Sources of longitudinal flow decorrelations in high-energy nuclear collisions

Jiangyong Jia [email protected] Department of Chemistry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA Physics Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11976, USA    Shengli Huang Department of Chemistry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA    Chunjian Zhang Shanghai Research Center for Theoretical Nuclear Physics, NSFC and Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Ion-beam Application (MOE), and Institute of Modern Physics, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China Department of Chemistry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA    Somadutta Bhatta Department of Chemistry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA
Abstract

The longitudinal structure of the quark-gluon plasma (QGP) consists of several components spanning various scales. However, its short-range features are often obscured by final-state non-flow correlations. Here, we introduce a data-driven approach to separate initial state structures from non-flow effects. The longitudinal structure is found having two distinct components: one that reflects the global twisted geometry of the QGP, and another that captures localized fluctuations in rapidity. The characteristics of this second component, contributing to short- and medium-range flow decorrelations, can be quantified by comparing collisions of nuclei with different shapes. This study represents the first successful attempt to disentangle long- and short-range flow decorrelations from non-flow backgrounds, providing new insights into the initial conditions of heavy-ion collisions.

Introduction. High-energy nuclear collisions serve as laboratories for generating and examining the QGP under varied conditions Busza et al. (2018). Understanding the dynamics and properties of this exotic state requires precise control of its initial conditions (IC), including the distributions of colliding nucleons, their constituent partons, the deposition of energy, and the 3D geometric profile. Recent advancements showcased the potential to fine-tune the IC by comparing collision systems with similar masses yet distinct shapes, allowing for precise control over the QGP’s initial shape without altering its hydrodynamic response Giacalone et al. (2021); Jia and Zhang (2023); Nijs and van der Schee (2023); Giacalone (2023). Leveraging ratios of bulk observables, such as the elliptic flow, between these systems facilitates the extraction of valuable information about the IC Bally et al. (2022); Xu et al. (2023). Such experimental comparisons, e.g. between 238U+238U and 197Au+197Au STAR Collaboration (2024) or 96Ru+96Ru and 96Zr+96Zr Abdallah et al. (2022); Jia and Zhang (2023), have indicated strong impacts of nuclear structure on the geometrical properties of the IC, which in turn can be used to constrain the longitudinal profile Bhatta et al. (2023); Zhang et al. (2024).

Most investigations of the QGP focused on transverse xy𝑥𝑦xyitalic_x italic_y profile of the IC near mid-pseudorapidity (η0𝜂0\eta\approx 0italic_η ≈ 0). However, the energy deposition process by the colliding nucleons is inherently non-boost-invariant and fluctuating along η𝜂\etaitalic_η, known as longitudinal fluctuations or decorrelations Bozek and Broniowski (2016); Pang et al. (2016); Li and Yan (2020); Franco and Luzum (2020). Consequently, the initial shape of the QGP and its transverse expansion vary with η𝜂\etaitalic_η even within a single collision event. In popular QCD-inspired string models (PYTHIA Sjöstrand (2020), HIJING Gyulassy and Wang (1994), AMPT Lin et al. (2005)), where nucleons deposit energy in color flux tubes, longitudinal fluctuations arise from variations in the starting positions and lengths of the flux tubes along η𝜂\etaitalic_η Bozek and Broniowski (2016); Pang et al. (2016). This gives rise to a global geometry that varies smoothly with η𝜂\etaitalic_η as well as local stochastic fluctuations (see Fig. 1).

Refer to caption
Figure 1: (top) The initial shape of the QGP has an elliptic component that interpolates between 2,Fsubscript2F\mathcal{E}_{2,\mathrm{F}}caligraphic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , roman_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT at far-forward rapidity and 2,Bsubscript2B\mathcal{E}_{2,\mathrm{B}}caligraphic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , roman_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT at far-backward rapidity, yielding a gradual variation of 2subscript2\mathcal{E}_{2}caligraphic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in η𝜂\etaitalic_η. Positions of forward-going (green disks) and backward-going (orange disks) nucleons sweeping out light-colored tubes in which energy may be deposited, where varying tube widths represent asymmetric energy deposition of nucleon, i.e. forward-going nuclei deposit more energy at positive η𝜂\etaitalic_η and vice versa. (bottom) The actual deposited energy from each nucleon spreads over segments (red lines) about |Δη|12less-than-or-similar-toΔ𝜂12|\Delta\eta|\lesssim 1-2| roman_Δ italic_η | ≲ 1 - 2. Within this range (closeby slices), most nucleons deposit energy coherently, but a few may deposit more energy in the left slice (a), right slice (b), or between the two slices (c). This stochastic behavior leads to short-range decorrelations of 2subscript2\mathcal{E}_{2}caligraphic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and V2subscript𝑉2V_{2}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

We illustrate this concept through an analysis of elliptic flow (V2=v2e2iΨsubscript𝑉2subscript𝑣2superscript𝑒2𝑖ΨV_{2}=v_{2}e^{2i\Psi}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 italic_i roman_Ψ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT), which characterizes the elliptical distribution of particles in the xy𝑥𝑦xyitalic_x italic_y-plane. The V2subscript𝑉2V_{2}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT captures the hydrodynamic response to an elliptically-shaped overlap region, quantified by the eccentricity vector

