Commons:Administrators/Requests/ZooFari 2
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for adminship.
Promoted. –Juliancolton | Talk 22:07, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
ZooFari (talk · contributions · deleted user contributions · recent activity · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)
- Scheduled to end: 20:46, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
ZooFari is an active Commons contributor who has been involved since May 2008, and he has since achieved over 9,000 edits. ZooFari has done some excellent work around Commons, especially with deletions and vector graphics. He has the autopatroll, filemover, and rollbacker user permissions. Commons would definitely benefit from having ZooFari as a sysop, and ZooFari would absolutely put the mop to good use. ~NerdyScienceDude (✉ • ✐) 20:46, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you NerdyScienceDude, I accept your nomination. In addition to the above, I'm also an OTRS volunteer where there are limitations when being a non-sysop, for example checking deleted files before restoring. I am also interested in assisting with CommonsDelinker requests and unfree Flickr/Pano/Picasa files. ZooFari 05:35, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
Votes
- Support I see your valueable work
, but I can't agree with non-admin-closures of deletion requests in such cases. Sorry.abf «Cabale!» 08:45, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
- Can you explain what you don't agree with? The guidelines state: "Non-admins may close a deletion request as keep if they have a good understanding of the process, and provided the closure is not controversial." --99of9 (talk) 09:01, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, you're right, it's not really controversial at all. abf «Cabale!» 09:08, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
- Support I was about to nominate ZooFari myself. Very active and trustworthy user. As an OTRS member, he will certainly find the admin tools useful. Pruneautalk 09:28, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose. Problematic use file renaming tool (e.g. here) -- User:Docu at 12:00, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
- Hmm..., this renaming after the request of the uploader looks completely uncontroversial to me. Trycatch (talk) 13:39, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
- If it were what he requested, but it isn't. -- User:Docu at 15:16, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
- You're probably right, I left a note on the user's talk. ZooFari 15:36, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
- If it were what he requested, but it isn't. -- User:Docu at 15:16, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
- Hmm..., this renaming after the request of the uploader looks completely uncontroversial to me. Trycatch (talk) 13:39, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
- Support Can't really see any issues and help is appreciated. --Herby talk thyme 12:55, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Trycatch (talk) 13:39, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
- Support –Juliancolton | Talk 14:31, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
- Support as nom. ~NerdyScienceDude (✉ • ✐) 15:11, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
- Support Only seen good work from him--DieBuche (talk) 18:16, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
- Support Clearly improved significantly from days at en.wikipedia. -FASTILY (TALK) 19:11, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
- Support; –BruTe Talk 19:24, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
- Support Of course. ■ MMXX talk 19:39, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
- absolutely completely extra giant support for the
ZooSaFari guy ;-) I hope you don't become a Jimbo Junior. --Diego Grez return fire 20:36, 13 June 2010 (UTC) - Support of course. Zoofari is a trusted contributor. -Nard the Bard 20:42, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
- Support, just hurt that I couldn't have nominated him myself.
