Sources of longitudinal flow decorrelations in high-energy nuclear collisions
Jiangyong Jia
[email protected]Department of Chemistry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA
Physics Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11976, USA
Shengli Huang
Department of Chemistry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA
Chunjian Zhang
Shanghai Research Center for Theoretical Nuclear Physics, NSFC and Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China
Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Ion-beam Application (MOE), and Institute of Modern Physics, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
Department of Chemistry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA
Somadutta Bhatta
Department of Chemistry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA
Abstract
The longitudinal structure of the quark-gluon plasma (QGP) consists of several components spanning various scales. However, its short-range features are often obscured by final-state non-flow correlations. Here, we introduce a data-driven approach to separate initial state structures from non-flow effects. The longitudinal structure is found having two distinct components: one that reflects the global twisted geometry of the QGP, and another that captures localized fluctuations in rapidity. The characteristics of this second component, contributing to short- and medium-range flow decorrelations, can be quantified by comparing collisions of nuclei with different shapes. This study represents the first successful attempt to disentangle long- and short-range flow decorrelations from non-flow backgrounds, providing new insights into the initial conditions of heavy-ion collisions.
Introduction. High-energy nuclear collisions serve as laboratories for generating and examining the QGP under varied conditions Busza et al. (2018). Understanding the dynamics and properties of this exotic state requires precise control of its initial conditions (IC), including the distributions of colliding nucleons, their constituent partons, the deposition of energy, and the 3D geometric profile. Recent advancements showcased the potential to fine-tune the IC by comparing collision systems with similar masses yet distinct shapes, allowing for precise control over the QGP’s initial shape without altering its hydrodynamic response Giacalone et al. (2021); Jia and Zhang (2023); Nijs and van der
Schee (2023); Giacalone (2023). Leveraging ratios of bulk observables, such as the elliptic flow, between these systems facilitates the extraction of valuable information about the IC Bally et al. (2022); Xu et al. (2023). Such experimental comparisons, e.g. between 238U+238U and 197Au+197Au STAR Collaboration (2024) or 96Ru+96Ru and 96Zr+96Zr Abdallah et al. (2022); Jia and Zhang (2023), have indicated strong impacts of nuclear structure on the geometrical properties of the IC, which in turn can be used to constrain the longitudinal profile Bhatta et al. (2023); Zhang et al. (2024).
Most investigations of the QGP focused on transverse profile of the IC near mid-pseudorapidity (). However, the energy deposition process by the colliding nucleons is inherently non-boost-invariant and fluctuating along , known as longitudinal fluctuations or decorrelations Bozek and Broniowski (2016); Pang et al. (2016); Li and Yan (2020); Franco and Luzum (2020). Consequently, the initial shape of the QGP and its transverse expansion vary with even within a single collision event. In popular QCD-inspired string models (PYTHIA Sjöstrand (2020), HIJING Gyulassy and Wang (1994), AMPT Lin et al. (2005)), where nucleons deposit energy in color flux tubes, longitudinal fluctuations arise from variations in the starting positions and lengths of the flux tubes along Bozek and Broniowski (2016); Pang et al. (2016). This gives rise to a global geometry that varies smoothly with as well as local stochastic fluctuations (see Fig. 1).
We illustrate this concept through an analysis of elliptic flow (), which characterizes the elliptical distribution of particles in the -plane. The captures the hydrodynamic response to an elliptically-shaped overlap region, quantified by the eccentricity vector
(1)
defined from transverse energy density at a given . The longitudinal structure of is driven by the asymmetrical energy deposition by forward and backward moving participants, resulting in a that interpolates between and , the eccentricity vectors defined by the forward-going and backward-going colliding nucleons, respectively Jia and Huo (2014). In other words, the initially produced QGP has an elliptic shape that twists and deforms from to , driving a final-state with a similar dependence (top of Fig. 1).
Experimentally, elliptic flow is accessed using the two-particle correlation (2PC) method, which quantifies the second moment of its event-by-event distribution,
(2)
The initial state longitudinal fluctuations result in a decrease of for pairs with increasing separation . Specifically, “global” decorrelations arising from nucleon fluctuations and nuclear deformation lead to gradual variations of with (the two sources have similar dependence Zhang et al. (2024)), whereas “local” decorrelations in energy deposition results in variation of at small (bottom of Fig. 1) Bozek and Broniowski (2016). However, the local decorrelations and non-flow are difficult to distinguish, as both appear at relatively small . An experimental separation between the initial state short-range correlations and final-state non-flow remains elusive.
In this paper, using correlations between and different estimates of , we identify sources of initial-state-driven decorrelations contributing to . By comparing U+U with Au+Au collisions, we discover a fingerprint of short-range correlation as a dilution of the impact of nuclear deformation, leading to an increase of the ratio of with . We further develop a method to disentangle between long-range correlation, short-range correlation, and final-state non-flow.
