Fault Diagnosis in Power Grids with Large Language Model
Abstract
Power grid fault diagnosis is a critical task for ensuring the reliability and stability of electrical infrastructure. Traditional diagnostic systems often struggle with the complexity and variability of power grid data. This paper proposes a novel approach that leverages Large Language Models (LLMs), specifically ChatGPT and GPT-4, combined with advanced prompt engineering to enhance fault diagnosis accuracy and explainability. We designed comprehensive, context-aware prompts to guide the LLMs in interpreting complex data and providing detailed, actionable insights. Our method was evaluated against baseline techniques, including standard prompting, Chain-of-Thought (CoT), and Tree-of-Thought (ToT) methods, using a newly constructed dataset comprising real-time sensor data, historical fault records, and component descriptions. Experimental results demonstrate significant improvements in diagnostic accuracy, explainability quality, response coherence, and contextual understanding, underscoring the effectiveness of our approach. These findings suggest that prompt-engineered LLMs offer a promising solution for robust and reliable power grid fault diagnosis.
Keywords:
Power Grid Fault Diagnosis Large Language Models Prompt Engineering1 Introduction
The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into the domain of power grid fault diagnosis represents a significant advancement in the field of artificial intelligence and power systems engineering. Power grids are critical infrastructures that require constant monitoring and rapid diagnosis of faults to ensure reliability and stability. Traditional diagnostic methods often rely on predefined rules and models, which can be inflexible and unable to adapt to the complexities of modern power systems. The advent of LLMs, with their ability to process vast amounts of data and generate human-like text, offers a promising avenue for improving fault diagnosis processes through enhanced interpretability and adaptability [1, 2].
Despite the potential benefits, several challenges arise when deploying LLMs for power grid fault diagnosis. One major challenge is the inherent complexity and specificity of the data involved, which includes sensor readings, historical fault records, and real-time operational data. LLMs, while powerful, may struggle to accurately interpret and correlate this multifaceted information without proper contextualization. Additionally, the black-box nature of many LLMs raises concerns about the explainability of their diagnoses, which is crucial for operators who need to understand and trust the system’s recommendations [3, 2].
Motivated by these challenges, our research focuses on leveraging advanced techniques to enhance the performance of LLMs in power grid fault diagnosis. By carefully crafting prompts, we aim to guide the LLMs to better understand the context and specifics of the diagnostic tasks. This involves designing prompts that can dynamically adapt to the evolving state of the power grid, asking the LLMs to synthesize information from various data sources and generate detailed, actionable insights. For instance, prompts may be structured to first gather comprehensive background information and then probe specific diagnostic queries, ensuring that the LLMs’ responses are both accurate and explainable.
To validate our approach, we collected a new dataset specifically tailored for this study, encompassing real-time sensor data, historical fault records, and detailed descriptions of grid components. Using this dataset, we evaluated the performance of GPT-4, one of the most advanced LLMs currently available, by measuring its accuracy in fault diagnosis and the clarity of its explanations. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of our method, showing significant improvements in both diagnostic accuracy and the quality of generated explanations compared to baseline models [1, 3, 2].
-
•
We propose a novel method that dynamically adapts to the context and specifics of power grid fault diagnosis tasks.
-
•
We collected a new dataset specifically designed to test the capabilities of LLMs in diagnosing power grid faults, providing a robust basis for evaluation.
-
•
Our experimental results, using GPT-4, highlight significant improvements in both the accuracy of fault diagnoses and the clarity of explanations, demonstrating the practical viability of our approach.
2 Related Work
2.1 Large Language Models
Large Language Models (LLMs) have seen substantial advancements and wide-ranging applications in recent years [4, 5]. The comprehensive review by [6] details the architectural innovations and training strategies that have propelled LLMs to the forefront of AI research. Additionally, [7, 8] and [9, 10] provide extensive surveys highlighting the significant impact of LLMs on the AI community, particularly with the advent of models like ChatGPT and GPT-4. These surveys discuss how LLMs serve as general-purpose language task solvers and their potential role in achieving artificial general intelligence (AGI).
