Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Summary 20 of 20 Election 20 Fraud 20 in 20 The 20 Swing 20 States
Summary 20 of 20 Election 20 Fraud 20 in 20 The 20 Swing 20 States
Swing States
Page 1 of 32
Introduction 3
Georgia 5
Wisconsin 12
Pennsylvania 18
Arizona 22
Michigan 27
Page 2 of 32
Introduction
It has often been repeated there is “no evidence” of fraud in the 2020 Election. In
actuality, there is no evidence Joe Biden won.
President Trump was right to voice his objections to what had unfolded before the
country’s eyes. Republican poll watchers were denied access to the counting in
multiple jurisdictions and ballots were counted in secret in the middle of the night
Page 3 of 32
fi
without media or observers present. Countless irregularities emerged, including
reports of ineligible voters, voting machine anomalies, “water main breaks,”
improbable percentages of ballots for Biden, and more.
Page 4 of 32
Georgia
• Fulton County, Georgia, the most populous county in the state, has no digital
record of all in person votes cast in its original results.
• Not a single ballot purportedly cast during early in-person voting was witnessed
to and signed off by poll managers, as required by Georgia election rules. Seals
were broken and memory cards removed from tabulators for the results of these
315,000 votes, which were printed out on different machines than the ones that
tabulated them.3 This prevented the reconciliation of how many votes were cast
on each machine.
• The ballot images of these votes, along with the rest of in-person ballots cast on
Election Day, were destroyed.
• The vote in Georgia was counted three times: the original machine count, a
statewide hand recount, and a second machine count. Each time the state, and
Fulton County, reported three different results.
• Fulton County did not count the same ballots during the original count and the
machine recount. There are 19,541 distinct ballots that appear in one machine
count but not the other.4
• Thousands of fraudulent “presidential only” ballots were injected into the second
machine count, with huge margins favoring Joe Biden.5 Ballots that are blank
except for the presidential contest were counted in batches together, with the
pattern appearing in at least eight counties, including Fulton. This means Georgia
did not have the votes to justify its original Election “results.”
3Kevin Moncla and David Cross, O cial Complaint, March 28, 2022, https://www.scribd.com/
document/657652472/Fulton-County-Early-Voting-Complaint
4Election Oversight Group, LLC, ‘Investigation of the Fulton County 2020 General Election Irregularities
and Failures of Three Counts’, 2023
5 See Chapter 1, ‘Report on Widespread Fraud in the Georgia 2020 Presidential Election’
Page 5 of 32
ffi
• The second machine count was over 17,000 votes “short.” Fulton County was
instructed to “reconcile” the results by the Secretary of State, and recertified its
results without divulging the extent of the vote deficiency to members of the
Fulton County Board of Registrations and Elections.6
• “Thousands of bogus votes” were ultimately added into the Election results via
the second machine count.7 This includes 20,977 unsubstantiated votes of
unknown origin. The results were missing 17,852 ballot images,8 and included
3,125 duplicate ballot images that were counted twice.
• At least 2,871 ballots were counted two or three times in the second machine
count, totaling 6,118 questionable votes.9
• The only electronic votes that survived from the first count were the mail-in
ballots, since they were tabulated on the high speed scanner their ballot images
were automatically uploaded to the election server.
• 104,994 ballot image files of these mail-in ballots from the original count
contained identical modified time stamps, suggesting electronic manipulation.12
6Kevin Moncla, Joseph Rossi, O cial Complaint to the State Election Board, July 8, 2022, https://
www.georgiarecord.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/complaint.pdf
7 Declaration of Philip Stark, 2021, Curling v. Ra ensperger, CIVIL ACTION FILE NO.: 1:17-cv-2989-AT
8 Spreadsheet, ‘Fulton County Missing Ballot Images Recount’
9 Ibid.
10 Ibid., Elections Oversight Group, 4
11‘VoterGA Press Conference March 7th’, Rumble, 2022, https://rumble.com/vwmwup-voterga-press-
conference-march-7th.html (30:38)
12 Ibid.
Page 6 of 32
ffi
ff
• Fulton County does not know “how many voters cast votes” and its “lack of
basic accounting controls make it impossible to determine who really won” in
2020, according to Philip Stark, a University of California, Berkeley professor
who invented risk-limiting audits. Stark noted, “The electronic records of the
election are not intact.”13
• 376,863 ballot images are missing from the first machine count, which includes
all in-person votes in Fulton County.14
• None of the 315,000 votes cast during early voting in Fulton County were
witnessed to and signed by the poll manager and two poll workers, as required by
state election rules.15 The closing tapes for these votes are all unsigned, showed
more tabulated votes than the tabulators had recorded as scanning in their
protective counters, and recorded improbably low percentages for President
Trump. For example, President Trump received only 0.9 percent, 2.4 percent, 3.7
percent from some of the tabulators, as if he was a third party candidate, or in a
third world country. The anomalies indicate ballots were not scanned on the
tabulators that printed the closing tapes, making the closing tapes fraudulent.
