Stablepdf3795303.pdfrefreqid Fastly-Defaultd8&Ab Segments &origin &ini 3
Stablepdf3795303.pdfrefreqid Fastly-Defaultd8&Ab Segments &origin &ini 3
Stablepdf3795303.pdfrefreqid Fastly-Defaultd8&Ab Segments &origin &ini 3
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/3795303?seq=1&cid=pdf-
reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Philadelphia Museum of Art is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access
to Philadelphia Museum of Art Bulletin
Of the three sources from which medieval Given the weight of tradition and authority that
knowledge of dragons was derived-the Bible and these texts bore, it is not surprising that medieval
church teaching, bestiaries, and travelers' travelers to desert or pagan lands were inclined to
1. Saint Michael and Although one mythical beast, the griffin, is the
the Dragon symbol for the Philadelphia Museum of Art, it is
Graduated Missal, fol. 239r
another, the dragon, that appears more
French, c. 1350
Illuminated manuscript, frequently in our collections. Louise W.
image 1/2 x 11/8s(3.8 x Lippincott, assistant curator of the Johnson
2.86cm) Collection, concentrates on the dragon in
Philip S. Collins Collection
45-65-7
Western art in this Bulletin, published in
conjunction with an exhibition-of paintings,
illuminated manuscripts, objects, and small
sculptures-that traces European dragon
iconography from late medieval times to the
nineteenth century. Miss Lippincott received her
doctorate in history at Princeton University this
past summer.
Other artists emphasized the satanic charac-The propensity of Saint Michael's dragon to
teristics of Saint Michael's dragon using theexhibit demonic qualities and behavior is
parallels between devils and dragons drawn consistent
in with the angelic status of the saint
the bestiaries. The illuminator of a French book and the location of the battle on the outskirts of
of hours, working around 1480, drew the creature heaven. Michael's opponent is clearly a
in human form covered with scales (fig. 3). supernatural as well as an evil creature-an
Like a dragon, he has bat wings and three important distinction for an age that held that
claws on each arm and leg. Furthermore, the dragons existed naturally on earth. The demonic
demon sprawls on the ground beneath the saint,associations, along with Saint Michael's wings
turning his head up and around to confront his and fantastic armor, situate them in the visionary
enemy. In other words, his pose is very simi- world of Revelation. These specifications of
lar to that of the tiny dragon from the four- protagonist and place help to differentiate the
teenth-century French missal; and, in fact, is heavenly battle from its earthly equivalent, Saint
more typical of dragons than demons. The mostGeorge's conquest of a dragon in Libya in the
demonic of the Museum's dragons appears in a third century A.D. While the images of Saint
mid fifteenth-century Flemish or French book of Michael tended toward the unreal and fantastic,
hours (fig. 4). He has a human body and head, and depictions of Saint George emphasized the
he stands upright, clutching a weapon in his earthly nature of their encounter.
talons, but a few dragonlike features persist: the
demon has three claws on his arms and legs, andThe themes of military triumph and the founding
he breathes fire at his opponent. Saint Michael's of a Christian community familiar from the
tactics against this antagonist also seem more Michael story also run through the most popular
suited to human than draconian foes. He kicks legends of struggle between saint and dragon,
the creature in the groin with his left foot and that of Saint George. While many of us recognize
raises the sword in his right hand for the coup the image of the knight on his white steed
de grace. rescuing a handsomely dressed maiden from a
dragon, few now realize that the story
the Dragon 4
represented more than a model of chivalrous and the death of the dragon followed, and George
behavior to damsels in distress. According tohad rescued a community from the joint dangers
Jacobus de Voragine, the thirteenth-century of dragons and paganism. George followed up this
author of the colorful, but not always accurate, feat with several other miraculous escapades, and
Golden Legend, George was a Christian officer diedina martyr's death in A.D. 287.
