-
What do we learn from inverting CLIP models?
Authors:
Hamid Kazemi,
Atoosa Chegini,
Jonas Geiping,
Soheil Feizi,
Tom Goldstein
Abstract:
We employ an inversion-based approach to examine CLIP models. Our examination reveals that inverting CLIP models results in the generation of images that exhibit semantic alignment with the specified target prompts. We leverage these inverted images to gain insights into various aspects of CLIP models, such as their ability to blend concepts and inclusion of gender biases. We notably observe insta…
▽ More
We employ an inversion-based approach to examine CLIP models. Our examination reveals that inverting CLIP models results in the generation of images that exhibit semantic alignment with the specified target prompts. We leverage these inverted images to gain insights into various aspects of CLIP models, such as their ability to blend concepts and inclusion of gender biases. We notably observe instances of NSFW (Not Safe For Work) images during model inversion. This phenomenon occurs even for semantically innocuous prompts, like "a beautiful landscape," as well as for prompts involving the names of celebrities.
△ Less
Submitted 4 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Fast Adversarial Attacks on Language Models In One GPU Minute
Authors:
Vinu Sankar Sadasivan,
Shoumik Saha,
Gaurang Sriramanan,
Priyatham Kattakinda,
Atoosa Chegini,
Soheil Feizi
Abstract:
In this paper, we introduce a novel class of fast, beam search-based adversarial attack (BEAST) for Language Models (LMs). BEAST employs interpretable parameters, enabling attackers to balance between attack speed, success rate, and the readability of adversarial prompts. The computational efficiency of BEAST facilitates us to investigate its applications on LMs for jailbreaking, eliciting halluci…
▽ More
In this paper, we introduce a novel class of fast, beam search-based adversarial attack (BEAST) for Language Models (LMs). BEAST employs interpretable parameters, enabling attackers to balance between attack speed, success rate, and the readability of adversarial prompts. The computational efficiency of BEAST facilitates us to investigate its applications on LMs for jailbreaking, eliciting hallucinations, and privacy attacks. Our gradient-free targeted attack can jailbreak aligned LMs with high attack success rates within one minute. For instance, BEAST can jailbreak Vicuna-7B-v1.5 under one minute with a success rate of 89% when compared to a gradient-based baseline that takes over an hour to achieve 70% success rate using a single Nvidia RTX A6000 48GB GPU. Additionally, we discover a unique outcome wherein our untargeted attack induces hallucinations in LM chatbots. Through human evaluations, we find that our untargeted attack causes Vicuna-7B-v1.5 to produce ~15% more incorrect outputs when compared to LM outputs in the absence of our attack. We also learn that 22% of the time, BEAST causes Vicuna to generate outputs that are not relevant to the original prompt. Further, we use BEAST to generate adversarial prompts in a few seconds that can boost the performance of existing membership inference attacks for LMs. We believe that our fast attack, BEAST, has the potential to accelerate research in LM security and privacy. Our codebase is publicly available at https://github.com/vinusankars/BEAST.
△ Less
Submitted 23 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Identifying and Mitigating Model Failures through Few-shot CLIP-aided Diffusion Generation
Authors:
Atoosa Chegini,
Soheil Feizi
Abstract:
Deep learning models can encounter unexpected failures, especially when dealing with challenging sub-populations. One common reason for these failures is the occurrence of objects in backgrounds that are rarely seen during training. To gain a better understanding of these failure modes, human-interpretable descriptions are crucial for further analysis and improvement which is expensive. In this st…
▽ More
Deep learning models can encounter unexpected failures, especially when dealing with challenging sub-populations. One common reason for these failures is the occurrence of objects in backgrounds that are rarely seen during training. To gain a better understanding of these failure modes, human-interpretable descriptions are crucial for further analysis and improvement which is expensive. In this study, we propose an end-to-end framework that utilizes the capabilities of large language models (ChatGPT) and vision-language deep models (CLIP) to generate text descriptions of failure modes associated with spurious correlations (e.g. rarely seen backgrounds) without human-in-the-loop intervention. These descriptions can be used to generate synthetic data using generative models, such as diffusion models. The model can now use this generated data to learn from its weaknesses and enhance its performance on backgrounds that are uncommon for each class of data. Our approach serves as a broad solution, promising progress in comprehending model failure modes and strengthening deep learning models across a wide range of failure scenarios (e.g. bacckgrounds, colors) automatically in a few-shot manner. Our experiments have shown remarkable \textbf{improvements in accuracy ($\sim \textbf{21%}$)} on hard sub-populations (particularly for wrong background association) across $40$ different models, such as ResNets, EfficientNets, DenseNets, Vision Transformer (ViT), SwAVs, MoCos, DINOs, and CLIPs on various datasets such as ImageNet-1000, CIFAR-10, and CIFAR-100.