2=ε2e2iΦe(r,ϕ)r2e2iϕr𝑑r𝑑ϕe(r,ϕ)r2r𝑑r𝑑ϕ,subscript2subscript𝜀2superscript𝑒2𝑖Φ𝑒𝑟italic-ϕsuperscript𝑟2superscript𝑒2𝑖italic-ϕ𝑟differential-d𝑟differential-ditalic-ϕ𝑒𝑟italic-ϕsuperscript𝑟2𝑟differential-d𝑟differential-ditalic-ϕ\displaystyle\mathcal{E}_{2}=\varepsilon_{2}e^{2i\Phi}\equiv-\frac{\int e(r,% \phi)r^{2}e^{2i\phi}rdrd\phi}{\int e(r,\phi)r^{2}rdrd\phi}\;,caligraphic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 italic_i roman_Φ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ≡ - divide start_ARG ∫ italic_e ( italic_r , italic_ϕ ) italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_e start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 italic_i italic_ϕ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r italic_d italic_r italic_d italic_ϕ end_ARG start_ARG ∫ italic_e ( italic_r , italic_ϕ ) italic_r start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_r italic_d italic_r italic_d italic_ϕ end_ARG , (1)

defined from transverse energy density e(r,ϕ)𝑒𝑟italic-ϕe(r,\phi)italic_e ( italic_r , italic_ϕ ) at a given η𝜂\etaitalic_η. The longitudinal structure of V2subscript𝑉2V_{2}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is driven by the asymmetrical energy deposition by forward and backward moving participants, resulting in a 2subscript2\mathcal{E}_{2}caligraphic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT that interpolates between 2,Fsubscript2F\mathcal{E}_{2,\mathrm{F}}caligraphic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , roman_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and 2,Bsubscript2B\mathcal{E}_{2,\mathrm{B}}caligraphic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , roman_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, the eccentricity vectors defined by the forward-going and backward-going colliding nucleons, respectively Jia and Huo (2014). In other words, the initially produced QGP has an elliptic shape that twists and deforms from 2,Fsubscript2F\mathcal{E}_{2,\mathrm{F}}caligraphic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , roman_F end_POSTSUBSCRIPT to 2,Bsubscript2B\mathcal{E}_{2,\mathrm{B}}caligraphic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , roman_B end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, driving a final-state V2subscript𝑉2V_{2}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with a similar η𝜂\etaitalic_η dependence (top of Fig. 1).

Experimentally, elliptic flow is accessed using the two-particle correlation (2PC) method, which quantifies the second moment of its event-by-event distribution,

V2Δ(η1,η2)=V2(η1)V2(η2).subscript𝑉2Δsubscript𝜂1subscript𝜂2delimited-⟨⟩subscript𝑉2subscript𝜂1superscriptsubscript𝑉2subscript𝜂2\displaystyle V_{2\Delta}(\eta_{1},\eta_{2})=\left\langle V_{2}(\eta_{1})V_{2}% ^{*}(\eta_{2})\right\rangle\;.italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) = ⟨ italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ⟩ . (2)

The initial state longitudinal fluctuations result in a decrease of V2Δsubscript𝑉2ΔV_{2\Delta}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT for pairs with increasing separation Δη=η1η2Δ𝜂subscript𝜂1subscript𝜂2\Delta\eta=\eta_{1}-\eta_{2}roman_Δ italic_η = italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Specifically, “global” decorrelations arising from nucleon fluctuations and nuclear deformation lead to gradual variations of V2Δsubscript𝑉2ΔV_{2\Delta}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with ΔηΔ𝜂\Delta\etaroman_Δ italic_η (the two sources have similar η𝜂\etaitalic_η dependence Zhang et al. (2024)), whereas “local” decorrelations in energy deposition results in variation of V2Δsubscript𝑉2ΔV_{2\Delta}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT at small |Δη|Δ𝜂|\Delta\eta|| roman_Δ italic_η | (bottom of Fig. 1Bozek and Broniowski (2016). However, the local decorrelations and non-flow are difficult to distinguish, as both appear at relatively small |Δη|Δ𝜂|\Delta\eta|| roman_Δ italic_η |. An experimental separation between the initial state short-range correlations and final-state non-flow remains elusive.

In this paper, using correlations between V2subscript𝑉2V_{2}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and different estimates of 2subscript2\mathcal{E}_{2}caligraphic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, we identify sources of initial-state-driven decorrelations contributing to V2Δ(η1,η2)subscript𝑉2Δsubscript𝜂1subscript𝜂2V_{2\Delta}(\eta_{1},\eta_{2})italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ). By comparing U+U with Au+Au collisions, we discover a fingerprint of short-range correlation as a dilution of the impact of nuclear deformation, leading to an increase of the ratio of V2Δ,UU/V2Δ,AuAusubscript𝑉2ΔUUsubscript𝑉2ΔAuAuV_{2\Delta,\mathrm{UU}}/V_{2\Delta,\mathrm{AuAu}}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ , roman_UU end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ , roman_AuAu end_POSTSUBSCRIPT with ΔηΔ𝜂\Delta\etaroman_Δ italic_η. We further develop a method to disentangle between long-range correlation, short-range correlation, and final-state non-flow.