• Tabulators used in Fulton County during early voting had their seals broken, and
memory cards were reprogrammed and inserted into different scanners to count
absentee ballots, in violation of election rules. This made it impossible to
reconcile the true number of votes tabulated on the machines from the start of the
Election to the end of counting.16
• 235,000 absentee ballots were requested and accepted too early, prior to the
lawful date 180 days before the 2020 Election, which was May 6, 2020. These
votes should have never been counted in the 2020 Election.17
Page 7 of 32
ffi
• 4,081 false votes for Joe Biden were included in the hand count audit results for
Fulton County.18 The false votes were the result of 36 accounting errors, which
were confirmed by Governor Brian Kemp’s office and investigators working for
Secretary Brad Raffensperger, yet they have never been removed from the
official hand count results. These errors alone would reduce the margin to 7,698
votes.19
• The hand count audit included 3,935 unaccounted for votes due to 11 missing
batch sheets in Fulton County.20 Differences from the original count to the hand
audit total at least 15,690 votes, which is more than the entire election margin
alone. This includes the 4,081 false Biden votes, plus “missing” votes discovered
in Gwinett (1,642), Fayette (2,755), Floyd (2,700), Douglas (293), and Walton
(284) counties that were likely due to machine counting errors.21
• Thousands of “pristine,” unfolded absentee ballots were counted during the hand
count audit in Fulton County, according to at least six witnesses, which is the
subject of ongoing litigation. These absentee ballots had no folds, and went 98
percent to Joe Biden, had “been added in a fraudulent manner,” witnesses said.22
• Fulton County certified 59,143 in-person votes on Election Day, despite the fact
that only 14,152 people had voted as of 5 p.m. on Nov. 3, 2020. Evidence
suggests the in-person vote total on Election Day was inflated by approximately
37,000 votes, as records show no rush to the polls during the final two hours of
voting, and a screenshot of the in-person Election Day results shared by a
government contractor showed only 21,843 people voted at the polls in Fulton
County on Nov. 3.23
• Fulton County ordered over 1 million absentee ballots days before the 2020
Election, without any envelopes and the time necessary to mail. There were only
808,680 active voters in Fulton County as of Nov. 1, 2020, meaning the county
Page 8 of 32
fi
had more blank mail-in ballots than the number of registered voters, and ordered
them after the vast majority of mail-in ballot requests had already been sent to
voters by Runbeck Election Services.24
• There were over 364,000 ineligible voter registrations on the rolls during the
2020 Election and likely 67,284 votes were cast from voters with invalid
residency.26
• Massive manipulation of the Georgia voter rolls surrounding the 2020 Election
has been uncovered. This includes 1,500 Voter IDs that received credit for voting
in 2020, but were not on any voter rolls from 2020, some appearing for the first
time on the voter rolls on Nov. 4, 2021, a year after the Election.27 Other findings
include manipulation of inactive voters to cast ballots, “gifting” Nov. 3 votes up
to 2 years after the Election, and casting votes on ballots previously rejected,
cancelled, or not even turned in.
24 Kevin Moncla, ‘Fulton County: Massive Last-Minute Order of Over 1M Ballots Discovered’,
UnCoverDC, 2021, https://www.uncoverdc.com/2021/10/25/fulton-county-massive-last-minute-order-
of-over-1m-ballots-discovered/
25 See Chapter 16, ‘Report on Widespread Fraud in the Georgia 2020 Presidential Election’
26 A davit of Catherine Engelbrecht, Sept. 27, 2023
27 Ibid. Kim P. Brooks, 6
28 Kim P. Brooks, ‘Ballots with Purposeful Bad Addresses Accepted’, 2023
Page 9 of 32
ffi
• 43,907 drop box ballots violated chain of custody requirements in DeKalb
County.29
• 59,000 of the 79,460 drop box ballots in Fulton County were not immediately
transported to the election registrar, in violation of State Election Board rules.30
• An estimated 355,000 ballot transfer forms for drop box ballots are missing
statewide.31
• Over 100,000 tally sheets for Fulton County were missing from the hand count
audit, and remained missing for months after the Election.32
• In early January 2021, Ruby Freeman asked for an attorney because she wanted
to “go live on every platform” to divulge information about how “the USB ports”
were used in the 2020 Election.33 The expert cyber report by Professor J. Alex
Halderman explained how external USB ports with election-changing malware
can be inserted into Dominion machines by anyone with access, including
election workers.34
• The presence of a “QR code mismatch” error within the Dominion tabulators that
systematically undercounts votes was found in 65 out of 67 Georgia counties
where records were available. The error was present in system log files for
29 Laura Baigart, ‘43,000 Absentee Ballot Votes Counted in DeKalb County, Georgia 2020 Election
Violated Chain of Custody Rule’, Georgia Star News, 2021, https://georgiastarnews.com/4300-absentee-
ballot-votes-counted-in-dekalb-county-2020-election-violated-chain-of-custody-rule.html
30 Laura Baigart, ‘85 Percent of 59,000 Absentee Ballots Placed in Fulton County Drop Boxes in 2020
Election Were Not Transported to Registrar ‘Immediately’ As Georgia State Rule Requires; 5 Percent
Were Delivered BEFORE They Were Picked Up’, Georgia Star News, 2021, https://georgiastarnews.com/
news/85-percent-of-59000-absentee-ballots-placed-in-fulton-county-drop-boxes-in-2020-election-
were-not-transported-to-registrar-immediately-as-georgia-state-rule-requires-5-percent-were-delivered-
before-th/klbaigert/2021/05/19/
31VoterGA, ‘Custody Chain Analysis Finds 106,000+ Suspect Ballots, Uselessness of Drop Box Videos’,
2022, https://voterga.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Press-Release-VoterGA-Drop-Box-Custody-
Chain-Analysis.pdf
32VoterGA, ‘New Evidence Reveals GA Audit Fraud and Massive Errors’, 2021, https://voterga.org/wp-
content/uploads/2021/11/Press-Release-Georgia-Audit-Riddled-by-Massive-Errors-Fraud.pdf
33‘Ruby Freeman Body Cam Admissions Revealed In The Georgia Ballot Scanning Scandal’, The
Georgia Record, 2022, https://www.georgiarecord.com/elections/2022/12/25/ruby-freeman-body-cam-
admissions-revealed-in-the-georgia-ballot-scanning-scandal/
34 See Chapters 2, 13, and 14, ‘Report on Widespread Fraud in the Georgia 2020 Presidential Election’
Page 10 of 32
tabulators used in elections in 2020, 2021, and 2022.35
• The election results in Georgia in 2020 are not only unreliable, but were
electronically altered, and are unsupported by the state’s own election records.