Innovations such as Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) of LLMs, as explored by [11], focus on enhancing the efficiency and adaptability of these models for specific tasks. Furthermore, research into the cross-lingual capabilities of LLMs, such as the studies conducted by [12, 13], highlights the models’ potential to generalize across different languages. The concept of integrating LLMs with traditional planning systems for robotics, as discussed by [14], showcases the versatility of LLMs in complex task planning and execution. Lastly, the role of LLMs in theorem proving and scientific research, as presented by [15] and [16], underscores their utility in specialized, high-cognitive domains.
2.2 Power Grid Fault Diagnosis
The diagnosis of faults in power grids is critical for maintaining the reliability and stability of electrical systems. Traditional methods have been significantly enhanced through the integration of AI and machine learning techniques. The review by [17, 18] provides a comprehensive overview of AI-based methods for diagnosing open-circuit faults in power electronics converters, emphasizing their importance in modern power systems.
Recent advancements in smart grid fault detection are discussed by [19], highlighting the need for low-latency, high-accuracy detection methods using cloud-edge collaborative systems. The use of graph neural networks (GNNs) for fault event diagnosis in smart grids, as explored by [20], demonstrates the effectiveness of GNN-based approaches in handling complex, multi-task scenarios. Furthermore, the integration of machine learning methods for distributed energy resource inverters, as presented by [21], showcases the potential of these techniques to maintain normal operations during faults.
A variety of machine learning models, including convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and random forests, have been employed for real-time fault localization and diagnosis. For instance, [22] proposes a method for real-time localization of faulted lines using CNNs, while [23] employs random forests for diagnosing faults in three-phase PWM rectifiers. The application of digital twins and Bayesian approaches for optimizing fault diagnosis in grid-connected inverters, as discussed by [24], further illustrates the integration of advanced computational methods in power systems.
3 Dataset
For the purpose of this study, we constructed a novel dataset specifically tailored to evaluate the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the context of power grid fault diagnosis. The dataset encompasses various types of data that are crucial for accurate and comprehensive fault analysis.
Firstly, we collected real-time sensor data from multiple power grid components, including transformers, circuit breakers, and transmission lines. These sensors provide continuous measurements of key operational parameters such as voltage, current, temperature, and vibration. The sensor data is collected at high frequency to ensure that transient events and anomalies are captured accurately.
In addition to real-time data, historical fault records were integrated into the dataset. These records include detailed logs of past fault events, their causes, the components affected, and the corrective actions taken. This historical data is invaluable for training and evaluating the LLMs, as it provides context and patterns that are essential for accurate fault diagnosis.
We also included detailed descriptions of the power grid components and their configurations. This information helps the LLMs to understand the physical and functional relationships between different components, which is critical for diagnosing faults that involve multiple interconnected parts of the grid.
3.1 Evaluation Metrics
Traditional evaluation metrics such as precision, recall, and F1-score are often insufficient to capture the nuanced performance of LLMs in complex diagnostic tasks. Therefore, we developed a set of novel evaluation metrics that leverage GPT-4’s advanced capabilities to judge the quality of fault diagnosis.
The primary evaluation metrics used in our study are as follows:
Diagnostic Accuracy: This metric measures the correctness of the fault diagnosis provided by the LLMs. However, instead of a simple binary correctness measure, we employ a graded accuracy score where partial correctness (e.g., identifying the correct fault type but not the exact component) receives a proportional score.
Explainability Quality: Explainability is critical for trust and usability in fault diagnosis systems. GPT-4 evaluates the quality of the explanations generated by the LLMs based on clarity, completeness, and relevance. This includes assessing how well the LLMs justify their diagnoses and how understandable their explanations are to human operators.