the Roman army stationed in Libya-a pagan,
desert area. "A chance journey took [George] Like one his prototype Saint Michael, George came to
day into the neighborhood of Silena.... In this be viewed as a protector of medieval Christians.
town, in a deep lake as large as an ocean, there In the Flemish Pembroke Hours of around 1460,
dwelt a horrible dragon, who many times hadmention put of George's conquest of the "pestiferum
to flight the men who came armed against him, draconem" and rescue of the princess is followed
and who was wont to prowl about the city wall; by a request for protection from visible and
poisoning all who came within reach of his invisible enemies-the joint evils of physical and
breath. In order to appease the fury of this spiritual danger combined within the dragon.Is
monster, and to keep him from destroying the
whole town, the burgesses had been offering In himmost illuminated manuscripts, George
two sheep every day."14 When the town began appears
to as a well-equipped medieval knight, who
run out of sheep, they offered the dragon human spears his dragon in the mouth. Within this
sacrifices; George arrived just as the daughtericonographical
of framework, however, artists have
the king was preparing to do her civic duty. enjoyed a great deal of latitude. A version of the
Ignoring the maiden's suggestion that he seek a from the late fifteenth century presents
scene
safer distance, George stunned the creature with George with an antagonist that the twen-
a blow from his lance, then ordered the princess tieth-century viewer recognizes instantly
to bind it with her girdle. Together they led the-not a dragon, but a crocodile (fig. 5). As we
dragon into town, where George threatened know to from bestiaries and Marco Polo's accounts,
unleash it on the inhabitants if they would not crocodiles were thought to be large and
convert to the Christian faith. Their conversion dangerous oriental serpents who lived in deep
water, ate people, and were killed when hunters back of his head, and twisted tail match written
rammed razor-tipped lances down their throats. descriptions of the dragon exactly. In fact, the
Since George's dragons and the crocodile, bothartist's quest for verisimilitude led him to draw
serpents, shared these significant physical and the dragon's tail wrapped around George's leg, in
behavioral characteristics, the medieval reference to a famous piece of dragon lore
illuminator's substitution of one for the other is recorded in bestiaries, which may also have
understandable. The dragon's squat legs, absence suggested the visual image: "It has a crest, a
of wings, and long tail are crocodilian. Further- small mouth and a narrow gullet through which
more, the scaly back, on which both horse it draws breath or puts out its tongue. Moreover,
and saint trample, suggests the hardened skin of its strength is not in its teeth but in its tail, and it
the reptile, which medieval naturalists believed inflicts injuries by blows rather than by stinging.
was too hard to pierce with any weapon.16 . . . Even the Elephant is not protected from it by
the size of its body; for the dragon, lying in wait
A version of Saint George and the Dragon from a near the paths along which the elephants usually
French book of hours of around 1480 is nearly as saunter, lassoes their legs in a knot with its tail
bizarre as the preceding two (fig. 6). George, and destroys them by suffocation."17 The George
wearing the familiar white coat with red cross of the Pembroke Hours faced death by poison or
over his armor, kills his enemy with a spear engulfment, while his French counterpart would
thrust in the mouth. His animal opponent, have suffocated had he lost the battle.
however, resembles nothing so much as an
aardvark. Aardvarks were, of course, unknown to The peculiar iconography of Saint George and the
the medieval world (at least as recorded in Dragon represents one artistic solution to
bestiaries), so this dragon must actually be a problems inherent in the portrayal of sacred
composite creature, invented to conform to a history. The saint's life and adventures are
verbal description from a text. The narrow accepted and depicted as historical facts, and the
throat, long jaw, flaming breath, comb on the protagonists are drawn with the greatest possible
naturalism. George is dressed as a contemporary
knight, while the dragon's image is taken from
6. Saint George and Saint the best eyewitness accounts and most reputable
Lawrence
texts. Every effort is made to lend liveliness and
Book of Hours, fol. 363r
Flemish or French, c. 1450 verisimilitude to the image in a manner analo-
Illuminated manuscript, gous to Jacobus de Voragine's use of dialogue
image 3YV x 2s%" (7.94 x and circumstantial detail to enliven his
6.67cm) Golden Legend.