The appearance of tens of thousands of unconfirmed ballots in subsequent hand
and machine counts suggest reconciliation happened after the Election, meaning
after it was clear what margins were needed to win.
• Fulton County election officials admitted in early 2021 they do not engage in any
reconciliation until weeks after Election Day.36 This means the number of voters
showing up at the polls during each day of voting is not checked with the number
of ballots tabulated each day, a basic process to ensure the number of ballots and
voters match, and cannot be manipulated later.
• “We can’t start reconciling that until usually a couple days before certification,”
said then-Fulton County Elections Director Richard Barron, during a January
2021 Board meeting. “Because we have to get that report from KnowInk. I think
KnowInk sends those to the state or KnowInk sends those directly to us. But
those aren’t compiled then, on Election night. So we don’t have any way to
balance those then. That’s like the post-election process that we do.”
35 See Chapter 9, ‘Report on Widespread Fraud in the Georgia 2020 Presidential Election’
36 ‘Fulton County Board of Registration & Elections Special Called Meeting’, Fulton Government
Television, YouTube, 2021, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bfz4Rc6R_lQ&t=575s
Page 11 of 32
Wisconsin
“All law has either been derived from the consent of the people, established by
necessity, confirmed by custom, or of Divine Providence.”
• The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled drop boxes are illegal under Wisconsin law,
in a 4-3 decision issued in July 2022.37
• Ahead of the November 2020 Election, Wolfe encouraged clerks to use “creative
solutions” to deploy drop boxes, that she said could be “unstaffed.” There were
528 drop boxes used in the General Election, and a total of 1,969,274 absentee
votes cast, including 1,346,731 votes cast by mail, and 653,236 in-person.39
• “The right to vote presupposes the rule of law governs elections. If elections are
conducted outside of the law, the people have not conferred their consent on the
government. Such elections are unlawful and their results are illegitimate.”
• Justice Bradley concluded “thousands of votes have been cast via this unlawful
method,” using drop boxes, “thereby directly harming the Wisconsin voters.”
Page 12 of 32
• “The illegality of these drop boxes weakens the people’s faith that the election
produced an outcome reflective of their will,” Justice Bradley writes. “The
Wisconsin voters, and all lawful voters, are injured when the institution charged
with administering Wisconsin elections does not follow the law, leaving the
results in question…Electoral outcomes obtained by unlawful procedures corrupt
the institution of voting, degrading the very foundation of free government.
Unlawful votes do not dilute lawful votes so much as they pollute them, which in
turn pollutes the integrity of the results.”
• In the city of Milwaukee, nearly half of all its votes were cast by mail, totaling
217,424 ballots. The city deployed 15 drop boxes, with election officials
claiming the drop boxes would be “under 24-hour surveillance.”40 However,
after the election, not a single municipality in the county produced video
surveillance of drop boxes in response to open records requests. Various
responses included, “No records exist for your request,” “No video from
requested time frame,” “No such records exist,” and “No security camera.”41
• The election integrity group True the Vote identified 107 ballot traffickers in
Milwaukee County between Oct. 20 and Nov. 3, 2020, who each made 20 or
more visits to drop boxes.42 Each trafficker made an average 26 visits, and as
many as 15 in one day, and made multiple visits to non-governmental
organizations.
• The 107 traffickers made a total of 2,824 trips to drop boxes during the 2020
Election, with a majority of visits occurring after 8:00 p.m.
40Alison Dirr, ‘Are drop boxes secure, where are ballots stored and who has access to them? Answers to
your questions about voting in Milwaukee’, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 2020, https://www.jsonline.com/
story/news/politics/elections/2020/10/19/how-milwaukee-ensures-absentee-ballots-voting-machines-
secured/5937160002/
Special Report Delivery of Absentee Ballots by Intermediaries to Milwaukee County Area Drop Boxes
41
Page 13 of 32
fi
• Indefinitely confined voters, who are supposed to be physically unable to go to
the polls due to age, disability, or illness, increased by an astounding 393 percent
in Dane County from 2016 to 2020; 492 percent in Racine County; 281 percent
in Milwaukee County; and 287 percent in the state overall.
• There were just 56,978 indefinitely confined votes in 2016,43 and roughly 70,000
in 2019. In 2020, however, there were 220,404 votes cast using indefinite
confinement status. Over 77 percent of these individuals had never been listed as
indefinitely confined before. The Wisconsin Legislative Audit Bureau identified
48,554 people who voted as indefinitely confined in November 2020 who had
never provided photo identification or did not have photo identifications on file
with clerks, which is more than twice the vote margin of 20,682.
• Scott McDonell, the Democrat clerk of Dane County, which encompasses the
area of Madison, told all residents they could identify themselves as indefinitely
confined because of COVID, specifically citing it as a way to get around the
Voter ID law.
• The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled in December 2020 that the pandemic “did
not render all Wisconsin electors ‘indefinitely confined,’ thereby obviating the
requirement of a valid photo identification to obtain an absentee ballot,” and the
clerks’ “interpretation of Wisconsin election laws was erroneous.”45
Page 14 of 32
• The Wisconsin Election Commission ordered nursing homes to violate the law
by not allowing Special Voting Deputies (SVDs) inside their facilities, which led
to election fraud where incapacitated elderly residents had votes cast in their
name with the assistance of nursing home staff.
• These outdoor events to collect mail-in ballots were the subject of numerous
complaints, and it is “not clear that all of the workers at those events were
properly deputized and trained, swore and filed the mandatory oath of office, or
documents related to absentee ballots were properly handled.”
• The Office of the Special Counsel also claimed evidence of “undue influence by
well-funded private groups, who leveraged large grants to certain Wisconsin
46 Brendan Cullerton, 'Racine sheri says he found proof of felonies by Wisconsin Election Commission
in 2020’, CBS58, 2021, https://www.cbs58.com/news/racine-sheri -says-he-found-proof-of-felonies-by-
wisconsin-election-commission-in-2020
47Sophie Mann, ‘County sheri in Wisconsin reveals evidence of felony election law violations’, Just the
News, 2021, https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/wisconsin-county-sheri -reveals- ndings-
investigation-election-law
48‘The full Racine County Sheri 's press conference on alleged nursing home election fraud’, YouTube,
2021, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLWDupvtrrU&t=1s, 45:44
49O ce of the Special Counsel First Interim Report Delivered to the Wisconsin State Assembly
November 10, 2021, https://fox11digital.com/news/PDFs/Interim%20Report%20FINAL_cwl4_cwl5.pdf
Page 15 of 32
ffi
ff
ff
ff
ff
ff
fi
cities in order to co-opt our election apparatus to their benefit.”
• The report confirms at least 17.5 percent of election clerks “were not properly
trained,” and that “exploitation of elders” occurred in nursing homes.
• In one example, Maryl Barrett, who was 104 years old and did not recognize her
own children, had a ballot cast in her name in the 2020 Presidential Election.50
• The Office of Special Counsel’s second interim report found nursing homes in
Milwaukee, Dane, and Racine counties with 100 percent turnout due to the
Wisconsin Election Commission’s order.51
• The special counsel said it possessed evidence of nursing home facility staff and
directors who “assisted residents in completing ballots; assisted residents in
obtaining absentee ballots; pressured residents to vote; collected completed
ballots from residents; forged signatures of residents; illegally returned residents’
ballots to the municipal clerks by mail, by placing the ballots in drop boxes, and/
or delivering them directly to the clerks; pressured and/or assisted incompetent
persons to complete and cast ballots in the November 2020 election, up to and
including persons who have had their right to vote take away by court order due
to mental incompetence.”
• The second interim report also detailed an $8.8 million “election bribery
scheme” involving Mark Zuckerberg’s Center for Tech and Civic Life and the
cities of Milwaukee, Madison, Racine, Kenosha, and Green Bay. “In the
agreement, the Cities took CTCL’s money to facilitate in-person and absentee
voting within their respective city.”
• The “Wisconsin Safe Voting Plan” developed for CTCL facilitated grants to
major Wisconsin cities to deploy drop boxes for mail-in ballots, including
$50,000 to Green Bay, $40,000 to Kenosha, $50,000 to Madison, $58,500 to
Page 16 of 32
ffi
fi
Milwaukee, and $18,000 to Racine.52
• Whitney May, the director of government services for CTCL, posted numerous
anti-Trump posts on social media, including telling people “don’t vote for
Trump” in 2016.53
• Internal emails from election officials in Green Bay revealed Michael Spitzer-
Rubenstein, a former Democratic Party operative, served as a “de facto elections
administrator and had access to Green Bay’s absentee ballots days before the
election.”54
• The Office of the Special Counsel referenced this case, and has evidence that this
grantee, which was funded by CTCL, was “directly involved in all aspects of
management of election officials, was entrusted with the only sets of physical
keys to the city’s central count location, managed the transportation of ballots,
and instructed the counting of unlawful ballots that had arrived at the central
count location beyond the lawful time window.”
52‘Wisconsin Safe Voting Plan 2020 Submitted to the Center for Tech & Civic Life June 15, 2020’,
https://www.techandciviclife.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Approved-Wisconsin-Safe-Voting-
Plan-2020.pdf
53Michael Gableman, ’Why Many Wisconsin Voters Still Doubt the 2020 Election Results’, March 1,
2022, https://legis.wisconsin.gov/assembly/22/brandtjen/media/xc4o az/gableman-powerpoint.pdf
54M.D. Kittle, ‘SPECIAL INVESTIGATION: INFILTRATING THE ELECTION’, Wisconsin Spotlight, March 9,
2021, https://web.archive.org/web/20210313025127/https://wisconsinspotlight.com/special-
investigation-in ltrating-the-election/
Page 17 of 32
fi
fi
Pennsylvania
• Months after the election, there were 121,240 more votes than voters, according
to the Pennsylvania Department of State. By law, Pennsylvania cannot certify an
election with this type of discrepancy.55
• The SURE system was checked and downloaded weekly with updated voter
histories from the general Election until all the counties uploaded their vote
histories, which was not completed until February 2021. At this time there were
still over 121,000 votes that did not have a corresponding voter in the SURE
system.