Setup. The study is carried out using the transport model, AMPT Lin et al. (2005), which simulates the full space-time evolution of heavy-ion collisions event by event. The nucleons are sampled from the Woods-Saxon distribution in polar coordinate: ρ(r,θ,ϕ)[1+exp((rR0(1+βY2,0(θ,ϕ))/a0)]1\rho(r,\theta,\phi)\propto[1+\exp((r-R_{0}(1+\beta Y_{2,0}(\theta,\phi))/a_{0}% )]^{-1}italic_ρ ( italic_r , italic_θ , italic_ϕ ) ∝ [ 1 + roman_exp ( ( italic_r - italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( 1 + italic_β italic_Y start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_θ , italic_ϕ ) ) / italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ] start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT - 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT, where the β𝛽\betaitalic_β is the quadrupole deformation, R0subscript𝑅0R_{0}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the nuclear radius, and a0subscript𝑎0a_{0}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is the skin thickness. Collisions for three systems are simulated, whose geometrical parameters, listed in Table 1, are taken from Ref. Ryssens et al. (2023). The collision events are generated at sNN=193subscript𝑠NN193\mbox{$\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$}=193square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_NN end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 193 GeV for U+U and sNN=200subscript𝑠NN200\mbox{$\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$}=200square-root start_ARG italic_s start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_NN end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_ARG = 200 GeV for Au+Au, employing the string-melting mode with a partonic cross-section of 3 m𝑚mitalic_mb. Elliptic eccentricities are calculated for all participating nucleons, denoted as 2subscript2\mathcal{E}_{2}caligraphic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, as well as for the partons at mid-rapidity |η|<0.4𝜂0.4|\eta|<0.4| italic_η | < 0.4 after string melting but before the partonic transport, 2,quarksubscript2quark\mathcal{E}_{2,\mathrm{quark}}caligraphic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , roman_quark end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. The partons are weighted by their total energy in the calculation according to Eq. 1, hence 2,quarksubscript2quark\mathcal{E}_{2,\mathrm{quark}}caligraphic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , roman_quark end_POSTSUBSCRIPT captures the initial state local fluctuation associated with strings (Fig. 1) without being impacted by non-flow. The final state particles used for the analysis are chosen from the transverse momentum range 0.2<pT<30.2subscript𝑝T30.2<p_{\mathrm{T}}<30.2 < italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < 3 GeV/c𝑐citalic_c and pseudorapidity range |η|<5𝜂5|\eta|<5| italic_η | < 5. Event centrality is defined by charged particle multiplicity in |η|<0.5𝜂0.5|\eta|<0.5| italic_η | < 0.5 (Nchsubscript𝑁chN_{\mathrm{ch}}italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ch end_POSTSUBSCRIPT). This analysis focuses on the 0–5% most central collisions, where the impact of nuclear deformation is prominent.

System 238U+238U 238U+238U 197Au+197Au
β𝛽\betaitalic_β 0.28 0.0 -0.14
R0subscript𝑅0R_{0}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT(fm) 6.81 6.81 6.62
a0subscript𝑎0a_{0}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT(fm) 0.55 0.55 0.52
Table 1: Nuclei species and their quadrupole deformation β𝛽\betaitalic_β, radius R0subscript𝑅0R_{0}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and skin thickness a0subscript𝑎0a_{0}italic_a start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT used in AMPT simulation.

Elliptic flow is calculated using two different approaches. First, the flow is obtained using the standard 2PC method, V2Δ(η1,η2)subscript𝑉2Δsubscript𝜂1subscript𝜂2V_{2\Delta}(\eta_{1},\eta_{2})italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT , italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ), in the pseudorapidity range |η1|,|η2|<2subscript𝜂1subscript𝜂22|\eta_{1}|,|\eta_{2}|<2| italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | , | italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT | < 2. This is the typical range covered by the detectors at RHIC and the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). The V2Δ(Δη)=V2Δ(η,ηΔη)𝑑η/𝑑ηsubscript𝑉2ΔΔ𝜂subscript𝑉2Δ𝜂𝜂Δ𝜂differential-d𝜂differential-d𝜂V_{2\Delta}(\Delta\eta)=\int V_{2\Delta}(\eta,\eta-\Delta\eta)d\eta/\int d\etaitalic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Δ italic_η ) = ∫ italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_η , italic_η - roman_Δ italic_η ) italic_d italic_η / ∫ italic_d italic_η, covering the range |Δη|<4Δ𝜂4|\Delta\eta|<4| roman_Δ italic_η | < 4, captures all the initial-state-driven long-range and short-range correlations illustrated by Fig. 1, as well as final-state non-flow.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Elliptic flow calculated using the 2PC method (left), projected to the 2subscript2\mathcal{E}_{2}caligraphic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT squared (middle), and projected to the 2,quarksubscript2quark\mathcal{E}_{2,\mathrm{quark}}caligraphic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , roman_quark end_POSTSUBSCRIPT squared (right) in three systems listed in Table 1. Bottom panels show the ratios between U+U with and without deformations (open blue circles) and between U+U with deformation and Au+Au (open red circles). The curves in the top-right panel are copies of the data from the middle-top panel, allowing a direct comparison between v2,εquark2superscriptsubscript𝑣2subscript𝜀quark2v_{2,\varepsilon_{\mathrm{quark}}}^{2}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_quark end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and v2,ε2superscriptsubscript𝑣2𝜀2v_{2,\varepsilon}^{2}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , italic_ε end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT.

In the second approach, we calculate the projection of the flow along the direction of eccentricity vectors,

v2,ε(η)V2(η)222,v2,εquark(η)V2(η)2,quark2,quark2,quarkformulae-sequencesubscript𝑣2𝜀𝜂delimited-⟨⟩subscript𝑉2𝜂superscriptsubscript2delimited-⟨⟩subscript2superscriptsubscript2subscript𝑣2subscript𝜀quark𝜂delimited-⟨⟩subscript𝑉2𝜂superscriptsubscript2quarkdelimited-⟨⟩subscript2quarksuperscriptsubscript2quark\displaystyle v_{2,\varepsilon}(\eta)\equiv\frac{\left\langle V_{2}(\eta)% \mathcal{E}_{2}^{*}\right\rangle}{\sqrt{\left\langle\mathcal{E}_{2}\mathcal{E}% _{2}^{*}\right\rangle}}\;,\;v_{2,\varepsilon_{\mathrm{quark}}}(\eta)\equiv% \frac{\left\langle V_{2}(\eta)\mathcal{E}_{2,{\mathrm{quark}}}^{*}\right% \rangle}{\sqrt{\left\langle\mathcal{E}_{2,{\mathrm{quark}}}\mathcal{E}_{2,{% \mathrm{quark}}}^{*}\right\rangle}}\;italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , italic_ε end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_η ) ≡ divide start_ARG ⟨ italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_η ) caligraphic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟩ end_ARG start_ARG square-root start_ARG ⟨ caligraphic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟩ end_ARG end_ARG , italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_quark end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_η ) ≡ divide start_ARG ⟨ italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_η ) caligraphic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , roman_quark end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟩ end_ARG start_ARG square-root start_ARG ⟨ caligraphic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , roman_quark end_POSTSUBSCRIPT caligraphic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , roman_quark end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ⟩ end_ARG end_ARG (3)

