Competition of long-range interactions and noise at ramped quench dynamical quantum phase transition: The case of the long-range pairing Kitaev chain
Abstract
The nonequilibrium dynamics of long-range pairing Kitaev model with noiseless/noisy linear time dependent chemical potential, is investigated in the frame work of dynamical quantum phase transitions (DQPTs). We have shown for the ramp crosses a single quantum critical point, while the short-range pairing Kitaev model displays a single critical time scale, the long-range pairing induces a region with three DQPTs time scales. We have found that the region with three DQPTs time scales shrinks in the presence of the noise. In addition, we have uncovered for a quench crossess two critical points, the critical sweep velocity above which the DQPTs disappear, enhances by the long-range pairing exponent while decreases in the presence of the noise. On the basis of numerical simulations, we have shown that noise diminishes the long-range pairing inductions.
I Introduction
Long-range interactions has been attracting great interest due to revealing surprising features [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14]. Long-range systems are often fascinating approach to analyze the validity of the hypotheses that are otherwise clearly perceived for prototypical short-range systems. The remarkable experimental advancement in ultracold atomic platforms has triggered a plethora of theoretical studies and opened up the possibility of engineering and fine-tuning long-range systems with great accuracy [15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20].
Moreover, the unprecedented advancement in recent years is impeccable enough to study the none-equilibrium dynamics of long-range systems in a controled manner [21, 22, 23, 24]. Consequently, over the latest decades, theoretical and experimental research has raised a great deal of interest in non-equilibrium quantum phenomena [25], which has led to the discovery of some intriguing physics, including the observation of Kibble-Zurek phenomena [26, 27], discrete time-crystals [28], many-body localization [29] and the breaking of ergodicity [30, 31, 32].
In recent years, the concept of dynamical quantum phase transitions (DQPTs) have been introduced as nonequilibrium counterparts of thermal phase transitions [33, 34]. Within DQPTs real time plays the role of control parameter analogous to temperature in equilibrium phase transitions [35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44]. While the conventional equilibrium phase transition is characterized by nonanalyticities in the thermal free energy, the DQPT is represented by the nonanalytical behavior of dynamical free energy [45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61]. DQPT displays a phase transition between dynamically emerging quantum phases, that takes place during the nonequilibrium coherent quantum time evolution under sudden/ramped quench [62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80] or time-periodic modulation of Hamiltonian [81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88]. Furthermore, analogous to order parameters at equilibrium quantum phase transition, a dynamical topological order parameter is proposed to capture DQPTs [89, 90].
DQPT was observed experimentally in several studies [91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97] to confirm theoretical anticipation. Most of these researches associated with deterministic quantum evolution generated by ramping or a sudden quench of the Hamiltonian. However, relatively little attention has been devoted to the stochastic driving of thermally isolated systems with noisy Hamiltonian. In any real experiment, the simulation of the desired time dependent Hamiltonian is imperfect and noisy fluctuations are inevitable [98, 99, 100, 101]. Therefore, understanding the effects of noise in such systems is of utmost importance both in designing experiments and comprehend the results [102, 103, 104, 105, 106].
Despite numerous studies of DQPTs in a wide variety of long-range quantum systems [107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113], comparatively little attention has been paid to the noise effects [114] on long-range interaction properties. In the present work, we contribute to develop the systematic understanding of the competition between noise and long-range interaction at noisy ramped quench DQPT. For this purpose, we investigate the ramped quench DQPT of long-range pairing Kitaev model [13] in the presence of the white noise with Gaussian distribution [104]. We solve an exact master equation for the quench dynamics averaged over the noise distribution. This allows us to study the competition between the near-adiabatic quench dynamics of the gapped modes of the long-range pairing system and the accumulation of noise induced excitations.
We show that, for the quench across a single critical point, while the long-range pairing induces a region with three DQPTs time scales (three critical modes), this region shrinks in the presence of the noise. In addition, for a quench that crosses two critical points, the critical sweep velocity above which the DQPTs disappear, enhances by the long-range pairing while decreases in the presence of the noise. In other words, the noise has destructive effects on long-range pairing features.
The paper is organized as follows. In Sec. II, the dynamical free energy and DTOP of the two band Hamiltonians are discussed. In Sec. III, we present the model and review its exact solution and equilibrium phase transition. Section IV is dedicated to the numerical simulation of the noiseless case based on the analytical result. The effects of noise on the system is numerically studied in Section V. Section VI contains some concluding remarks.
II Quench of an integrable model and dynamical phase transition
II.1 Dynamical free energy
To study the ramped quench DQPTs, we follow the method used in Refs. [115, 116] in the subsequent discussions. Let us consider an integrable model reducible to a two level Hamiltonian for each momentum mode and the system is initially () prepared in the ground state of the pre-quench Hamiltonian for each mode. Thereupon the parameter is quenched from an initial value at to the final value at , following the linear quenching protocol , in such a way that the system crosses the quantum critical point (QCP) at . Since the adiabatic dynamics breaks in the vicinity of the QCP, the final state (for the -th mode) may not be the ground state of the post-quench Hamiltonian . The post-quench state can be written in the form of , () where, and are the ground and the excited states of the post-quench Hamiltonian , respectively with the corresponding energy eigenvalues and . The non-adiabatic transition probability where the system ends up in the excited state at the end of quench is denoted by . Therefore, the Loschmidt overlap and the corresponding dynamical free energy [33, 34], for the mode for are defined by [115, 116]
(2) |
respectively, where is the size of the system.
Summing over the contributions from all modes and replacing summation by the integral in the thermodynamic limit, one gets [115, 116, 117]
where is measured from the instant the final state, , is reached at the end of the ramped quench (Fig. 1). The non-analyticities in appear at the values of the real time s given by
(4) |
These are the critical times for the DQPTs, with the mode at which the argument of the logarithm in Eq. (II.1) vanishes for .