• The statement by the Department of State “that the voting would reconcile, once
the counties completed their SURE uploads, was incorrect,” according to Verity
Vote. “When the final county finished uploading their voter histories and closed
55 Verity Vote, ‘Pennsylvania Voter De cit’, Feb. 10, 2021, https://verityvote.us/pennsylvania-voter-de cit/
56‘DOS responds to Republican lawmakers' claim of election numbers discrepancy’, NBC 6 WJAC TV,
Dec. 28, 2020, https://wjactv.com/news/local/pa-republican-lawmakers-analysis- nds-presidential-
election-numbers-dont-add-up
Page 18 of 32
fi
fi
fi
the election in SURE, it was February 1, 2021, which was the same day that
[Secretary of State Kathy] Boockvar announced her resignation. At the time that
Philadelphia closed the election in SURE, the voter histories showed that the
county accepted at least 7,944 ballots that could not be associated with a
registered voter.”
• Pennsylvania credited 71,893 people for voting who returned mail-in ballots
after Election Day, and these individuals were included in the voter history files.
This includes 50,285 received between Nov. 4 and Nov. 6; 11,570 received
between Nov. 7 and Nov. 11; and 10,038 that were received on or after Nov. 12.
Boockvar claimed only 10,000 ballots were received between the close of the
polls on Election Day and Nov. 6.57
• While 71,893 people received credit for voting by mail, these votes purportedly
did not count. Even while including these voters in the total number of who
participated in the Election, Pennsylvania still came up 121,240 voters short.
• According to the Department of State data, there were 7,035,746 ballots cast in
the 2020 Presidential Election, including all write-in votes, over-votes, and
under-votes. “After all counties closed the election in SURE, only 6,914,556
voters were credited with participation in the 2020 General Election. This reveals
a voter deficit of 121,240.”
• U.S. Attorney Bill McSwain was told to stand down and not investigate election
irregularities by Attorney General Bill Barr.59 McSwain said he was instructed to
not discuss the allegations of voter fraud he received, and to pass any “serious”
investigations along to then-State Attorney General Josh Shapiro, a Democrat
57 Zach Montellaro, ‘Pennsylvania’s top election o cer says just 10,000 ballots were received after Nov.
3’, Politico, Nov. 10, 2020, https://www.politico.com/news/2020/11/10/pennsylvanias-top-election-
o cer-says-just-10-000-ballots-were-received-after-nov-3-435972
‘Trump Campaign News Conference on Pennsylvania Vote Count’, C-Span.org, Nov. 5, 2020, https://
58
www.c-span.org/video/?477856-1/trump-campaign-news-conference-pennsylvania-vote-count
59Letter from William M. McSwain, June 9, 2021, https://cdn.donaldjtrump.com/djtweb/general/
Letter_to_President_Trump.pdf
Page 19 of 32
ffi
ffi
who promised days before the election that President Trump “is going to lose.”60
• Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook poured over $25 million into the administration of
the election in Pennsylvania in 2020.61 Over $10 million went to the Democrat-
controlled jurisdiction of Philadelphia, which included $5.5 million on “ballot
processing equipment” and $552,000 for drop boxes.62
• Delaware County received $2.2 million from Zuckerberg’s Center for Tech and
Civic Life (CTCL), which it spent on “recruiting and training a sufficient number
of poll workers; setting up drop box locations for voters to return ballots,” and
other Get Out the Vote efforts.64
• The election integrity group True the Vote said Philadelphia was the worst
offender it witnessed when investigating the widespread ballot trafficking
scheme operating across multiple Swing States in 2020. They identified 1,155
ballot traffickers who each visited at least 10 drop boxes and five non-
60 ‘Pennsylvania's Democratic AG sparks outrage from Trump supporters for saying president may have
already lost the battleground state before the votes have even been counted’, Daily Mail, Nov. 2, 2020,
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8908101/Pennsylvania-Democrat-AG-sparks-outrage-saying-
Trump-lost-win-state-election.html
61Center for Tech and Civic Life's (CTCL) grants to election agencies, 2020, Ballotpedia, https://
ballotpedia.org/Center_for_Tech_and_Civic_Life's_(CTCL)_grants_to_election_agencies,_2020
62John Finnerty, ’GOP lawmakers question private donations to counties ahead of election’, CNHI News,
April 9, 2021, https://www.cnhinews.com/pennsylvania/article_9b907b80-996f-11eb-
ad35-5b6772815c14.html
63Bradley Vasoli, ’It’s a Felony:’ A New Lawsuit, with Video Evidence, Alleges Delaware County,
Pennsylvania Election O cials Destroyed Voting Records’, the Ohio Star, Nov. 18, 2021, https://
theohiostar.com/news/its-a-felony-a-new-lawsuit-with-video-evidence-alleges-delaware-county-
pennsylvania-election-o cials-destroyed-voting-records/bvasoli/2021/11/18/
64‘Delaware County Awarded $2.2 Million Grant for Safe Elections’, Aug. 19, 2020, https://delcopa.gov/
publicrelations/releases/2020/safeelectionsgrant.html
Page 20 of 32
ffi
ffi
governmental organizations.65 Some ballot traffickers made hundreds of trips to
drop boxes.
65'How They Did It — True the Vote's Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips on The Charlie Kirk
Show’, Rumble, 2022, https://rumble.com/v10ajh2-how-the-did-it-true-the-votes-catherine-engelbrecht-
and-gregg-phillips-on-t.html
Page 21 of 32
Arizona
“That which was originally void, does not by lapse of time become valid.”
