Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Title: The Significance of the Title

"Frankenstein" by Shelley

Mary Shelley's novel "Frankenstein" has become an iconic piece of literature


since its publication in 1818. The title itself holds significant meaning and
captures the essence of the novel's themes and motifs. By examining the origins
of the name, the character of Victor Frankenstein, and the broader implications
of the title, we can gain a deeper understanding of Shelley's intentions and the
enduring relevance of her work.
The title "Frankenstein or The Modern Prometheus" refers to the character of
Victor Frankenstein, the ambitious scientist who creates the creature that
becomes the central focus of the novel. However, it is important to note that
Frankenstein is not the name of the monster but of its creator. The name
Frankenstein has its roots in German folklore and is associated with a legendary
alchemist who sought to create life from dead matter. By invoking this name,
Shelley taps into a tradition of stories and legends surrounding the pursuit of
forbidden knowledge and the consequences of playing God. The subtitle, 'The
Modern Prometheus' brings to mind the Greek god Prometheus who gave the
knowledge of fire to humanity and was then severely punished for it. Victor,
attempting to become a modern Prometheus is certainly punished, but unlike
fire, his "gift" to humanity is the knowledge of the secret of life, which remains
an unraveled.
The character of Victor Frankenstein embodies the dual nature of the title's
significance. On one hand, he represents the creator, the one who aspires to
unlock the secrets of life and achieve God-like power. Victor's ambition and
obsession drive him to cross ethical boundaries, ultimately leading to the
creation of the monster. His arrogance and neglect of his creation demonstrate
the dangers of unchecked scientific pursuit, highlighting the perils of playing
with the forces of life and death. On the other hand, Victor himself becomes a
kind of monster as his actions and guilt consume him. He is tormented by the
consequences of his creation, haunted by the "wretch" he brought to life. This
duality of Frankenstein's character reflects Shelley's exploration of the blurred
lines between creator and creation, suggesting that the true monster may reside
within the creator's own heart and mind. Rather than offering the Monster
"the small portion of happiness which was yet in my power to bestow" –he
performs the ultimate gesture of castration by destroying of the female
monster negating any hope that the Monster might gain access to a "chain
of existence and events". Consequently, the Monster strikes at Frankenstein
through elements in Frankenstein's own 'chain of existence and events':
after William and Justine Moritz, his bosom friend Henry Clerval and his
bride, Elizabeth. Victor's wedding night ends in a necrophiliac embrace. As
a parent, it was Victor’s duty to care for the child and nurture it in spite of
all odds. What makes a monster out of the creature is not its devilish
appearance, but its deep sense of isolation caused by parental
incompetence.
Frankenstein curses the day of its creation, and reiterates: "Begone! Relieve me
from the sight of your detested form". Given the fact that Victor Frankenstein
was already aware of the abhorrence of his unnatural gestation, he could have
taken the situation back in control by aborting the very idea of giving life to ‘the
thing’ that ‘lay at his feet’. Rejection of the child to an alien world solely
because of its ugliness is not justified at all because our notion of beauty is
socially conditioned. In case of the ‘creature’, this was far more expected as his
ugliness was something that initially appeared beautiful to Victor as he had
actually ‘chosen his parts’. All the misery that the creature faces then onwards
has its genesis in the initial rejection by the parent. So, Victor is the only parent
who is responsible for the ‘uncanny’ birth of his child and for all the hatred that
it faces throughout its life. Beyond the individual character of Victor
Frankenstein, the title "Frankenstein" carries broader implications that resonate
throughout the novel. The story raises profound questions about the nature of
responsibility, the limits of human knowledge, and the consequences of
tampering with the natural order.
Shelley uses the character of Victor and his creation to examine the ethical
implications of scientific progress and the dangers of unchecked ambition.
Through the lens of Frankenstein's pursuit of knowledge and the subsequent
destruction caused by his creation, the novel critiques the arrogance of humanity
and warns against the unbridled pursuit of power and control. Moreover, the
title "Frankenstein" has also come to represent the misunderstood and
marginalized "monster" in popular culture. The creature, despite being a product
of Victor's ambition, evokes sympathy as he grapples with his own identity and
the rejection he faces from society. In this sense, the title invites us to question
the nature of monstrosity and explore the themes of alienation and empathy. It
encompasses the multi-layered themes of ambition, responsibility, and the
consequences of playing God that are central to Shelley's novel. By referencing
the name, Shelley sets the stage for a thought-provoking exploration of
humanity's relationship with science, morality, and the boundaries of creation.
The enduring significance of the title "Frankenstein" lies in its ability to
captivate readers and provoke critical reflection on these timeless themes.

You might also like