Commons:Candidatas a imágenes destacadas

Aquí están las candidatas a imágenes destacadas

Ten en cuenta que todo el proceso se realiza en inglés por lo que necesitarás conocimientos mínimos de éste para poder presentar una nueva nominación.

Formalidades

Nominación

Si crees que hay alguna foto en Commons lo suficientemente atractiva como para estar entre las imágenes destacadas, entonces por favor inclúyela en la lista de candidaturas editando este enlace. Si hay consenso general después de 10 días, la imagen se transferirá a imágenes destacadas.

Crear una nueva nominación

Paso 1: copia el nombre de la imagen y pégalo en este cuadro (incluyendo el prefijo Image: ), cuando ya hayas pegado el nombre de la imagen, por ejemplo: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:EL-NOMBRE-DE-TU-IMAGEN.JPG. Haz clic en el botón crear nueva nominación.

Paso 2: Sigue las instrucciones que verás en la página para rellenar los campos de información de tu imagen.

Paso 3: Manualmente inserta un enlace a la página que has creado sobre tu imagen arriba del todo en Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Haz clic aquí, y añade la siguiente línea ARRIBA en la página de nominaciones:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:EL-NOMBRE-DE-TU-IMAGEN.JPG}}

Para votar

Para votar puedes usar las siguientes plantillas:

{{Support}} ( Support),
{{Oppose}} ( Oppose),
{{Neutral}} ( Neutral),
{{Comment}} ( Comment),
{{Info}} ( Info),
{{Question}} ( Question).

Puedes indicar que una imagen no puede ser destacada con {{FPX|razón}}, donde en razón explicas los motivos claramente por los que no puede ser destacada.

Por favor explica brevemente porque estas a favor o en contra de la nominación de esa imagen, especialmente cuando votes en contra.

Puedes hacer comentarios en el idioma que quieras, aunque más vale tener en cuenta el hecho de que la mayor parte de los usuarios hablan inglés.

Reglas

Hay 9 días de deliberaciones. Se decide el resultado al día 10 después de la nominación.
Los usuarios anónimos pueden proponer candidatas.
Los usuarios anónimos pueden participar en la discusión.
Los votos de usuarios anónimos no cuentan.
Una nominación no cuenta automáticamente como un voto. Debes expresar tu apoyo de forma explícita.

La candidata se convertirá en una imagen destacada a condición de:

estar bajo una licencia libre (por supuesto)
que haya un mínimo de siete votos a favor
que la proporción de votos a favor / en contra sea al menos 2/1 (o sea, una mayoría de dos tercios o 67%)
si a partir del quinto día, la candidatura tiene al menos diez votos a favor y ninguno en contra, automáticamente será destacada (regla del quinto día)

Recarga para nuevas nominaciones: purge this page's cache

Propuestas

Featured picture candidates

File:Bloem geranium pratense 'Galactic'. 30-05-2024 (d.j.b.).jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2024 at 04:29:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants #Family : Geraniaceae
Info Flower of a Geranium pratense 'Galactic' Focus stack of 43 photos.}}
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:29, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:29, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ponta da Ferraria panorama.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2024 at 00:14:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
Info: panoramic view of Ponta da Ferraria; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:14, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:14, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Don't love how part of the road is cropped, but since it's minor, it'll do for me. --SHB2000 (talk) 02:28, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gobio (Amblyeleotris rubrimarginata), Anilao, Filipinas, 2023-08-23, DD 169.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2024 at 20:53:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Gobiidae_(Gobies)
Info Goby (Amblyeleotris rubrimarginata), Anilao, Philippines. This species of goby found on reefs or in sea grass beds in the western Pacific from New Caledonia to the Great Barrier Reef and around New Guinea, Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines. It can be found at depths of from 3 to 26 metres (9.8 to 85.3 ft). This is a fairly elongated goby up to 8 centimetres (3.1 in) standard length. Note: we have no FPs of the genus Amblyeleotris. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:53, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:53, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:15, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Miradouro das Rocas 2023-03-13.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2024 at 14:51:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
Info: view from Miradouro das Rocas, Peneda-Gerês National Park; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:51, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:51, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Люк-менажница на территории Мечниковской больницы 12.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2024 at 22:06:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info created by Lvova - uploaded by Lvova - nominated by Lvova -- Анастасия Львова^ru/en 22:06, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Анастасия Львова^ru/en 22:06, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elvis Presley, Modern Screen, June 1958.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2024 at 19:27:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1950-1959
Info created by unknown photographer, uploaded and nominated by Yann
Support -- Yann (talk) 19:27, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 20:35, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prise de la Bastille clean.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2024 at 18:39:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Others#Historical
Info created by Jean-Pierre Houël / digitized by the French National Library (BNF), uploaded and nominated by Yann
Info A recent FPC was withdrawn soon after the its nomination.
Support Slightly edited version, just white balance corrected with a bit more light, as the paper and the artwork have yellowed a little due to time. -- Yann (talk) 18:39, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 20:41, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:52, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fields Zangla Zanskar River Ladakh Jun24 A7CR 00981.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2024 at 14:53:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#India
Info The fields of Zangla (elev. 3,510 m (11,520 ft)) are green with newly-sown crops at the start of the short 3-month growing season in this arid cold region. The snow-fed Zanskar river flows through the narrowing valley from left to centre, to enter the Zanskar gorge en route to its confluence with the Indus after about 120 km (75 mi). The stark peaks in the centre are about 5,200 m (17,100 ft). Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 14:53, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 14:53, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Benji 18:34, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support What a great panorama, with that strong contrast between the green cultivated areas and the browns of the sharp, rocky mountains! Interesting also the pattern of the metamorphic layers. --Harlock81 (talk) 21:18, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 21:46, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Harlock81. – Aristeas (talk) 08:11, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:53, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:38, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 02:28, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:African bush elephant (Loxodonta africana) drinking Kruger.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2024 at 07:18:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Elephantidae (Elephants)
Info We are not short of elephant FPs, but none show how they use their trunks to drink. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:18, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:18, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unusual action shot, excellent quality. --Tagooty (talk) 14:57, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Benji 18:35, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I wonder what elephant trunk water tastes like. --Zzzs (talk) 18:35, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, nobody nose. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:16, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:20, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There is lot of CA by water edges, beneath his mouth, and i see "golden" spot of water. You could clean them. Background is not so interesting. --Mile (talk) 07:19, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The background was chosen very carefully to be not so interesting. In the African bush, this is the nearest we can get to a nice bokeh. You would not see the water droplets otherwise. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:46, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support A very little bit noise, but nice composition. IMO FP. --XRay 💬 15:05, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per ZRay. --SHB2000 (talk) 02:28, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Синие пламя.jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2024 at 06:56:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Rocks_and_minerals#Microscopic_images_of_crystals
Info created by SergRussu - uploaded by SergRussu - nominated by Henrysz -- Henrysz (talk) 06:56, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Henrysz (talk) 06:56, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Having no idea how these images are made, I found this explanation. No idea if this image used a waveplate or some other technique like masking to add the colours. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:26, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support but more information needed. Yann (talk) 10:08, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 21:44, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 08:07, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another incredibly beautiful pattern design by mother nature. – Aristeas (talk) 08:11, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 14:41, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:53, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Pretty unremarkable to me. Wolverine XI 19:01, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 20:16, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pretty amazing images. --SHB2000 (talk) 02:29, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Close-up photograph of Oecophylla smaragdina (Red weaver ant).jpg

Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2024 at 06:57:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera#Family : Formicidae (Ants)
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:57, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:57, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gray Jay perched on a globe.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2024 at 23:16:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Corvidae_(Crows,_Jays_and_Magpies)
Info created by Serena-Wilderness - uploaded by Serena-Wilderness - nominated by Henrysz -- Henrysz (talk) 23:16, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Henrysz (talk) 23:16, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 01:35, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Seems underexposed / gray to me. Also possibly downsized, because the image measures exactly 2000 px large (that's not huge) -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:15, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Lovely composition, but low on detail. File size 392 KB is rather small. Do you have a higher res, higher quality version? --Tagooty (talk) 04:15, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's not my photo, and as far as I can tell the photographer had a single burst of activity in 2022 and is no longer active. I only nominated this because I was strongly "wowed" by it, and in my opinion the low quality does not preclude it from being FP as there are some recent successful nominations with a similar resolution. But of course that's up for debate Henrysz (talk) 06:37, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
some examples because why not:

File:Scoliid wasp (Megascolia bidens) male Cap Bon 2.jpg

File:STS-135 Atlantis' final tow back.jpg

File:Zara Larsson @ The Observatory OC 05 02 2019 (48498569766).jpg Henrysz (talk) 06:45, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hardy a sensible image to choose to make your point. Wasps are not quite as large as birds and the resolution of the wasp photo is HUGE compared with this... Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:08, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The resolution in the Space Shuttle image is WAY larger (5,988,000 pixels, more than doubled) compared to the image you're nominating (2,666,000 pixels). --Zzzs (talk) 17:22, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And 2.74 MB is much more than 392 KB. High JPG compression rate in this case -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:32, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The above discussion indicates that the image cannot be improved, per my comment above. --Tagooty (talk) 10:52, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree, underexposed, WB off, too small Poco a poco (talk) 17:58, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scimitar-Horned Oryx (Oryx dammah).jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2024 at 19:05:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Bovidae_(Bovids)
Info created by Faouz Kilani - uploaded by Faouz Kilani - nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 19:05, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 19:05, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Vignetting --Zzzs (talk) 19:26, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment And underexposed -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:55, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment With a little creativity and aging it could be made to look like a sepia-toned last-ever image of this species before it became extinct in the wild (late 1990s). Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:34, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment An enigmatic, almost symbolic capture with great potential. Vignette and subdued toning may have been the photographer’s choice. Still, it could be improved by making the vignetting less strong/obvious. --Argenberg (talk) 18:19, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Lightning and quality issues. Wolverine XI 19:03, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Front view of the Imperial Throne Hall Geunjeongjeon at Gyeongbokgung Palace with blue sky in Seoul.jpg

Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2024 at 03:41:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#South Korea
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:41, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:41, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The shape of the clouds are certainly...odd. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:07, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

contrails? Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:14, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Long clouds, in my opinion, like here a few minutes later -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:42, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 07:03, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Very nice photograph, definitely deserves to be featured! Professor Penguino (talk) 09:21, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 12:50, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The wide-angle perspective really helps here to capture the majesty of this place. – Aristeas (talk) 14:43, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 19:08, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unusual use of low perspective. --Tagooty (talk) 04:18, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:36, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 09:42, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:26, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:00, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:26, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mapas de España y Portugal - por el ingeniero de minas D. Federico de Botella y de Hornos

Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2024 at 21:17:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of Europe
Info created by Federico de Botella y de Hornos - uploaded by Gzen92Bot - nominated by ★ -- ★ 21:17, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 21:17, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:11, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:26, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good scans of two beautiful classic maps, complementing each other to give a perfect impression of geology and topography of the Iberian Peninsula. We usually prefer digitally restored scans of such old works, but in this case I think the markings and even fingerprints on the borders emphasize the historical character of these documents. – Aristeas (talk) 07:57, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:55, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:27, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oriental Shorthair kittens.jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2024 at 20:03:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Felidae_(Felids)
Info All by -- Felinlove (talk) 20:03, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Felinlove (talk) 20:03, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Promoting your cat business? Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:40, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We have users dedicated to nominating images from their special field of interest like space, fractals, birds, flowers, churches, Arctics, weather, old photos, whatever. Yet the user you decide to drop a daft remark on regarding their specialty, is the one interested in cats. --Cart (talk) 20:54, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't call my remark daft. This user signed up this month and has decided to post an image on FPC. I wondered why? I am entitled to point out that the user runs a cat business. I remind users that Cart authored the self-promoting Wikipedia article about herself under an alias. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:50, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That article wasn't made as a promotion, only a test run at translating articles from sv-wiki (article not written by me), as I have explained to you before and you didn't say anything about at the time. Now you bring that up, with your own made up reason for why it was made, as soon as you want to throw some dirt my way, it's getting old. I've spent ten years here atoning for that first mistake (yes, I call it a mistake even though I told Admins on en-wp my real name and they cleared me for writing it) and you are still holding a grudge for that, even though I've tried to have the article deleted twice. Well, I'm not the one placing a link to my website in the description field on every photo I upload here. Up until a few years ago, that was a site that promoted your own photo business. --Cart (talk) 22:01, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Charles, please assume good faith. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:08, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not easy with this user; she jumps in on many of my comments, just to annoy me. She succeeds! My photography is not a business. I donate all my images and publications. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:47, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have you considered...that she [[[User:W.carter|Cart]]] may be right? Shocking, I know right? --SHB2000 (talk) 02:30, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"This user signed up this month and has decided to post an image on FPC" @Charlesjsharp