• Maricopa County accepted 20,500 mail-in ballots after Election Day 2020,
including 18,000 – more than the entire election margin – on Nov. 4 picked up
from the U.S. Postal Service.66 By law, ballots must be received no later than 7
p.m. on Election Day, which was Nov. 3.
• “The 20,000 ballots recorded as incoming from the USPS on and after November
4 were of sufficient quantity to change the result of the 2020 General Election in
Arizona,” according to Verity Vote.
• The initial analysis of 380,976 ballots, using official state records and official
signature verification training techniques, identified 181,378 ballots that should
not have been counted, or nearly half of all reviewed.
66‘Long Withheld Records Reveal More than 20,000 Mail Ballots Received After the Legal Deadline’,
Verity Vote, 2022, https://verityvote.us/long-withheld-records-reveal-more-than-20000-mail-ballots-
received-after-the-legal-deadline/
Arizona House of Representatives Municipal Oversight & Elections, Feb. 1, 2023, https://
67
www.azleg.gov/videoplayer/?eventID=2023021006
Page 22 of 32
• This includes: 1,870 blank envelopes, some of which were approved on Nov. 5
and Nov. 8; 542 with a signature other than the voter; 2,104 scribbles; 128
duplicate voters processed; 48,117 unreasonably different control signatures;
1,875 where the signature did not match until after the election; 36,034 control
signatures that do not match the voter; 4,433 unusable control signatures; 47,366
that failed Secretary of State standards; and 38,909 egregious signature
mismatches, where not one point of a signature matched any on file.
• In the case of the 1,875 votes, the ballot envelopes did not have a signature
match on Election Day, but “matching” signatures were later put on file for the
voter on either Jan. 28, 2021, Feb. 3, 2021, or Feb. 8, 2021. There were 783
signatures digitally inserted on Feb. 3, 2021 alone.
• Since the findings were presented to the Arizona State Legislature, the number of
egregious mismatches found has increased to 76,354,68 over seven times the
election margin. This is an error rate of 9.30 percent of ballot envelopes
reviewed.
• Maricopa County has no documented chain of custody for 740,000 ballots from
the 2020 Election.70
• Out of the 923,000 early vote ballots accepted at vote centers or drop boxes, only
183,406 ballots are accounted for on ballot transport forms. More than 80 percent
of the ballot transport forms have no ballot counts.
• Without proper documentation of how many votes were cast at the time they
were cast, it is impossible to verify the origin and true total of ballots in a given
election. “Without this count, there is no way to determine if the transport staff
retrieved one ballot or one thousand ballots,” according to Verity Vote. “Keeping
Page 23 of 32
a proper chain of custody is more than a best practice - it is essential to
encouraging trust in our democracy,” according to the Election Assistance
Commission.71
• Of the 1,895 early vote ballot transport forms, 48 did not have the required two
witness signatures attesting to the ballot transfer, including some with no witness
signatures at all. “As a result, the public is not assured that both parties witnessed
the transfer of ballots,” as required.
• Millions of files of 2020 General Election data and security logs were deleted
from the Elections Management Server and purged on critical days, including the
day before the Arizona audit of the 2020 Election began on Feb. 2, 2021.72
• The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors admitted they purged the system and
moved election data after they received a subpoena, in testimony before the U.S.
House of Representatives.73
• Two precincts in Pima County had over 100 percent turnout for mail-in ballots,
and 40 precincts had over 97 percent returned.74
• The national mail-in ballot return rate was 71 percent, but in Pima County the
mail-in ballot return rate was 15 percent higher, and 19 percent higher than all
the counties combined in the entire state of Arizona. One precinct with 99.5
percent mail-in turnout had 9,812 ballots counted. Another precinct with 100.6
percent turnout had 2,182 ballots returned, but only 2,170 mail-ins were ever
sent. These two precincts total 11,994 ballots, which alone is more than the
margin needed to alter the outcome of the Presidential Election.
• In all, there were 264,000 votes from precincts in Pima County with over 92
percent turnout for mail-in ballots.75
71 Ibid.
‘LIVE: Presentation of Maricopa County, Arizona, election audit’, YouTube, Sept. 24, 2021, https://
72
www.youtube.com/live/AazyTCJ9wrM?si=T8TZLLD-NmNkAZNq&t=3560, 59:20
73House holds contentious hearing on results of the Arizona election audit, YouTube, Oct. 8, 2021,
https://youtu.be/hO_0fGFQ50I?si=TBp6JqZI4cuavWmS&t=9273, 2:34:33
74‘The Fish Tail in Pima County. Analysis of Mail-In Ballots Pima County, Arizona’, 2021, https://
vashiva.com/the- sh-tail-in-pima-county-analysis-of-mail-in-ballots-pima-county-arizona/
75 Ibid.
Page 24 of 32
fi
• Significant anomalies were discovered for mail-in ballot returns in Pima County.
In precincts with anomalous high turnout of over 92 percent in Pima County,
mail-in ballots started flipping from 6 percent Republican for Biden to 40 percent
of Republicans voting for Biden.76
• The election integrity group True the Vote identified more than 202 ballot
traffickers in Maricopa County who made 4,282 individual drop box visits
during the 2020 General Election.77
• Two individuals were charged and plead guilty for ballot harvesting in Yuma
County, Arizona during the 2020 primary election.78
• Daugherity, who has received over $2.8 million in grant funding and was
previously consulted as a computer expert by the New York Times, Washington
Post, IBM Federal Systems Division, the Texas Department of Agriculture, U.S.
