
That love, he argues, offers compensation for all his insults, slights, and
misfortunes. In this way, the poem contrasts love with wealth and status. Love
stands outside those pursuits, and, with its intense pleasures and rewards, offers
an alternate path to happiness.
When the speaker experiences the despair and self-doubt he describes in the
poem’s first eight lines, he thinks about the man he loves and his mood
transforms. Thinking about the young man, he experiences something close to
ecstasy: he compares his mood to an exalted, almost religious music that breaks
free of the “sullen earth” and rises to heaven itself. The speaker’s love for the
young man radically improves his mood and his self-esteem. Love, here, not only
improves the speaker’s general well-being, but also offers a kind of
compensation for the misfortunes he has suffered. He may not have the wealth
or political standing he covets, but his love offers him a different form of riches.
The speaker’s frequent use of economic and political terms reinforces the idea of
love itself as a form of wealth. He notably describes himself as “in disgrace with
fortune,” envies those “rich in hope,” and desires “that man’s scope” (that is, his
power, influence, or skill). Though not directly describing money in these
instances, this use of language nonetheless suggests that an economic and
political preoccupation that runs throughout the poem.
One might interpret this in several ways. On the one hand, the poem could be
presenting love as something apolitical, divorced from the consequential
decisions that shape the life of a state or a community. On the other, the poem
might suggest that love stands as an alternative to the values that motivate
people in politics and business (i.e., desire for money and power). Perhaps that
alternative serves to critique the limitations of those values, suggesting another
system of values altogether—which does not breed despair and anxiety.
The poem opens with the word "When," and a quick survey of the poem reveals
that sentence doesn't end for a long time—indeed, the only period in the poem
comes at the end of line 14. The poem is an extended, single sentence, which
can be divided in two: a conditional clause and a main clause. The conditional
clause lists a series of circumstances and the main clause then explains what
happens in those circumstances. The word "When" in the first line of the poem
introduces the conditional clause, and the next four lines reveal what that "when"
consists of. In other words, these four lines describe a situation: a situation of
considerable despair and despondency for the speaker of the poem.
The next 3 lines of the poem register these effects on the speaker's life: he is
"alone" and he is an "outcast." He weeps over his condition, and he prays to
heaven for relief. But his prayers are "bootless"—that is, useless. They fail to
improve his lot, and so he looks at himself and curses the circumstances that
brought him to this point.
The lines are highly charged with emotion—when this speaker is not weeping, he
is crying out to heaven or cursing his fate. Indeed, they may even be
melodramatic. Immediately, then, the reader faces a major interpretative issue:
whether to take the speaker seriously. If the reader does, the eventual resolution
of the poem is a powerful testament to love's capacity to assuage the wounds of
the world. If the reader doesn't, however, the poem becomes melodramatic and
unconvincing.
The word "Yet" in line 9 signals that shift in mood from feelings of isolation
and despair to a sense of hope. The visual image of the lark, a wild bird,
symbolizes the poetic voice's improved disposition. As the bird rises freely
into the morning sky, there is a renewed promise that life can be, and will be,
better. Supported by ideas of "sweet love" that enhances life and "wealth" in
line 13, the shift in mood shows the speaker has found a source of happiness
in his beloved and is ready to move away from despair and self-pity.
The final couplet gives the reader a new perspective of the poetic voice, just
as he gains a new perspective on life. He is now a renewed being who is
grateful for his state in life because of his beloved and the love they share.
The speaker acknowledges that he is so happy with his place in life, and that
he "scorns to change his state with kings" (line 14) because he has thoughts
of his beloved. The speaker has moved from a state of internal loathing to a
state of awareness that some things are more important than wealth and
status. Through the unified structure and end rhyme in the heroic couplet,
this ending serves to further unify his feelings of hope and gratitude, as well
as emphasize the speaker's awareness that his "wealth" (line 13) is more
bountiful than that of royalty.
A heroic couplet is a pair of two lines of poetry that end with rhyming words
or contain end rhyme. The lines in a heroic couplet also share a similar meter
—in this case, pentameter. Heroic couplets function as strong conclusions to
grab the reader's attention. They emphasize the importance of the idea
through their use of end rhyme.
The speaker compares his state to a lark, which is a symbol of hope. Pexels
An enjambment is a thought in verse that doesn't end at the end of a line, but
it continues onto the next line without the use of punctuation.
"(Like to the lark at break of day arising
From sullen earth) sings hymns at heaven's gate," (11-12)
Enjambment leaves the reader engaged in the ideas and in search of a
complete thought. In lines 11-12 of the poem, line 11 ends with the word
"arising" and continues on to the next line without punctuation. This thought
connects the first line with a feeling of uprising and moves to the next line,
propelling the verse forward. The incomplete sensation at the end of line 11
retains the readers' attention, much like a cliff-hanger at the end of a movie—
it leaves the audience wanting more. The quatrain itself ends with an
incomplete idea, and this drives the reader to the final couplet.
"Sonnet 29" - Key takeaways
The themes of "Sonnet 29" deals with isolation, despair, and love.
Some of life's greatest joys should be appreciated, even if you are
unhappy with certain aspects of life.
The mood of "Sonnet 29" shifts from feelings of despair and isolation
to feeling grateful.