△ Less
Submitted 8 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
EditVal: Benchmarking Diffusion Based Text-Guided Image Editing Methods
Authors:
Samyadeep Basu,
Mehrdad Saberi,
Shweta Bhardwaj,
Atoosa Malemir Chegini,
Daniela Massiceti,
Maziar Sanjabi,
Shell Xu Hu,
Soheil Feizi
Abstract:
A plethora of text-guided image editing methods have recently been developed by leveraging the impressive capabilities of large-scale diffusion-based generative models such as Imagen and Stable Diffusion. A standardized evaluation protocol, however, does not exist to compare methods across different types of fine-grained edits. To address this gap, we introduce EditVal, a standardized benchmark fo…
▽ More
A plethora of text-guided image editing methods have recently been developed by leveraging the impressive capabilities of large-scale diffusion-based generative models such as Imagen and Stable Diffusion. A standardized evaluation protocol, however, does not exist to compare methods across different types of fine-grained edits. To address this gap, we introduce EditVal, a standardized benchmark for quantitatively evaluating text-guided image editing methods. EditVal consists of a curated dataset of images, a set of editable attributes for each image drawn from 13 possible edit types, and an automated evaluation pipeline that uses pre-trained vision-language models to assess the fidelity of generated images for each edit type. We use EditVal to benchmark 8 cutting-edge diffusion-based editing methods including SINE, Imagic and Instruct-Pix2Pix. We complement this with a large-scale human study where we show that EditVall's automated evaluation pipeline is strongly correlated with human-preferences for the edit types we considered. From both the human study and automated evaluation, we find that: (i) Instruct-Pix2Pix, Null-Text and SINE are the top-performing methods averaged across different edit types, however {\it only} Instruct-Pix2Pix and Null-Text are able to preserve original image properties; (ii) Most of the editing methods fail at edits involving spatial operations (e.g., changing the position of an object). (iii) There is no `winner' method which ranks the best individually across a range of different edit types. We hope that our benchmark can pave the way to developing more reliable text-guided image editing tools in the future. We will publicly release EditVal, and all associated code and human-study templates to support these research directions in https://deep-ml-research.github.io/editval/.
△ Less
Submitted 3 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Robustness of AI-Image Detectors: Fundamental Limits and Practical Attacks
Authors:
Mehrdad Saberi,
Vinu Sankar Sadasivan,
Keivan Rezaei,
Aounon Kumar,
Atoosa Chegini,
Wenxiao Wang,
Soheil Feizi
Abstract:
In light of recent advancements in generative AI models, it has become essential to distinguish genuine content from AI-generated one to prevent the malicious usage of fake materials as authentic ones and vice versa. Various techniques have been introduced for identifying AI-generated images, with watermarking emerging as a promising approach. In this paper, we analyze the robustness of various AI…
▽ More
In light of recent advancements in generative AI models, it has become essential to distinguish genuine content from AI-generated one to prevent the malicious usage of fake materials as authentic ones and vice versa. Various techniques have been introduced for identifying AI-generated images, with watermarking emerging as a promising approach. In this paper, we analyze the robustness of various AI-image detectors including watermarking and classifier-based deepfake detectors. For watermarking methods that introduce subtle image perturbations (i.e., low perturbation budget methods), we reveal a fundamental trade-off between the evasion error rate (i.e., the fraction of watermarked images detected as non-watermarked ones) and the spoofing error rate (i.e., the fraction of non-watermarked images detected as watermarked ones) upon an application of diffusion purification attack. To validate our theoretical findings, we also provide empirical evidence demonstrating that diffusion purification effectively removes low perturbation budget watermarks by applying minimal changes to images. The diffusion purification attack is ineffective for high perturbation watermarking methods where notable changes are applied to images. In this case, we develop a model substitution adversarial attack that can successfully remove watermarks. Moreover, we show that watermarking methods are vulnerable to spoofing attacks where the attacker aims to have real images identified as watermarked ones, damaging the reputation of the developers. In particular, with black-box access to the watermarking method, a watermarked noise image can be generated and added to real images, causing them to be incorrectly classified as watermarked. Finally, we extend our theory to characterize a fundamental trade-off between the robustness and reliability of classifier-based deep fake detectors and demonstrate it through experiments.
△ Less
Submitted 14 February, 2024; v1 submitted 29 September, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Run-Off Election: Improved Provable Defense against Data Poisoning Attacks
Authors:
Keivan Rezaei,
Kiarash Banihashem,
Atoosa Chegini,
Soheil Feizi
Abstract:
In data poisoning attacks, an adversary tries to change a model's prediction by adding, modifying, or removing samples in the training data. Recently, ensemble-based approaches for obtaining provable defenses against data poisoning have been proposed where predictions are done by taking a majority vote across multiple base models. In this work, we show that merely considering the majority vote in…
▽ More
In data poisoning attacks, an adversary tries to change a model's prediction by adding, modifying, or removing samples in the training data. Recently, ensemble-based approaches for obtaining provable defenses against data poisoning have been proposed where predictions are done by taking a majority vote across multiple base models. In this work, we show that merely considering the majority vote in ensemble defenses is wasteful as it does not effectively utilize available information in the logits layers of the base models. Instead, we propose Run-Off Election (ROE), a novel aggregation method based on a two-round election across the base models: In the first round, models vote for their preferred class and then a second, Run-Off election is held between the top two classes in the first round. Based on this approach, we propose DPA+ROE and FA+ROE defense methods based on Deep Partition Aggregation (DPA) and Finite Aggregation (FA) approaches from prior work. We evaluate our methods on MNIST, CIFAR-10, and GTSRB and obtain improvements in certified accuracy by up to 3%-4%. Also, by applying ROE on a boosted version of DPA, we gain improvements around 12%-27% comparing to the current state-of-the-art, establishing a new state-of-the-art in (pointwise) certified robustness against data poisoning. In many cases, our approach outperforms the state-of-the-art, even when using 32 times less computational power.
