-
MLPerf HPC: A Holistic Benchmark Suite for Scientific Machine Learning on HPC Systems
Authors:
Steven Farrell,
Murali Emani,
Jacob Balma,
Lukas Drescher,
Aleksandr Drozd,
Andreas Fink,
Geoffrey Fox,
David Kanter,
Thorsten Kurth,
Peter Mattson,
Dawei Mu,
Amit Ruhela,
Kento Sato,
Koichi Shirahata,
Tsuguchika Tabaru,
Aristeidis Tsaris,
Jan Balewski,
Ben Cumming,
Takumi Danjo,
Jens Domke,
Takaaki Fukai,
Naoto Fukumoto,
Tatsuya Fukushi,
Balazs Gerofi,
Takumi Honda
, et al. (18 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Scientific communities are increasingly adopting machine learning and deep learning models in their applications to accelerate scientific insights. High performance computing systems are pushing the frontiers of performance with a rich diversity of hardware resources and massive scale-out capabilities. There is a critical need to understand fair and effective benchmarking of machine learning appli…
▽ More
Scientific communities are increasingly adopting machine learning and deep learning models in their applications to accelerate scientific insights. High performance computing systems are pushing the frontiers of performance with a rich diversity of hardware resources and massive scale-out capabilities. There is a critical need to understand fair and effective benchmarking of machine learning applications that are representative of real-world scientific use cases. MLPerf is a community-driven standard to benchmark machine learning workloads, focusing on end-to-end performance metrics. In this paper, we introduce MLPerf HPC, a benchmark suite of large-scale scientific machine learning training applications driven by the MLCommons Association. We present the results from the first submission round, including a diverse set of some of the world's largest HPC systems. We develop a systematic framework for their joint analysis and compare them in terms of data staging, algorithmic convergence, and compute performance. As a result, we gain a quantitative understanding of optimizations on different subsystems such as staging and on-node loading of data, compute-unit utilization, and communication scheduling, enabling overall $>10 \times$ (end-to-end) performance improvements through system scaling. Notably, our analysis shows a scale-dependent interplay between the dataset size, a system's memory hierarchy, and training convergence that underlines the importance of near-compute storage. To overcome the data-parallel scalability challenge at large batch sizes, we discuss specific learning techniques and hybrid data-and-model parallelism that are effective on large systems. We conclude by characterizing each benchmark with respect to low-level memory, I/O, and network behavior to parameterize extended roofline performance models in future rounds.
△ Less
Submitted 26 October, 2021; v1 submitted 21 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
MLPerf Training Benchmark
Authors:
Peter Mattson,
Christine Cheng,
Cody Coleman,
Greg Diamos,
Paulius Micikevicius,
David Patterson,
Hanlin Tang,
Gu-Yeon Wei,
Peter Bailis,
Victor Bittorf,
David Brooks,
Dehao Chen,
Debojyoti Dutta,
Udit Gupta,
Kim Hazelwood,
Andrew Hock,
Xinyuan Huang,
Atsushi Ike,
Bill Jia,
Daniel Kang,
David Kanter,
Naveen Kumar,
Jeffery Liao,
Guokai Ma,
Deepak Narayanan
, et al. (12 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Machine learning (ML) needs industry-standard performance benchmarks to support design and competitive evaluation of the many emerging software and hardware solutions for ML. But ML training presents three unique benchmarking challenges absent from other domains: optimizations that improve training throughput can increase the time to solution, training is stochastic and time to solution exhibits h…
▽ More
Machine learning (ML) needs industry-standard performance benchmarks to support design and competitive evaluation of the many emerging software and hardware solutions for ML. But ML training presents three unique benchmarking challenges absent from other domains: optimizations that improve training throughput can increase the time to solution, training is stochastic and time to solution exhibits high variance, and software and hardware systems are so diverse that fair benchmarking with the same binary, code, and even hyperparameters is difficult. We therefore present MLPerf, an ML benchmark that overcomes these challenges. Our analysis quantitatively evaluates MLPerf's efficacy at driving performance and scalability improvements across two rounds of results from multiple vendors.
△ Less
Submitted 2 March, 2020; v1 submitted 2 October, 2019;
originally announced October 2019.
-
Yet Another Accelerated SGD: ResNet-50 Training on ImageNet in 74.7 seconds
Authors:
Masafumi Yamazaki,
Akihiko Kasagi,
Akihiro Tabuchi,
Takumi Honda,
Masahiro Miwa,
Naoto Fukumoto,
Tsuguchika Tabaru,
Atsushi Ike,
Kohta Nakashima
Abstract:
There has been a strong demand for algorithms that can execute machine learning as faster as possible and the speed of deep learning has accelerated by 30 times only in the past two years. Distributed deep learning using the large mini-batch is a key technology to address the demand and is a great challenge as it is difficult to achieve high scalability on large clusters without compromising accur…
▽ More
There has been a strong demand for algorithms that can execute machine learning as faster as possible and the speed of deep learning has accelerated by 30 times only in the past two years. Distributed deep learning using the large mini-batch is a key technology to address the demand and is a great challenge as it is difficult to achieve high scalability on large clusters without compromising accuracy. In this paper, we introduce optimization methods which we applied to this challenge. We achieved the training time of 74.7 seconds using 2,048 GPUs on ABCI cluster applying these methods. The training throughput is over 1.73 million images/sec and the top-1 validation accuracy is 75.08%.
△ Less
Submitted 29 March, 2019;
originally announced March 2019.