For the case , Eq. (4) is simplified to
(5) |
II.2 Dynamical Topological Order Parameter
The dynamical topological order parameter is introduced to represent the topological characteristic associated with DQPTs [89]. The DTOP displays integer (quantized) values as a function of time and its unit magnitude jumps at the time of DQPTs reveal the topological aspect of DQPT [89, 118, 119].
The dynamical topological order parameter is defined as [89]
(6) |
where the geometric phase is extracted from the total phase by subtracting the dynamical phase : . The total phase is the phase factor of Loschmidt amplitude in its polar coordinate representation, i.e., and in which and , for the two level system can be calculated as follows [115, 116]
III Model and Exact Solution
Recently, an extension of the Kitaev model [120] which describes the algebraic decay of the tunneling and/or pairing terms has been intensively investigated [121, 13, 12, 122, 123]. This model describes experimental realizations of long-range topological superconductors [124, 125]. It has been shown that the phase diagram is modified in the presence of the long-range interactions [13, 122]. Moreover, this model exhibits algebraically localized edge states and an algebraic closing of the energy gap [13, 122]. However, when the pairing and tunneling terms are isotropic, exponential localization is recovered independent of the power-law exponent, as long as it is larger than unity [122, 12].
In this paper, we investigate how the noise affects features of the long-range interaction in the long-range pairing Kitaev model. Representing fermionic annihilation (creation) operators as , the Hamiltonian of the long-range pairing Kitaev model with linear time dependent chemical potential is given as
(8) | |||||
where denotes the hopping strength of the fermionic particles between adjacent lattice sites, is the strength of the superconducting pairing term that decays with distance in a power law fashion characterized by exponent , and the onsite time dependent chemical potential changes from the initial value at time to the final values at with sweep velocity . The effective distance , between two sites denoted by and on the closed ring with sites, is given by the function .
In the presence of the long-range pairing, the Hamiltonian Eq. (8) is exactly solvable in the momentum space [13]. Introducing the Nambu spinor , the Fourier transformed Hamiltonian can be expressed as the sum of independent terms acting in the two-dimensional Hilbert space generated by
(9) |
where (the superscript in is introduced to denote noise-free driving) is given by
(10) |
where is the Fourier transform of the superconducting gap term and . In the thermodynamic limit , when gets continuous values, the function , is described as with being the polylogarithmic function of that vanishes in the limit and for . When the polylogarithmic function only vanishes in the limit .
In the limit of , the model reduces to that of the short-range Kitaev chain with only nearest-neighbor pairing which is exactly solvable and its topological properties were unravelled by Kitaev [120]. In this limit, for time-independent chemical potential and , the time-independent Hamiltonian undergoes topological quantum phase transitions at , where the energy gap closes at [120]. For the phase diagram and the topological properties of the long-range pairing Kitaev chain are identical to that of a short-range Kitaev chain (Fig. (2)). However, as approaches , the bulk gradually starts becoming gapped near and for , no longer remains a critical point [13].
In the time dependent case , the instantaneous eigenvalues and eigenvectors of time dependent Hamiltonian Eq.(8), are given by
(11) | |||||
where,
with , and , and
are the adiabatic basis of the system.
In such a case, if the system is prepared in its ground state at (), the probability that the :th mode is found in the upper level at is given as (see Appendix A)
IV Noiseless numerical results
In this section, we report the results of our numerical simulations, based on an analytical approach, to investigate the dynamics of the model using the notion of DQPTs. To this end, we consider the linear quenching of the chemical potential , changes from initial value , where the system is prepared in its ground state, to various final values at . In addition, to better understand the effect of long-range pairing on the dynamics of system after the ramp quench, we will focus only on the case where the location of the critical points in the parameter space is not altered by varying .
IV.0.1 Quench across a single critical point
For the ramped quench, which crosses the single critical point at , the excitation probability after quench is dependent. As expected, when the system is driven across the critical point, the system undergoes nonadiabatic evolution due to the gap closing and thus the transition probability is maximum at the gap closing mode . However, away from the gap closing mode the system evolves adiabatically due to the non-zero energy gap and can be shown that . Considering these two limiting cases, and also continuity of the transition probability as a function of in the thermodynamic limit, imply that there should exist a critical mode at which and consequently DQPTs occur. The transition probability has been plotted versus in Fig. 3(a), (b) for for different sweep velocities as the ramped quench crosses the single critical point . Since the quench crosses the critical point, the excitation probability takes its maximum value at , while it is negligible away from the gap closing mode (). From these observations, it is straightforward to conclude that there is always a critical momentum and hence those of , related through Eq. (6). Interestingly, we observed that there exists a region in the parameter space where the system encompasses three distinct critical modes for which , even though the system is quenched across a single QCP. In such a case, the system displays three different critical time scales as obtained from Eq. (6). While in the short-range case [79, 116] the system contains only a single critical mode following a quench across a single QCP. In Fig. 3(c), we have plotted a phase diagram in plane for , and in which region with three critical modes (TCMs) separated from the regions with single critical mode (SCM). On the phase boundary separating these two regions, there are two values of with . As seen, the width of TCMs region shrinks and vanishes as increases and also as decreases. The numerical results show that, the threshold values of above which TCMs region appears is . In other words, the exponent has a critical value above which the dynamical behavior of the system is similar to that of the short-range system. Consequently, our findings confirm that the appearance of TCMs region is indeed an artifact of the long-range pairing nature of the Hamiltonian.
The dynamical free energy and DTOP () of the model have been depicted in Fig. 3(d)-(f) for the quench across a single critical point (corresponding to Fig. 3(b)), for different sweep velocities and , respectively. In Fig. 3(d) and (f) the system is in SCM region, where it encompasses a single critical time scale . Although the cusps in are not discernible but the quantization and jumps in the associated DTOP are clearly visible as an indicator of DQPTs. The observed oscillation in the dynamical free energy seems to be the natural behavior, which results from the unitary time evolution of the post-quench ground state in terms of the Hamiltonian’s eigenstates. The behaviour of DTOP, i.e, whether would jump or drop, can be predicted by the slope of at the critical momentum (positive (negative) slop results jump (drop)) [116, 107]. Appearing successive jumps or drops in indicate that the system has only a single critical mode, while the presence of both jump and drop in DTOP curve implies that the system has at least two critical modes as seen in Fig. 3(e). As seen, uninterrupted jumps in Fig. 3(d), (f) reveal that the system is in SCM region while two successive jumps and then drop of (t) in Fig. 3(e) points the existence of three different critical modes in accordance with (Fig. 3(b)), which shows that the system is in TCMs region.
