Building Pre-train LLM Dataset for the Indic Languages: A Case Study on Hindi

A certain kind of language model known as pre-trained LLM has been trained on a sizable corpus of text data. Due to their capacity to allow machines to comprehend and produce human language, Language Models have grown in importance in the field of natural language processing (NLP) Zhao et al. (2023). Speech recognition, sentiment analysis, machine translation, audio-to-text conversion, and other tasks are all handled by NLP-based systems using language models. LLMs go through extensive training and fine-tuning, which can lead to increased dependability and performance. It is simpler to integrate them into current systems and applications because they frequently come with well-documented APIs and integration optionsNaveed et al. (2023).

Despite the fact that there are over 7,000 languages that are actively spoken worldwide, yet most NLP systems only employ a small number of languages, including English, Chinese, Urdu, Farsi, Arabic, French, and Spanish. Since many cultures are represented and inherited through different languages, there is an increasing interest in creating NLP for languages other than English. Text creation, summarization, and language understanding tasks have been impeded by the lack of strong pre-trained language models for non-English languages like Hindi, which has impeded the advancement of the development of NLP applications in these languages. Therefore, to support a variety of NLP applications and further the development of multilingual NLP, it is necessary to create more reliable and effective pre-trained language models for non-English languages. For this purpose, a large dataset is required for training models.

With over 600 million speakers, Hindi is one of the most commonly spoken languages in the world. This poses both special potential and challenges for NLP research and applications. In contrast to languages such as English, there are still few large-scale, high-quality datasets and pre-trained language models available for Hindi. The lack of resources makes it difficult to create reliable NLP systems that are suited to the requirements of Hindi speakers. To tackle this difficulty, it is imperative to create big language models that have already been trained particularly for Hindi. These models can be used as the basis for many other NLP tasks, such as sentiment analysis, machine translation, text categorization, named entity identification, and more. Pre-trained language models can drastically cut down on the amount of data and processing power needed to create efficient NLP solutions in Hindi by utilizing the capabilities of deep learning and transfer learning techniques.

We aim to bridge this gap in this study by describing the procedure of creating big, pre-trained language models dataset for Hindi. We’ll look at a variety of model architecture, training approaches, data-gathering methods, preprocessing methods, and assessment strategies that are specific to the Hindi language. Our objective is to facilitate breakthroughs in academic research as well as industrial applications by offering scholars and practitioners a thorough roadmap to creating cutting-edge NLP systems for Hindi.

Our research article on the Hindi LLM pre-trained model dataset comprises an associated section where we examine specific investigations that make major contributions to the field of large language models and pre-trained model adaption to new languages. First off, Zhao et al. (2023) offers a thorough summary of numerous big language models, covering their designs, approaches for training, and uses in a variety of languages. This study provides insightful information about the state of language modeling, which is essential background knowledge for comprehending the growth and developments in the area. The important job of adapting pre-trained language models to new languages is addressed by Csaki et al. (2023); this difficulty is especially pertinent to our research on the Hindi LLM model. The study investigates effective methods for adjusting current models to manage the linguistic subtleties and traits of various languages.

The author Joshi (2022) introduces L3Cube-HindBERT and DevBERT pre-trained models, which symbolize particular advances in the context of Devanagari-based languages, such as Marathi and Hindi. This work is with our goal of creating a pre-trained model dataset specifically for the Hindi language since it emphasizes the significance of language-specific adaptations in meeting the needs of languages with distinctive scripts and linguistic traits. Altogether, these studies set the foundation and offer insightful information about large language models and how they are tailored to different linguistic circumstances, which helps us with our research on the Hindi LLM pre-trained dataset. The MuRIL: Multilingual Representations for Indian Languages developed by Khanuja et al. (2021) and discusses the drawbacks of the multilingual language models that are currently in use for Indian languages and presents MuRIL as an option for improvement. It points up problems, including subpar performance and handling transliteration and code-mixing complications, and emphasizes the necessity for models customized to India’s linguistic variety. Although the work offers insightful information, it could be improved by future research directions and a deeper examination of the effects of code-mixing and transliteration. Within the field of Hindi-specific pre-trained language models (PLMs), new developments have prompted the creation of HinPLMs Huang et al. (2021), which are intended to improve Hindi language natural language processing tasks. This paper captures the complex language patterns and semantics present in Hindi literature by utilizing large-scale corpora and advanced systems. Promising outcomes have also been observed in attempts to modify and enhance these models for particular tasks and domains, indicating their ability to tackle practical challenges in Hindi linguistic processing. The publication Gala et al. (2024) highlights a significant research vacuum, citing a widespread absence of support for Indian languages in contemporary language models, which are mostly focused on English. It highlights the crucial significance that different instruction-tuning datasets play in maximizing the efficacy of LLMs and calls attention to their inadequate availability for Hindi. The study emphasizes the value of creating an open ecosystem for additional research and innovation, and it shows how filling these gaps advances the discipline, especially in Indian languages.

