Commons:Deletion requests/2024/06/09
June 9
[edit]
Bogus PD rationale (70pma for an unknown author), no evidence of first publication 70 or more years ago to meet COM:Russia requirements. Quick1984 (talk) 09:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Keep This was tagged with PD-old in 2008, before modern license standards have formed. That's a standard formal photograph, and hence presumably published at the time, making it PD-Russia and PD-US-expired.--Prosfilaes (talk) 21:41, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- presumably published? What about COM:EVID and COM:PRP? Quick1984 (talk) 18:02, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- COM:PRP says "where there is significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file, it should be deleted." (Italics in the original.) There's no significant doubt that this was published at the time. Moreover, we tend to be a little looser on technicalities on photos that have been on Commons and in use for over a decade, as the costs of deleting a photo that old is a lot higher then for a new photo.--Prosfilaes (talk) 00:28, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- So, if one haven’t been caught for a long time, then it’s like no longer a violator. There are more than significant grounds for suspicion that this photo was not published: many similar documents were kept in classified archives and became accessible only after the collapse of the USSR in the 1990s. And again, since you didn’t want to notice, what about COM:EVID? There's still no evidence, that the photographer wasn't subjected to repression and rehabilitated posthumously to make clear the duration of copyright. Quick1984 (talk) 01:27, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- COM:PRP says "where there is significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file, it should be deleted." (Italics in the original.) There's no significant doubt that this was published at the time. Moreover, we tend to be a little looser on technicalities on photos that have been on Commons and in use for over a decade, as the costs of deleting a photo that old is a lot higher then for a new photo.--Prosfilaes (talk) 00:28, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- presumably published? What about COM:EVID and COM:PRP? Quick1984 (talk) 18:02, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- This is a heavily used photograph. This looks like it was published before the 1940s, but you are correct that we should not assume this was an anonymous photograph just because we don't know who the photographer was. Abzeronow (talk) 16:38, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
Ist das Wappen gemeinfrei oder steht es unter Urheberrecht? Schriftzüge wohl ohne Schöpfungshöhe. GerritR (talk) 20:11, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:23, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Die Entscheidung, die Datei zu belassen, hat sich nicht adäquat mit dem vorbeugenden Prinzip auseinandergesetzt. (PCP). GerritR (talk) 05:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- COM:PCP for the coat of arms in the image. GerritR (talk) 05:52, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- The image description says that it's the family coat of arms of the family "Dorfner". The Wikipedia text says that a guy called Andreas Dorfner bought the brewery in 1817, so it is _very_ likely that family coa is at least that old and thus PD. PaterMcFly (talk) 09:19, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; and you don't get to just renominate after a close; that is not how DR work. You are entitled to more explanation if you think that there is insufficient explanation and I did respond on my talk page. special:diff/881173947/881246710#Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logo der Schlossbrauerei Hirschau.svg — billinghurst sDrewth 09:52, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Whatever the age of the general design, per Commons:Coats of arms, each drawing can have its own copyright. This one appears to be extracted from an existing drawing, such as one in this PDF. Bitmap version of the same on this web page (direct image here). This was either vectorized from that drawing and is a derivative work, or (more likely) extracted from a PDF somewhere, given that tiny details seem to match up. Either way, we would need COM:VRT verification of a license from the company as the presumed author of that particular drawing. Carl Lindberg (talk) 18:35, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2024/06#File:Logo_der_Schlossbrauerei_Hirschau.svg (discussion about the copyright issue) --GerritR (talk) 07:01, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Löschen per nomination. --Krd 08:02, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
It's a handwritten text and not a font type, so cannot apply {{PD-textlogo}} as license. Taichi (talk) 19:56, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Kommentar COM:TOO Japan indicates that [c]opyright protection of fonts is limited only to those that raise artistic appreciation as much as artistic works do. Is there anything specific to handwriting? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 22:20, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not familiar with Japanese TOO, but I think this must be above. Löschen --Krd 08:04, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not familiar with Japanese TOO, but I think this must be above.