where “\left\langle\right\rangle⟨ ⟩” indicates an average over events in a specific centrality range. The v2,ε(η)subscript𝑣2𝜀𝜂v_{2,\varepsilon}(\eta)italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , italic_ε end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_η ) captures initial-state-driven long-range correlations, while v2,εquark(η)subscript𝑣2subscript𝜀quark𝜂v_{2,\varepsilon_{\mathrm{quark}}}(\eta)italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_quark end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_η ) captures in addition the initial-state-driven short-range correlations. Both observables are free of non-flow. Therefore, comparing the shapes of v2,ε2(η)superscriptsubscript𝑣2𝜀2𝜂v_{2,\varepsilon}^{2}(\eta)italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , italic_ε end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_η ) and v2,εquark2(η)superscriptsubscript𝑣2subscript𝜀quark2𝜂v_{2,\varepsilon_{\mathrm{quark}}}^{2}(\eta)italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_quark end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_η ) to the shape of V2Δ(Δη)subscript𝑉2ΔΔ𝜂V_{2\Delta}(\Delta\eta)italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Δ italic_η ) facilitates the separation of the initial- and final-state effects.

The values of V2Δsubscript𝑉2ΔV_{2\Delta}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, displayed in Fig. 2(a), decrease gradually with ΔηΔ𝜂\Delta\etaroman_Δ italic_η for all three systems. This decreasing trend is characterized by a mild structure at |Δη|<2Δ𝜂2|\Delta\eta|<2| roman_Δ italic_η | < 2 and a broader one at |Δη|>2Δ𝜂2|\Delta\eta|>2| roman_Δ italic_η | > 2, which as we show later indicates non-flow and initial-state-driven short-range correlations, respectively. The differences

V2Δ,β(Δη)=V2Δ{β=0.28}V2Δ{β=0}b(Δη)β2,subscript𝑉2Δ𝛽Δ𝜂subscript𝑉2Δ𝛽0.28subscript𝑉2Δ𝛽0𝑏Δ𝜂superscript𝛽2\displaystyle V_{2\Delta,\beta}(\Delta\eta)=V_{2\Delta}\{\beta=0.28\}-V_{2% \Delta}\{\beta=0\}\approx b(\Delta\eta)\beta^{2}\;,italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ , italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Δ italic_η ) = italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT { italic_β = 0.28 } - italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT { italic_β = 0 } ≈ italic_b ( roman_Δ italic_η ) italic_β start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT , (4)

capture the deformation-driven contribution of Uranium, and has a quadratic dependence on deformation parameter Jia (2022); Jia and Zhang (2023). Based on this discussion, the 2PC flow has four components,

V2Δ(Δη)=a(Δη)+b(Δη)β2+src(Δη)+nf(Δη).subscript𝑉2ΔΔ𝜂𝑎Δ𝜂𝑏Δ𝜂superscript𝛽2srcΔ𝜂nfΔ𝜂\displaystyle V_{2\Delta}(\Delta\eta)=a(\Delta\eta)+b(\Delta\eta)\beta^{2}+% \mathrm{src}(\Delta\eta)+\mathrm{nf}(\Delta\eta)\;.italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Δ italic_η ) = italic_a ( roman_Δ italic_η ) + italic_b ( roman_Δ italic_η ) italic_β start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + roman_src ( roman_Δ italic_η ) + roman_nf ( roman_Δ italic_η ) . (5)

The a(Δη)𝑎Δ𝜂a(\Delta\eta)italic_a ( roman_Δ italic_η ) and src(Δη)srcΔ𝜂\mathrm{src}(\Delta\eta)roman_src ( roman_Δ italic_η ) capture the initial-state-driven long-range and short-range correlations in collisions of spherical nuclei, respectively, b(Δη)𝑏Δ𝜂b(\Delta\eta)italic_b ( roman_Δ italic_η ) has similar long-range structure as a(Δη)𝑎Δ𝜂a(\Delta\eta)italic_a ( roman_Δ italic_η ) Zhang et al. (2024), and nf(Δη)nfΔ𝜂\mathrm{nf}(\Delta\eta)roman_nf ( roman_Δ italic_η ) is associated with non-flow.

Figure 2(b) shows the ratio of V2Δsubscript𝑉2ΔV_{2\Delta}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT between U+U with and without deformation, as well as between U+U and Au+Au. The former can be expressed as

RV2Δ(Δη)=a(Δη)+b(Δη)β2+src(Δη)+nf(Δη)a(Δη)+src(Δη)+nf(Δη).subscript𝑅subscript𝑉2ΔΔ𝜂𝑎Δ𝜂𝑏Δ𝜂superscript𝛽2srcΔ𝜂nfΔ𝜂𝑎Δ𝜂srcΔ𝜂nfΔ𝜂\displaystyle R_{V_{2\Delta}}(\Delta\eta)=\frac{a(\Delta\eta)+b(\Delta\eta)% \beta^{2}+\mathrm{src}(\Delta\eta)+\mathrm{nf}(\Delta\eta)}{a(\Delta\eta)+% \mathrm{src}(\Delta\eta)+\mathrm{nf}(\Delta\eta)}\;.italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Δ italic_η ) = divide start_ARG italic_a ( roman_Δ italic_η ) + italic_b ( roman_Δ italic_η ) italic_β start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT + roman_src ( roman_Δ italic_η ) + roman_nf ( roman_Δ italic_η ) end_ARG start_ARG italic_a ( roman_Δ italic_η ) + roman_src ( roman_Δ italic_η ) + roman_nf ( roman_Δ italic_η ) end_ARG . (6)

Since src(Δη)srcΔ𝜂\mathrm{src}(\Delta\eta)roman_src ( roman_Δ italic_η ) and nf(Δη)nfΔ𝜂\mathrm{nf}(\Delta\eta)roman_nf ( roman_Δ italic_η ) are short-range, they dilute the impact of nuclear deformation at small |Δη|Δ𝜂|\Delta\eta|| roman_Δ italic_η |, leading to an increase of the ratio towards large |Δη|Δ𝜂|\Delta\eta|| roman_Δ italic_η |. The increase slows down at |Δη|1.5greater-than-or-equivalent-toΔ𝜂1.5|\Delta\eta|\gtrsim 1.5| roman_Δ italic_η | ≳ 1.5, suggesting src(Δη)srcΔ𝜂\mathrm{src}(\Delta\eta)roman_src ( roman_Δ italic_η ) and nf(Δη)nfΔ𝜂\mathrm{nf}(\Delta\eta)roman_nf ( roman_Δ italic_η ) have different ranges in ΔηΔ𝜂\Delta\etaroman_Δ italic_η.

Figure 2(c) and (e) display the results of v2,ε2superscriptsubscript𝑣2𝜀2v_{2,\varepsilon}^{2}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , italic_ε end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT and v2,εquark2superscriptsubscript𝑣2subscript𝜀quark2v_{2,\varepsilon_{\mathrm{quark}}}^{2}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_quark end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT over the full η𝜂\etaitalic_η range. The values are smaller than V2Δsubscript𝑉2ΔV_{2\Delta}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT as expected since they are projections of flow signal and free of non-flow. Their shapes signify the expected η𝜂\etaitalic_η dependence of the single particle flow.

The corresponding ratios between U+U with and without deformation are displayed in the bottom panels. The Rv2,ε2subscript𝑅superscriptsubscript𝑣2𝜀2R_{v_{2,\varepsilon}^{2}}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , italic_ε end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is nearly independent η𝜂\etaitalic_η, which is expected since v2,εsubscript𝑣2𝜀v_{2,\varepsilon}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , italic_ε end_POSTSUBSCRIPT only captures the long-range components a𝑎aitalic_a and bβ2𝑏superscript𝛽2b\beta^{2}italic_b italic_β start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT in Eq. 6, both of which have a similar shape Zhang et al. (2024). On the other hand, Rv2,εquark2subscript𝑅superscriptsubscript𝑣2subscript𝜀quark2R_{v_{2,\varepsilon_{\mathrm{quark}}}^{2}}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_quark end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT displays a gradual increase with η𝜂\etaitalic_η, with a shape that closely resembles Fig. 2(a). Our interpretation is that the local structures of the initial state at mid-rapidity, captured by 2,quarksubscript2quark\mathcal{E}_{2,{\mathrm{quark}}}caligraphic_E start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , roman_quark end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, generate additional flow around mid-rapidity. This is supported by Fig. 2(e), which shows that v2,εquark>v2,εsubscript𝑣2subscript𝜀quarksubscript𝑣2𝜀v_{2,\varepsilon_{\mathrm{quark}}}>v_{2,\varepsilon}italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_quark end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT > italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , italic_ε end_POSTSUBSCRIPT at |Δη|<2Δ𝜂2|\Delta\eta|<2| roman_Δ italic_η | < 2 but they are much closer at |Δη|>2Δ𝜂2|\Delta\eta|>2| roman_Δ italic_η | > 2. The presence of initial state short-range correlation in εquarksubscript𝜀quark\varepsilon_{\mathrm{quark}}italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_quark end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, contributing to V2subscript𝑉2V_{2}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, is responsible for the gradual increase of Rv2,εquark2subscript𝑅superscriptsubscript𝑣2subscript𝜀quark2R_{v_{2,\varepsilon_{\mathrm{quark}}}^{2}}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_quark end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in Fig. 2(f). The bottom panels of Fig. 2 also show ratios between U+U and Au+Au by red circles, which are smaller than ratios between U+U with and without deformation and exhibit weaker ΔηΔ𝜂\Delta\etaroman_Δ italic_η oder η𝜂\etaitalic_η dependence as well. This suggests that the impacts of Uranium deformation are partially canceled by the moderate deformation of 197Au.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: Top: comparison of V2Δsubscript𝑉2ΔV_{2\Delta}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (solid black), V2Δ,εquarksubscript𝑉2Δsubscript𝜀quarkV_{2\Delta,\varepsilon_{\mathrm{quark}}}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ , italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_quark end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (solid red), and V2Δ,εsubscript𝑉2Δ𝜀V_{2\Delta,\varepsilon}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ , italic_ε end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (solid blue) in collisions of undeformed U (a), deformed U (b), and Au (c). A small scale factors are applied so V2Δ,εquarksubscript𝑉2Δsubscript𝜀quarkV_{2\Delta,\varepsilon_{\mathrm{quark}}}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ , italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_quark end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT can match the tail of V2Δsubscript𝑉2ΔV_{2\Delta}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. In panel a, deformation-induced flow V2Δ,βsubscript𝑉2Δ𝛽V_{2\Delta,\beta}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ , italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is scaled to match the tail of V2Δ,εsubscript𝑉2Δ𝜀V_{2\Delta,\varepsilon}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ , italic_ε end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (open blue). This comparison allows us to decompose the 2PC V2Δsubscript𝑉2ΔV_{2\Delta}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in 0–5% most central collisions into a long-range component, a short-range component from the initial state, as well as a non-flow component. Bottom: the estimated non-flow component (solid black) and that estimated from the 90–100% most peripheral collisions selected based on Npartsubscript𝑁partN_{\mathrm{part}}italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_part end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, via V2Δ,nf=V2Δ,90100%Nch,90100%/Nch,05%subscript𝑉2Δnfsubscript𝑉2Δ90percent100subscript𝑁ch90percent100subscript𝑁ch0percent5V_{2\Delta,\mathrm{nf}}=V_{2\Delta,90-100\%}N_{\mathrm{ch},90-100\%}/N_{% \mathrm{ch},0-5\%}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ , roman_nf end_POSTSUBSCRIPT = italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ , 90 - 100 % end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ch , 90 - 100 % end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ch , 0 - 5 % end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

