“We’re not sure that, even if he wins, he can survive four years more,” said one official from a European NATO country. https://politi.co/3RYn57f
POLITICO
Online Audio and Video Media
Arlington, Virginia 163,143 followers
Nobody knows politics like POLITICO.
About us
POLITICO is a global news and information company at the intersection of politics and policy. With publications based in Washington, D.C., New York and Brussels - and continued expansion into various state capitals in the United States - POLITICO has one of the most robust and rapidly expanding roster of journalists covering politics and policy in the world. Since its launch in 2007, POLITICO has delivered journalism about politics and policy making that is more authoritative in its sophistication and nonpartisan perspective than any competitor; that is more useful to people with a professional interest in public affairs; and that is more fun to read for a community of people who love the drama and sheer sport of politics. The central mission of POLITICO, from birth to our current period of growth, has been to help sustain and vastly expand nonpartisan political and policy journalism. We all believe informing readers and holding leaders accountable is and will forever be essential to smart governance, regardless of shifts in technology and consumption habits.
- Website
-
http://www.politico.com
External link for POLITICO
- Industry
- Online Audio and Video Media
- Company size
- 501-1,000 employees
- Headquarters
- Arlington, Virginia
- Type
- Privately Held
- Founded
- 2007
- Specialties
- News, Subscriptions, Events, Policy, Politics, and Government
Locations
-
Primary
1000 Wilson Blvd
Suite 8
Arlington, Virginia 22209, US
-
1000 Wilson Blvd
Arlington, VA 22209, US
Employees at POLITICO
-
James Daly
Journalist. Entrepreneur. Frequently both. (Wired, TED, Business 2.0, Google, Facebook, Forbes, Edutopia, Rolling Stone). A fair selection of clips…
-
Richard Dawson
Joined Up Thinking to help you uncover your Strategy & strengthen your Brand > Digital Marketing Excellence. ✅Knowledgeable about Generative AI &…
-
Yesenia Chappell
Director, Marketing Operations and Technology at POLITICO
-
Sudeep Reddy
Senior Managing Editor at POLITICO
Updates
-
Some Democrats interpreted this as threatening and “chilling.” The latest comments from the leader spearheading Project 2025 – a sweeping roadmap for dismantling aspects of the federal government if Trump wins reelection: https://politi.co/3zrjuYX
-
-
🚨BREAKING: Labour has obliterated the Tories with a historic UK election win according to the official exit poll. Follow for updates: https://trib.al/ZEbeHwJ
-
-
Over in Britain, our former overlords are having an election – on the same day we celebrate our independence from them. And it’s looking like a game-changing one that could sweep the Conservatives away after 14 years in power and put the Labour Party back at the top. Catch up with what on earth is happening in British politics and who's about to take over: https://politi.co/4eQ3nnW
-
-
The fact that Joe Biden’s debate performance was so shocking was largely the result of how effectively his top aides have kept him in a protective cocoon — far away from cameras, questions and more intense public scrutiny — in an effort to manage public perceptions of the oldest person to ever hold the office. But inside the White House, the 81-year-old president’s growing limitations were becoming apparent long before last week’s on-camera disaster. And some staffers and other Democrats are blaming the small group of senior longtime aides who have the president’s ear and trust. “It’s the same people — he has not changed those people for 40 years,” said one Dem operative and close adviser to several members of Congress. “The number of people who have access to the president has gotten smaller and smaller and smaller,” another Dem strategist in a battleground state said. “They’ve been digging deeper into the bunker for months now.” And “the more you get into the bunker, the less you listen to anyone.” Full story at the link below. 📷 AP Photo/Gerald Herbert https://lnkd.in/eWJBNr23
-
-
The Supreme Court’s decision on Trump’s claim to be immune from prosecution may go down as one of the most brazenly political decisions in the court’s history, says our senior writer Ankush Khadori in his latest column, Rules of Law. The opinion will have far-reaching consequences for the presidency. But more immediately, it exponentially shrinks the odds of a trial before November on Trump’s effort to remain in power after losing in 2020. Just call it Bush v. Gore 2.0: a stunning intervention that could plausibly swing the presidential election to Trump. The decision is also nothing short of a mess for prosecutors and the judge, and perhaps by design. How should they proceed? Ankush answers at the link below. 📷 Francis Chung/POLITICO https://lnkd.in/eMJaDNBJ
-
-
Extreme heat waves have cost Californians at least $7.7 billion over the last decade and killed nearly 460 people, according to a report by California Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara.
-
Donald Trump has immunity from criminal prosecution over some actions he took as president while fighting to subvert the 2020 election, the Supreme Court ruled Monday, further complicating efforts to put Trump on trial in Washington on criminal charges that he engaged in fraud to try to cling to power. The decision, which divided the court along ideological lines, immediately knocked out some of the central allegations that special counsel Jack Smith leveled against Trump, including claims that he attempted to weaponize his Justice Department to concoct or amplify false claims of voter fraud. However, the opinion also leaves much unresolved, sending the case back to the trial court for further proceedings. There, U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan must now sift through the allegations to separate Trump’s official acts — those he took in his capacity as president — from private ones, when he was acting as a presidential candidate. That process could further stall the case by months and is likely to push any trial past Election Day. The opinion from Chief Justice John Roberts declared that former presidents have “absolute” immunity from criminal prosecution over actions that fall within their “core constitutional powers.” “There is no immunity,” Roberts wrote, for “unofficial acts.” More soon at the link below. AP Photo/Susan Walsh https://lnkd.in/eu8Sp67Z
-
-
The Supreme Court will decide today whether Donald Trump has immunity from the most serious criminal charges against him: the federal indictment for trying to subvert the 2020 election. A range of pathways the court can take👇
The Trump immunity decision is about to drop. Here’s how it might go.
politico.com
-
The Supreme Court just ruled that the SEC can’t rely on in-house courts to resolve certain enforcement disputes, a potential blow to a critical power of corporate watchdogs across the federal government. More: https://lnkd.in/gpASpPih
-