Macaw: A Machine Code Toolbox for the Busy Binary Analyst
Authors:
Ryan G. Scott,
Brett Boston,
Benjamin Davis,
Iavor Diatchki,
Mike Dodds,
Joe Hendrix,
Daniel Matichuk,
Kevin Quick,
Tristan Ravitch,
Valentin Robert,
Benjamin Selfridge,
Andrei Stefănescu,
Daniel Wagner,
Simon Winwood
Abstract:
When attempting to understand the behavior of an executable, a binary analyst can make use of many different techniques. These include program slicing, dynamic instrumentation, binary-level rewriting, symbolic execution, and formal verification, all of which can uncover insights into how a piece of machine code behaves. As a result, there is no one-size-fits-all binary analysis tool, so a binary a…
▽ More
When attempting to understand the behavior of an executable, a binary analyst can make use of many different techniques. These include program slicing, dynamic instrumentation, binary-level rewriting, symbolic execution, and formal verification, all of which can uncover insights into how a piece of machine code behaves. As a result, there is no one-size-fits-all binary analysis tool, so a binary analysis researcher will often combine several different tools. Sometimes, a researcher will even need to design new tools to study problems that existing frameworks are not well equipped to handle. Designing such tools from complete scratch is rarely time- or cost-effective, however, given the scale and complexity of modern instruction set architectures.
We present Macaw, a modular framework that makes it possible to rapidly build reliable binary analysis tools across a range of use cases. Over a decade of development, we have used Macaw to support an industrial research team in building tools for machine code-related tasks. As such, the name "Macaw" refers not just to the framework itself, but also a suite of tools that are built on top of the framework. We describe Macaw in depth and describe the different static and dynamic analyses that it performs, many of which are powered by an SMT-based symbolic execution engine. We put a particular focus on interoperability between machine code and higher-level languages, including binary lifting from x86 to LLVM, as well verifying the correctness of mixed C and assembly code.
△ Less
Submitted 8 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
Verifying Programs Under Custom Application-Specific Execution Models
Authors:
Brett Boston,
Zoe Gong,
Michael Carbin
Abstract:
Researchers have recently designed a number of application-specific fault tolerance mechanisms that enable applications to either be naturally resilient to errors or include additional detection and correction steps that can bring the overall execution of an application back into an envelope for which an acceptable execution is eventually guaranteed. A major challenge to building an application th…
▽ More
Researchers have recently designed a number of application-specific fault tolerance mechanisms that enable applications to either be naturally resilient to errors or include additional detection and correction steps that can bring the overall execution of an application back into an envelope for which an acceptable execution is eventually guaranteed. A major challenge to building an application that leverages these mechanisms, however, is to verify that the implementation satisfies the basic invariants that these mechanisms require--given a model of how faults may manifest during the application's execution.
To this end we present Leto, an SMT based automatic verification system that enables developers to verify their applications with respect to a first-class execution model specification. Namely, Leto enables software and platform developers to programmatically specify the execution semantics of the underlying hardware system as well as verify assertions about the behavior of the application's resulting execution. In this paper, we present the Leto programming language and its corresponding verification system. We also demonstrate Leto on several applications that leverage application-specific fault tolerance mechanisms.
△ Less
Submitted 15 May, 2018;
originally announced May 2018.