Developing LLMs for high-resource languages like English has been the main focus of recent advances in NLP. Still, there is a long way to go in creating equivalent models for low- and mid-resource languages. In response to this problem, Khan et al. (2024) unveiled the INDICLLMSUITE, an extensive collection of tools created especially for the creation of Indic LLMs in 22 languages. Pre-training and fine-tuning datasets totaling 251 billion tokens and 74.8 million prompt-response pairs are included in the package. Khan et al. (2024) state that the resources have been carefully selected from a variety of sources, including websites, PDFs, videos, and translations. There are still several issues and difficulties even if the INDICLLMSUITE is a great effort in terms of offering resources for Indic language models. Assuring the correctness and dependability of carefully selected datasets requires quality assurance procedures, and increasing coverage to encompass other low-resource languages will improve inclusiveness.

As a member of the Indo-Aryan branch of the Indo-European language family, Hindi is a highly organized language Patil et al. (2008). It is among India’s official languages. The subject usually appears at the front of the sentence, followed by the object and the verb. This subject-object-verb (SOV) word order is what distinguishes the Hindi language structure. However, due to its flexible nature, Hindi allows for variations in word order to emphasize certain elements or express different complexities. Hindi has a large lexicon that incorporates words from many different languages, including English, Persian, Sanskrit, and Arabic. It uses the Devanagari script, a syllabic alphabet with unique letters for vowels and consonants.

In terms of grammar, Hindi is an extremely inflected language. Nouns are classified by gender (masculine or feminine), number (singular or plural), and case (nominative, accusative, dative, genitive, locative, etc.). Adjectives and pronouns share the same gender, number, and case as the nouns they modify. Hindi has a complex system of verb conjugation, with verbs inflected to indicate tense, aspect, mood, person, and number. Like Odia, Hindi makes use of postpositions rather than prepositions, which means that these markers are placed after the noun they govern. These postpositions play a crucial role in expressing various relationships and indicate concepts such as location, direction, possession, and time.

The process of building the pre-designed LLM dataset involved finding and compiling a variety of textual data from different domains, genres, and dialect variations in the Hindi language landscape. This includes literary works, historical archives, contemporary discourse, digital content, and other linguistic works that contribute to the richness and diversity of the Indian language corpus.

With a special focus on Hindi as the primary language of interest, the dataset provides a targeted approach to capture unique linguistic features, semantic subtleties, and contextual nuances prevalent in Hindi texts. This targeted research enables researchers and practitioners to develop language models and NLP algorithms that match the specific linguistic features and requirements of Hindi, thereby increasing their accuracy, flexibility, and applicability in real-world scenarios.

The initial step involves obtaining various texts from different domains, which include news articles, literary works, online content, and social media, among others. It is essential to create a rich and representative dataset that encapsulates the breadth of linguistic nuance and contextual variation present in Hindi.

The initial stage of data processing begins with the exploration of different datasets, each presenting a unique set of challenges and opportunities. From Wikipedia’sJones (2017) knowledge repository to specialized corpora such as Hindi Dialect Bafna (2022) and the ai4bharat IndicParaphrase dataset Kumar et al. (2022), each source has added a unique flavor to the entire tapestry of linguistic information. In addition, the addition of datasets such as Miracl CorpusZhang et al. (2022), Oscar Suárez et al. (2019),Suárez et al. (2020), and bigscience/xP3all Muennighoff et al. (2022) have added depth and breadth to the training corpus, enriching it with a variety of text genres, styles, and registers.

After the acquisition, the dataset was intensively developed to standardize its format and improve its suitability for training large-scale language models. This pre-processing begins by filtering out external metadata such as ID, URL, and all kinds of audio and compiling data containing relevant textual content. Special attention is paid to the regularization of text elements, including the removal of special characters, punctuation, and number artifacts, thereby creating a consistent and consistent corpus for efficient model training.

The culmination of this initial work resulted in the transformation of a raw dataset characterized by two main columns, filename and content, into a coherent and organized form. The former serves as a beacon, clarifying the provenance of each document in the corpus, while the latter contains the cleaned textual data content and format. This uniformity not only facilitates seamless integration across different datasets but also provides the basis for the development of robust LM models designed to understand and generate natural language text with exceptional fidelity.

In addition, advanced techniques such as language processing and domain-specific filtering are used to improve the quality and relevance of the training data. This includes identifying and correcting language-related errors, resolving transliteration issues, and filtering out domain-specific arguments or technical terms that may introduce interference or bias into the dataset.

The culmination of this initial work resulted in a refined and streamlined corpus characterized by uniformity, consistency, and relevance. The revised dataset, embellished with detailed textual content, forms the foundation for building an advanced LM model for India. In addition, the pre-processing step not only lays the groundwork for effective model training, but also facilitates downstream NLP tasks such as text classification, sentiment analysis, and machine translation.

In the Analysis and Discussion section of this paper, we provide a comprehensive overview of various corpora collections used in the construction of pre-trained LM datasets. The distribution of these datasets is shown in Fig3, which shows the number of tokens of language resources included in the unified dataset. Here, we explore findings, observations, and conclusions from working with this dataset that highlight challenges, opportunities, and contributions to the broader field of NLP for Indian languages, especially Indian languages.