Please tell me how much time must pass after my registration before I can nominate a picture I took? Felinlove (talk) 10:42, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Felinlove and Cart, don’t take this too seriously. It’s not easy with this user; he jumps in on many nominations, commenting on everything. Of course if Charles mentions objective shortcomings of a photo, this is important (just as with any other user); but if any user (including me, including Charles, …) makes personal attacks or invents rules, it’s best just to ignore it. – Aristeas (talk) 14:57, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for clarifying that @Aristeas Felinlove (talk) 23:56, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CharlesjsharpI hope you're joking. I might agree if someone used this as an opportunity to promote the services of a photographer, but how can nominating a featured picture promote the cat business? Felinlove (talk) 10:40, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I misinterpreted your motives Felinlove; I was looked at the EXIF which shows that the image was produced by, and links to, a cat business. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:47, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Nothing spectacular, and pretty average, technically speaking. Wolverine XI 20:51, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The animals are in their natural environment, they are practicing common daily activities of their species instinctively, they seem to be an undefined genetic variety with larger than usual ears, which catches my attention. I think it must have been difficult to take this photo due to the rapid movement of the cats playing and running around. I think it must have been challenging, I imagine pulling out these photos of miniature leopards, some carnivorous ancestor. --Wilfredor (talk) 21:15, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This image isn't very sharp and the grass obstructs much of the lower subject without adding to the image. It doesn't have the same wow factor or rather "awwwwww" factor as this other image by the same user. I mean this one is so cute, has a shallow depth of field with the face in focus, and no distracting elements and its of the same species. Image:Oriental_shorthair_kitten.jpg --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 00:22, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Image converted to link. Please don't display other files on a nom as the FPCBot will read them as 'Alternatives' and mess up the closing process. --Cart (talk) 00:34, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Needsmoreritalin (talk) 18:16, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Low quality as others have noted, lacking "wow". --Tagooty (talk) 04:20, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. --August (talk) 15:04, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Impala (Aepyceros melampus) female with red-billed oxpecker Kruger.jpg

Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2024 at 17:27:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
Info Another oxpecker; but this one is not hiding... All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:27, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:27, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info Confused by your croping, sometime 30 % of negative space and this one merely maybe 3% vertical. Any reason ? --Mile (talk) 19:05, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If you look, there is no crop. I decided to eliminate more space than usual in the composition to get the bird as large as possible. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:37, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I would have liked a composition without so many elements more, but that still makes it a good shot, in a natural environment with very elusive or surly animals. --Wilfredor (talk) 21:20, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's amazing this bird traveled from an impala to a giraffe :-) Maybe something to say :-) Basile Morin (talk) 03:56, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment That's why it was on the podium at the mammal-perching Olympics. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:50, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 07:02, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I swear I saw that same oxpecker in a similar nomination. --Zzzs (talk) 15:13, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Benji 18:46, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:23, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Quality is good but the top crop is too tight and the composition is too cluttered to me, sorry. I don't think this is a FP. Poco a poco (talk) 17:55, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:22, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Санкт-Петербург, площадь Стругацких сверху зимой.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2024 at 18:38:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Russia
Info all by me -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 18:38, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 18:38, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support excellent photo! --SHB2000 (talk) 23:18, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ^{(я бы всё же порекомендовал вам именовать файлы пользуясь английским наречием)} --Alex Florstein (talk) 07:03, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry Krasniy, for me just one of numerous very good drone photos you shoot, but not much more, nothing really special here. --A.Savin 11:57, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Composition is special. Despite its not big sensor quality is good. Snow did help. --Mile (talk) 19:03, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cold and futuristic composition, the picture is a bit small but its a small drone sensor. --Wilfredor (talk) 21:22, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice symmetry. ★ 22:21, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:24, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support In your composition, I admire your ability to capture the symmetry of the subject, and the contrast between the white buildings and snow against the blacktop. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 00:27, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:35, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:11, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Winter cityscape is often quite banal, but here it looks like a puzzle from another planet. Very cool. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 01:15, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:35, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:23, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:01, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 08:07, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 14:43, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 15:05, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:29, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Toronto Railway August 2017 03.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2024 at 09:40:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Canada
Info View towards downtown Toronto and the CN Tower from Sir Isaac Brock Bridge. Created, uploaded and nominated by ArildV
Support -- ArildV (talk) 09:40, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Wow! ★ 11:15, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Appealing composition, interesting tower and conical building. Sharpness could be better, but it is a long exposure shot taken at low ISO with enough depth of field -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:05, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is one of the Toronto of all time. --Zzzs (talk) 04:05, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love it --Tmv (talk) 05:50, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:46, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 11:39, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 12:02, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 16:09, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bustling...Wolverine XI 20:54, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Maybe my next city? Im trying to go to another city but the rental prices in Toronto are crazy. But regarding this image, I would have preferred to join several photos to improve the sharpness but that doesn't make it any less good. --Wilfredor (talk) 21:23, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great capture. Well composed with an iconic structure that helps viewers connect a less familiar location with a landmark that anchors it to a major city. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 00:09, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile and Needsmoreritalin. – Aristeas (talk) 14:23, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Benji 18:48, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The composition and colouring work well together --Tagooty (talk) 04:22, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:33, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:22, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:01, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 14:45, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely. (Sometimes I wish more sharpness, but sometimes it's not possible.) --XRay 💬 15:07, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Traquet rieur Gabes.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2024 at 09:22:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Muscicapidae (Old World Flycatchers)
Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 09:22, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 09:22, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:34, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not sufficiently in line with COM:SCOPE of being of sufficient educational value to be featured. The key purpose of this site is educational so images like this shouldn't be highlighted such as included on the front-page instead of e.g. illustrations or otherwise more-educational media. --Prototyperspective (talk) 10:08, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A high quality photo of a bird species like this does provide educational value. Not everyone will be aware that semiarid dessert supports significant birdlife. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:56, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes but not much of it and my view is that it's not sufficient to be FP. It shows how this particular species looks like (like the other photos of the species) but the educational value (especially given the large amount of FP photos like that, the limited relevance to people and society, the existing other media about the bird, etc) is limited. I don't know why the criteria of educational value is not more important to other editors here given the WMC pillars / the contents of the scope page. Prototyperspective (talk) 21:33, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support I beg to differ. --Zzzs (talk) 16:21, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't think that oppose vote should even be considered.
Wolverine XI 20:57, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, the bot doesn't care. --SHB2000 (talk) 02:31, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:47, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 19:42, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:06, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good photo (and absolutely in scope, sorry). – Aristeas (talk) 14:06, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose It's a good photo but there's so few things in the composition.... Henrysz (talk) 22:23, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:32, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:30, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 02:32, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:CH.VS.Zermatt Hotel-Wellnessresort-La-Ginabelle 4747 3x2-R 11K.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2024 at 09:05:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Switzerland
Info Hotel La Ginabelle in Zermatt, Switzerland – created and uploaded by Roy Egloff - nominated by Augustgeyler -- August (talk) 09:05, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- August (talk) 09:05, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Now that's appealing. Wolverine XI 20:01, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Needs some vertikal, horizontal lines. Tree on right side bother. --Mile (talk) 07:47, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not sufficiently in line with COM:SCOPE of being of sufficient educational value to be featured. The key purpose of this site is educational so images like this shouldn't be highlighted such as included on the front-page instead of e.g. illustrations or otherwise more-educational media. --Prototyperspective (talk) 10:08, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There is a danger Prototyperspective that your rejections of a range of different images that you claim have insufficient educational value could be taken as disruptive voting. Perhps it is just that your wording is unfortunate and you could find a different way to oppose. Insufficient 'wow' is vague, but is often used as a reason to oppose a nomination that voters feel is too everyday or boring. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:05, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think architecture can be seen as an educational subject. --August (talk) 12:40, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agree but not sufficiently so in this case to be highlighted rather than just existing on WMC is what I'm arguing. Prototyperspective (talk) 13:42, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question This picture is upscaled? what's happened with the child face (right lower corner) --Wilfredor (talk) 21:25, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This must have been due to some window glass curve effect. I don't think the image was upscaled. The camera is capable of more than 100 MP. August (talk) 21:32, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thanks for answering Wilfredor (talk) 21:51, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Lupe (talk) 22:38, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:23, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Mile. -- Karelj (talk) 13:00, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Exceptional picture.--Ermell (talk) 21:58, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ermell. -- Radomianin (talk) 14:47, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vidigal, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2024 at 08:38:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Brazil
Info created and uploaded by Wilfredor, nominated by me. RodRabelo7 (talk) 08:38, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- RodRabelo7 (talk) 08:38, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality problem. F/2.8 = Limited depth of field. Out of focus foreground and background. ISO 5,000 = poor level of detail. Very high level of noise in the dark areas. Blown highlights on the beach. Also overprocessed (the whites are gray) -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:52, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you, RodRabelo7, for this nomination. I reconstructed the image from RAW using NX Studio, applying a vignetting fix. I used Topaz Denoise for noise reduction. The ISO was set to 1600 due to the lighting conditions. I didn't use a tripod to avoid drawing attention in a favela. The aperture was set to 2.8 because the subject was far away, and at such distances, a larger aperture isn't necessary. It’s normal because it is a night photo for some areas to appear very bright while others are darker. --Wilfredor (talk) 23:53, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I dont see DoF problems, but 2.8 means very unsharp on edges. Bigest problem is very strong CA, i think hours could be spent here to solve it, after it highligthed boards etc. Tripod would solve, but you didnt try it. Alternative has same problems. What is blown cant get back. --Mile (talk) 07:46, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't use a tripod because it is a dangerous place to have such an expensive camera, I couldn't draw attention to myself so I had some problems in that place Wilfredor (talk) 12:42, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I read that before, but i dont see how should this help to change my vote. You would have CA in any case, means a lot of work to solve it. I did like the photo in thumb, but when opened in 100 % not so much. --Mile (talk) 14:25, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alt version

