Ballotpedia Courts: State Partisanship/Overview of Confidence Scoring Results

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Ballotpedia Courts State Partisanship Page Banner.png





State Partisanship

Ballotpedia Courts State Partisanship VNT.png

Main page

PDF Version

Übersicht
Methodology and defintionsOverview of Confidence Scoring ResultsState Supreme Court Control Compared to State Government Trifectas Breakdown of Justices by Confidence Categories

The Most and Least Divided State Supreme Courts
The Least Homogeneous State Supreme CourtsThe Most Homogeneous State Supreme CourtsThe Percentage of the Population that Lives in States with Democratic- or Republican-Controlled Courts

Judicial Selection Methods and Partisanship
Partisanship of Justices Across Judicial Selection MethodsComparison of Appointment Methods by Court Balance Score and Median Court ScoreDifficulties with Our Analysis of Pure Partisanship Scores by Selection Method

Partisan Balance Rules

Retention Elections and Vacancy Appointments
Retention ElectionsVacancy Appointments

Confidence Scores
Highest Confidence ScoresIndeterminate Justice Confidence ScoresPure Partisan Scores

June 2020

Of the 341 justices studied, 179 (52.5%) are affiliated with the Republican Party, 113 (33.1%) are affiliated with the Democratic Party, and 49 (14.4%) have an indeterminate affiliation.

The proportion of justices affiliated with each party is roughly equal to the percentage of courts with a majority of justices with each party affiliation.

Partisan Majority Number of States Percent of States Number of Justices Percent of Justices
Democrat 15 30% 113 33.10%
Republican 27 54% 179 52.50%
Split/Indeterminate 8 16% 49 14.40%

Twenty-seven states (54%) have a majority of justices with Republican Confidence Scores. Fifteen state supreme courts (30%) have a majority of justices with Democratic Confidence Scores. Eight state supreme courts (16%) are not composed of a majority of justices with Democratic Confidence Scores or Republican Confidence Scores due to the number of justices with Indeterminate Confidence Scores. We use the term split control to refer to the states that have neither a majority of justices with Democratic Confidence Scores nor a majority of Justices with Republican Confidence Scores.

SSC by state.png

Party States
States with a majority of justices with Democratic Confidence Scores (15): California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Kansas, Maine, Minnesota, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Washington
States with a majority of justices with Republican Confidence Scores (27): Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Nebraska, New Jersey, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming
Split States, with neither a majority of justices with Democratic nor Republican Confidence Scores (8): Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Vermont
  • Washington has the greatest number of justices with Democratic Confidence Scores, with eight out of nine justices on the court.
  • Texas has the greatest number of justices with Republican Confidence Scores, with 18 out of 18 justices on their two courts of last resort.
State Mild D Strong D Mild R Strong R Indeterminate Party Control *Listed in order of (D-R-I)
Total by party 113 179 49
Total by confidence 78 35 125 54 49
Alabama 0 0 2 7 0 Republican (0-9-0)
Alaska 0 0 3 0 2 Republican (0-3-2)
Arizona 0 0 4 2 1 Republican (0-6-1)
Arkansas 0 0 3 1 3 Republican (0-4-3)
California 1 3 0 0 3 Democrat (4-0-3)
Colorado 2 2 1 0 2 Democrat (4-1-2)
Connecticut 4 1 0 0 2 Democrat (5-0-2)
Delaware 2 2 0 0 1 Democrat (4-0-1)
Florida 0 0 5 2 0 Republican (0-7-0)
Georgien 0 0 4 3 2 Republican (0-7-2)
Hawaii 4 0 0 1 0 Democrat (4-1-0)
Idaho 0 0 4 1 0 Republican (0-5-0)
Illinois 1 3 3 0 0 Democrat (4-3-0)
Indiana 0 0 4 1 0 Republican (0-5-0)
Iowa 0 1 4 1 1 Republican (1-5-1)
Kansas 4 0 1 1 0 Democrat (4-2-0)
Kentucky 2 0 2 0 3 Split (2-2-3)
Louisiana 2 0 3 1 1 Republican (2-4-1)
Maine 3 1 0 0 2 Democrat (4-0-2)
Maryland 3 0 0 1 3 Split (3-1-3)
Massachusetts 2 0 3 0 2 Split (2-3-2)
Michigan 2 1 0 4 0 Republican (3-4-0)
Minnesota 2 2 2 0 1 Democrat (4-2-1)
Mississippi 2 0 5 2 0 Republican (2-7-0)
Missouri 3 0 3 0 1 Split (3-3-1)
Montana 3 0 0 1 3 Split (3-1-3)
Nebraska 1 0 4 2 0 Republican (1-6-0)
Nevada 1 1 3 0 2 Split (2-3-2)
New Hampshire 1 0 1 1 1 Split (1-2-1)
New Jersey 2 0 4 0 1 Republican (2-4-1)
New Mexico 2 2 1 0 0 Democrat (4-1-0)
New York 6 0 1 0 0 Democrat (6-1-0)
North Carolina 0 6 1 0 0 Democrat (6-1-0)
North Dakota 0 0 3 1 1 Republican (0-4-1)
Ohio 2 0 0 5 0 Republican (2-5-0)
Oklahoma 3 1 7 1 2 Republican (4-8-2)
Oregon 4 3 0 0 0 Democrat (7-0-0)
Pennsylvania 1 4 2 0 0 Democrat (5-2-0)
Rhode Island 1 0 3 0 1 Republican (1-3-1)
South Carolina 0 0 4 0 1 Republican (0-4-1)
South Dakota 0 0 4 1 0 Republican (0-5-0)
Tennessee 2 0 3 0 0 Republican (2-3-0)
Texas 0 0 8 10 0 Republican (0-18-0)
Utah 0 0 4 0 1 Republican (0-4-1)
Vermont 0 1 2 0 2 Split (1-2-2)
Virginia 1 0 4 1 1 Republican (1-5-1)
Washington 8 0 0 0 1 Democrat (8-0-1)
West Virginia 0 1 3 1 0 Republican (1-4-0)
Wisconsin 1 0 2 2 2 Republican (1-4-2)
Wyoming 0 0 4 1 0 Republican (0-5-0)
Total by confidence 78 35 125 54 49
Total by party 113 179 49

About the authors

Samuel Postell is a staff writer on Ballotpedia's Marquee Team and a lecturer at the University of Dallas.

Luke Seeley is a staff writer on Ballotpedia's Marquee Team.

Heidi Jung developed the graphics.

Ballotpedia CEO Leslie Graves, Ballotpedia COO Gwen Beattie, Editor-in-Chief Geoff Pallay, and Ballotpedia Vice President of external relations Alison Prange reviewed the report and provided feedback as did editor Cory Eucalitto. Outside reviewers included Dr. G. Alan Tarr from Rutgers University, and Dr. Aman McLeod from the University of Idaho College of Law.

Footnotes