Setup. The study is carried out using the transport model, AMPT Lin et al. (2005), which simulates the full space-time evolution of heavy-ion collisions event by event. The nucleons are sampled from the Woods-Saxon distribution in polar coordinate: , where the is the quadrupole deformation, is the nuclear radius, and is the skin thickness. Collisions for three systems are simulated, whose geometrical parameters, listed in Table 1, are taken from Ref. Ryssens et al. (2023). The collision events are generated at GeV for U+U and GeV for Au+Au, employing the string-melting mode with a partonic cross-section of 3 b. Elliptic eccentricities are calculated for all participating nucleons, denoted as , as well as for the partons at mid-rapidity after string melting but before the partonic transport, . The partons are weighted by their total energy in the calculation according to Eq. 1, hence captures the initial state local fluctuation associated with strings (Fig. 1) without being impacted by non-flow. The final state particles used for the analysis are chosen from the transverse momentum range GeV/ and pseudorapidity range . Event centrality is defined by charged particle multiplicity in (). This analysis focuses on the 0–5% most central collisions, where the impact of nuclear deformation is prominent.
System
238U+238U
238U+238U
197Au+197Au
0.28
0.0
-0.14
(fm)
6.81
6.81
6.62
(fm)
0.55
0.55
0.52
Table 1: Nuclei species and their quadrupole deformation , radius and skin thickness used in AMPT simulation.
Elliptic flow is calculated using two different approaches. First, the flow is obtained using the standard 2PC method, , in the pseudorapidity range . This is the typical range covered by the detectors at RHIC and the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). The , covering the range , captures all the initial-state-driven long-range and short-range correlations illustrated by Fig. 1, as well as final-state non-flow.
In the second approach, we calculate the projection of the flow along the direction of eccentricity vectors,
(3)
where “” indicates an average over events in a specific centrality range. The captures initial-state-driven long-range correlations, while captures in addition the initial-state-driven short-range correlations. Both observables are free of non-flow. Therefore, comparing the shapes of and to the shape of facilitates the separation of the initial- and final-state effects.
The values of , displayed in Fig. 2(a), decrease gradually with for all three systems. This decreasing trend is characterized by a mild structure at and a broader one at , which as we show later indicates non-flow and initial-state-driven short-range correlations, respectively. The differences
(4)
capture the deformation-driven contribution of Uranium, and has a quadratic dependence on deformation parameter Jia (2022); Jia and Zhang (2023). Based on this discussion, the 2PC flow has four components,
(5)
The and capture the initial-state-driven long-range and short-range correlations in collisions of spherical nuclei, respectively, has similar long-range structure as Zhang et al. (2024), and is associated with non-flow.
Figure 2(b) shows the ratio of between U+U with and without deformation, as well as between U+U and Au+Au. The former can be expressed as
(6)
Since and are short-range, they dilute the impact of nuclear deformation at small , leading to an increase of the ratio towards large . The increase slows down at , suggesting and have different ranges in .
Figure 2(c) and (e) display the results of and over the full range. The values are smaller than as expected since they are projections of flow signal and free of non-flow. Their shapes signify the expected dependence of the single particle flow.
The corresponding ratios between U+U with and without deformation are displayed in the bottom panels. The is nearly independent , which is expected since only captures the long-range components and in Eq. 6, both of which have a similar shape Zhang et al. (2024). On the other hand, displays a gradual increase with , with a shape that closely resembles Fig. 2(a). Our interpretation is that the local structures of the initial state at mid-rapidity, captured by , generate additional flow around mid-rapidity. This is supported by Fig. 2(e), which shows that at but they are much closer at . The presence of initial state short-range correlation in , contributing to , is responsible for the gradual increase of in Fig. 2(f). The bottom panels of Fig. 2 also show ratios between U+U and Au+Au by red circles, which are smaller than ratios between U+U with and without deformation and exhibit weaker oder dependence as well. This suggests that the impacts of Uranium deformation are partially canceled by the moderate deformation of 197Au.
Clearly, the dependence of the deformation-driven flow is a reflection of the short-range correlation and its rapidity structure. To quantify the sources of decorrelations in , we perform a convolution of and within :
(7)
The expression for is analogous. These quantities approximate the initial-state-driven flow decorrelations and can be directly compared to .
This comparison is carried out in Fig. 3. The has a shape that matches almost perfectly with at , while the is much flatter in . The shape of is also similar to the shape of in Eq. 4, suggesting a similarly weak dependence Zhang et al. (2024).