Philip S. Collins Collection
45-65-5
The theme of the saint combating a dragon in
order to protect the boundaries of Christian
civilization and initiate a new era of the godly
beyond its outposts is repeated in the legend of
Saint Sylvester, told in its most elaborate form by
Voragine. The high points of the story are
depicted in a small predella panel attributed to
the Florentine painter Agnolo Gaddi (fig. 7). In
the center of a barren landscape relieved by a cave
or cleft in the rocks, sparse buildings, and a
freestanding antique column, Sylvester, dressed
as a pope, binds the mouth of a chastened dragon
with his signet ring and a piece of cord. Two
pagan magicians lie paralyzed between the saint
and his captive; subsequently revived by the
saint, they also pray in the background. On the
left, the saint's two Christian companions
observe with becoming gravity, while the
emperor Constantine, newly converted to the
religion, gestures in astonishment on the right.
w1p
At
· .X ' ,-~
":~. ' al7
· ' ' 11i.
''';, . ,, V
;-A
A.,V. i
-'~ .A.. ..
< ::
*,~~~~~~~ . u s ..., '., 's.:;,
e DX; wi ~~~~~~~~~~...... .,. ,,. .~ l..
l ' 't''P
... ' ' ! 'i'~i
10. Saint Margaret and within the oak, and the irregular texture suggests
the Dragon
a hairy coat (fig. 10).
French, 15th century
Oak, height 29" (73.66cm)
Gift of Mr. and Mrs. Roland While Saint Margaret's four-legged, hairy, often
L. Taylor wingless dragons present new variations on
29-66-4
standard dragon images, the artists seem to have
selected them to emphasize the spiritual
meaning of the Margaret legend. Most of the
dragons depicted with Saint Margaret are colored
yellow or gilded, in contrast to the green or red
animals found with Saints Michael, George, and
Sylvester. The gold color may relate these
dragons to the crocodile, their serpent cousin
from the bestiaries, according to customary
verbal descriptions: "Crocodile is so called from
its saffron or crocus colour. It is born in the River
Nile, an amphibious animal with four legs... ."23
Why should a medieval illuminator allude to the
crocodile when illustrating the Margaret legend?
The answer is to be found in the life history of
another Nile creature, the Hydrus. A natural
enemy of the crocodile, the Hydrus liked to roll
in the mud until slippery, then dash down the
gaping jaws of sleeping reptiles. "The crocodile
then, suddenly waking up, gulps it down, and the
Hydrus, splitting all the crocodile's guts into two
parts, not only remains alive but comes out
safely at the other end."24 The crocodile and
Hydrus reenacted Margaret's historical
encounter with the dragon in the natural world;
it was only logical for the illuminator to make
the parallel explicit.
albeit I do not possess it."52 His narrow escapeengulfed and damned if he had succumbed to it
from death by a fever (heat, again) may be entirely. However, after his conversion, the
suggested by the young man's flight from the dragon's role in the saint's life changes. Its image
dragon's flaming breath. That the entire scene reminds him of his brush with sin and death and
may refer to Jerome's past is indicated by the protects
odd him from further temptation. It becomes
posture of the saint himself. He tums away from a symbol of his hard-earned virtue and wisdom in
his sacred books and writings (his future as a the classicizing tradition of Alciati. But even
Christian scholar) and looks back over his these dual interpretations of the dragon can be
shoulder at a symbolic reenactment of the reconciled, if the meaning of the painting
turning point in his life. concerns the value of a classical education and
worldly experience as preparation for a life of
If this interpretation of the iconography is Christian scholarship.