Info Another shoot in low level --Wilfredor (talk) 01:32, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ I dont see DoF problems, but 2.8 means very unsharp on edges. Bigest problem is very strong CA, i think hours could be spent here to solve it, after it highligthed boards etc. Tripod would solve, but you didnt try it. Alternative has same problems. What is blown cant get back. --Mile (talk) 07:46, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
chromatic aberration is gone Wilfredor (talk) 18:59, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Its is, i wish you could do that with first one, or to try here midtones,shadows to incerase EV. 1st is too brigth, this one is a bit underexposed. --Mile (talk) 19:10, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Level of blur of the background. Yes, DoF is a real problem, not only on edges, also at the distance. Low level of detail due to high ISO: 2500 here or 5000 / 1600 in the previous version(s), it is far too excessive when you need to lift the shadows in post-process. Shooting at dark night without tripod is hard (more than blue hour). The picture is okay to document the place, but technically not one of the finest. Empirical solutions when you don't have a tripod: 1) use a simple (and more discreet) monopod, which generally allows you to reach one full second quite easily, 2) use a wall, or any edge of surrounding structure, then stabilize the camera with stones, 3) walk with a friend who masters martial arts :-) or with good eyes, capable of monitoring, 4) Possible sometimes to manually take multiple shots at different focus points, then carefully assembly them at home, 5) Go at blue hour, when there is still more light. It will also bring an appealing sky, while reducing the highlights -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:18, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support striking photo Henrysz (talk) 22:24, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peces mandarín (Synchiropus splendidus), Anilao, Filipinas, 2023-08-24, DD 233.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2024 at 08:04:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Callionymidae_(Dragonets)
Info Mandarinfishes (Synchiropus splendidus) during mating, Anilao, Philippines. The mandarinfish is native to the Pacific, ranging approximately from the Ryukyu Islands south to Australia, in a depth of up to 18 metres (59 ft). They reach a length between 5–8 centimetres (2.0–3.1 in) with males being bigger (on the left in this picture). Despite their popularity in the aquarium trade, mandarinfish are considered difficult to keep as some fish never adapt to aquarium life, refusing to eat anything but amphipods and copepods, what this carnivore feeds from in wild. Note: only one FP of the whole family (aquarium shot). c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 08:04, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 08:04, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 12:59, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 18:10, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 04:06, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 05:25, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:11, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lupe (talk) 22:50, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 07:07, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:07, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:19, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 09:54, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 14:48, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:D-6-78-134-131 Gertraudiskapelle Gerolzhofen mit Naturdenkmal ND-05851 Kapellenlinde 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2024 at 08:11:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Germany
Info created by Plozessor - uploaded by Plozessor - nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 08:11, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ Very little space at the right. (And at the top.) For an ordinary subject in midday light, I would expect a more balanced composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:43, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Basile Morin You're right, uploaded a new version, please have another look. Thx! Plozessor (talk) 11:20, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Improved -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:34, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support: pleasant composition and light --The Cosmonaut (talk) 07:06, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support It’s really nice how the old chapel and the old lime tree combine to a pleasant view. – Aristeas (talk) 06:34, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 21:21, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shrungagiri Sri Shanmukha Swamy Temple 62.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2024 at 08:04:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers
Info created by Gpkp - uploaded by Gpkp - nominated by Gpkp -- Gpkp (talk) 08:04, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gpkp (talk) 08:04, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very interesting motif, but the quality isn't good (noisy, there is smudge to bottom left, tilted counter-clockwise) and also the roof to the right spoils it. --C messier (talk) 12:16, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Princetown (AU), Port Campbell National Park, Twelve Apostles -- 2019 -- 0930.jpg

Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2024 at 03:18:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#Victoria
Info created and uploaded by XRay - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 03:18, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:18, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 03:35, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:28, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:33, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 09:01, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:39, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Aristeas (talk) 15:20, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Different from this view taken a few minutes later -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:53, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Helen Hunt Jackson by Charles F. Conly.jpg

Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2024 at 00:17:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Historical/People#1880-1889
Info created by Charles F. Conly - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:17, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:17, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 22:02, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:38, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 13:03, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:01, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 09:03, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Once again an excellent restauration. – Aristeas (talk) 14:21, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fauvette à lunettes Aqueduc de Zaghouan.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2024 at 21:12:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Sylviidae (Sylviid Warblers)
Info No FPs of this species. created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:12, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:12, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice shot. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:37, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:51, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A typical Charles' shot. ★ 22:03, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice! --August (talk) 22:26, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice --Zzzs (talk) 22:41, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:36, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 01:47, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support D500 and that lens is the perfect combination for birds, just beautifull --Wilfredor (talk) 01:56, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sharp! Nice Bokeh too. And very high resolution. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 2:44, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 05:55, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 07:26, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:26, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice posture. --Mile (talk) 08:17, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:44, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:52, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lupe (talk) 18:58, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love the bird's crazy hairdo and its weird beard-like growth around its neck. Wolverine XI 20:45, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:36, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --C messier (talk) 20:00, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:18, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not sufficiently in line with COM:SCOPE of being of sufficient educational value to be featured. The key purpose of this site is educational so images like this shouldn't be highlighted such as included on the front-page instead of e.g. illustrations or otherwise more-educational media. Enough bird photos which people have surely seen by the hundreds by now are among the FP. --Prototyperspective (talk) 10:11, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are clearly missing the point of having FPs. Ideally, we should have at least one image that is so great it can be viewed as an FP for each category and each article on the WikiProject. Saying that we don't need more FPs of birds because there are already hundreds of them, is simply ludicrous. We need more FPs (of all sorts of subjects), not less, if this is ever going to be the high quality project we strive to make it. And please stop referring to the front-page all the time with these boilerplate opposes, they are not a helpful critique. The front-page is an insignificant by-product, not a goal. Odd votes like this, are actually counterproductive since they keep many good photographers away from FPC, thereby limiting the selection of diverse photos here. Not all people show up voluntarily to such hostile environments to get their photos evaluated when photography is a hobby and not a livelihood you need to fight for. --Cart (talk) 11:16, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The same applies for illustrations and other images that are more educational than photos of which there are many thousands of the same subject. Prototyperspective (talk) 13:43, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your reasoning sounds really warped to me. So in your opinion, what should we have FPs of since according to you, people and birds are now out of the question, and how many FPs do you think we should have on Commons to cover all articles and projects? You have only stated cons in your arguments, I'm interested in hearing your pros. I'm also curious about what categories here contain thousands of illustrations of the same subject. I do a lot of category sorting, and I don't recall coming across such categories. It would be interesting to see so many different takes on the same subject. --Cart (talk) 14:20, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that all of Proto's opposing votes should be nullified. Criticizing pictures of birds and claiming they do not fit within COM:SCOPE, as well as using the Main Page as a reason to oppose, are unhelpful reasons. Additionally, Proto mentioned that they would "start voting oppose very often" because the image they nominated received multiple opposing votes due to quality and professionality. Based on their behavior, I doubt Proto understands how FPC works. Zzzs (talk) 15:28, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If we had a community decision that a user isn't fit to vote on FPC, for whatever reason, then all their votes (s & o) should be striked. That's how it's been done before with sockpuppets and disruptive users. Such a decision usually comes after a discussion on the FPC talk page. --Cart (talk) 15:38, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this should be considered as a last resort if Proto continues with his disruptive behaviour on FPC. Zzzs (talk) 15:42, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is true. All other efforts and attempts to resolve things like this, should first be made before doing something drastic. --Cart (talk) 15:45, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have posted on his talk page what COM:FPC is and warned him of his behaviour. Zzzs (talk) 16:49, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fingers crossed then. I really miss the days when FPC was a forum for photographers, where we supported each other and tried our darndest to create the most stunning images for the WikiProject. --Cart (talk) 18:42, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, I've started a thread on COM:ANU. --SHB2000 (talk) 04:45, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

as well as using the Main Page as a reason to oppose

Objectively false.