Clearly, the ΔηΔ𝜂\Delta\etaroman_Δ italic_η dependence of the deformation-driven flow is a reflection of the short-range correlation and its rapidity structure. To quantify the sources of decorrelations in V2Δsubscript𝑉2ΔV_{2\Delta}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, we perform a convolution of v2,ε(η)subscript𝑣2𝜀𝜂v_{2,\varepsilon}(\eta)italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , italic_ε end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_η ) and v2,εquark(η)subscript𝑣2subscript𝜀quark𝜂v_{2,\varepsilon_{\mathrm{quark}}}(\eta)italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_quark end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_η ) within |η|<2𝜂2|\eta|<2| italic_η | < 2:

V2Δ,ε(Δη)=1422v2,ε(η1)v2,ε(η2)δ(η1η2)𝑑η1𝑑η2subscript𝑉2Δ𝜀Δ𝜂14superscriptsubscript22subscript𝑣2𝜀subscript𝜂1subscript𝑣2𝜀subscript𝜂2𝛿subscript𝜂1subscript𝜂2differential-dsubscript𝜂1differential-dsubscript𝜂2\displaystyle V_{2\Delta,\varepsilon}(\Delta\eta)=\frac{1}{4}\int_{-2}^{2}v_{2% ,\varepsilon}(\eta_{1})v_{2,\varepsilon}(\eta_{2})\delta(\eta_{1}-\eta_{2})d% \eta_{1}d\eta_{2}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ , italic_ε end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Δ italic_η ) = divide start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG 4 end_ARG ∫ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT - 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , italic_ε end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_v start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 , italic_ε end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_δ ( italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) italic_d italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_d italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (7)

The expression for V2Δ,εquark(Δη)subscript𝑉2Δsubscript𝜀quarkΔ𝜂V_{2\Delta,\varepsilon_{\mathrm{quark}}}(\Delta\eta)italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ , italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_quark end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Δ italic_η ) is analogous. These quantities approximate the initial-state-driven flow decorrelations and can be directly compared to V2Δsubscript𝑉2ΔV_{2\Delta}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT.

This comparison is carried out in Fig. 3. The V2Δ,εquarksubscript𝑉2Δsubscript𝜀quarkV_{2\Delta,\varepsilon_{\mathrm{quark}}}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ , italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_quark end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT has a shape that matches almost perfectly with V2Δsubscript𝑉2ΔV_{2\Delta}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT at |Δη|>2Δ𝜂2|\Delta\eta|>2| roman_Δ italic_η | > 2, while the V2Δ,εsubscript𝑉2Δ𝜀V_{2\Delta,\varepsilon}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ , italic_ε end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is much flatter in |Δη|Δ𝜂|\Delta\eta|| roman_Δ italic_η |. The shape of V2Δ,εsubscript𝑉2Δ𝜀V_{2\Delta,\varepsilon}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ , italic_ε end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is also similar to the shape of V2Δ,βsubscript𝑉2Δ𝛽V_{2\Delta,\beta}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ , italic_β end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in Eq. 4, suggesting a similarly weak ΔηΔ𝜂\Delta\etaroman_Δ italic_η dependence Zhang et al. (2024).

These insights enable us to separate components of longitudinal flow decorrelations (shaded areas). The long-range component, V2Δ,εsubscript𝑉2Δ𝜀V_{2\Delta,\varepsilon}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ , italic_ε end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, dominates, followed by the short-range component induced by local fluctuations. This short-range component starts to decrease at |Δη|>2Δ𝜂2|\Delta\eta|>2| roman_Δ italic_η | > 2, reflecting the typical coherence length of the local fluctuations. The estimated non-flow component, between V2Δsubscript𝑉2ΔV_{2\Delta}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and V2Δ,εquarksubscript𝑉2Δsubscript𝜀quarkV_{2\Delta,\varepsilon_{\mathrm{quark}}}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ , italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_quark end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, spans a range of |Δη|<2Δ𝜂2|\Delta\eta|<2| roman_Δ italic_η | < 2. Since V2Δ,εquarksubscript𝑉2Δsubscript𝜀quarkV_{2\Delta,\varepsilon_{\mathrm{quark}}}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ , italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_quark end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT may not capture all the initial-state-driven short-range components, this method likely gives an upper-limit of non-flow. In the bottom panels, we compare this component to an estimate obtained by assuming non-flow is unmodified and scales inversely with Nchsubscript𝑁chN_{\mathrm{ch}}italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ch end_POSTSUBSCRIPT from Ref. STAR Collaboration (2024)

nfs(Δη)=V2Δ,90100%Nch,90100%/Nch,05%.subscriptnf𝑠Δ𝜂subscript𝑉2Δ90percent100subscript𝑁ch90percent100subscript𝑁ch0percent5\displaystyle\mathrm{nf}_{s}(\Delta\eta)=V_{2\Delta,90-100\%}N_{\mathrm{ch},90% -100\%}/N_{\mathrm{ch},0-5\%}\;.roman_nf start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Δ italic_η ) = italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ , 90 - 100 % end_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ch , 90 - 100 % end_POSTSUBSCRIPT / italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ch , 0 - 5 % end_POSTSUBSCRIPT . (8)