These insights enable us to separate components of longitudinal flow decorrelations (shaded areas). The long-range component, , dominates, followed by the short-range component induced by local fluctuations. This short-range component starts to decrease at , reflecting the typical coherence length of the local fluctuations. The estimated non-flow component, between and , spans a range of . Since may not capture all the initial-state-driven short-range components, this method likely gives an upper-limit of non-flow. In the bottom panels, we compare this component to an estimate obtained by assuming non-flow is unmodified and scales inversely with from Ref. STAR Collaboration (2024)
(8)
Note that 90–100% centrality events are selected based on number of participanting nucleons , instead of to avoid selection bias. When integrated over , the non-flow from the scaling method is about 30–40% lower. The long tail in , arising mainly from the away-side jet fragmentation, is completely absent in the subtraction method. This is due to jet quenching in AMPT, which is very effective in erasing component of the away-side at low 111Away-side non-flow shape at low is very broad and dominated by driven by momentum conservation, which is the only harmonics surviving after medium effects..
Equipped with this knowledge, we are ready to dissect the rising trend of the in Fig. 2(b). We calculate three ratios between U+U in Fig. 3(a) and Au+Au in Fig. 3(c), , , and , and display the results in Fig. 4. According to Eq. 6, the ordering, , signifies the dilution of the impact of Uranium deformation by non-flow and initial-state short-range correlations. About half of the increase of is due to non-flow concentrated at , while the remaining increase over is due to short-range correlations captured by . These initial-state-driven short-range correlations have a fairly wide range not exhausted even at where and is still below . We stress that the impact of short-range correlations and non-flow was revealed only because of the large . Therefore, ratios of isobar or isobar-like systems with different nuclear shapes are excellent tools to explore the rapidity structure of the QGP’s initial state.
fullevent non-flow
subevent non-flow
U+U
6.9 %
4.2 %
U+U
14.4 %
8.7 %
Au+Au
11.8 %
6.8 %
Table 2: Estimated non-flow in 0–5% centrality in AMPT within STAR acceptance for full-event and subevent, obtained by integration of the black points in bottom panels of Fig. 3.
Recently, STAR has measured the between U+U and Au+Au collisions in the range , and compared with a hydrodynamic model to constrain the deformation of the Uranium nucleus STAR Collaboration (2024). The hydrodynamic model includes non-flow from resonance decays but not jets, and has no long-range decorrelation effects. The STAR measurement was performed within the two-subevent method, nearly equivalent to the 2PC method with a cut of . For this choice, the estimated non-flow in AMPT model is 6.8% for Au+Au collisions (see Table 2), reducing to 4% for between U+U and Au+Au, consistent with the uncertainty quoted by the STAR measurement STAR Collaboration (2024). Previous estimations rely on multi-parameter fit of assume that non-flow either has a double-gaussian shape Abdulhamid et al. (2024) or having no flow decorrealtions Abdelwahab et al. (2015). Due to the unconstrained nature of these assumptions, the extracted non-flow fraction may vary up to 20% in central Au+Au collisions. Our approach serves as a valuable tool to expose potential limitations of any non-flow estimation methods.
The presence of a significant initial-state-driven short-range correlation impacts the interpretation of the flow decorrelations based on the factorization ratio Khachatryan et al. (2015); Aaboud et al. (2018), where is typically chosen from forward region, e.g. with a gap of at least 2 units from , e.g. . However, the initial-state-driven short-range correlations may span a range larger than , reducing the values of . This component is local and stochastic in nature and therefore is expected to cause random fluctuations of amplitude and direction of Pang et al. (2016); Xu et al. (2022). In this sense, can not be interpreted as reflecting just the decorrelations between and .
Summary. We show that initial-state-driven longitudinal flow decorrelations have several components with different ranges in . In addition to the usual global long-range component that are nearly independent of , the flow decorrelations has a significant short-range component that is broader than non-flow correlations. This short-range component was shown to dilute the impact of nuclear deformation out to . Our approach provides a new tool to analyze the initial longitudinal structure and final state response in transport or hydrodynamic models and can be extended to other bulk observables such as triangular flow and fluctuations.
Understanding the longitudinal dynamics of the QGP is the frontier of high-energy nuclear research. The ability to vary the nuclear shape in isobar or isobar-like collisions provides a means to expose these dynamics. Future research should explore such a possibility by leveraging the large acceptance detectors such as ALICE Phase2 upgrade Acharya et al. (2024) and fixed target program of the SMOG2 at LHCb LHCb Collaboration .
This work is supported by DOE Research Grant Number DE-SC0024602.
Bally et al. (2022)Benjamin Bally et al., “Imaging the initial condition of heavy-ion collisions and
nuclear structure across the nuclide chart,” (2022), arXiv:2209.11042
[nucl-ex] .
