Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Thread Wallets v. Brixley Bags - Complaint
Thread Wallets v. Brixley Bags - Complaint
2 Page 1 of 12
Plaintiff,
COMPLAINT
v.
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
BRIXLEY BAGS, LLC, a Utah limited
liability company, Judge Jill N. Parrish
Defendant.
Plaintiff Thread Wallets LLC (hereinafter, “Thread” or “Plaintiff”), by and through its
undersigned counsel, hereby complains and alleges against Defendant Brixley Bags, LLC
THE PARTIES
-1-
12703837v1
Case 2:23-cv-00874-JNP-JCB Document 2 Filed 12/04/23 PageID.3 Page 2 of 12
2. Upon information and belief, Brixley is a Utah limited liability company with a
principal place of business at 2982 West Hancock Street, Mapleton, Utah, 84664. Upon
information and belief, Brixley transacts business in Utah, including in this district.
3. This is an action for design patent infringement under the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C.
§ 101 et seq. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and
1338(a).
4. Specifically, upon information and belief, Brixley has copied the design of
-2-
12703837v1
Case 2:23-cv-00874-JNP-JCB Document 2 Filed 12/04/23 PageID.4 Page 3 of 12
5. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action under 28 U.S.C.
§§ 1331 and 1338 in that this case arises under the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. § 101 et seq.
6. The Court has personal jurisdiction over Brixley because Brixley resides in the
State of Utah and does business in the State of Utah by, among other things, offering for sale and
selling bags, including the unlawful products at issue in this action. On information and belief,
Brixley causes the unlawful products to be sold outside of Utah and places its products within the
and 1400(b) because 1) Brixley resides in this judicial district, 2) Brixley has committed acts of
infringement in this judicial district, and 3) a substantial part of the events giving rise to the
-3-
12703837v1
Case 2:23-cv-00874-JNP-JCB Document 2 Filed 12/04/23 PageID.5 Page 4 of 12
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
8. Thread designs, manufactures, and markets innovative bags, wallets, phone cases,
and accessories.
10. Thread is the owner by assignment of U.S. Patent No. D995,105 (“the ’105
patent”), which covers the design of Thread’s cross-body bag. The ’105 patent issued on August
11. Photographs of Thread’s cross-body bag, which embodies the design claimed in
the ’105 patent, are set forth in the table below next to figures 1, 4, and 5 from the ’105 patent:
-4-
12703837v1
Case 2:23-cv-00874-JNP-JCB Document 2 Filed 12/04/23 PageID.6 Page 5 of 12
12. Upon information and belief, Brixley has copied Thread’s cross-body bag and
distributes, imports, sells, and offers for sale its competing product in the United States. The
table below shows photographs of one example of Brixley’s product next to figures from the
’105 patent:
-5-
12703837v1
Case 2:23-cv-00874-JNP-JCB Document 2 Filed 12/04/23 PageID.7 Page 6 of 12
https://brixleybags.com/products/lagoon-
crossbody-sling
13. On information and belief, Brixley knows that Brixley’s cross-body bag is a copy or
near copy of Thread’s product, and Brixley intentionally copied Thread’s product.
14. Thread’s social media posts have been inundated with comments that Thread copied
Brixley’s product and that consumers should purchase Brixley’s product, as shown in the
examples below:
-6-
12703837v1
Case 2:23-cv-00874-JNP-JCB Document 2 Filed 12/04/23 PageID.8 Page 7 of 12
-7-
12703837v1
Case 2:23-cv-00874-JNP-JCB Document 2 Filed 12/04/23 PageID.9 Page 8 of 12
-8-
12703837v1
Case 2:23-cv-00874-JNP-JCB Document 2 Filed 12/04/23 PageID.10 Page 9 of 12
-9-
12703837v1
Case 2:23-cv-00874-JNP-JCB Document 2 Filed 12/04/23 PageID.11 Page 10 of 12
15. These and other consumer comments evidence that Brixley’s product is substantially
similar to the patented design and that Brixley’s infringement is considerably harming Thread.
paragraphs 1–15 of this Complaint into this Claim for Relief as though fully set forth herein.
17. The ’105 patent, entitled “Cross-Body Bag,” was duly and lawfully issued by the
18. Thread is the owner by assignment of the entire right, title, and interest in the ’105
patent and possesses all rights of recovery under the ’105 patent, including the right to recover
damages.
19. Thread’s product packaging gives explicit notice to consumers that its products
may be covered by one or more U.S. patents and is fixed with the URL
- 10 -
12703837v1
Case 2:23-cv-00874-JNP-JCB Document 2 Filed 12/04/23 PageID.12 Page 11 of 12
posting on the internet that associates the patented article with the number of the patent. Thread’s
Thread’s cross-body bag as embodying the design claimed in the ’105 patent.
20. Brixley, alone or in concert with others, has been and is now infringing Thread’s
’105 patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271 by making, using, distributing, importing, selling,
and/or offering for sale products (specifically, its cross-body bags) that embody Thread’s
21. Upon information and belief, Brixley has made, used, distributed, imported, sold,
and/or offered to sell products infringing the ’105 patent throughout the United States and
22. Brixley has had actual and/or constructive notice of Thread’s patent through prior
24. Upon information and belief, Brixley’s infringing products were copied from
Thread’s products covered by the ’105 patent. Upon further information and belief, Brixley’s
WHEREFORE, Thread demands a judgment in its favor and demands the following
relief:
- 11 -
12703837v1
Case 2:23-cv-00874-JNP-JCB Document 2 Filed 12/04/23 PageID.13 Page 12 of 12
A. for judgment holding Brixley liable for design patent infringement under 35
U.S.C. § 271;
C. For an award of damages caused by Brixley through its infringement of the ’105
patent and a trebling of damages for Brixley’s willful infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 284, or an
award of Brixley’s profits from its infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 289, whichever is
greater;
§ 285;
F. Such other relief as the Court may deem equitable and appropriate.
JURY DEMAND
Respectfully submitted,
- 12 -
12703837v1