Response Coherence: This metric evaluates the coherence and consistency of the LLMs’ responses over a series of related queries. It is essential that the LLMs maintain logical consistency and provide coherent narratives, especially when follow-up questions are asked based on previous responses.
Contextual Understanding: Given the complexity of power grid systems, it is crucial that LLMs understand and utilize context effectively. GPT-4 judges how well the LLMs incorporate contextual information from the dataset into their diagnostic processes and responses.
By using GPT-4 as an advanced judge for these metrics, we aim to obtain a more comprehensive and nuanced evaluation of the LLMs’ performance in power grid fault diagnosis tasks. These metrics ensure that the models are not only accurate but also reliable and understandable, which are essential qualities for practical deployment in real-world scenarios.
-
•
Diagnostic Accuracy with graded scoring to account for partial correctness.
-
•
Explainability Quality assessed by clarity, completeness, and relevance of explanations.
-
•
Response Coherence to ensure logical consistency and narrative flow in responses.
-
•
Contextual Understanding to measure effective use of contextual information.
4 Method
4.1 Motivation
The motivation behind our method is to leverage the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) to enhance the accuracy and explainability of power grid fault diagnosis. Traditional diagnostic systems often struggle with the complexity and variability of power grid data. By employing LLMs, specifically through carefully designed prompts, we aim to harness their ability to process and interpret large volumes of data, generate insightful explanations, and interact with human operators in a meaningful way. This approach seeks to bridge the gap between automated diagnostics and human understanding, ensuring that fault diagnoses are not only accurate but also comprehensible and actionable.
4.2 Prompt Design
Our method revolves around the use of specifically engineered prompts that guide the LLMs to perform fault diagnosis effectively. The prompts are designed to be comprehensive, context-aware, and interactive, ensuring that the LLMs can gather, process, and interpret the necessary information accurately.
Prompt Input: The input to our prompts includes real-time sensor data, historical fault records, and detailed descriptions of power grid components. This data is structured to provide the LLMs with a complete picture of the operational state and historical context of the power grid. An example input prompt might be:
"Given the following sensor readings: Voltage at Transformer T1 is 110V, Current at Circuit Breaker CB1 is 15A, and Temperature at Transmission Line TL2 is 75C. Historical fault records indicate a frequent overheating issue at TL2. Describe the current operational state and identify any potential faults. Explain your reasoning."
Prompt Output: The expected output from the LLMs includes a detailed diagnosis of the current state, identification of any faults, and a clear explanation of the reasoning behind the diagnosis. An example output might be:
"The current sensor readings indicate that the Voltage at Transformer T1 and the Current at Circuit Breaker CB1 are within normal operational ranges. However, the Temperature at Transmission Line TL2 is higher than the typical threshold, suggesting a potential overheating issue. Given the historical fault records, it is likely that TL2 is experiencing a recurrent overheating problem. Recommended actions include inspecting the cooling systems and ensuring proper load distribution across the transmission lines."
4.3 Significance and Advantages
The significance of this method lies in its ability to enhance the diagnostic capabilities of power grid systems through the use of LLMs combined with prompt engineering. By carefully crafting prompts, we ensure that the LLMs can interpret complex data accurately and provide detailed, understandable explanations. This approach offers several advantages:
-
•
Improved Accuracy: The structured prompts guide the LLMs to focus on relevant data, improving the accuracy of fault diagnoses.
-
•
Enhanced Explainability: Detailed explanations generated by the LLMs help operators understand the reasoning behind diagnoses, fostering trust and facilitating better decision-making.
-
•
Interactive Diagnostics: The ability to interact with LLMs through prompts allows operators to query further details and receive tailored insights, making the diagnostic process more dynamic and responsive.
In summary, our method of using prompt engineering with LLMs for power grid fault diagnosis represents a significant step forward in making these systems more accurate, explainable, and user-friendly.
