Mary Shelley's novel "Frankenstein" has become an iconic piece of literature
since its publication in 1818. The title itself holds significant meaning and captures the essence of the novel's themes and motifs. By examining the origins of the name, the character of Victor Frankenstein, and the broader implications of the title, we can gain a deeper understanding of Shelley's intentions and the enduring relevance of her work. The title "Frankenstein or The Modern Prometheus" refers to the character of Victor Frankenstein, the ambitious scientist who creates the creature that becomes the central focus of the novel. However, it is important to note that Frankenstein is not the name of the monster but of its creator. The name Frankenstein has its roots in German folklore and is associated with a legendary alchemist who sought to create life from dead matter. By invoking this name, Shelley taps into a tradition of stories and legends surrounding the pursuit of forbidden knowledge and the consequences of playing God. The subtitle, 'The Modern Prometheus' brings to mind the Greek god Prometheus who gave the knowledge of fire to humanity and was then severely punished for it. Victor, attempting to become a modern Prometheus is certainly punished, but unlike fire, his "gift" to humanity is the knowledge of the secret of life, which remains an unraveled. The character of Victor Frankenstein embodies the dual nature of the title's significance. On one hand, he represents the creator, the one who aspires to unlock the secrets of life and achieve God-like power. Victor's ambition and obsession drive him to cross ethical boundaries, ultimately leading to the creation of the monster. His arrogance and neglect of his creation demonstrate the dangers of unchecked scientific pursuit, highlighting the perils of playing with the forces of life and death. On the other hand, Victor himself becomes a kind of monster as his actions and guilt consume him. He is tormented by the consequences of his creation, haunted by the "wretch" he brought to life. This duality of Frankenstein's character reflects Shelley's exploration of the blurred lines between creator and creation, suggesting that the true monster may reside within the creator's own heart and mind. Rather than offering the Monster "the small portion of happiness which was yet in my power to bestow" –he performs the ultimate gesture of castration by destroying of the female monster negating any hope that the Monster might gain access to a "chain of existence and events". Consequently, the Monster strikes at Frankenstein through elements in Frankenstein's own 'chain of existence and events': after William and Justine Moritz, his bosom friend Henry Clerval and his bride, Elizabeth. Victor's wedding night ends in a necrophiliac embrace. As a parent, it was Victor’s duty to care for the child and nurture it in spite of all odds. What makes a monster out of the creature is not its devilish appearance, but its deep sense of isolation caused by parental incompetence. Frankenstein curses the day of its creation, and reiterates: "Begone! Relieve me from the sight of your detested form". Given the fact that Victor Frankenstein was already aware of the abhorrence of his unnatural gestation, he could have taken the situation back in control by aborting the very idea of giving life to ‘the thing’ that ‘lay at his feet’. Rejection of the child to an alien world solely because of its ugliness is not justified at all because our notion of beauty is socially conditioned. In case of the ‘creature’, this was far more expected as his ugliness was something that initially appeared beautiful to Victor as he had actually ‘chosen his parts’. All the misery that the creature faces then onwards has its genesis in the initial rejection by the parent. So, Victor is the only parent who is responsible for the ‘uncanny’ birth of his child and for all the hatred that it faces throughout its life. Beyond the individual character of Victor Frankenstein, the title "Frankenstein" carries broader implications that resonate throughout the novel. The story raises profound questions about the nature of responsibility, the limits of human knowledge, and the consequences of tampering with the natural order. Shelley uses the character of Victor and his creation to examine the ethical implications of scientific progress and the dangers of unchecked ambition. Through the lens of Frankenstein's pursuit of knowledge and the subsequent destruction caused by his creation, the novel critiques the arrogance of humanity and warns against the unbridled pursuit of power and control. Moreover, the title "Frankenstein" has also come to represent the misunderstood and marginalized "monster" in popular culture. The creature, despite being a product of Victor's ambition, evokes sympathy as he grapples with his own identity and the rejection he faces from society. In this sense, the title invites us to question the nature of monstrosity and explore the themes of alienation and empathy. It encompasses the multi-layered themes of ambition, responsibility, and the consequences of playing God that are central to Shelley's novel. By referencing the name, Shelley sets the stage for a thought-provoking exploration of humanity's relationship with science, morality, and the boundaries of creation. The enduring significance of the title "Frankenstein" lies in its ability to captivate readers and provoke critical reflection on these timeless themes.