Note that 90–100% centrality events are selected based on number of participanting nucleons Npartsubscript𝑁partN_{\mathrm{part}}italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_part end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, instead of Nchsubscript𝑁chN_{\mathrm{ch}}italic_N start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ch end_POSTSUBSCRIPT to avoid selection bias. When integrated over |Δη|<2Δ𝜂2|\Delta\eta|<2| roman_Δ italic_η | < 2, the non-flow from the scaling method is about 30–40% lower. The long tail in nfs(Δη)subscriptnf𝑠Δ𝜂\mathrm{nf}_{s}(\Delta\eta)roman_nf start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_s end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Δ italic_η ), arising mainly from the away-side jet fragmentation, is completely absent in the subtraction method. This is due to jet quenching in AMPT, which is very effective in erasing cos(2Δϕ)2Δitalic-ϕ\cos(2\Delta\phi)roman_cos ( 2 roman_Δ italic_ϕ ) component of the away-side at low pTsubscript𝑝Tp_{\mathrm{T}}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT 111Away-side non-flow shape at low pTsubscript𝑝Tp_{\mathrm{T}}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is very broad and dominated by cos(Δϕ)Δitalic-ϕ\cos(\Delta\phi)roman_cos ( roman_Δ italic_ϕ ) driven by momentum conservation, which is the only harmonics surviving after medium effects..

Refer to caption
Figure 4: Ratios of V2Δsubscript𝑉2ΔV_{2\Delta}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT (black), V2Δ,εsubscript𝑉2Δ𝜀V_{2\Delta,\varepsilon}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ , italic_ε end_POSTSUBSCRIPT capturing only the global correlations (blue), and V2Δ,εquarksubscript𝑉2Δsubscript𝜀quarkV_{2\Delta,\varepsilon_{\mathrm{quark}}}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ , italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_quark end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT capturing also initial state short-range correlation (red) between U+U and Au+Au collisions in 0–5% centrality in the AMPT model. They are compared to the corresponding values obtained using the subevent method of STAR STAR Collaboration (2024), corresponding to an average |Δη|Δ𝜂|\Delta\eta|| roman_Δ italic_η | of 1.2 with a 4% uncertainty (green box).

Equipped with this knowledge, we are ready to dissect the rising trend of the RV2Δsubscript𝑅subscript𝑉2ΔR_{V_{2\Delta}}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT in Fig. 2(b). We calculate three ratios between U+U in Fig. 3(a) and Au+Au in Fig. 3(c), RV2Δsubscript𝑅subscript𝑉2ΔR_{V_{2\Delta}}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, RV2Δ,εquarksubscript𝑅subscript𝑉2Δsubscript𝜀quarkR_{V_{2\Delta,\varepsilon_{\mathrm{quark}}}}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ , italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_quark end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and RV2Δ,εsubscript𝑅subscript𝑉2Δ𝜀R_{V_{2\Delta,\varepsilon}}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ , italic_ε end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, and display the results in Fig. 4. According to Eq. 6, the ordering, RV2ΔRV2Δ,εquark<RV2Δ,εless-than-or-similar-tosubscript𝑅subscript𝑉2Δsubscript𝑅subscript𝑉2Δsubscript𝜀quarksubscript𝑅subscript𝑉2Δ𝜀R_{V_{2\Delta}}\lesssim R_{V_{2\Delta,\varepsilon_{\mathrm{quark}}}}<R_{V_{2% \Delta,\varepsilon}}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ≲ italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ , italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_quark end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT < italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ , italic_ε end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT, signifies the dilution of the impact of Uranium deformation by non-flow and initial-state short-range correlations. About half of the increase of RV2Δsubscript𝑅subscript𝑉2ΔR_{V_{2\Delta}}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is due to non-flow concentrated at |Δη|<2Δ𝜂2|\Delta\eta|<2| roman_Δ italic_η | < 2, while the remaining increase over 2<|Δη|<42Δ𝜂42<|\Delta\eta|<42 < | roman_Δ italic_η | < 4 is due to short-range correlations captured by RV2Δ,εquarksubscript𝑅subscript𝑉2Δsubscript𝜀quarkR_{V_{2\Delta,\varepsilon_{\mathrm{quark}}}}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ , italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_quark end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. These initial-state-driven short-range correlations have a fairly wide range not exhausted even at Δη=4Δ𝜂4\Delta\eta=4roman_Δ italic_η = 4 where RV2Δsubscript𝑅subscript𝑉2ΔR_{V_{2\Delta}}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and RV2Δ,εquarksubscript𝑅subscript𝑉2Δsubscript𝜀quarkR_{V_{2\Delta,\varepsilon_{\mathrm{quark}}}}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ , italic_ε start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_quark end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is still below RV2Δ,εsubscript𝑅subscript𝑉2Δ𝜀R_{V_{2\Delta,\varepsilon}}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ , italic_ε end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. We stress that the impact of short-range correlations and non-flow was revealed only because of the large βUsubscript𝛽U\beta_{\mathrm{U}}italic_β start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_U end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. Therefore, ratios of isobar or isobar-like systems with different nuclear shapes are excellent tools to explore the rapidity structure of the QGP’s initial state.

fullevent non-flow subevent non-flow
|Δη|<2Δ𝜂2|\Delta\eta|<2| roman_Δ italic_η | < 2 0.8<|Δη|<20.8Δ𝜂20.8<|\Delta\eta|<20.8 < | roman_Δ italic_η | < 2
U+U β=0.28𝛽0.28\beta=0.28italic_β = 0.28 6.9 % 4.2 %
U+U β=0𝛽0\beta=0italic_β = 0 14.4 % 8.7 %
Au+Au β=0.14𝛽0.14\beta=-0.14italic_β = - 0.14 11.8 % 6.8 %
Table 2: Estimated non-flow in 0–5% centrality in AMPT within STAR acceptance for full-event and subevent, obtained by integration of the black points in bottom panels of Fig. 3.