Xu et al. (2023)Hao-jie Xu, Wenbin Zhao,
Hanlin Li, Ying Zhou, Lie-Wen Chen, and Fuqiang Wang, “Probing nuclear structure with mean transverse
momentum in relativistic isobar collisions,” Phys. Rev. C 108, L011902 (2023), arXiv:2111.14812 [nucl-th] .
STAR Collaboration (2024)STAR
Collaboration, “Imaging
Shapes of Atomic Nuclei in High-Energy Nuclear Collisions,” (2024), arXiv:2401.06625 [nucl-ex] .
Abdallah et al. (2022)Mohamed Abdallah et al. (STAR), “Search for the chiral magnetic effect
with isobar collisions at =200 GeV by the STAR Collaboration
at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider,” Phys. Rev. C 105, 014901 (2022), arXiv:2109.00131 [nucl-ex] .
Bhatta et al. (2023)Somadutta Bhatta, Chunjian Zhang, and Jiangyong Jia, “Energy dependence of heavy-ion initial condition in isobar collisions,” (2023), arXiv:2301.01294 [nucl-th] .
Zhang et al. (2024)Chunjian Zhang, Shengli Huang, and Jiangyong Jia, “Longitudinal Structure of Quark-Gluon Plasma Unveiled Through Nuclear
Deformations,” (2024), arXiv:2405.08749 [nucl-th] .
Bozek and Broniowski (2016)Piotr Bozek and Wojciech Broniowski, “The torque
effect and fluctuations of entropy deposition in rapidity in
ultra-relativistic nuclear collisions,” Phys. Lett. B 752, 206–211 (2016), arXiv:1506.02817 [nucl-th] .
Pang et al. (2016)Long-Gang Pang, Hannah Petersen, Guang-You Qin, Victor Roy, and Xin-Nian Wang, “Decorrelation of
anisotropic flow along the longitudinal direction,” Eur.
Phys. J. A 52, 97
(2016), arXiv:1511.04131 [nucl-th] .
Gyulassy and Wang (1994)Miklos Gyulassy and Xin-Nian Wang, “HIJING 1.0: A
Monte Carlo program for parton and particle production in high-energy
hadronic and nuclear collisions,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 83, 307 (1994), arXiv:nucl-th/9502021 .
Lin et al. (2005)Zi-Wei Lin, Che Ming Ko,
Bao-An Li, Bin Zhang, and Subrata Pal, “A Multi-phase transport model for relativistic
heavy ion collisions,” Phys. Rev. C 72, 064901 (2005), arXiv:nucl-th/0411110
.
Jia and Huo (2014)Jiangyong Jia and Peng Huo, “Forward-backward eccentricity and participant-plane angle fluctuations and
their influences on longitudinal dynamics of collective flow,” Phys. Rev. C 90, 034915 (2014), arXiv:1403.6077 [nucl-th] .
Ryssens et al. (2023)Wouter Ryssens, Giuliano Giacalone, Björn Schenke, and Chun Shen, “Evidence of
Hexadecapole Deformation in Uranium-238 at the Relativistic Heavy Ion
Collider,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 212302 (2023), arXiv:2302.13617 [nucl-th]
.
Note (1)Away-side non-flow shape at low
is very broad and dominated by driven by momentum
conservation, which is the only harmonics surviving after medium
effects.
Abdulhamid et al. (2024)M. I. Abdulhamid et al. (STAR), “Estimate of background baseline and
upper limit on the chiral magnetic effect in isobar collisions at sNN=200 GeV
at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider,” Phys. Rev. C 110, 014905 (2024), arXiv:2310.13096 [nucl-ex] .
Abdelwahab et al. (2015)N. M. Abdelwahab et al. (STAR), “Isolation of Flow and Nonflow
Correlations by Two- and Four-Particle Cumulant Measurements of Azimuthal
Harmonics in 200 GeV Au+Au Collisions,” Phys. Lett. B 745, 40–47 (2015), arXiv:1409.2043 [nucl-ex] .
Khachatryan et al. (2015)Vardan Khachatryan et al. (CMS), “Evidence for transverse momentum and
pseudorapidity dependent event plane fluctuations in PbPb and pPb
collisions,” Phys. Rev. C 92, 034911 (2015), arXiv:1503.01692 [nucl-ex] .
Xu et al. (2022)Zhiwan Xu, Xiatong Wu,
Caleb Sword, Gang Wang, Sergei A. Voloshin, and Huan Zhong Huang, “Flow-plane decorrelations in heavy-ion
collisions with multiple-plane cumulants,” Phys. Rev. C 105, 024902 (2022), arXiv:2012.06689 [nucl-ex] .