IV.0.2 Quench across two critical points
Performing a quench across both equilibrium critical points shows new features. In these cases, the chemical potential is swept from one trivial (non-topological) phase to another one, and it is not expected to result in DQPTs when the quench is sudden [48, 116, 117]. For a quench crossing both critical points, as expected, the nonadiabatic evolution of the system at gap closing modes , leads to maximum transition probability, i.e., .
However, the minimum of , occurs at the maximum energy gap mode at , which is the farthest mode from the gap closing mode. Since, the maximum value of transition probability is greater than , the appearance of DQPTs requires the condition that the minimum value of transition probability becomes less than . As the system changes adiabatically at the gapped mode for small sweep velocity, making the quench sufficiently slow () ensures that the minimum excitation probability is smaller than , which sets a succession of DQPTs. In Fig. 4(a) the transition probability has been shown versus for a quench that crosses two critical points (i.e. ) for the exponent . As predicted, and the minimum of away from the critical modes is less than for the small sweep velocity (). In such a case, there is two critical modes and at which yields a sequence of DQPTs at the corresponding critical times . Furthermore, the minimum of becomes greater than for a sweep velocity greater than the critical sweep velocity , thus blocking the appearance of DQPTs.
The phase diagram of the model for a quench crossing two critical points, has been illustrated in Fig. 4(b) for different values of and where the region marked ”DQPTs” support aperiodic sequences of DQPTs. As seen, the critical sweep velocity decreases by increasing the exponent and is equivalent to the that of short-range pairing system for .
Fig. 4(c) shows the dynamical free energy and DTOP for a quench crossing two critical points and . Cusps in and quantizations in the associated DTOP are clearly visible as an indicator of DQPTs. As observed, DTOP oscillates between and , which indicates that the corresponding contains two critical modes with different slopes (Fig. 4(a)).
V Noisy ramp quench
As mentioned the noises are ubiquitous and indispensable in any physical system. Specifically, when energy is transferred into or out of an otherwise isolated system via a quench in the laboratory, there will inevitably be time dependent fluctuations (”noise”) in this transfer. In this section we investigate the effects of noise on the dynamical phase diagram of the long-range pairing Kitaev model. For this purpose, we add a noise to the time dependent chemical potential , where is a random fluctuation confined to the ramp interval , with vanishing mean, . We use white noise with Gaussian two-point correlations where characterizes the strength of the noise ( has units of time). White noise is approximately equivalent to fast colored noise with exponentially decaying two-point correlations (Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process) [114]. In the presence of noise the transition probability is obtained by numerically solving the exact master equation [128, 129, 130, 131] for the averaged density matrix of the noisy system
(13) |
where is the noise-free Hamiltonian while expresses the “noisy” part for the full Hamiltonian . The master equation, Eq.(13), is solved within the quench interval .
The transition probability in the presence of the noise is given by
As a result, the dynamical phase diagram of the model is characterized by the interplay of two competing effects: (i) The non-trivial excitation resulting from the long-range pairing and (ii) the accumulation of noise-induced excitations during the evolution. Moreover, we expect that the non-adiabaticity by large values of the sweep velocity gives less time for the noise to become effective. Our numerical simulation, which is based on the exact master equation reveals that the main effect of noise is to shift the critical mode yielding the succession of DQPTs and a shift on the phase boundaries. In addition, the numerical results uncover that the noise contributions diminish the long-range pairing dynamics.
The phase diagram of the model in the absence and presence of the noise () has been plotted in Fig. 5 for a quench across the single critical point for . As seen, the TCMs boundaries change in the presence of the noise. Moreover, the width of TCMs region shrinks rapidly as exponent increases. In addition, the borders between TCMs and SCM regions change less for large values of sweep velocity which corresponds to our anticipation. In other words, the noise weakens the effect of long-range pairing on the dynamical phase diagram.
Fig. 6 depicts the border between DQPTs and no-DQPTs regions for both noiseless and noisy cases, for a ramped quench that crosses two critical points for . As indicated, the critical sweep velocity above which the DQPT is wiped out, decreases in the presence of the noise even for large values of , where the critical values of the sweep velocity is the same as that of short range pairing case. Moreover, the border undergoes more changes for the smaller sweep velocities than the larger sweep velocities. However, the changes is constant for , where the dynamics is the same as that of the short-range pairing case. The numerical results show that the changes in the border of different regions in the phase diagram of both ramped quench cases (Figs. 5 and 6) decreases by decreasing the noise strength, as anticipated.
VI Summary and discussion
In this paper, we have studied the non-equilibrium dynamics of the long-range pairing Kitaev model () with noiseless and noisy linear time dependent chemical potential. For a noiseless quench across one of the equilibrium quantum critical points (), we find that the dynamical phase diagram in plane is classified into two regions, the three critical modes and the single critical mode regions. The three critical modes region is the result of the long-range pairing, in contrast to the short-range Kitaev model which shows a single critical mode for a noiseless quench across a single critical point. The three critical modes region shrinks and disappears as the exponent increases. In addition, the numerical results show that appearance of the three critical modes region depends on the final values of the chemical potential. The lower bond of the chemical potential above which three critical modes region emerges is and the upper bound is the next critical point, i.e, . Moreover, the exponent has a critical value above which the dynamical behavior of the long-range pairing system is similar to that of the short-range system. Consequently, our finding confirms that the appearance of TCMs region is indeed an outcome of the long-range pairing nature of the Hamiltonian.