Recently, STAR has measured the RV2Δsubscript𝑅subscript𝑉2ΔR_{V_{2\Delta}}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT between U+U and Au+Au collisions in the range |Δη|<2Δ𝜂2|\Delta\eta|<2| roman_Δ italic_η | < 2, and compared with a hydrodynamic model to constrain the deformation of the Uranium nucleus STAR Collaboration (2024). The hydrodynamic model includes non-flow from resonance decays but not jets, and has no long-range decorrelation effects. The STAR measurement was performed within the two-subevent method, nearly equivalent to the 2PC method with a cut of 0.8<|Δη|<20.8Δ𝜂20.8<|\Delta\eta|<20.8 < | roman_Δ italic_η | < 2. For this choice, the estimated non-flow in AMPT model is 6.8% for Au+Au collisions (see Table 2), reducing to 4% for RV2Δsubscript𝑅subscript𝑉2ΔR_{V_{2\Delta}}italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT between U+U and Au+Au, consistent with the uncertainty quoted by the STAR measurement STAR Collaboration (2024). Previous estimations rely on multi-parameter fit of RV2Δ(Δη)subscript𝑅subscript𝑉2ΔΔ𝜂R_{V_{2\Delta}}(\Delta\eta)italic_R start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 roman_Δ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Δ italic_η ) assume that non-flow either has a double-gaussian shape Abdulhamid et al. (2024) or having no flow decorrealtions Abdelwahab et al. (2015). Due to the unconstrained nature of these assumptions, the extracted non-flow fraction may vary up to 20% in central Au+Au collisions. Our approach serves as a valuable tool to expose potential limitations of any non-flow estimation methods.

The presence of a significant initial-state-driven short-range correlation impacts the interpretation of the flow decorrelations based on the factorization ratio r2(η)=V2(η)V2(ηref/V2(η)V2(ηref)r_{2}(\eta)=\left\langle V_{2}(-\eta)V_{2}^{*}(\eta_{\mathrm{ref}}\right% \rangle/\left\langle V_{2}(\eta)V_{2}^{*}(\eta_{\mathrm{ref}})\right\rangleitalic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_η ) = ⟨ italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( - italic_η ) italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ref end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ⟩ / ⟨ italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( italic_η ) italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ∗ end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT ( italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ref end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ) ⟩ Khachatryan et al. (2015); Aaboud et al. (2018), where ηrefsubscript𝜂ref\eta_{\mathrm{ref}}italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ref end_POSTSUBSCRIPT is typically chosen from forward region, e.g. ηref>4subscript𝜂ref4\eta_{\mathrm{ref}}>4italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ref end_POSTSUBSCRIPT > 4 with a gap of at least 2 units from η𝜂\etaitalic_η, e.g. |η|<2𝜂2|\eta|<2| italic_η | < 2. However, the initial-state-driven short-range correlations may span a |Δη|Δ𝜂|\Delta\eta|| roman_Δ italic_η | range larger than |ηrefη|subscript𝜂ref𝜂|\eta_{\mathrm{ref}}-\eta|| italic_η start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_ref end_POSTSUBSCRIPT - italic_η |, reducing the values of r2subscript𝑟2r_{2}italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. This component is local and stochastic in nature and therefore is expected to cause random fluctuations of amplitude and direction of V2subscript𝑉2V_{2}italic_V start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT Pang et al. (2016); Xu et al. (2022). In this sense, r2(Δη)subscript𝑟2Δ𝜂r_{2}(\Delta\eta)italic_r start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 2 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT ( roman_Δ italic_η ) can not be interpreted as reflecting just the decorrelations between η𝜂-\eta- italic_η and η𝜂\etaitalic_η.

Summary. We show that initial-state-driven longitudinal flow decorrelations have several components with different ranges in ΔηΔ𝜂\Delta\etaroman_Δ italic_η. In addition to the usual global long-range component that are nearly independent of ΔηΔ𝜂\Delta\etaroman_Δ italic_η, the flow decorrelations has a significant short-range component that is broader than non-flow correlations. This short-range component was shown to dilute the impact of nuclear deformation out to Δη=4Δ𝜂4\Delta\eta=4roman_Δ italic_η = 4. Our approach provides a new tool to analyze the initial longitudinal structure and final state response in transport or hydrodynamic models and can be extended to other bulk observables such as triangular flow and pTsubscript𝑝Tp_{\mathrm{T}}italic_p start_POSTSUBSCRIPT roman_T end_POSTSUBSCRIPT fluctuations.

Understanding the longitudinal dynamics of the QGP is the frontier of high-energy nuclear research. The ability to vary the nuclear shape in isobar or isobar-like collisions provides a means to expose these dynamics. Future research should explore such a possibility by leveraging the large acceptance detectors such as ALICE Phase2 upgrade Acharya et al. (2024) and fixed target program of the SMOG2 at LHCb LHCb Collaboration .

This work is supported by DOE Research Grant Number DE-SC0024602.

References