correct, Paris Bordone's Saint Jerome in the
Wilderness updates the ancient and medieval During modem times-from the seventeenth
versions of the combat myth. As a scholar rathercentury to the present-the evil nature of the
than a knight, Jerome confronts the dragon butdragon has reasserted itself. Educated people no
does not slay it. His encounter leads to a longer believe that winged and footed dragons
conversion, his own, and a new life of Christianexist in nature, although the creatures have been
scholarship and asceticism. Memories of his granted perpetual life in the world of allegory,
horrific escape from death (the dragon) help himsymbol, and imagination. In art and literature
maintain a high spiritual level of existence in they
the appear frequently as embodiments of death
face of enormous temptations. Thus, the dragon and damnation, and their appearance is calcu-
actually plays two parts in the Jerome combatlated to terrify.
story. From the Christian standpoint it
represents the polluting evils of antique The return of the dragon-demon was engineered
paganism and sexual vice from which he escaped; by the Counter-Reformation Catholic church,
like Saint Margaret, Jerome would have been which found it a convenient symbol for heresy. In
Rubens's A Franciscan Allegory in Honor of the fierce violent person; especially a fiercely or
Immaculate Conception (fig. 16), a dragon's headaggressively watchful woman; a duenna."53
functions as the jaws of hell into which Johnson's chaperone is a deliberately comical
Franciscan monks shovel demons. In Jacques interpretation of the classical concept of the
Callot's Temptation of Saint Anthony (fig. 17), dragon as guardian of virtue; a once fearsome
the demons themselves are depicted as dragons, creature has become an object for ridicule. The
reminiscent of the medieval opponents of Saint eighteenth century replaced the creaking
Michael. The seventeeth-century Catholic medieval creature with the beneficent and
church's revival of medieval dragon imagery decorative Chinese dragon. These fascinating
beasts may have originated in the ancient Middle
should be seen in relation to its militant struggle
against the rising tide of heresy, atheism, and East, as Western dragons did. However, when
Protestantism. Saint and dragon combats within adopted by the Chinese, they retained their old
this context represent the victory of true significance as powerful forces of nature.54 To
(Catholic) Christianity over false religions, be eighteenth-century Western viewers, unversed
they Protestant or pagan. in the intricacies of Chinese thought, they were
charming monsters lacking the unpleasant
The religious conflicts of the seventeeth century associations of their Western, Christianized
were followed by an eighteenth century wary of counterparts. Chinese dragons, with their
religious extremism and sometimes wary of distinctive faces, scaly bodies, and lack of wings,
religion itself. This attitude, combined with further modified Western notions of the
significant advances in natural history and world appearance of the dragon.
exploration, nearly obliterated the traditional
Western dragon. Samuel Goldsmith, in his Such modifications are apparent in the dragon
Natural History wrote, "The Dragon, a most ornamenting a teapot manufactured in Ireland in
terrible animal, but most probably not of 1872 (see cover). Although called "Chinese" by
Nature's formation," while Samuel Johnson the manufacturer, the dragon is actually a hybrid
went one step further by applying the term to "a combining Eastern and Western features.
~1m
I-X
*, , K ':.
,; . -
-i
» li
w ., At.
7 I
>\'.» ;
\ r'
.:/'
I t .
ir' ". P ;
Notes
Crouching below the teapot, it owes more to 1. Edward Topsell, The historie of serpents. Or,
medieval dragon-crocodiles than to its oriental the second booke of living creatures... (London,
relative. The crocodilian body, twisted tail, ears,1608), p. 158.
and nose horn, are characteristic of the Westem2. Ibid., pp. 156-57.
medieval prototype, as are the batwings 3. Joseph Fontenrose, Python: A Study of
supporting the teapot. The sculptor has added aDelphic Myth and Its Origins (Berkeley, 1980).
novel feature of his own-webbed feet. From the Fontenrose traces the evolution of the dragon
oriental dragon, he has borrowed the scales and combat myth from pre-Classical to early
blue and lavender coloration. This composite Christian times.
beast is in the crouched and twisted posture 4. Oxford English Dictionary, s.v. dragon.
reminiscent of the dragons of Saints George and 5. Job 30:29; Jeremiah 9:11.