Further, for a noiseless ramped quench that crosses two critical points, the critical sweep velocity above which the dynamical quantum phase transition is wiped out for long-range pairing, is larger than that of the short-range pairing case. The critical sweep velocity decreases by increasing the exponent of long-range pairing and saturates to the critical sweep velocity of the short-range pairing case beyond .
The boundaries between different regions in both cases of the ramped quench, are changed in the presence of the Guassian white noise. The three critical modes region for the quench that crosses the single critical point, shrinks faster in the presence of noise by increasing . Moreover, for the ramped quench which crosses two critical points, the critical sweep velocity above which the dynamical quantum phase transition disappears, reduces by adding noise. The numerical results exhibit that the system is affected less at the large sweep velocities. In summary, the noise has destructive effects on the long-range pairing features.
The case of hosts massive edge modes for the open boundary condition, which is not our case. However, the study of a system with massive edge modes could be an interesting issue for further investigations.
Appendix A Time-dependent Schrödinger equation in the diabatic basis
The time-dependent Schrödinger equation of Hamiltonian in Eq. (8) is given by
(20) | |||
(21) |
where , and , are the coefficients which define the quantum state in the diabatic bases. The time-dependent Schrödinger equation (21) is mapped to the time-dependent Schrödinger equation of Landau-Zener problem [132, 133] by performing rotation around the axes and defining the new time scale ,
(28) | |||
(29) |
References
- Thouless [1969] D. J. Thouless, Long-range order in one-dimensional ising systems, Phys. Rev. 187, 732 (1969).
- Fisher et al. [1972] M. E. Fisher, S.-k. Ma, and B. G. Nickel, Critical exponents for long-range interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 917 (1972).
- Dutta and Bhattacharjee [2001] A. Dutta and J. K. Bhattacharjee, Phase transitions in the quantum ising and rotor models with a long-range interaction, Phys. Rev. B 64, 184106 (2001).
- Luijten and Meßingfeld [2001] E. Luijten and H. Meßingfeld, Criticality in one dimension with inverse square-law potentials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5305 (2001).
- Van Regemortel et al. [2016] M. Van Regemortel, D. Sels, and M. Wouters, Information propagation and equilibration in long-range kitaev chains, Phys. Rev. A 93, 032311 (2016).
- Giuliano et al. [2018] D. Giuliano, S. Paganelli, and L. Lepori, Current transport properties and phase diagram of a kitaev chain with long-range pairing, Phys. Rev. B 97, 155113 (2018).
- Ares et al. [2018] F. Ares, J. G. Esteve, F. Falceto, and A. R. de Queiroz, Entanglement entropy in the long-range kitaev chain, Phys. Rev. A 97, 062301 (2018).
- Benito et al. [2014] M. Benito, A. Gómez-León, V. M. Bastidas, T. Brandes, and G. Platero, Floquet engineering of long-range -wave superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B 90, 205127 (2014).
- Francica and Dell’Anna [2022] G. Francica and L. Dell’Anna, Correlations, long-range entanglement, and dynamics in long-range kitaev chains, Phys. Rev. B 106, 155126 (2022).
- Mondal et al. [2022] S. Mondal, S. Bandyopadhyay, S. Bhattacharjee, and A. Dutta, Detecting topological phase transitions through entanglement between disconnected partitions in a kitaev chain with long-range interactions, Phys. Rev. B 105, 085106 (2022).
- Dias and Marques [2022] R. G. Dias and A. M. Marques, Long-range hopping and indexing assumption in one-dimensional topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B 105, 035102 (2022).
- Jäger et al. [2020] S. B. Jäger, L. Dell’Anna, and G. Morigi, Edge states of the long-range kitaev chain: An analytical study, Phys. Rev. B 102, 035152 (2020).
- Vodola et al. [2014] D. Vodola, L. Lepori, E. Ercolessi, A. V. Gorshkov, and G. Pupillo, Kitaev chains with long-range pairing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 156402 (2014).
- Bhattacharya and Dutta [2018] U. Bhattacharya and A. Dutta, Topological footprints of the kitaev chain with long-range superconducting pairings at a finite temperature, Phys. Rev. B 97, 214505 (2018).
- Schauß et al. [2012] P. Schauß, M. Cheneau, M. Endres, T. Fukuhara, S. Hild, A. Omran, T. Pohl, C. Gross, S. Kuhr, and I. Bloch, Observation of spatially ordered structures in a two-dimensional rydberg gas, Nature 491, 87 (2012).
- Britton et al. [2012] J. W. Britton, B. C. Sawyer, A. C. Keith, C.-C. J. Wang, J. K. Freericks, H. Uys, M. J. Biercuk, and J. J. Bollinger, Engineered two-dimensional ising interactions in a trapped-ion quantum simulator with hundreds of spins, Nature 484, 489 (2012).
- Islam et al. [2013] R. Islam, C. Senko, W. C. Campbell, S. Korenblit, J. Smith, A. Lee, E. E. Edwards, C.-C. J. Wang, J. K. Freericks, and C. Monroe, Emergence and frustration of magnetism with variable-range interactions in a quantum simulator, Science 340, 583 (2013).
- Richerme et al. [2014] P. Richerme, Z.-X. Gong, A. Lee, C. Senko, J. Smith, M. Foss-Feig, S. Michalakis, A. V. Gorshkov, and C. Monroe, Non-local propagation of correlations in quantum systems with long-range interactions, Nature 511, 198 (2014).
- Monroe et al. [2021] C. Monroe, W. C. Campbell, L.-M. Duan, Z.-X. Gong, A. V. Gorshkov, P. W. Hess, R. Islam, K. Kim, N. M. Linke, G. Pagano, P. Richerme, C. Senko, and N. Y. Yao, Programmable quantum simulations of spin systems with trapped ions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025001 (2021).
- Bloch et al. [2012] I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and S. Nascimbene, Quantum simulations with ultracold quantum gases, Nature Physics 8, 267 (2012).
