-
Does ChatGPT Have a Mind?
Authors:
Simon Goldstein,
Benjamin A. Levinstein
Abstract:
This paper examines the question of whether Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT possess minds, focusing specifically on whether they have a genuine folk psychology encompassing beliefs, desires, and intentions. We approach this question by investigating two key aspects: internal representations and dispositions to act. First, we survey various philosophical theories of representation, includ…
▽ More
This paper examines the question of whether Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT possess minds, focusing specifically on whether they have a genuine folk psychology encompassing beliefs, desires, and intentions. We approach this question by investigating two key aspects: internal representations and dispositions to act. First, we survey various philosophical theories of representation, including informational, causal, structural, and teleosemantic accounts, arguing that LLMs satisfy key conditions proposed by each. We draw on recent interpretability research in machine learning to support these claims. Second, we explore whether LLMs exhibit robust dispositions to perform actions, a necessary component of folk psychology. We consider two prominent philosophical traditions, interpretationism and representationalism, to assess LLM action dispositions. While we find evidence suggesting LLMs may satisfy some criteria for having a mind, particularly in game-theoretic environments, we conclude that the data remains inconclusive. Additionally, we reply to several skeptical challenges to LLM folk psychology, including issues of sensory grounding, the "stochastic parrots" argument, and concerns about memorization. Our paper has three main upshots. First, LLMs do have robust internal representations. Second, there is an open question to answer about whether LLMs have robust action dispositions. Third, existing skeptical challenges to LLM representation do not survive philosophical scrutiny.
△ Less
Submitted 26 June, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
-
AI Deception: A Survey of Examples, Risks, and Potential Solutions
Authors:
Peter S. Park,
Simon Goldstein,
Aidan O'Gara,
Michael Chen,
Dan Hendrycks
Abstract:
This paper argues that a range of current AI systems have learned how to deceive humans. We define deception as the systematic inducement of false beliefs in the pursuit of some outcome other than the truth. We first survey empirical examples of AI deception, discussing both special-use AI systems (including Meta's CICERO) built for specific competitive situations, and general-purpose AI systems (…
▽ More
This paper argues that a range of current AI systems have learned how to deceive humans. We define deception as the systematic inducement of false beliefs in the pursuit of some outcome other than the truth. We first survey empirical examples of AI deception, discussing both special-use AI systems (including Meta's CICERO) built for specific competitive situations, and general-purpose AI systems (such as large language models). Next, we detail several risks from AI deception, such as fraud, election tampering, and losing control of AI systems. Finally, we outline several potential solutions to the problems posed by AI deception: first, regulatory frameworks should subject AI systems that are capable of deception to robust risk-assessment requirements; second, policymakers should implement bot-or-not laws; and finally, policymakers should prioritize the funding of relevant research, including tools to detect AI deception and to make AI systems less deceptive. Policymakers, researchers, and the broader public should work proactively to prevent AI deception from destabilizing the shared foundations of our society.
△ Less
Submitted 28 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
No-hole $λ$-$L(k, k-1, \ldots, 2, 1)$-labeling for Square Grid
Authors:
Soumen Atta,
Priya Ranjan Sinha Mahapatra,
Stanisław Goldstein
Abstract:
Given a fixed $k$ $\in$ $\mathbb{Z}^+$ and $λ$ $\in$ $\mathbb{Z}^+$, the objective of a $λ$-$L(k, k-1, \ldots, 2, 1)$-labeling of a graph $G$ is to assign non-negative integers (known as labels) from the set $\{0, \ldots, λ-1\}$ to the vertices of $G$ such that the adjacent vertices receive values which differ by at least $k$, vertices connected by a path of length two receive values which differ…
▽ More
Given a fixed $k$ $\in$ $\mathbb{Z}^+$ and $λ$ $\in$ $\mathbb{Z}^+$, the objective of a $λ$-$L(k, k-1, \ldots, 2, 1)$-labeling of a graph $G$ is to assign non-negative integers (known as labels) from the set $\{0, \ldots, λ-1\}$ to the vertices of $G$ such that the adjacent vertices receive values which differ by at least $k$, vertices connected by a path of length two receive values which differ by at least $k-1$, and so on. The vertices which are at least $k+1$ distance apart can receive the same label. The smallest $λ$ for which there exists a $λ$-$L(k, k-1, \ldots, 2, 1)$-labeling of $G$ is known as the $L(k, k-1, \ldots, 2, 1)$-labeling number of $G$ and is denoted by $λ_k(G)$. The ratio between the upper bound and the lower bound of a $λ$-$L(k, k-1, \ldots, 2, 1)$-labeling is known as the approximation ratio. In this paper a lower bound on the value of the labeling number for square grid is computed and a formula is proposed which yields a $λ$-$L(k, k-1, \ldots, 2, 1)$-labeling of square grid, with approximation ratio at most $\frac{9}{8}$. The labeling presented is a no-hole one, i.e., it uses each label from $0$ to $λ-1$ at least once.
△ Less
Submitted 22 December, 2016; v1 submitted 21 September, 2016;
originally announced September 2016.
-
A Linear Logic Programming Language for Concurrent Programming over Graph Structures
Authors:
Flavio Cruz,
Ricardo Rocha,
Seth Copen Goldstein,
Frank Pfenning
Abstract:
We have designed a new logic programming language called LM (Linear Meld) for programming graph-based algorithms in a declarative fashion. Our language is based on linear logic, an expressive logical system where logical facts can be consumed. Because LM integrates both classical and linear logic, LM tends to be more expressive than other logic programming languages. LM programs are naturally conc…
▽ More
We have designed a new logic programming language called LM (Linear Meld) for programming graph-based algorithms in a declarative fashion. Our language is based on linear logic, an expressive logical system where logical facts can be consumed. Because LM integrates both classical and linear logic, LM tends to be more expressive than other logic programming languages. LM programs are naturally concurrent because facts are partitioned by nodes of a graph data structure. Computation is performed at the node level while communication happens between connected nodes. In this paper, we present the syntax and operational semantics of our language and illustrate its use through a number of examples.
△ Less
Submitted 14 May, 2014;
originally announced May 2014.
-
Counting common substrings effectively
Authors:
Stanisław Goldstein,
Piotr Beling
Abstract:
This article presents effective (dynamic) algorithm for solving a problem of counting the number of substrings of given string which are also substrings of second string. Presented algorithm can be used for example for quick calculation of strings similarity measure using generalized $n$-gram method (Niewiadomski measure), which are shown. Correctness and complexity analyses are included.
-----…
▽ More
This article presents effective (dynamic) algorithm for solving a problem of counting the number of substrings of given string which are also substrings of second string. Presented algorithm can be used for example for quick calculation of strings similarity measure using generalized $n$-gram method (Niewiadomski measure), which are shown. Correctness and complexity analyses are included.
-----
W artykule przedstawiono efektywny (dynamiczny) algorytm wyznaczający miarę podobieństwa wyrazów za pomocą uogólnionej metody $n$-gramów (miary Niewiadomskiego). Uzasadniono także poprawność działania algorytmu i oszacowano jego złożoność obliczeniową.
△ Less
Submitted 21 September, 2012;
originally announced September 2012.