If the standards are this high, I'm going to vote by putting images under a lens of a high standard. Prototyperspective (talk) 21:04, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote "images like this shouldn't be highlighted such as included on the front-page" as part of your reason for opposing, so I don't see how you can deny that and call it "false". --Cart (talk) 21:14, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was referring to Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. They aren't only shown on the frontpage but also highlighted with tools and methods that show featured pictures as well as more as a general thing where I disagree with that these "some of the finest on Commons". People turned this FP thing into a "some of the finest by photography technical criteria but nothing else" long ago but WMC is not a photography critique site (not saying technical photo critique shouldn't be done and that there shouldn't be photo communities on the site). Prototyperspective (talk) 21:37, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons as such may not be a photography critique site, but the COM:CRIT, QIC, VIC and FPC sure are. How else can we determine what photos are good. --Cart (talk) 21:48, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Their contents are already evaluated so technical flawlessness etc is already not the only criteria – people here just don't consider the criteria of educational content much usually. I quoted things that describe what FP is and what WMC is and from both I conclude that criteria of educational quality/degree is very appropriate. Prototyperspective (talk) 22:28, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You don't seem to be getting the point here, do you? --SHB2000 (talk) 05:06, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:50, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good photo. If this photo would be not sufficiently in scope, what on earth would be in scope at all? Mugshots? – Aristeas (talk) 14:10, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Thi (talk) 10:12, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 14:55, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Miradouro da Cascata do Arado.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2024 at 14:16:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
Info: view from Miradouro da Cascata do Arado, Peneda-Gerês National Park. I really like how it's both sunny and rainy in the same photo. All by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:16, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:16, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose La mise au point est sur le rocher à partir de là la netteté est perdue, c'est le type de photo où une photo en pile fonctionnerait, en plus de prendre une autre photo sans ce rocher --Wilfredor (talk) 01:51, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 14:34, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, this is really a nice scenery and a good composition, but large parts of the landscape (which IMHO is the subject) are rather soft, and in darker parts, espec. at the right, one sees irritating dust (?) and something like a reflection or violet veiling (see image note). Was this photo taken through a window? – Ah, maybe the “dust” items are just falling rain drops. That would explain them. But they still look rather like dust and don’t give the impression of a rain shower, sorry. Aristeas (talk) 08:52, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:16, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stop Putler sign.jpg

Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2024 at 13:04:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#2020-now
Info created by Alisdare Hickson - uploaded by A1Cafel - nominated by Thi
Support --Thi (talk) 13:04, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 13:10, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question However much one agrees with the sentiments, is FPC the place for snapshot of a crude political statement? I don't think so. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:00, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Politics is everywhere and has to do with history. Voting for an image is a fundamental right that we should all exercise, regardless of our political opinions. Historical photographs, from Nazism to Communism, remind us of past realities. These images should not prevent us from supporting a photograph that opposes a dictator. Supporting that image is defending justice and freedom. Wilfredor (talk) 19:07, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You know not everything is a "right". We humans like to think of ourselves as deservant or entitled to something, when in reality we only deserve as much as we get. Having said that, I see no need to feature this image, so Oppose. Wolverine XI 20:58, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The question here is whether this is an outstanding photo or not. Not for me because the face is covered. The judgement should always be neutral, completely independent of political views. Anything else would be manipulation.--Ermell (talk) 19:44, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Ermell (talk) 19:59, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A stunning image. Very well processed, insane light, very good storytelling by repeating the subject from the DoF in the unsharp background. That face, crystal sharp looking directly to us – very good. I would love to vote for this image. But the historical statement made by the crowd here can only be described as anti-historic. I would have no problem if they would protest again Putin or even for him. But the Hitler comparison is so stupid. Well, I have to think about it. Perhaps I will come to the conclusion that the content is not disturbing that masterpiece of photography. --August (talk) 22:34, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Could it then be a good representation of human stupidity? In any case all authoritarian governments are compared to Hitler Wilfredor (talk) 01:57, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My analysis: this image represents an iconic anti-Putin (Putler) protest and has the wow factor, as well as an anti-communist or a Nazi propaganda poster. History is history. Period. ★ 17:47, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Stop this "period" thing, it's getting old. Anyways, history is history is a very weak argument because it doesn't take into account all the crazy shit we humans have done and continue to do, examples include the holocaust, 9/11, World War I & II, American Civil War, Slave Trade, environmental damages, atheism, hate speech, antisemitism and the list continues. Wolverine XI 21:09, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
By your logic, this 9/11 photo should never be promoted (I just invite you to nominate it for FP delisting). ★ 21:55, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We are judging historical FPs, not the facts that led to events. ★ 01:38, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
~~Neutral~~ Emblematic, but I prefer my suggested crop. ★ 17:29, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support I took the initiative to crop, since the author is not a Commons user. ★ 01:35, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support However I'd also prefer the crop --Lupe (talk) 19:02, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the disturbing arm is a issue. ★ 01:18, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support OK. I thought it through. Supporting it as a stunning photographic work. --August (talk) 19:43, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support the Hitler comparison is messed up, but this is not the forum to discuss that. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:19, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's the point! ★ 17:10, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The engaged personification of blinkered mass. It's so naive... --Alex Florstein (talk) 07:16, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Beautiful eyes and long clean hair, but the nazi salute attributed to Putin ruins the message. Face hidden behind a scarf, as only semi-convinced, semi-recognizable. And she seems more attentive to the photographer and the image of herself than to the protest in action. Looking at the viewer, she seems to say "look at my Photoshopped Putler shared on Facebook and Instagram ". Nazi analogies are so often rehashed that they are not very powerful, in addition to corrupting ancient history. It's like representing Vladimir Putin dressed as a devil with horns and tail, I don't know who would worry about that. It can even cause the opposite of the desired goal. An image of a real, serious fact truly attributed to Putin would be better than a poor mental fabrication. And a convincing protester with more energy -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:29, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Such a heated political discussion but no one notices possible copyright problems? --A.Savin 12:08, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment When I reviewed the image, there was no violation warning. Did you add this? --August (talk) 19:58, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, just surprised that for some people it needs a warning to see potential issues. Or not surprised. --A.Savin 20:05, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And the PR template. It could be derivative from one of these Nazi salutes, but it looks like not -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:59, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Disgusting political propaganda. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:25, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nice that "disgusting propaganda" is more important argument for you here on Commons, rather than possible copyright violation. --A.Savin 19:50, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I did say that FPC is not the place for snapshot of a crude political statement and look, it leads to a political 'Disgusting' comment. Why not just withdraw it Thi? Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:46, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I consider the picture photojournalism. It is nominated for the contemporary history gallery. Demonstrations and statements like this were common in 2022. --Thi (talk) 21:26, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose We have some unwriten rule, not to put actual political situtaion on FP, till it cool down. Probably we have double copyvio, i doubt author of printed photo made Kremelj and Putin photo, to make collage. Above all, i dont want to see this "hate speach" as picture of the day. --Mile (talk) 11:15, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The sign includes copyrighted elements, so the picture is under deletion according to Commons:Derivative works. 29 Wikipedia articles use the image. It could be useful if the sign was blurred like the license plate numbers in some pictures. I don't do it with my own skills, so that the picture doesn't start to resemble Ecce Homo. --Thi (talk) 18:26, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Agree; maybe we can help here. @A.Savin: Would you agree that it is sufficient to blur the image(s) on the demonstrator’s sign, keeping the “Stop Putler!” letters, to get rid of the copyright violation problem? Then such a modified version of this image could be kept as a useful illustration for the mentioned Wikipedia articles. Is it also necessary to blur the (already very blurry) Hitler image on the sign in the background? I would regard the latter as de minimis because it is out of focus. (And no, I do not want to promote/defent the “Putler” term; historically this is certainly a wrong comparison, just as most comparisons; but the term exists, and the image is a good illustration.) – Aristeas (talk) 19:22, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not just the source images but also the collage itself (yes, even as poorly made one as this) may be a reason to claim copyright. So no, blurring wouldn't help us and the image should be deleted. --A.Savin 10:13, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retouched image: File:Stop Putler sign (edited).jpg. --Thi (talk) 11:19, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per August, SHB2000, and Thi. – Aristeas (talk) 08:40, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Das ist nicht dein Ernst... --A.Savin 10:11, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Klar, das Bild wird wahrscheinlich aus Copvio-Gründen gelöscht werden, aber einfach als Foto betrachtet finde ich es wirklich gut. Es ist absolut kein “snapshot”, sondern sehr gut gemacht. In früheren Diskussionen haben diverse Leute empfohlen, die Copyright-Fragen im Löschantrag zu diskutieren und nicht hier – also folge ich diesem Rat. Und wenn ich die rein politischen Begründungen sehe, die hier für einige Kontra-Stimmen verwendet werden, und den Druck, der gegenüber dem Nominerenden aufgebaut wird (“Why not just withdraw” etc.), dann möchte ich – auch zu dessen moralischer Unterstützung – auch mit Pro stimmen. Aristeas (talk) 14:22, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Possible copyvio, not sure if the picture of a person holding a photoshopped image from internet is better in terms of copyright than the picture itself. Красный ^{wanna talk?} 14:59, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Анастасия Львова^ru/en 08:07, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support according to Aristeas' statement in German. -- Radomianin (talk) 14:59, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:CH.BE.Boenigen 2021-08-15 Seaplane-Meeting 5322 16x9-R 8192x4608 s-ai Br1137.jpg

Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2024 at 13:21:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Propeller_aircraft
Info D-ERNC at Seaplane-Meeting in Boenigen 2021, Switzerland – created and uploaded by Roy Egloff - nominated by Augustgeyler -- August (talk) 13:21, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- August (talk) 13:21, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 13:43, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Terragio67 (talk) 16:40, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good, clear shot. --Mile (talk) 17:02, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support High level of detail but the temperature seems too cold -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:01, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose QI or VI, but not unusual to make it FP. --Tagooty (talk) 02:57, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose It's a good photo but I don't like how the wing lines up with the water line Henrysz (talk) 04:43, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose I thought about it for a while. Certainly a good photo, but in my opinion the composition should be better for a FP. The border is also too narrow, so that hardly anything of the surroundings can be seen. --XRay 💬 09:35, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 14:33, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lupe (talk) 22:47, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:58, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beach of Cape Fiolent, Crimea.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2024 at 21:32:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Crimea
Info Cape Fiolent, the product of ancient Jurassic volcanism in Crimea, during the sea storm. Upper Miocene lava and carbonate intrusions on heavily eroded Jurassic foundation. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 21:32, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Argenberg (talk) 21:32, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support This picture creates an interesting mood, and I think its impact is stronger when you consider what is happening in Crimea and the Ukraine. The colors of the rocks against the water of the black sea and the gray clouds. The woman photographing her child, the smooth hills, with the large, sharp outcroppings, and all of the pebbles and small stones. I think of the resilience of the people of Ukraine in harsh conditions, the Holodomor and the Russian occupation. The image is well composed and interesting, but also stirring. --Needsmoreritalin (talk) 3:44, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:05, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good, and very few FPC of Crimea. --Yann (talk) 13:17, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good image - QI, VI - yes, but IMO not enough wow for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 14:06, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Quite dramatic coastline, the stormy (?) weather adds to it. --C messier (talk) 19:16, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:21, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:42, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose The view is fine but the quality (level of detail) just not there IMHO, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 16:09, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:48, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Poco.--Ermell (talk) 20:17, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
chromatic aberration -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:23, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info This file has been reprocessed with additional treatment for CAs and slightly increased sharpness to reveal more fine detail. When evaluating the ‘level of detail’ one should take into account stormy weather conditions, ragged clouds, coastal humidity, drizzle, which dissolve, dissipate and polarize light in the air and naturally give it a more opaque appearance. --Argenberg (talk) 09:40, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info @Basile Morin any more spot than those 3 squares ? Krimea is nice place, i could clean them...!? --Mile (talk) 14:01, 21 July 2024 (UTC) p.S. Done[reply]