△ Less
Submitted 16 May, 2023; v1 submitted 4 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
Data-Centric Debugging: mitigating model failures via targeted data collection
Authors:
Sahil Singla,
Atoosa Malemir Chegini,
Mazda Moayeri,
Soheil Feiz
Abstract:
Deep neural networks can be unreliable in the real world when the training set does not adequately cover all the settings where they are deployed. Focusing on image classification, we consider the setting where we have an error distribution $\mathcal{E}$ representing a deployment scenario where the model fails. We have access to a small set of samples $\mathcal{E}_{sample}$ from $\mathcal{E}$ and…
▽ More
Deep neural networks can be unreliable in the real world when the training set does not adequately cover all the settings where they are deployed. Focusing on image classification, we consider the setting where we have an error distribution $\mathcal{E}$ representing a deployment scenario where the model fails. We have access to a small set of samples $\mathcal{E}_{sample}$ from $\mathcal{E}$ and it can be expensive to obtain additional samples. In the traditional model development framework, mitigating failures of the model in $\mathcal{E}$ can be challenging and is often done in an ad hoc manner. In this paper, we propose a general methodology for model debugging that can systemically improve model performance on $\mathcal{E}$ while maintaining its performance on the original test set. Our key assumption is that we have access to a large pool of weakly (noisily) labeled data $\mathcal{F}$. However, naively adding $\mathcal{F}$ to the training would hurt model performance due to the large extent of label noise. Our Data-Centric Debugging (DCD) framework carefully creates a debug-train set by selecting images from $\mathcal{F}$ that are perceptually similar to the images in $\mathcal{E}_{sample}$. To do this, we use the $\ell_2$ distance in the feature space (penultimate layer activations) of various models including ResNet, Robust ResNet and DINO where we observe DINO ViTs are significantly better at discovering similar images compared to Resnets. Compared to LPIPS, we find that our method reduces compute and storage requirements by 99.58\%. Compared to the baselines that maintain model performance on the test set, we achieve significantly (+9.45\%) improved results on the debug-heldout sets.
△ Less
Submitted 17 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
InForecaster: Forecasting Influenza Hemagglutinin Mutations Through the Lens of Anomaly Detection
Authors:
Ali Garjani,
Atoosa Malemir Chegini,
Mohammadreza Salehi,
Alireza Tabibzadeh,
Parastoo Yousefi,
Mohammad Hossein Razizadeh,
Moein Esghaei,
Maryam Esghaei,
Mohammad Hossein Rohban
Abstract:
The influenza virus hemagglutinin is an important part of the virus attachment to the host cells. The hemagglutinin proteins are one of the genetic regions of the virus with a high potential for mutations. Due to the importance of predicting mutations in producing effective and low-cost vaccines, solutions that attempt to approach this problem have recently gained a significant attention. A histor…
▽ More
The influenza virus hemagglutinin is an important part of the virus attachment to the host cells. The hemagglutinin proteins are one of the genetic regions of the virus with a high potential for mutations. Due to the importance of predicting mutations in producing effective and low-cost vaccines, solutions that attempt to approach this problem have recently gained a significant attention. A historical record of mutations have been used to train predictive models in such solutions. However, the imbalance between mutations and the preserved proteins is a big challenge for the development of such models that needs to be addressed. Here, we propose to tackle this challenge through anomaly detection (AD). AD is a well-established field in Machine Learning (ML) that tries to distinguish unseen anomalies from the normal patterns using only normal training samples. By considering mutations as the anomalous behavior, we could benefit existing rich solutions in this field that have emerged recently. Such methods also fit the problem setup of extreme imbalance between the number of unmutated vs. mutated training samples. Motivated by this formulation, our method tries to find a compact representation for unmutated samples while forcing anomalies to be separated from the normal ones. This helps the model to learn a shared unique representation between normal training samples as much as possible, which improves the discernibility and detectability of mutated samples from the unmutated ones at the test time. We conduct a large number of experiments on four publicly available datasets, consisting of 3 different hemagglutinin protein datasets, and one SARS-CoV-2 dataset, and show the effectiveness of our method through different standard criteria.
△ Less
Submitted 24 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.