- Dupont and Moore [2022] M. Dupont and J. E. Moore, Quantum criticality using a superconducting quantum processor, Phys. Rev. B 106, L041109 (2022).
- Langen et al. [2015] T. Langen, R. Geiger, and J. Schmiedmayer, Ultracold atoms out of equilibrium, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 6, 201 (2015).
- King et al. [2022] A. D. King, S. Suzuki, J. Raymond, A. Zucca, T. Lanting, F. Altomare, A. J. Berkley, S. Ejtemaee, E. Hoskinson, S. Huang, et al., Coherent quantum annealing in a programmable 2,000 qubit ising chain, Nature Physics 18, 1324 (2022).
- Keesling et al. [2019] A. Keesling, A. Omran, H. Levine, H. Bernien, H. Pichler, S. Choi, R. Samajdar, S. Schwartz, P. Silvi, S. Sachdev, et al., Quantum kibble–zurek mechanism and critical dynamics on a programmable rydberg simulator, Nature 568, 207 (2019).
- Polkovnikov et al. [2011] A. Polkovnikov, K. Sengupta, A. Silva, and M. Vengalattore, Colloquium: Nonequilibrium dynamics of closed interacting quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 863 (2011).
- Dziarmaga [2005] J. Dziarmaga, Dynamics of a quantum phase transition: Exact solution of the quantum ising model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 245701 (2005).
- Francuz et al. [2016] A. Francuz, J. Dziarmaga, B. Gardas, and W. H. Zurek, Space and time renormalization in phase transition dynamics, Phys. Rev. B 93, 075134 (2016).
- Yang and Cai [2021] X. Yang and Z. Cai, Dynamical transitions and critical behavior between discrete time crystal phases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 020602 (2021).
- Abanin et al. [2019] D. A. Abanin, E. Altman, I. Bloch, and M. Serbyn, Colloquium: Many-body localization, thermalization, and entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 021001 (2019).
- Mishra et al. [2013] U. Mishra, R. Prabhu, A. Sen(De), and U. Sen, Tuning interaction strength leads to an ergodic-nonergodic transition of quantum correlations in the anisotropic heisenberg spin model, Phys. Rev. A 87, 052318 (2013).
- Chanda et al. [2016] T. Chanda, T. Das, D. Sadhukhan, A. K. Pal, A. Sen(De), and U. Sen, Static and dynamical quantum correlations in phases of an alternating-field model, Phys. Rev. A 94, 042310 (2016).
- Awasthi et al. [2018] N. Awasthi, S. Bhattacharya, A. Sen(De), and U. Sen, Universal quantum uncertainty relations between nonergodicity and loss of information, Phys. Rev. A 97, 032103 (2018).
- Heyl et al. [2013] M. Heyl, A. Polkovnikov, and S. Kehrein, Dynamical quantum phase transitions in the transverse-field ising model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 135704 (2013).
- Heyl [2018] M. Heyl, Dynamical quantum phase transitions: a review, Reports on Progress in Physics 81, 054001 (2018).
- Jafari et al. [2019] R. Jafari, H. Johannesson, A. Langari, and M. A. Martin-Delgado, Quench dynamics and zero-energy modes: The case of the creutz model, Phys. Rev. B 99, 054302 (2019).
- Jafari and Johannesson [2017] R. Jafari and H. Johannesson, Loschmidt echo revivals: Critical and noncritical, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 015701 (2017).
- Najafi et al. [2019] K. Najafi, M. A. Rajabpour, and J. Viti, Return amplitude after a quantum quench in the XY chain, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2019, 083102 (2019).
- Mukherjee and Nag [2019] S. Mukherjee and T. Nag, Dynamics of decoherence of an entangled pair of qubits locally connected to a one-dimensional disordered spin chain, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2019, 043108 (2019).
- Zhang and Yang [2016] J. M. Zhang and H.-T. Yang, Cusps in the quench dynamics of a bloch state, EPL (Europhysics Letters) 114, 60001 (2016).
- Serbyn and Abanin [2017] M. Serbyn and D. A. Abanin, Loschmidt echo in many-body localized phases, Phys. Rev. B 96, 014202 (2017).
- Sadrzadeh et al. [2021] M. Sadrzadeh, R. Jafari, and A. Langari, Dynamical topological quantum phase transitions at criticality, Phys. Rev. B 103, 144305 (2021).
- Wong and Yu [2022] C. Y. Wong and W. C. Yu, Loschmidt amplitude spectrum in dynamical quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B 105, 174307 (2022).
- Rylands et al. [2021] C. Rylands, E. A. Yuzbashyan, V. Gurarie, A. Zabalo, and V. Galitski, Loschmidt echo of far-from-equilibrium fermionic superfluids, Annals of Physics 435, 168554 (2021), special issue on Philip W. Anderson.
- Abdi [2019] M. Abdi, Dynamical quantum phase transition in bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. B 100, 184310 (2019).
- Andraschko and Sirker [2014] F. Andraschko and J. Sirker, Dynamical quantum phase transitions and the loschmidt echo: A transfer matrix approach, Phys. Rev. B 89, 125120 (2014).
- Vajna and Dóra [2015] S. Vajna and B. Dóra, Topological classification of dynamical phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B 91, 155127 (2015).
- Karrasch and Schuricht [2013] C. Karrasch and D. Schuricht, Dynamical phase transitions after quenches in nonintegrable models, Phys. Rev. B 87, 195104 (2013).
- Vajna and Dóra [2014] S. Vajna and B. Dóra, Disentangling dynamical phase transitions from equilibrium phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B 89, 161105 (2014).
- Jafari [2019] R. Jafari, Dynamical quantum phase transition and quasi particle excitation, Scientific reports 9, 2871 (2019).
- Mondal and Nag [2022] D. Mondal and T. Nag, Anomaly in the dynamical quantum phase transition in a non-hermitian system with extended gapless phases, Phys. Rev. B 106, 054308 (2022).