PetarM, yes, feel free to clean them if you see something and feel like it. --Argenberg (talk) 19:59, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, PetarM, for the notification, and sorry for the late reply, your image notes didn't show up yesterday. Yes, rightly spotted. Thanks for having successfully fixed them -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:33, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:20, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good for me, some edits i made. --Mile (talk) 14:12, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per C messier. – Aristeas (talk) 14:16, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 15:04, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vista panoramica dalla fortezza di Bertinoro - Emilia-Romagna - GT 03- 2024-07-01.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2024 at 14:38:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Italy
Info In this panoramic view, I like to highlight the alternation of wheat fields, vineyards, olive groves and more that create patches of different colors. In the background the mountains of the Tuscan-Romagnolo Apennines are visible and recognisable at a distance of 50 kilometres. These hilly places are historically important, as the famous Italian poet Dante Alighieri stayed there immediately after being exiled from Florence, and then went to Forlì and Ravenna where he rests in peace. Dante speaks of this place in the Divine Comedy, defining it as: "That sweet land" . All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 14:38, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This version is similar to a withdrawn previous one. It was necessary to upload a new file because it is not allowed to update improved images larger than 100 MB. -- Terragio67 (talk) 15:07, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 15:08, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 18:50, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A lovely view, and much better now. Really good quality when we consider the resolution – in the past people often downscaled such stitched panoramas, easily hiding any flaws. I am astonished how closely this landscape resembles some areas in Tuscany – no wonder that Dante felt at home here ;–). – Aristeas (talk) 08:40, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dante remained in these areas very close to Florence between 1302 and 1303 because he was aiming for an agreement with the Ubaldini family to gain access to Florence, at the time the dominion of the Black Guelphs. Dante was a White Guelph and when he realized that he could not return without taking risks (he had been sentenced to death for treason), he left those places from which he had had security. In chapter XXVII of the Divine Comedy - Inferno (starting from line 25) he speculated and explained differences between places and consequently pointed which area of Romagna could be convenient to live in without running further risks. This chapter was written in this sweet land, because, in any case, it offered him peace and serenity. Terragio67 (talk) 13:23, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the additional remarks! – Aristeas (talk) 15:27, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:49, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:39, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:23, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I find the light a bit underwhelming, but the level of detail more than compensates for it, so full Support from me --The Cosmonaut (talk) 06:59, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:57, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Casal de turistas caminha em uma duna, enquanto o dia morre nos Lençóis Maranhenses.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2024 at 12:01:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Brazil
Info created and uploaded by Julio Cesar Goncalves Corrêa - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:01, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another planet! 🌎 -- ★ 12:01, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support If you can touch up the vignetting on the top left that would be perfect El Golli Mohamed 15:02, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Na verdade, essa foto é a original. Tenho outra versão mais recente sem a vinheta. 2804:14D:5C54:9336:4143:B51A:6FBC:B45 09:16, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Julio, é você? ★ 11:21, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 22:55, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
chromatic aberration on the main subjects, and weird vignetting at the left -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:31, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose this version -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:34, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Because Julio Cesar Goncalves Corrêa is not very active here, I have created a slightly edited version. The editing possibilities are somewhat limited in this case (because of the compression and the large gradients in the original file we run very soon into pixelation and posterization when we make major changes). However the CAs on contours as well as the colour noise on the dunes and water is mostly gone and the extreme vignetting on the top left corner fixed, too. (I have kept some of the slight vignetting at the left, removing it entirely seems to reduce the effect of the image.) @ArionStar, Basile Morin, and El Golli Mohamed: What do you think? If you like this version better, please nominate it as an alternative. If you have further hints for editing, I will try to fulfil them. Hope it helps, – Aristeas (talk) 10:22, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your version is better El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:51, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the difficulty. CA is almost fixed. Upper left corner is showing a weird aspect, but it's much less obvious than on the previous version -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:34, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Should not be promoted as is. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:04, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Support Aristeas just saved me again! Thank you so much! ★ 21:24, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking look Henrysz (talk) 04:46, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support very good now Terragio67 (talk) 07:56, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you for nominating the alternative. – Aristeas (talk) 08:10, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:54, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Vignette or whatever is still there. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:03, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:22, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:07, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:51, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --C messier (talk) 19:13, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 19:38, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:20, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:16, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:38, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 01:10, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:21, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zzzs (talk) 14:11, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Outstanding! Many thanks to Aristeas for his help in improving the technical quality.-- Radomianin (talk) 15:12, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ripe Seeds Coffee Robusta Coorg Karnataka India Feb24 D72 25688.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2024 at 10:35:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Rubiaceae
Info Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 10:35, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ripening coffee berries (~12–18 mm (0.47–0.71 in)) on Robusta bushes (Coffea canephora), Kodagu district, Karnataka, India. The berries take 6-8 months to mature, these are 1-2 weeks from full maturity. Hand-held photo outdoors. -- Tagooty (talk) 10:35, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support El Golli Mohamed 15:04, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Dicynodont (talk) 16:32, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ☕️ ★ 01:03, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:37, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I expect crispness in shots like this one, it isn't the case, sorry, Poco a poco (talk) 17:13, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:54, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Poco, unfortunately too noisy and seems there is some motion blur. --C messier (talk) 15:26, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:56, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Request What kind of light source was used here?
@Augustgeyler: The lighting was natural weak sunlight from behind the camera, there were light clouds to the west. This image of the coffee bush was taken at the same time. If you zoom in to the bush in the lower left, you'll see the berries in my close-up shot. --Tagooty (talk) 15:37, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. August (talk) 17:00, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Олонец, место крепости сверху.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2024 at 10:17:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Russia
Info all by me -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 10:17, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Красный ^{wanna talk?} 10:17, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Dicynodont (talk) 16:30, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 01:04, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 02:42, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:57, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vue aerienne d'ensemble de la Sebkha de Moknine - Tunisie.jpg

Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2024 at 07:42:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Tunisia
Info created by Skander Zarrad - uploaded by Skander Zarrad - nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 07:42, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 07:42, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality is not there. Wolverine XI 20:25, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support A splendid view with the stunning colours of the Sebkha Moknine, and IMHO the quality is fine, especially when we consider the high resolution and the difficulties of taking sharp photos from the air. – Aristeas (talk) 08:45, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support: per Aristeas --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:24, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The colors seem oversaturated to me -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:25, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:34, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Lovely colors but the composition seems a bit random. --C messier (talk) 12:22, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:17, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:40, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support ★ 02:49, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]