Feelings about Bodies: Emotions on Diet and Fitness Forums Reveal Gendered Stereotypes and Body Image Concerns

Body image—the feelings and attitudes an individual holds towards their own body—is largely shaped by social forces. The concept of the ‘ideal body’, as communicated by typical Western media, is split by traditional conceptualizations of gender, where the ideal feminine individual is presented with a thin body—the ‘thin ideal’—and the ideal masculine person with a muscular body—the ‘muscular ideal’ (Murnen and Don, 2012a). These ideals are taught from a young age, with popular dolls like Barbie or Bratz, who have noticeably thin bodies, and action figures with exaggerated muscular physiques (Boyd and Murnen, 2017). Jáuregui-Lobera et al. (2013) explores gender differences in weight misperception, self-reported physical fitness, and dieting among adolescents, revealing significant associations with self-esteem, body appreciation, mental health, and risk of EDs. However, the popular associations between masculinity and muscularity are being challenged, through women bodybuilders (Grogan et al., 2004), men pining for thinner bodies (Jones and Morgan, 2010), and more. In this work, we explore the online relationship between gendered expression (i.e., masculinity, femininity) and body image ideals (thin, muscular), and emotions.

Eating disorders (EDs) are characterized by distorted body image, obsessive thoughts about body size and shape, and core disturbances in eating and feeding behaviors. Individuals with EDs often fail to self-identify their condition and fewer than 20% ever receive treatment. This makes peer support provided by online communities an important factor for recovery. Until recently, EDs were mainly associated with anorexia and bulimia, which disproportionately affect women and girls. These disorders are associated with an intense fear of gaining weight, extreme dieting, and overexercising as compensatory behavior for eating.

There is a growing recognition of ED phenotypes in males, characterized by muscle dysmorphia and strict eating rules for greater muscularity (aka ‘bigorexia’). This syndrome is associated with an elevated risk of illicit muscle-building substance use and a heightened risk for medical and psychiatric morbidity, including increased suicidality.

Eating disorders have become more prevalent in recent years, leading researchers to link them to the spread of idealized body images in the media, particularly on social media platforms like Twitter, Instagram, and TikTok (Kao et al., 2024). Exposure to these images fuels body image concerns, a key risk factor for developing depression and EDs (Choukas-Bradley et al., 2022). Studies have shown that people compare themselves to idealized body images and as a result, feel worse about their appearance (Saiphoo and Vahedi, 2019; Fardouly and Vartanian, 2016; Choukas-Bradley et al., 2022).

Anorexia communities have long existed online, on blogs and message boards, and more recently on social media platforms such as Reddit. Researchers argue these communities provide both benefits and harms for individuals struggling with eating disorders. Such communities offer social support (Juarascio et al., 2010) and a sense of belonging to individuals who often feel stigmatized and misunderstood (Oksanen et al., 2016; Yeshua-Katz and Martins, 2013) and help individuals better understand and manage their illness (McCormack, 2010). However, anorexia communities can also increase psychological distress and exacerbate anorexia by promoting unhealthy behaviors like extreme calorie restriction and overexercising.

Studies have shown that users often start with mainstream content that revolves around dieting and fitness but are ultimately led to more harmful (Marks et al., 2020) content. Chu et al. (2024) characterized this phenomenon as a feedback loop similar to online radicalization, which drives the increase in content glorifying eating disorders and self-harm by trapping individuals in echo chambers that reinforce extreme behaviors. They showed that both the Pro- and Anti-ED communities on Twitter are strongly connected to the Keto & Diet, Body Image, and Weight Loss communities.

With the increasing exposure to muscular male images in Western culture, there has been an upsurge in online content characterized by (i) the mass overvaluation of a muscular body ideal and (ii) the broad dissemination of methods to optimize muscularity. However, in contrast to the wealth of research about the thin ideal, online content focusing on the muscular ideal has not been well characterized.