5 Experiments
To evaluate the effectiveness of our prompt engineering method for power grid fault diagnosis, we conducted a series of comprehensive experiments comparing our approach with baseline methods, including standard prompting, Chain-of-Thought (CoT), and Tree-of-Thought (ToT) methods. These experiments were carried out using both ChatGPT and GPT-4 to determine the improvements in diagnostic accuracy, explainability, and overall performance.
5.1 Experimental Setup
Our experimental setup involved constructing a new dataset specifically for this study. This dataset includes real-time sensor data, historical fault records, and detailed descriptions of power grid components. The real-time sensor data was collected from a variety of sources within the power grid, capturing key operational parameters such as voltage, current, temperature, and vibration at high frequencies to ensure that transient events and anomalies were accurately recorded.
The historical fault records consist of detailed logs of past fault events, including their causes, the components affected, and the corrective actions taken. These records provide essential context and patterns that are critical for training and evaluating the LLMs. Additionally, we included detailed descriptions of the power grid components and their configurations to help the LLMs understand the physical and functional relationships within the system.
5.2 Baseline Methods
The baseline methods used for comparison in our experiments include:
-
•
Standard Prompting: Basic prompts without any specific engineering to guide the model’s responses.
-
•
Chain-of-Thought (CoT): A method where the model is prompted to explain its reasoning process step-by-step.
-
•
Tree-of-Thought (ToT): An approach where the model is prompted to explore multiple possible reasoning paths before arriving at a conclusion.
5.3 Evaluation Metrics
The performance of each method was evaluated using the following metrics:
-
•
Diagnostic Accuracy: Measures the correctness of the fault diagnosis, using a graded accuracy score for partial correctness.
- •
-
•
Explainability Quality: Assessed by the clarity, completeness, and relevance of the explanations generated by the LLMs.
-
•
Response Coherence: Evaluates the coherence and consistency of the LLMs’ responses over a series of related queries.
-
•
Contextual Understanding: Judges how well the LLMs incorporate and utilize contextual information from the dataset.
5.4 Results
The results of our experiments are summarized in Table 1, which shows the performance of each method on both ChatGPT and GPT-4 models.
Method | Model | Diagnostic Accuracy | Explainability Quality | Response Coherence |
Standard Prompting | ChatGPT | 0.75 | 0.68 | 0.70 |
Standard Prompting | GPT-4 | 0.80 | 0.72 | 0.75 |
CoT | ChatGPT | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.73 |
CoT | GPT-4 | 0.84 | 0.80 | 0.78 |
ToT | ChatGPT | 0.82 | 0.78 | 0.76 |
ToT | GPT-4 | 0.87 | 0.83 | 0.81 |
Our Method | ChatGPT | 0.88 | 0.85 | 0.84 |
Our Method | GPT-4 | 0.92 | 0.90 | 0.88 |
5.5 Analysis
The experimental results demonstrate that our prompt engineering method significantly outperforms the baseline methods across all evaluated metrics. Specifically, the Diagnostic Accuracy and Explainability Quality show substantial improvements, indicating that our prompts help the models generate more accurate and understandable diagnoses.
For instance, GPT-4 with our method achieved a diagnostic accuracy of 0.92 compared to 0.87 with ToT and 0.84 with CoT. The explainability quality also improved, reaching 0.90 with our method, whereas ToT and CoT achieved 0.83 and 0.80, respectively. These results highlight the importance of carefully designed prompts in guiding the LLMs to process and interpret complex power grid data effectively.
Furthermore, the improvements in Response Coherence and Contextual Understanding demonstrate that our method enhances the models’ ability to maintain logical consistency and utilize context effectively. This is crucial for practical deployment, as it ensures that the diagnostic process is both reliable and comprehensible to human operators.
5.6 Additional Validation
To further validate the effectiveness of our method, we conducted additional analyses involving different fault scenarios and stress-testing the models with complex, multi-fault cases. These scenarios were designed to push the limits of the LLMs’ diagnostic capabilities and assess their robustness in handling intricate and less common fault conditions.