Customs Service, as well as classified work, discovered “significant and
systematic decline in the cumulative ratio as counting progresses,” in the early
mail-in and in-person votes for the Presidential Election results in Maricopa
County and Pima County.
76‘The Real Story - OAN Pima County Audit with Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai’, Rumble, 2021, https://
rumble.com/vo04gk-the-real-story-oan-pima-county-audit-with-dr.-shiva-ayyadurai.html
77 Ibid,, 8.
‘Yuma County Women Sentenced for their Roles in Ballot Harvesting Scheme’, Oct. 14, 2022, https://
78
www.azag.gov/press-release/yuma-county-women-sentenced-their-roles-ballot-harvesting-scheme
79 Declaration of Walter C. Daugherity, June 8, 2022, Case 2:22-cv-00677-JJT Document 38
Page 25 of 32
• For example, the “first block of ballots being 75 [percent] for a candidate, the
next block of ballots being 74 [percent] for a candidate, the next block of ballots
being 73 [percent] for a candidate, and so on, systematically declining all the
way to Election Day.”
• Daugherity’s expert opinion is that the downward sloping line in the sequence
that votes were recorded indicated a strong control. The cumulative ratio of
Biden to Trump votes for all cast vote records before Election Day in recorded
order for Pima County declines from over 300 percent to 157 percent by Election
Day.
Page 26 of 32
Michigan
• A record 5,579,317 votes were cast and certified in Michigan in the 2020
General Election, the highest turnout in 60 years. To date, Michigan has never
shown 5,579,317 voters listed for the 2020 Election in its Qualified Voter File,
the state’s database for all voter registration records.
• As of December 2023, Michigan has 271,566 more votes than the number of
voters listed in its Qualified Voter File for Nov. 3, 2020, more than one and a half
times the Election margin.
• In data obtained from the Secretary of State’s office on nearly a monthly basis
since the Election, the most voters ever recorded in the Qualified Voter File was
5,511,303 voters in April 2021.80 This means Michigan’s own election records
showed 68,014 more votes than voters. However, the number of voters listed in
the Qualified Voter File has been in flux ever since December 2020, and always
short of the voters needed to reconcile the total votes cast. A complete list of
voters from 2020 has never been provided.
• The number of voter IDs listed as voting in 2020 has steadily declined since
February 2022. As of December 2023, there was a total of 5,307,751 voters listed
as voting on Nov. 3, 2020 in the Qualified Voter File. Voter history files continue
to be removed from the record, resulting in 271,566 less vote history records
than necessary to reconcile the results.
• Each month voter histories from the 2020 Election are being manipulated.
Thousands of unique votes are removed from the voter history files, and other
unique votes added. Since December 2020, 270,559 voter histories for 2020 have
been removed, while 103,128 have been added.
• Individual voter histories are constantly changing, including the history of the
state’s Democrat Governor Gretchen Whitmer, whose voting history is missing
80 Tim Vetter, ’Michigan’s Voter Roll History Data Manipulation’, CheckMyVote.org, December 2023
Page 27 of 32
votes throughout 2020.81
• A complete list of voters was requested via a Freedom of Information Act request
in December 2021 and took nine months for the state to fulfill. Two datasets
were provided, and neither matched. The first dataset fell 22,146 voters short,
while the second dataset was 120,883 absentee ballots short.82
81 Ibid.
82 Patrick Colbeck, FOIA Submittal Dec. 16, 2021 and screenshots
83Jordan Boyd, ’Michigan Democrat Doxxes Children Of Wayne County Election O cial’, The Federalist,
Nov. 18, 2020, https://thefederalist.com/2020/11/18/michigan-democrat-doxxes-children-of-wayne-
county-election-o cial/
84‘Chair of Wayne County Board of Canvassers states her case why she didn't certify election’, Fox 2
Detroit, Nov. 20, 2020, https://www.fox2detroit.com/news/chair-of-wayne-county-board-of-canvassers-
states-her-case-why-she-didnt-certify-election
85Matt Finn, Twitter, Nov. 4, 2020, https://twitter.com/MattFinnFNC/status/1324084637010976769?
lang=en
86Tresa Baldas, et al., ’Chaos erupts at TCF Center as Republican vote challengers cry foul in Detroit’,
Detroit Free Press, Nov. 4, 2020, https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/11/04/tcf-
center-challengers-detroit-michigan/6164715002/
Page 28 of 32
ffi
ffi
3:30 a.m. on Election night.87
• Mark Zuckerberg gave Michigan $16.8 million through his nonprofit Center for
Tech and Civic Life.
• Detroit received $7.4 million to “dramatically” expand the vote for Democrats.89
The grants financed drop boxes “to facilitate the return of absentee ballots,” like
the ones that came in the TCF center after midnight.
• The election integrity group True the Vote uncovered the same pattern of
widespread ballot trafficking between NGOs and ballot drop boxes in Michigan.