Michael, but its flaming breath would warm the 6. For complete catalogue information on this
teapot rather than an adversary. and other illuminated manuscripts from the
collection, see Carl Zigrosser, "The Philip S.
Not all nineteenth-century uses of dragon Collins Collection of Medieval Illuminated
imagery were so trivial or so delightful. At the
Manuscripts," Philadelphia Museum of Art
other end of the symbolic spectrum lurks the
Bulletin, vol. 58, no. 275 (1962).
dragon as envisioned by the German painter and
7. Michael J. Curley, trans., Physiologus (Austin,
graphic artist Max Klinger. This creature exists as
1979), pp. ix-xxxiii.
a highly abstract gate ornament in a print
8. T. H. White, ed. and trans., The Bestiary: A
entitled A Love: At the Gate (fig. 18), one
Book of Beasts (New York, 1960), pp. 165-67; for
of a series. In the context of a young woman
the original Latin text, see M. R. James, The
inviting her admirer into a lush garden, it
Bestiary (Oxford, 1928).
connotes Eve's temptation in the Garden of Eden
9. Ronald Latham, trans., The Travels of Marco
and the onset of original sin. But, since it is
Polo (London, 1958), pp. 178-79.
wrapped around a lance in the gate design, it also
10. M. C. Seymour, ed., Mandeville's Travels
recalls Saint George's heroic rescue of a doomed
(Oxford, 1967), p. 29.
city and his chaste refusal of marriage to the
11. See Zigrosser, "The Philip S. Collins
king's daughter. The troubling ambiguity of the
Collection," pp. 7-9, for a discussion of the forms
dragon's moral significance adds to the tension of
of illuminated manuscript service books.
the moment depicted; is it an agent of corruption
12. Revelation 12:3, 7-9.
or a guardian of virtue? Will temptation or virtue
13. Book of Hours (French, late fifteenth
triumph? The issue is clarified by the remainder
century), Philadelphia Museum of Art, Philip S.
of the series, of which this is the second image.
Collins Collection (45-65-9), fol. 26.
Seduction is followed by shame, death, and
14. Jacobus de Voragine, The Golden Legend,
remorse. Although a far cry from the clear-cut
trans. and adapted Granger Ryan and Helmut
definitions of medieval times, the ambiguous
Ripperger (1941, reprint, New York, 1969),
dragon is nevertheless appropriate to the
pp.233-35.
uncertain moral and psychological climate of the
15. Book of Hours (The Pembroke Hours),
late nineteeth century.
Philadelphia Museum of Art, Philip S. Collins
The mixture of form and metaphor evidenced in Collection (45-65-2), fol. 42.
the nineteeth-century dragons indicates the 16. White, The Bestiary, p. 202.
17. Ibid., pp. 166-67.
shifting and broadening of form and meaning that
have occurred since belief in dragons-and 18. Voragine, Golden Legend, pp.81-82.
serious dragon studies-has declined. The weird 19. Topsell, Historie of serpents, p. 154.
creatures that grace the covers of science fiction 20. Voragine, Golden Legend, pp. 613-14.
21. Revelation 12:9.
novels or haunt the dungeons of fantasy
22. Joan Barclay Lloyd, African Animals in
adventure games today are even more remote
from their medieval and Renaissance Renaissance Literature and Art (Oxford, 1971),
p. 14.
forerunners.55 Yet even if they inhabit distant
23. White, The Bestiary, p. 202.
planets or join the ranks of fantastic monsters
whose slaughter can win experience and treasure
24. Ibid., pp. 178-80.
25. Ibid., p. 180.
for a game-playing adventurer, they remain
creatures of the outer limits and the inner life of 26. Pembroke Hours, fol. 47.
27. Fontenrose, Python, pp.217-19.
the mind. Every century has its dragons.