Empirical efforts to assess the clinical impact of engaging in online pro-muscularity communities have suggested that disordered eating practices may be a central feature of these online communities. Preliminary content analyses illustrated that (i) compulsive exercise, (ii) binge eating, (iii) strict restrictive eating practices, and (iv) illicit anabolic steroid use commonly feature (Murray et al., 2016). Follow-up analyses demonstrated that engagement in pro-muscularity online content was linearly associated with clinical eating disorder symptomatology (Quiniones and Oster, 2019). Importantly, more recent evidence suggests that the pursuit of a more muscular ideal, and engagement in online pro-muscularity communities, extends to women, and in turn, is associated with an array of negative psychiatric outcomes (Cunningham, 2023).

Community moderation is meant to foster safe and supportive environments in online communities while limiting toxicity and harmful content. This task is especially challenging in sensitive health discussions where overly lax or overly strict moderation can have lasting effects. Moderators face the challenge of identifying harmful or potentially triggering content, while still allowing for nuanced discussions of personal experiences. Reddit is based on a decentralized model, where human moderators use a range of tools from simple regex-based methods like Automoderator (Jhaver et al., 2019) to machine learning-based methods (He et al., 2023) to manage online communities or subreddits. Tools like Perspective and Detoxify provide automated toxicity detection, but the risk of over-blocking makes it less suitable for nuanced community moderation tasks (Chandrasekharan et al., 2019).

Identifying harmful content in online communities remains a challenge. While automated tools to detect specific types of harmful content such as toxicity and hate speech (Davidson et al., 2017) have been developed, they lack nuance and risk overblocking (Chandrasekharan et al., 2019), which can have disparate impacts on vulnerable or marginalized groups (Dorn et al., 2023). In addition, evolving community jargon quickly makes such tools obsolete (Chancellor et al., 2016). We fill a gap in existing literature by directly comparing thin ideal and muscular ideal communities and how they discuss body image concerns.

To analyze the structure of online communities discussing diet, fitness, and body image concerns, we construct a network of subreddit mentions. In this directed network, each node represents a subreddit, and an edge between two nodes signifies an interaction where a user mentions another subreddit in their posts (in the title or content) or comments at least once. The weight of the edge represents the frequency of such interactions. We use regular expressions (Aho, 1991) to extract mentions of subreddits in the text by identifying strings that match the pattern r/subreddit_name. Each mention of a subreddit within a unit of text (whether a post or a comment) is counted once. Subreddits included in the analysis must be mentioned at least ten times, encompassing open, banned, and quarantined subreddits. We identify higher-level clusters (groups of subreddits) of densely linked nodes in the subreddit mention network using the Louvain modularity method (Blondel et al., 2008).

To quantify online communities along a dimension of a social construct like gender or body ideal, we use the community embedding method of Waller and Anderson (2021). Specifically, we create a user-community bipartite graph $G=(U,C,E)$, where $U$ are the users and $C$ are the subreddits. A link $e$ exists between a user $u$ and a community $c$ if the user has commented or posted in the subreddit. The weight of the link represents the frequency of the user activities. We then create community embeddings using node2vec (Grover and Leskovec, 2016). As a result, communities with similar user bases are clustered together in the high-dimensional embedding space.

Next, we identify several seed pairs $P=\{(c^{a}_{i},c^{b}_{i})|_{i=1}^{n}\}$ of communities that differ in the target construct but are similar in other respects. For example, [r/AskMen, r/AskWomen] and [r/daddit, r/Mommit] are pairs representing masculinity and femininity of the gender dimension. Similarly, [r/loseit, r/gainit] and [r/AnorexiaNervosa, r/GettingShredded] represent the thin and muscular directions of the body ideal spectrum. Note that the seed pair communities only need to differ primarily in the social construct, but not have to at the poles of the target dimension. The axis $x$ is a single vector robustly representing the desired social dimension, which is defined as the average embeddings of communities on one side from the pair minus that on the other side, as $x=\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i=1}^{n}(e(c^{a}_{i})-e(c^{b}_{i}))$, where $e(\cdot)$ represents the embedding of the community. We project the community onto the axis $x$ by computing the cosine similarity between the community embedding and the axis.

