Grain-Boundary Segregation and Phase-Separation Mechanism in Yttria-Stabilized Tetragonal Zirconia Polycrystal

Article Preview

Abstract:

Microstructure development during sintering in 3 mol% Y2O3-stabilized tetragonal ZrO2 polycrystal (Y-TZP) was systematically investigated in two sintering conditions: (a) 1100-1650°C for 2 h and (b) 1300°C for 0-50 h. In the sintering condition (a), the density and grain size in Y-TZP increased with the increasing sintering temperature. Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) and nanoprobe X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) measurements revealed that the Y3+ ion distribution was nearly homogeneous up to 1300°C, i.e., most of grains were the tetragonal phase, but cubic-phase regions with high Y3+ ion concentration were clearly formed in grain interiors adjacent to the grain boundaries at 1500°C. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and nanoprobe EDS measurements revealed that no amorphous or second phase is present along the grain-boundary faces, and Y3+ ions segregated not only along the tetragonal-tetragonal phase boundaries but also along tetragonal-cubic phase boundaries over a width below about 10 nm, respectively. These results indicate that the cubic-phase regions are formed from the grain boundaries and/or the multiple junctions in which Y3+ ions segregated. We termed this process a “grain boundary segregation-induced phase transformation (GBSIPT)” mechanism. In the sintering condition (b), the density was low and the grain-growth rate was much slow. In the specimen sintered at 1300°C for 50 h, the cubic-phase regions were clearly formed in the grain interiors adjacent to the grain boundaries. This behavior shows that the cubic-phase regions were formed without grain growth, which can be explained by the GBSIPT model.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

82-88

Citation:

Online since:

July 2011

Export:

Price:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] F.F. Lange: J. Am. Ceram. Soc., Vol. 69 (1986), p.240.

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Yoshizawa and T. Sakuma: ISIJ Int., Vol. 29 (1989), p.746.

Google Scholar

[3] K. Matsui, H. Yoshida, and Y. Ikuhara: J. Am. Ceram. Soc., Vol. 86(2003), p.1401.

Google Scholar

[4] K. Matsui, H. Yoshida, and Y. Ikuhara: J. Mater. Res., Vol. 21 (2006), p.2278.

Google Scholar

[5] K. Matsui, H. Yoshida and Y. Ikuhara: J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., Vol. 30(2010), p.1679.

Google Scholar

[6] N. Ohmichi, K. Kamioka, K. Ueda, K. Matsui and M. Ogai: J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. Vol. 107(1999), p.28.

Google Scholar

[7] Y. Ikuhara, P. Thavorniti and T. Sakuma: Acta Mater. Vol. 45 (1997), p.5275.

Google Scholar