- Mendoza-Arenas [2022] J. J. Mendoza-Arenas, Dynamical quantum phase transitions in the one-dimensional extended fermi–hubbard model, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2022, 043101 (2022).
- Sedlmayr et al. [2018a] N. Sedlmayr, P. Jaeger, M. Maiti, and J. Sirker, Bulk-boundary correspondence for dynamical phase transitions in one-dimensional topological insulators and superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 97, 064304 (2018a).
- Sedlmayr et al. [2018b] N. Sedlmayr, M. Fleischhauer, and J. Sirker, Fate of dynamical phase transitions at finite temperatures and in open systems, Phys. Rev. B 97, 045147 (2018b).
- Khatun and Bhattacharjee [2019] A. Khatun and S. M. Bhattacharjee, Boundaries and unphysical fixed points in dynamical quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 160603 (2019).
- Ding [2020] C. Ding, Dynamical quantum phase transition from critical quantum quench, arXiv , 2005.08660 (2020).
- Corps and Relaño [2023] A. L. Corps and A. Relaño, Theory of dynamical phase transitions in quantum systems with symmetry-breaking eigenstates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 100402 (2023).
- De Nicola et al. [2021] S. De Nicola, A. A. Michailidis, and M. Serbyn, Entanglement view of dynamical quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 040602 (2021).
- Verga [2023] A. D. Verga, Entanglement dynamics and phase transitions of the floquet cluster spin chain, Phys. Rev. B 107, 085116 (2023).
- Rossi and Dolcini [2022] L. Rossi and F. Dolcini, Nonlinear current and dynamical quantum phase transitions in the flux-quenched su-schrieffer-heeger model, Phys. Rev. B 106, 045410 (2022).
- Khan et al. [2023a] N. A. Khan, P. Wang, M. Jan, and G. Xianlong, Anomalous correlation-induced dynamical phase transitions, Scientific Reports 13, 9470 (2023a).
- Khan et al. [2023b] N. A. Khan, X. Wei, S. Cheng, M. Jan, and G. Xianlong, Dynamical phase transitions in dimerized lattices, Physics Letters A 475, 128880 (2023b).
- Zhou and Du [2021] L. Zhou and Q. Du, Non-hermitian topological phases and dynamical quantum phase transitions: a generic connection, New Journal of Physics 23, 063041 (2021).
- Vanhala and Ojanen [2023] T. I. Vanhala and T. Ojanen, Theory of the loschmidt echo and dynamical quantum phase transitions in disordered fermi systems, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 033178 (2023).
- Mondal and Nag [2023] D. Mondal and T. Nag, Finite-temperature dynamical quantum phase transition in a non-hermitian system, Phys. Rev. B 107, 184311 (2023).
- Cao et al. [2020] K. Cao, W. Li, M. Zhong, and P. Tong, Influence of weak disorder on the dynamical quantum phase transitions in the anisotropic xy chain, Phys. Rev. B 102, 014207 (2020).
- Masłowski and Sedlmayr [2023] T. Masłowski and N. Sedlmayr, Dynamical bulk-boundary correspondence and dynamical quantum phase transitions in higher-order topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B 108, 094306 (2023).
- Wrześniewski et al. [2022] K. Wrześniewski, I. Weymann, N. Sedlmayr, and T. Domański, Dynamical quantum phase transitions in a mesoscopic superconducting system, Phys. Rev. B 105, 094514 (2022).
- Corps and Relaño [2022] A. L. Corps and A. Relaño, Dynamical and excited-state quantum phase transitions in collective systems, Phys. Rev. B 106, 024311 (2022).
- Masłowski and Sedlmayr [2020] T. Masłowski and N. Sedlmayr, Quasiperiodic dynamical quantum phase transitions in multiband topological insulators and connections with entanglement entropy and fidelity susceptibility, Phys. Rev. B 101, 014301 (2020).
- Zeng et al. [2023] Y. Zeng, B. Zhou, and S. Chen, Dynamical singularity of the rate function for quench dynamics in finite-size quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B 107, 134302 (2023).
- Stumper et al. [2022] S. Stumper, M. Thoss, and J. Okamoto, Interaction-driven dynamical quantum phase transitions in a strongly correlated bosonic system, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013002 (2022).
- Yu et al. [2021] W. C. Yu, P. D. Sacramento, Y. C. Li, and H.-Q. Lin, Correlations and dynamical quantum phase transitions in an interacting topological insulator, Phys. Rev. B 104, 085104 (2021).
- Vijayan et al. [2023] V. Vijayan, L. Chotorlishvili, A. Ernst, S. S. P. Parkin, M. I. Katsnelson, and S. K. Mishra, Topological dynamical quantum phase transition in a quantum skyrmion phase, Phys. Rev. B 107, L100419 (2023).
- Zheng-Rong Zhu [2023] J. Z. L.-A. W. Zheng-Rong Zhu, Bin Shao, Orthogonality catastrophe and quantum speed limit for dynamical quantum phase transition, arXiv , arXiv:2308.04686 (2023).
- Yu [2023] X.-J. Yu, Dynamical phase transition and scaling in the chiral clock potts chain, Phys. Rev. A 108, 062215 (2023).
- Bhattacharjee [2024] S. M. Bhattacharjee, Complex dynamics approach to dynamical quantum phase transitions: The potts model, Phys. Rev. B 109, 035130 (2024).
- Lakkaraju et al. [2024] L. G. C. Lakkaraju, S. K. Haldar, and A. Sen(De), Predicting a topological quantum phase transition from dynamics via multisite entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 109, 022436 (2024).
- Puskarov and Schuricht [2016] T. Puskarov and D. Schuricht, Time evolution during and after finite-time quantum quenches in the transverse-field Ising chain, SciPost Phys. 1, 003 (2016).
- Zamani et al. [2023] S. Zamani, J. Naji, R. Jafari, and A. Langari, Scaling and universality at ramped quench dynamical quantum phase transition, arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.15101 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1101.2354 (2023).