Language of online communities carry their mindset and beliefs (Jiang et al., 2022; He et al., 2024c, a). We encode the submissions of each subreddit using DistilBERT (Sanh et al., 2019) finetuned on Reddit data²²2https://huggingface.co/mwkby/distilbert-base-uncased-sentiment-reddit-crypto into 768-d vectors, which represent their semantics. We then measure the textual similarity between subreddits using the cosine similarity between the centroids of corpus embeddings (Kour et al., 2022). Based on this metric, we identify groups of subreddits with similar content using the agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm. We choose the number of classes that maximizes the silhouette metric.

Language carries cues to affect, which include emotions and toxicity. We measure the toxicity and emotions expressed in the language of posts and comments within the communities. To detect toxicity, we utilize the Detoxify library (Hanu and Unitary team, 2020), which provides a real toxicity score ranging from 0 to 1, with 1 indicating high toxicity. Additionally, Detoxify returns scores for various specific types of toxicity, such as obscene, threat, insult, and identity attack. To avoid noise, we consider submissions and comments with toxicity levels equal to or greater than 0.01.

For emotion analysis, we employ a model³³3https://huggingface.co/SamLowe/roberta-base-go_emotions derived from RoBERTa (Liu et al., 2019), trained on the GoEmotions dataset (Demszky et al., 2020) for multilabel classification. The GoEmotions dataset comprises Reddit comments labeled with 28 categories (27 emotion categories and a neutral category). This model outputs a score between 0 and 1, representing the confidence of each sentiment category, including the neutral category.

We plot the distributions of emotions in different subreddits in Appendix B.2. Previous studies have identified a gendered divide in emotional online language: women tend to express warmer and more compassionate language, while men often use colder and more impersonal language (Park et al., 2016). Do men and women exhibit the same behaviors when talking about their bodies? To answer this, we first look at emotions expressed in submissions made to the subreddits. The neutral emotion implies that the text does not express any emotion. Figure 4(left) shows the median confidence values of the neutral emotion in the submissions to each subreddit, ranked by their median values. Larger values imply less emotionality.

We observe a striking separation by the body ideal. Subreddits with submissions that express less emotion include those focusing on the muscular ideal, like r/steroids, r/Brogress, and r/weightroom. At the other end of the spectrum with fewer non-emotional posts are the thin ideal forums discussing anorexia and other eating disorders. Mental health-related forums (r/Suicidewatch, r/BDDVent) are understandably also more emotional.

How do members of online communities in this space respond to submissions? What emotions are expressed in the comments on the forums in our sample? Figure 4(right) in Appendix B.3 compares the distribution of the neutral emotion confidence scores in the comments to the confidence score in the submissions. Overall, comments are more neutral, i.e., less emotional, than submissions. The exceptions are the muscular ideal communities r/steroid, r/Brogress, and r/weightroom, where members respond with more emotional language than submissions. While the dominant emotion in comments across most subreddits in our study is neutral, Figure 13(b) in Appendix B.3 indicates that the dominant emotion in comments in r/progresspics, r/amiugly, and r/Brogress is admiration. This suggests that users often respond positively to posts that showcase their peer’s fitness journeys and request community feedback on their appearance. Additionally, comments in mental health and eating disorder communities, such as r/EatingDisorders and r/SuicideWatch, predominantly exhibit a caring tone, suggesting that communities provide emotional support for their peers.

We also calculate toxicity scores for submissions and comments. Figure 8 shows the distribution of toxicity scores across all subreddits in our dataset, highlighting the differences in their median scores. Generally, there is little difference in toxicity scores between submissions and comments for most subreddits. However, significant deviations from this trend exist. Specifically, members of mental health and ED communities typically respond to peers’ posts with less toxicity. This is likely because submissions in these forums often express distress, prompting supportive responses. In contrast, comments in muscular-focused communities like r/steroids, r/Brogress, BulkOrCut, and bodybuilding tend to be more toxic than submissions. This trend is also evident in appearance-focused subreddits such as amiugly and progresspics, where users invite peers to comment on their appearance. Interestingly, comments in these communities often exhibit a mix of toxicity and admiration. In muscular ideal forums, individuals’ body self-disclosures receive validation often using explicit language. The following examples show how toxicity serves to amplify admiration and support:

r/progresspics: ”You look fucking phenomenal”
r/Brogress: ”Fucking amazing bro. Keep it up. Looking big man”
r/amiugly: ”You’re so handsome holy shit”

To quantify differences in the emotions of community responses, we calculate confidence scores of the emotions and toxicity of comments (Fig. 14 and 15 in Appendix B.3) and correlate them with its body ideal score. Figure 7 shows the Spearman correlation coefficient between the median emotion and toxicity confidence score of comments and the (a) muscular-thin ideal and (b) masculine-feminine scores. Compared to the emotions of submissions (Fig. 5), toxicity in the thin ideal communities is much reduced. Comments in the more masculine communities are now more toxic than in the feminine communities, in contrast to submissions. Masculine communities are also more emotional. Positive emotions are now more aligned with the gender axis. These results support our conclusion that feminine, and to a lesser degree thin ideal, communities provide more emotional support and validation in the form of positive emotions to their members.

Toxic language on social media is often associated with harm, and many studies have utilized computational models to detect toxicity in natural language to understand this phenomenon (Pascual-Ferrá et al., 2021; Arora et al., 2023; Jiang and Vosoughi, 2020). However, this pattern fails in online spaces serving marginalized identities (Dorn et al., 2023) or discussing sensitive topics, including body image concerns. As shown in Figure 8, forums dedicated to mental health and eating disorders exhibit high levels of toxicity in both submissions and comments. Closer examination reveals that, despite being flagged as highly toxic, these subreddits rely on moderation to maintain a safe environment without spreading harm. For example, r/SuicideWatch⁴⁴4https://www.reddit.com/r/SuicideWatch/ provides a safe space for peer support for individuals struggling with suicidal thoughts. To minimize harm, moderators enforce strict rules to ensure safety and civility, such as avoiding inciting language and judgmental comments. Users in these forums often seek emotional support through self-disclosure, which may include explicit language (e.g., obscenities). Toxicity detection algorithms are prone to incorrectly flag such texts as toxic (Garg et al., 2023). Therefore, such posts are frequently flagged as toxic. Below is an original post from r/SuicideWatch illustrating this point:

r/SuicideWatch: ”Fuck everyone who has hurt me
Fuck you all. Fuck you piece of shit medical legal assholes. I hope you all live a long and ugly life full of suffering. I hope you go to bed every night crying because of the evil you emit. Fuck my ”family”. Fuck all you former friends who left when it got hard. Fuck ”doctors”, ”judges”, and whatever other little bitches out there who are just stuck up on that high horse of theirs. FUCK YOU ALL, GO KILL YOURSELVES. But do it away from me so I can die in peace.”

Conversely, forums focusing on the muscular ideal, such as r/steroids and r/GettingShredded, present a higher risk of amplifying harm despite having lower toxicity scores compared to other communities.

For example, r/steroids features discussions that promote the use of illegal muscle-building substances with significant health risks (Pärssinen and Seppälä, 2002). The information shared on these forums can lead to the dissemination of misinformation and advice that contradicts medical guidelines, posing serious physical harm to participating users.

r/steroids: ”[Compounds] Experience threads for common stacks
I think a great idea for new compound experience threads could be really common stacks like nandrolone/dbol or tren/mast etc. It could give people good insight in to what the compounds can do differently when combined with other complimentary compounds; it could help inform people of the specific synergies present between certain compounds. Just an idea.”

This research touches on highly sensitive topics related to mental health, which calls for extra precautions to minimize risks to study subjects as well as researchers. All data used for this study is public and collected following Reddit’s terms of service. The study protocol was reviewed by the authors’ IRB. To minimize privacy risks, identifiable information was removed, and analysis was carried out on aggregated data. As a result, we believe that the risks of negative outcomes due to the use of these data are trivial. To minimize risks to researchers, we did not collect images and regularly met with the team to identify potential sources of distress.