;)
I don't think he'll be deleting his own works or performing other malicious actions (unfounded accusations from his last attempt). Blurpeace 23:19, 13 June 2010 (UTC) - Support Kameraad Pjotr 18:28, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
- Support --High Contrast (talk) 19:19, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Mbdortmund (talk) 04:27, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
- Support Good addition to the team. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:13, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
- Support --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
- Strong support Of course! --by Màñü飆¹5 talk 00:55, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
- Support I voted for him before it was cool. upstateNYer 02:16, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
- Support Good work in the deletion request area. --A.Ceta (talk) 07:55, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
- Support - but you normally deserve an oppose for your blinding, telling "look at me I`m great"-Signature. Marcus Cyron (talk) 01:32, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- Hmm? –Juliancolton | Talk 01:37, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- I don't get the joke ;p --Diego Grez return fire 02:18, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- Colored signatures are frowned upon at de-wp. (Yeah, I know that this isn't de-wp but users coming from there are not used to it.) --AFBorchert (talk) 07:03, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- At the en-wp "how to be an admin" there is explicit advice against elaborate sigs. More than half of us would fail -- must be our graphic nature showing? Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:35, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- The fact that many of us would fail at en wp reassures me somewhat...:) --Herby talk thyme 15:44, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- At the en-wp "how to be an admin" there is explicit advice against elaborate sigs. More than half of us would fail -- must be our graphic nature showing? Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:35, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- Colored signatures are frowned upon at de-wp. (Yeah, I know that this isn't de-wp but users coming from there are not used to it.) --AFBorchert (talk) 07:03, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- I don't get the joke ;p --Diego Grez return fire 02:18, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- Hmm? –Juliancolton | Talk 01:37, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Oppose - Rollback abuse, does not respect OTRS requests that have already been approved.--William S. Saturn (talk) 20:19, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- All due respect, but since you opposed like 10 minutes after that edit, this seems a bit retaliatory. –Juliancolton | Talk 21:38, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
-
- User:AFBorchert handled the problem appropriately.
ZooFari's response was not appropriate for an admin.--William S. Saturn (talk) 22:57, 17 June 2010 (UTC)- This user tends to oppose when someone disagrees with his actions. --Diego Grez return fire 18:57, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
- User:AFBorchert handled the problem appropriately.
- Support ZooFari is very active and helpful in administrative areas and his support is very much welcomed. I also trust that the interaction with concerned users and the drive for consensus-driven approaches will improve (see comments above and below). --AFBorchert (talk) 05:54, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
- Support – Kwj2772 (msg) 08:48, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
- Support has my respect. — raeky (talk | edits) 21:30, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Comments
- Could you please explain why you renamed a huge set of photographs uploaded by Butko from their original Russian names to English names despite our policy draft regarding file names that states media files can be uploaded with names in any language in any script and why no discussion with Butko took place? --AFBorchert (talk) 06:59, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- This appears problematic to me too. --99of9 (talk) 07:31, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- Latin is the standard naming convention according to binomial nomenclature rules, see Homo sapiens in ru:wiki. I'm going to propose a revamp of the policy, so I'm bringing this renaming stuff to a halt. ZooFari 15:12, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- There is no policy or consensus that enforces the binomial nomenclature onto names of files that depict some creature. In my experience, not too few uploaders are quite sensitive in regard to how their uploads are named. As we are an international project with many non-English speakers coming from diverse Wikimedia projects, we need to be conservative in regard to file name moves such that users continue to be invited to upload their images here (instead to the local projects) — even if they have no or little knowledge of English (or Latin if it comes to that). I still wonder why no attempt has been made to discuss this with the uploader. --AFBorchert (talk) 21:49, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- I've put thought into my actions and agree that this was a bit too controversial. This was not the first time, and I plan to ask Commons talk:File renaming for second-hand thoughts before renaming mass files like these ones in the future. I apologize if I grabbed people's attention needlessly, I respect Docu's oppose. I have dropped a note the on user's talk. ZooFari 00:32, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
- There is no policy or consensus that enforces the binomial nomenclature onto names of files that depict some creature. In my experience, not too few uploaders are quite sensitive in regard to how their uploads are named. As we are an international project with many non-English speakers coming from diverse Wikimedia projects, we need to be conservative in regard to file name moves such that users continue to be invited to upload their images here (instead to the local projects) — even if they have no or little knowledge of English (or Latin if it comes to that). I still wonder why no attempt has been made to discuss this with the uploader. --AFBorchert (talk) 21:49, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- Latin is the standard naming convention according to binomial nomenclature rules, see Homo sapiens in ru:wiki. I'm going to propose a revamp of the policy, so I'm bringing this renaming stuff to a halt. ZooFari 15:12, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- This appears problematic to me too. --99of9 (talk) 07:31, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion.