User talk:Hazard-SJ

Rollback

Hello I am requesting extension of my rollback rights ( maybe permanently), since I was given the rights I have done a lot of counter vandalism work, and I have made sure to warn the users involved. I may be away for sometime and I may forget to reapply before it has expired later this month. I am requesting this since I will still use SW viewer which requires local rollback. Thank you for your time Synoman Barris (talk) 08:16, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Synoman Barris: you only seem to have 120 edits here. No offense, but I don't think that's enough for an indef grant. I will let Hazard-SJ decide for himself though, since I'm not a sysop here. Best, --Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 02:56, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Though if I were him, per I may be away for sometime and I may forget to reapply before it has expired later this month, I'd grant for a few months more. --Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 02:58, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

@Synoman Barris:  extended indefinitely; while it's still a fairly small number of reversions here, I'm also taking into account your history on other projects (per Wikidata:Rollbackers#Requesting rollback). Hazard-SJ (talk) 03:22, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Rollback

Hi, my rollback privileges expired yesterday. I have been using it responsibly here and think I am ready for an indef grant. Could you give it to me indef? Thanksǃ P.S. If I have a block on en wikipedia, don't worry, it's just an emergency measure applied to a block that I had requested Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 14:44, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Probably work continuing the discussion on WD:RFOR instead of here in a separate place; I'll comment there once I get the chance. Hazard-SJ (talk) 08:23, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Nah, I don't want it. Thanks anyways. --Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 00:44, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Wikidata:Requests for checkuser

Would it be possibly to get your bot to archive Wikidata:Requests for checkuser automatically? --Trade (talk) 07:48, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

@Trade: At a glance, looks like the process would be to archive transcluded subpages that have had no discussion for at least 2 weeks (per Wikidata talk:Requests for checkuser#Archiving), but probably only those with one of the completed/declined templates (from the Checkuser icons table), by removing the transclusion and instead adding a link on Wikidata:Requests for checkuser/Archives in a section by archival year? I can look into it, though it would also be good to verify whether that is the expected behavior and whether people would be okay with the automated archival (probably on Wikidata talk:Requests for checkuser). Hazard-SJ (talk) 08:46, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Commons

Hi. You haven't edited on Commons in 3 months. We miss you, and things are breaking. Please come back.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 05:18, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I just responded on Commons! Hazard-SJ (talk) 23:08, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Strange archive from your bot

Your bot created this archive. But correct archive for August 2020 is Wikidata:Bot requests/Archive/2020/08. On Wikidata:Bot requests said that the page is archived by SpBot and only sections with {{Section resolved}} are archiving but the archive contains sections without the template. 217.117.125.88 14:00, 5 March 2021 (UTC)