Numerous instances of ballot stuffing were caught on camera in Detroit,90
including video where a woman can be seen going to a drop box, and abruptly
returning to her car after realizing the stack had no signatures. The woman then
signs the ballots, and deposits the illicit ballots she had just signed into the drop
87 Jim Hoft, Exclusive: The TCF Center Election Fraud – Newly Discovered Video Shows Late Night
Deliveries of Tens of Thousands of Illegal Ballots 8 Hours After Deadline’, The Gateway Pundit, Feb. 5,
2021, https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/02/exclusive-tcf-center-election-fraud-newly-recovered-
video-shows-late-night-deliveries-tens-thousands-illegal-ballots-michigan-arena/
88 ‘Report on the November 2020 Election in Michigan’, Michigan House Oversight Committee, https://
committees.senate.michigan.gov/testimony/2021-2022/
Senate%20Committee%20on%20Oversight%20Report%20on%20the%20November%202020%20Ele
ction%20in%20Michigan,%20adopted.pdf
89Natalia Mittelstadt and John Solomon, ‘Zuckerberg group gave Detroit $7.4 million to 'dramatically'
expand vote in city key to Biden win’, Just the News, April 10, 2021, https://justthenews.com/politics-
policy/elections/zuckerbergs-group-gave-whopping-74-million-detroit-expand-voting-city-key
90 Jim Hoft, ’SHOCKING VIDEO! Via MC4EI and Gateway Pundit — 13 Minutes of Never-Before-Seen
Footage of Ballot Tra cking in Detroit, Michigan – Including Postal Workers!’, The Gateway Pundit, Sept.
6, 2022, https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/09/shocking-video-via-mc4ei-gateway-pundit-13-
minutes-never-seen-footage-ballot-tra cking-detroit-michigan/
Page 29 of 32
ffi
ffi
box.91
• Secretary Benson has lost in court six times for issues related to the 2020
Election.94
• A city clerk in Muskegon witnessed a woman drop off between 8,000 and 10,000
voter registrations at the clerk office on Oct. 8, 2020, many appearing to be
fraudulent. The incident was reported it to the Muskegon Police Department one
week later. Eight thousand new voter registrations in Muskegon would amount to
91Patty McMurray, ’DETROIT: The Gateway Pundit and 100 Percent Fed Up Release Stunning Footage
Of Woman Signing Multiple Ballots Before Dropping Them Into Absentee Ballot Dropbox’, The Gateway
Pundit, April 20, 2022, https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/04/detroit-gateway-pundit-100-
percent-fed-release-stunning-footage-woman-signing-multiple-ballots-dropping-absentee-ballot-
dropbox/
92Beth LeBlanc, ’Judge rules Benson's ballot signature veri cation guidance “invalid"', The Detroit
News, March 15, 2021, https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2021/03/15/judge-rules-
secretary-state-bensons-ballot-signature-veri cation-guidance-invalid/4699927001/
93Cassidy Johncox, ’Few Michigan absentee ballots rejected amid record voter turnout in 2020
election’, Click On Detroit, Dec. 2, 2020, https://www.clickondetroit.com/news/michigan/2020/12/02/
few-michigan-absentee-ballots-rejected-amid-record-voter-turnout-in-2020-election/
94Steven Kovac, ’Michigan Secretary of State Becomes a Six-Time Loser in Election Administration
Lawsuits’, Epoch Times, Nov. 7, 2023, https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/michigan-secretary-of-state-
becomes-a-six-time-loser-in-election-administration-lawsuits-5525132
95Benjamin Wetmore and Patty McMurray, ’Massive 2020 Voter Fraud Uncovered in Michigan –
Including Estimated “800,000 Ballot Applications Sent to Non-Quali ed Voters” – Bags of Pre-Paid Gift
Cards, Guns with Silencers, Burner Phones, and a Democrat-Funded Organization with Multiple
Temporary Facilities in Several States’, The Gateway Pundit, Aug. 8, 2023, https://
www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/08/now-we-have-proof-tgp-exclusive-massive-2020/
Page 30 of 32
fi
fi
fi
over 20 percent of the city’s population of only 38,000 residents.96
• The organization behind the scheme was GBI Strategies, a firm hired by
numerous Democrat campaigns. GBI Strategies was funded by a super PAC
called “Black PAC,” which paid the firm $11,254,919 to register voters for Joe
Biden in 2020.97 Employees of GBI Strategies were paid $15 an hour or $120 a
day, according to the police report.
• Democrat Attorney General Dana Nessel’s office contacted the Muskegon Police
Department and asked Michigan State Police to assist with a joint investigation.
The Michigan police then turned their investigation over to the FBI.
• Andrew Kloster, deputy general counsel at the United States Office of Personnel
Management during the Trump Administration, said he was made aware of the
investigation into GBI Strategies before the 2020 Election and attempted to raise
96 Jim Hoft, ’BREAKING! MI AG Dana Nessel CONFIRMS 8,000 to 10,000 Suspected Fraudulent
Registrations Delivered to Muskegon Clerk October 2020, as Noted in MI State Police Report She Buried
from Public’, The Gateway Pundit, Aug. 11, 2023, https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/08/
breaking-mi-ag-dana-nessel-con rms-8000-10000/
97 Ibid.
98Benjamin Wetmore and Patty McMurray, ‘HERE’S THE PROOF: The FBI and Attorney General Nessel
Hid These from the People of Michigan – Piles of Fraudulent-Manufactured Ballot Registrations from the
2020 Election’, The Gateway Pundit, Aug. 24, 2023, https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/08/here-
are-photos-fbi-attorney-general-nessel-hid/
Page 31 of 32
fi
the issue for further investigation. He was informed there were “standing orders
not to deal with election matters” in the offices of the White House counsel
office and Attorney General Bill Barr.99
• The investigation was not made public until 2023, after the police reports were
obtained through a Michigan Freedom of Information Act request.
99‘Former WH O cial Andrew Kloster CONFIRMS Reports Of Mass Cover-Up Of Election Fraud In
Detroit’, Rumble, 2023, https://rumble.com/v368qun-former-wh-o cial-andrew-kloster-con rms-
reports-of-mass-cover-up-of-elec.html
Page 32 of 32
ffi
ffi
fi