- Delfino and Sorba [2022] G. Delfino and M. Sorba, Persistent oscillations after quantum quenches in d dimensions, Nuclear Physics B 974, 115643 (2022).
- Yang et al. [2019] K. Yang, L. Zhou, W. Ma, X. Kong, P. Wang, X. Qin, X. Rong, Y. Wang, F. Shi, J. Gong, and J. Du, Floquet dynamical quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B 100, 085308 (2019).
- Zamani et al. [2020] S. Zamani, R. Jafari, and A. Langari, Floquet dynamical quantum phase transition in the extended xy model: Nonadiabatic to adiabatic topological transition, Phys. Rev. B 102, 144306 (2020).
- Kosior and Sacha [2018] A. Kosior and K. Sacha, Dynamical quantum phase transitions in discrete time crystals, Phys. Rev. A 97, 053621 (2018).
- Jafari and Akbari [2021] R. Jafari and A. Akbari, Floquet dynamical phase transition and entanglement spectrum, Phys. Rev. A 103, 012204 (2021).
- Kosior et al. [2018] A. Kosior, A. Syrwid, and K. Sacha, Dynamical quantum phase transitions in systems with broken continuous time and space translation symmetries, Phys. Rev. A 98, 023612 (2018).
- Naji et al. [2022] J. Naji, M. Jafari, R. Jafari, and A. Akbari, Dissipative floquet dynamical quantum phase transition, Phys. Rev. A 105, 022220 (2022).
- Jafari et al. [2022] R. Jafari, A. Akbari, U. Mishra, and H. Johannesson, Floquet dynamical quantum phase transitions under synchronized periodic driving, Phys. Rev. B 105, 094311 (2022).
- et al. [2022] J. , R. Jafari, L. Zhou, and A. Langari, Engineering floquet dynamical quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B 106, 094314 (2022).
- Budich and Heyl [2016] J. C. Budich and M. Heyl, Dynamical topological order parameters far from equilibrium, Phys. Rev. B 93, 085416 (2016).
- Bhattacharya et al. [2017] U. Bhattacharya, S. Bandyopadhyay, and A. Dutta, Mixed state dynamical quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B 96, 180303 (2017).
- Fläschner et al. [2017] N. Fläschner, D. Vogel, M. Tarnowski, B. S. Rem, D.-S. Lühmann, M. Heyl, J. C. Budich, L. Mathey, K. Sengstock, and C. Weitenberg, Observation of dynamical vortices after quenches in a system with topology, Nature Physics 14, 265 (2017).
- Jurcevic et al. [2017] P. Jurcevic, H. Shen, P. Hauke, C. Maier, T. Brydges, C. Hempel, B. P. Lanyon, M. Heyl and, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Direct observation of dynamical quantum phase transitions in an interacting many-body system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 080501 (2017).
- Martinez et al. [2016] E. A. Martinez, C. A. Muschik, P. Schindler, D. Nigg, A. Erhard, M. Heyl, P. Hauke, M. Dalmonte, T. Monz, P. Zoller, et al., Real-time dynamics of lattice gauge theories with a few-qubit quantum computer, Nature 534, 516 (2016).
- Guo et al. [2019] X.-Y. Guo, C. Yang, Y. Zeng, Y. Peng, H.-K. Li, H. Deng, Y.-R. Jin, S. Chen, D. Zheng, and H. Fan, Observation of a dynamical quantum phase transition by a superconducting qubit simulation, Phys. Rev. Applied 11, 044080 (2019).
- Wang et al. [2019] K. Wang, X. Qiu, L. Xiao, X. Zhan, Z. Bian, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Simulating dynamic quantum phase transitions in photonic quantum walks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 020501 (2019).
- Nie et al. [2020] X. Nie, B.-B. Wei, X. Chen, Z. Zhang, X. Zhao, C. Qiu, Y. Tian, Y. Ji, T. Xin, D. Lu, and J. Li, Experimental observation of equilibrium and dynamical quantum phase transitions via out-of-time-ordered correlators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 250601 (2020).
- González et al. [2022] F. J. González, A. Norambuena, and R. Coto, Dynamical quantum phase transition in diamond: Applications in quantum metrology, Phys. Rev. B 106, 014313 (2022).
- Pichler et al. [2012] H. Pichler, J. Schachenmayer, J. Simon, P. Zoller, and A. J. Daley, Noise- and disorder-resilient optical lattices, Phys. Rev. A 86, 051605 (2012).
- Zoller et al. [1981] P. Zoller, G. Alber, and R. Salvador, ac stark splitting in intense stochastic driving fields with gaussian statistics and non-lorentzian line shape, Phys. Rev. A 24, 398 (1981).
- Chen et al. [2010] X. Chen, A. Ruschhaupt, S. Schmidt, A. del Campo, D. Guéry-Odelin, and J. G. Muga, Fast optimal frictionless atom cooling in harmonic traps: Shortcut to adiabaticity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 063002 (2010).
- Doria et al. [2011] P. Doria, T. Calarco, and S. Montangero, Optimal control technique for many-body quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 190501 (2011).
- Marino and Silva [2012] J. Marino and A. Silva, Relaxation, prethermalization, and diffusion in a noisy quantum ising chain, Phys. Rev. B 86, 060408 (2012).
- Marino and Silva [2014] J. Marino and A. Silva, Nonequilibrium dynamics of a noisy quantum ising chain: Statistics of work and prethermalization after a sudden quench of the transverse field, Phys. Rev. B 89, 024303 (2014).
- Dutta et al. [2016] A. Dutta, A. Rahmani, and A. del Campo, Anti-kibble-zurek behavior in crossing the quantum critical point of a thermally isolated system driven by a noisy control field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 080402 (2016).
- Bando et al. [2020] Y. Bando, Y. Susa, H. Oshiyama, N. Shibata, M. Ohzeki, F. J. Gómez-Ruiz, D. A. Lidar, S. Suzuki, A. del Campo, and H. Nishimori, Probing the universality of topological defect formation in a quantum annealer: Kibble-zurek mechanism and beyond, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033369 (2020).
- Chenu et al. [2017] A. Chenu, M. Beau, J. Cao, and A. del Campo, Quantum simulation of generic many-body open system dynamics using classical noise, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 140403 (2017).
- Dutta and Dutta [2017] A. Dutta and A. Dutta, Probing the role of long-range interactions in the dynamics of a long-range kitaev chain, Phys. Rev. B 96, 125113 (2017).
- Uhrich et al. [2020] P. Uhrich, N. Defenu, R. Jafari, and J. C. Halimeh, Out-of-equilibrium phase diagram of long-range superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 101, 245148 (2020).
- Xavier and Hoyos [2023] J. C. Xavier and J. A. Hoyos, Effect of long-range hopping on dynamic quantum phase transitions of an exactly solvable free-fermion model: Nonanalyticities at almost all times, Phys. Rev. B 108, 214303 (2023).
- Syed et al. [2021] M. Syed, T. Enss, and N. Defenu, Dynamical quantum phase transition in a bosonic system with long-range interactions, Phys. Rev. B 103, 064306 (2021).
- Žunkovič et al. [2018] B. Žunkovič, M. Heyl, M. Knap, and A. Silva, Dynamical quantum phase transitions in spin chains with long-range interactions: Merging different concepts of nonequilibrium criticality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 130601 (2018).
- Mishra et al. [2020] U. Mishra, R. Jafari, and A. Akbari, Disordered kitaev chain with long-range pairing: Loschmidt echo revivals and dynamical phase transitions, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 53, 375301 (2020).
- Lakkaraju et al. [2023] L. G. C. Lakkaraju, S. Ghosh, D. Sadhukhan, and A. S. De, Framework of dynamical transitions from long-range to short-range quantum systems, arXiv , 2305.02945 (2023).
- Jafari et al. [2023] R. Jafari, A. Langari, S. Eggert, and H. Johannesson, Dynamical quantum phase transitions following a noisy quench, preprint arXiv:2310.13337 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.13337 (2023).
- Divakaran et al. [2016] U. Divakaran, S. Sharma, and A. Dutta, Tuning the presence of dynamical phase transitions in a generalized spin chain, Phys. Rev. E 93, 052133 (2016).
- Sharma et al. [2016] S. Sharma, U. Divakaran, A. Polkovnikov, and A. Dutta, Slow quenches in a quantum ising chain: Dynamical phase transitions and topology, Phys. Rev. B 93, 144306 (2016).
- Dóra et al. [2013] B. Dóra, F. Pollmann, J. Fortágh, and G. Zaránd, Loschmidt echo and the many-body orthogonality catastrophe in a qubit-coupled luttinger liquid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 046402 (2013).
- Bhattacharjee and Dutta [2018] S. Bhattacharjee and A. Dutta, Dynamical quantum phase transitions in extended transverse ising models, Phys. Rev. B 97, 134306 (2018).
- Sharma et al. [2014] S. Sharma, A. Russomanno, G. E. Santoro, and A. Dutta, Loschmidt echo and dynamical fidelity in periodically driven quantum systems, Europhysics Letters 106, 67003 (2014).
- Kitaev [2001] A. Y. Kitaev, Unpaired majorana fermions in quantum wires, Physics-Uspekhi 44, 131 (2001).
- Ryu and Hatsugai [2002] S. Ryu and Y. Hatsugai, Topological origin of zero-energy edge states in particle-hole symmetric systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 077002 (2002).
- Alecce and Dell’Anna [2017] A. Alecce and L. Dell’Anna, Extended kitaev chain with longer-range hopping and pairing, Phys. Rev. B 95, 195160 (2017).
- Solfanelli et al. [2023] A. Solfanelli, S. Ruffo, S. Succi, and N. Defenu, Logarithmic, fractal and volume-law entanglement in a kitaev chain with long-range hopping and pairing, Journal of High Energy Physics 2023, 1 (2023).
- Nadj-Perge et al. [2014] S. Nadj-Perge, I. K. Drozdov, J. Li, H. Chen, S. Jeon, J. Seo, A. H. MacDonald, B. A. Bernevig, and A. Yazdani, Observation of majorana fermions in ferromagnetic atomic chains on a superconductor, Science 346, 602 (2014).
- Ruby et al. [2017] M. Ruby, B. W. Heinrich, Y. Peng, F. von Oppen, and K. J. Franke, Exploring a proximity-coupled co chain on pb (110) as a possible majorana platform, Nano letters 17, 4473 (2017).
- Szegö [1954] G. Szegö, A. erdélyi, w. magnus, f. oberhettinger and fg tricomi, higher transcendental functions, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 60, 405 (1954).
- Abramowitz et al. [1988] M. Abramowitz, I. A. Stegun, and R. H. Romer, Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables (1988).
- Łuczka [1991] J. Łuczka, Quantum open systems in a two-state stochastic reservoir, Czechoslov. J. Phys. 41, 289 (1991).
- Budini [2000] A. A. Budini, Non-markovian gaussian dissipative stochastic wave vector, Phys. Rev. A 63, 012106 (2000).
- Costa-Filho et al. [2017] J. I. Costa-Filho, R. B. B. Lima, R. R. Paiva, P. M. Soares, W. A. M. Morgado, R. L. Franco, and D. O. Soares-Pinto, Enabling quantum non-markovian dynamics by injection of classical colored noise, Phys. Rev. A 95, 052126 (2017).
- Kiely [2021] A. Kiely, Exact classical noise master equations: Applications and connections, EPL 134, 10001 (2021).
- Vitanov and Garraway [1996] N. V. Vitanov and B. M. Garraway, Landau-zener model: Effects of finite coupling duration, Phys. Rev. A 53, 4288 (1996).
- Vitanov [1999] N. V. Vitanov, Transition times in the landau-zener model, Phys. Rev. A 59, 988 (1999).