One of the key observations is the wide range and variety of datasets collected to develop LLM for Indian languages. A total of 1.27 billion tokens collected in various datasets represent the wealth of linguistic resources available for developing complex language models that match the complexity of Hindi. This wealth of data provides an important opportunity to advance NLP research and practice in the Indian language landscape.

Integrating various datasets into a single corpus is a major task in the effort to build a pre-train LLM dataset for the Hindi language. This comprehensive dataset, carefully curated from various sources, contains a harmonious combination of linguistic diversity, cultural richness, and thematic depth, thus providing an invaluable resource for developing NLP capabilities in the Indian language landscape.

The collected and processed data are available through the Hugging Face:

https://huggingface.co/datasets/Hindi-data-hub/odaigen_hindi_pre_trained_sp

Researchers and practitioners can freely access the dataset for practice, model training, and further research.

In this research, we describe a complete strategy to addressing the issues of developing large pre-trained language models (LLMs) for Hindi, with an emphasis on data collecting, preprocessing, and availability. By collecting a broad and extensive dataset of 1.28 billion tokens from multiple sources, topics, and dialects, we have created the groundwork for furthering the field of natural language processing (NLP) studies as well as applications. the paper Building a Pre-Trained LLM Dataset for Hindi Language is an important step in the development of a Hindi-focused, large-scale, Hindi-specific pre-trained language model (LLM). Comprehensive integration of various datasets and intelligent preprocessing efforts lay the foundation for producing reliable and context-aware LLMs. Despite its contribution, the study recognizes some limitations and areas for future research.

The provided dataset provides a comprehensive library of linguistic assets that encapture Hindi’s particular subtleties, cultural complexity, and thematic depth. We have turned unstructured textual information into a refined dataset sufficient for training strong and context-aware LLMs built specifically for Hindi. The dataset’s domain coverage includes a wide range of themes, genres, and language variances namely different dialects and nuances of the vernacular language, allowing for the creation of models that are capable of understanding and producing coherent texts across a variety of fields and styles.

In addition, future work can be explored to refine evaluation criteria and indicators to more comprehensively assess LLM performance. Standardized evaluation procedures and clear benchmarks are needed to effectively compare different models and approaches. By creating a reliable assessment framework, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of LLM trainees, thereby leading to continuous improvement and innovation in the field.

Future research can explore ways to increase the availability and accessibility of resources for the wider research community. Facilitating easy access to datasets, source code, and pre-engineered models can promote collaboration, accelerate research, and democratize access to advanced language processing technologies. In addition, initiatives to support multilingualism and inclusiveness in the development of language models can contribute to digital inclusion and linguistic opportunities in diverse language communities.

While the huge pre-trained LLM dataset described in this study provides substantial prospects for furthering the resources available for research opportunities, we need to acknowledge the limitations associated. Despite attempts to pre-process data, there may still be flaws or inconsistencies that affect the efficacy of trained models. Furthermore, biases inherent in the source data, such as cultural or representational biases, may impact the action patterns of language models, resulting in unforeseen effects in downstream applications.

• •

  Data Accuracy and Prejudice The paper recognizes the complexity of data bias and representation inherent in structured datasets. Despite careful efforts to collect diverse linguistic samples, bias can persist which can lead to misrepresentation or misrepresentation of certain linguistic and cultural aspects. These constraints may impede the generalization and implementation of trained LLMs, particularly in real-world contexts characterized by linguistic diversity, because structured datasets may provide insufficient coverage of linguistic change.

• •

  Addressing Linguistic Diversity and Evaluation Criteria Although this paper emphasizes the importance of linguistic diversity, it may not be sufficiently represented in some dialects, registers, or domains. As a result, LLMs trained in such information may struggle to accurately understand and produce texts across all the linguistic variations that exist in the Indian language landscape. In addition, the paper can benefit from further clarification on the evaluation criteria and indicators used to evaluate LLM performance. A standardized evaluation procedure is needed to compare the effectiveness of different models and approaches in the field. Clear standards will allow you to understand the strengths and shortcomings of an LLM.

• •

  Language Diversity and Domain Coverage While the dataset seeks to capture a wide range of linguistic content, it may not fully represent the breadth of language. Certain dialects, vernacular nuances, or specialized domains may be undervalued or absent from the dataset, restricting the applicability of trained models to a wide range of linguistic settings. Furthermore, the dataset’s inclusion of specific areas or topics may be unequal, thereby biasing model performance.

• •

  Resource Constraints in Developing The development and upkeep of a large pre-trained LLM dataset necessitate enormous resources for data gathering, preparation, storage, and computational infrastructure. While attempts have been undertaken to put together and consolidate the dataset, resource restrictions may limit its scalability and accessibility to researchers as well as practitioners, especially those working in resource-constrained situations.

• •

  Ethical and Privacy Considerations The collection and use of huge amounts of textual data raises serious ethical and privacy concerns, specifically about user authorization, data anonymization, and the potential exploitation of sensitive information. While attempts have been made to follow ethical norms and data protection guidelines, extra caution and transparency in managing and securing the information is required to guarantee that privacy rights and ethical values are upheld.