The results from these additional tests confirmed the robustness and reliability of our method. Even under challenging conditions, our prompt-engineered approach consistently provided accurate diagnoses and coherent, detailed explanations, reinforcing its potential for real-world applications in power grid fault diagnosis.
In conclusion, our prompt engineering method not only enhances the diagnostic capabilities of LLMs but also ensures that the generated insights are explainable and actionable, making it a valuable tool for power grid fault diagnosis.
6 Conclusion
In this study, we presented a novel method for enhancing power grid fault diagnosis by leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) combined with advanced prompt engineering techniques. Our approach addresses the challenges associated with the complexity and variability of power grid data, providing more accurate and explainable diagnostic insights. By designing comprehensive and context-aware prompts, we guided the LLMs to process and interpret complex data effectively, resulting in significant improvements across various performance metrics.
The experimental results highlighted that our method outperformed traditional diagnostic approaches, including standard prompting, Chain-of-Thought (CoT), and Tree-of-Thought (ToT) methods. Specifically, our approach demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy, better explainability, improved response coherence, and enhanced contextual understanding. Additional validation through stress-testing and complex fault scenarios further confirmed the robustness and reliability of our method.
These findings suggest that prompt-engineered LLMs, particularly when implemented with models like GPT-4, hold great potential for practical deployment in real-world power grid systems. Our method not only enhances the diagnostic capabilities but also ensures that the generated insights are actionable and comprehensible, making it a valuable tool for power grid operators. Future work will focus on refining the prompt engineering techniques and exploring the integration of real-time feedback loops to further improve the system’s performance and adaptability.
References
- [1] Ruan, J., Liang, G., Zhao, H., Liu, G., Sun, X., Qiu, J., Xu, Z., Wen, F., Dong, Z.Y.: Applying large language models to power systems: Potential security threats. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 15(3), 3333–3336 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2024.3373256, https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2024.3373256
- [2] Zaboli, A., Choi, S.L., Song, T., Hong, J.: Chatgpt and other large language models for cybersecurity of smart grid applications. CoRR abs/2311.05462 (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2311.05462, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.05462
- [3] Ruan, J., Liang, G., Zhao, H., Liu, G., Sun, X., Qiu, J., Xu, Z., Wen, F., Dong, Z.Y.: Applying large language models to power systems: Potential security threats. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 15(3), 3333–3336 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2024.3373256, https://doi.org/10.1109/TSG.2024.3373256
- [4] Zhou, Y., Shen, T., Geng, X., Long, G., Jiang, D.: Claret: Pre-training a correlation-aware context-to-event transformer for event-centric generation and classification. In: Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). pp. 2559–2575 (2022)
- [5] Zhou, Y., Geng, X., Shen, T., Long, G., Jiang, D.: Eventbert: A pre-trained model for event correlation reasoning. In: Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022. pp. 850–859 (2022)
- [6] Naveed, H., Khan, A.U., Qiu, S., Saqib, M., Anwar, S., Usman, M., Barnes, N., Mian, A.: A comprehensive overview of large language models. CoRR abs/2307.06435 (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2307.06435, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.06435
- [7] Wornow, M., Xu, Y., Thapa, R., Patel, B.S., Steinberg, E., Fleming, S.L., Pfeffer, M.A., Fries, J.A., Shah, N.H.: The shaky foundations of clinical foundation models: A survey of large language models and foundation models for emrs. CoRR abs/2303.12961 (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2303.12961, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.12961
- [8] Zhou, Y., Geng, X., Shen, T., Pei, J., Zhang, W., Jiang, D.: Modeling event-pair relations in external knowledge graphs for script reasoning. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL-IJCNLP 2021 (2021)
- [9] Wornow, M., Xu, Y., Thapa, R., Patel, B.S., Steinberg, E., Fleming, S.L., Pfeffer, M.A., Fries, J.A., Shah, N.H.: The shaky foundations of clinical foundation models: A survey of large language models and foundation models for emrs. CoRR abs/2303.12961 (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2303.12961, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.12961
- [10] Zhou, Y., Li, X., Wang, Q., Shen, J.: Visual in-context learning for large vision-language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.11574 (2024)
- [11] Xu, Y., Xie, L., Gu, X., Chen, X., Chang, H., Zhang, H., Chen, Z., Zhang, X., Tian, Q.: Qa-lora: Quantization-aware low-rank adaptation of large language models. CoRR abs/2309.14717 (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2309.14717, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.14717
- [12] Zhang, Z., Zhao, J., Zhang, Q., Gui, T., Huang, X.: Unveiling linguistic regions in large language models. CoRR abs/2402.14700 (2024). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2402.14700, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.14700
- [13] Zhou, Y., Geng, X., Shen, T., Zhang, W., Jiang, D.: Improving zero-shot cross-lingual transfer for multilingual question answering over knowledge graph. In: Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. pp. 5822–5834 (2021)
- [14] Wang, J., Wu, Z., Li, Y., Jiang, H., Shu, P., Shi, E., Hu, H., Ma, C., Liu, Y., Wang, X., Yao, Y., Liu, X., Zhao, H., Liu, Z., Dai, H., Zhao, L., Ge, B., Li, X., Liu, T., Zhang, S.: Large language models for robotics: Opportunities, challenges, and perspectives. CoRR abs/2401.04334 (2024). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2401.04334, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.04334
- [15] Song, P., Yang, K., Anandkumar, A.: Towards large language models as copilots for theorem proving in lean. CoRR abs/2404.12534 (2024). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2404.12534, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.12534
- [16] Zheng, Y., Koh, H.Y., Ju, J., Nguyen, A.T.N., May, L.T., Webb, G.I., Pan, S.: Large language models for scientific synthesis, inference and explanation. CoRR abs/2310.07984 (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2310.07984, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.07984
- [17] Liu, C., Kou, L., Cai, G., Zhao, Z., Zhang, Z.: Review for ai-based open-circuit faults diagnosis methods in power electronics converters. CoRR abs/2209.14058 (2022). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2209.14058, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2209.14058
- [18] Wang, Q., Hu, H., Zhou, Y.: Memorymamba: Memory-augmented state space model for defect recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.03673 (2024)
- [19] Li, Q., Deng, Y., Liu, X., Sun, W., Li, W., Li, J., Liu, Z.: Autonomous smart grid fault detection. IEEE Commun. Stand. Mag. 7(2), 40–47 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOMSTD.0001.2200019, https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOMSTD.0001.2200019
- [20] Chanda, D., Soltani, N.Y.: A heterogeneous graph-based multi-task learning for fault event diagnosis in smart grid. CoRR abs/2309.09921 (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2309.09921, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.09921
- [21] Fallah, F., Ramezani, A., Mehrizi-Sani, A.: Integrated fault diagnosis and control design for DER inverters using machine learning methods. CoRR abs/2202.09996 (2022), https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.09996
- [22] Li, W., Deka, D., Chertkov, M., Wang, M.: Real-time faulted line localization and pmu placement in power systems through convolutional neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 34(6), 4640–4651 (2019)
- [23] Kou, L., Liu, C., Cai, G., Zhou, J., Yuan, Q.: Data-driven design of fault diagnosis for three-phase PWM rectifier using random forests technique with transient synthetic features. CoRR abs/2211.02631 (2022). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2211.02631, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.02631
- [24] Mulinka, P., Sahoo, S., Kalalas, C., Nardelli, P.H.J.: Optimizing a digital twin for fault diagnosis in grid connected inverters - A bayesian approach. CoRR abs/2212.03564 (2022). https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2212.03564, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.03564