Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2011/08/19
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
The flickr license is incorrect, this is a photo on a movie set and the flickr uploader has this to say "I am told they were all laughing at Asrani who was practising on the rock behind the camera" which implies that he wasn't there when the picture was taken SpacemanSpiff (talk) 18:13, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
- Also add derivatives File:Amjad Khan.jpeg and File:Sanjeev Kumar.jpeg to this nomination. SpacemanSpiff (talk) 18:17, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
- A better quality and larger image is available here and has a copyright note (c) 1975 Sippy Films and is sourced to the Film Society of Lincoln Center. SpacemanSpiff (talk) 18:40, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy close -- clearcopyvio. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:27, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
- I didn't khow about it (I am author of the photo). Thanks, Dear AVRS!--Дубопробка (talk) 07:22, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted:
This photo is a DW of the underlying book, as the photographer is never indicated to be the creator of that work. Nothing else to this photo than a picture of the book's two pages. Courcelles (talk) 21:30, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
- I am the same user as Poule on English wikipedia; I took the photograph and I created the communication book shown here for a particular AAC user, using Boardmaker software. I chose the size of the book, the layout, format, vocabulary, the symbols and placed them as I deemed appropriate. --Poulet (talk) 12:31, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
- Given you actually made the book yourself, and then photographed it yourself, this would be an entirely different story, as the actual clip art would be rather insignificant. Courcelles (talk) 19:54, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
- Keep, the copyrights on both the photo and the arrangement are held by the uploader. Quadell (talk) 12:06, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Kept, Nomination withdrawn Courcelles (talk) 22:18, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
The photograph depicts graffiti which is itself a derivative work of the characters of a recent American television show en:Aqua Teen Hunger Force. —Ryūlóng (竜龍) 01:38, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
- Agree: DW, I cannot see how such a recent show should be PD in the US and it is not {{PD-ineligible}}. The characters: en:File:ATHF-Baffler Meal.jpg. And if the characters were altered so much by the graffiti artist that the original copyright does not matter anymore they are copyrighted by the graffiti artist. And there is no FOP in the US (photo taken at Palo, Iowa) for anything except buildings so this hasn't be taken into account. --Saibo (Δ) 01:46, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
- If the graffiti was done illegaly, then the author can't claim copyright on the graffiti. See: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Image_casebook#Graffiti. But the image would still be derivative work. Amada44 talk to me 18:51, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:17, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Provided source releases the image under a non-commercial licence. 117Avenue (talk) 02:24, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:17, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Provided source releases the image under a non-commercial licence. 117Avenue (talk) 02:25, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
I am not sure what non-commercial licence means so I guess this is where I ask for help. If Wikipedia doesnt accept such licenses, then go ahead and delete. Mhalifu (talk) 07:29, 19 August 2011 (MT)
Deleted: Wikimedia Commons requires that the image be free for all use, including commercial use. It might be possible to keep this image on WP:EN. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:18, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Provided source releases the image under a non-commercial licence. 117Avenue (talk) 02:26, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:18, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Copyvio, false claim of ownership, copied from here. Bill william comptonTalk 05:21, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:18, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Useless gallery: only one file. Mathonius (talk) 05:58, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
- That was apparently handled by a speedy delete independent of this deletion request: Can be closed as "done". –Be..anyone (talk) 23:57, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:18, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
This is a photograph of a work of art that does not appear to be in the public domain. (See fr:Jacques Gestalder) Robert.Allen (talk) 06:34, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
- It is my understanding that Template:FOP does not apply in this case, since apparently France does not recognize "Freedom of Panorama". (See en:Freedom of panorama#Europe). --Robert.Allen (talk) 20:08, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:21, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
Author request Butqa (talk) 07:29, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
- (Assuming that it is in Georgia) delete: the portrait, and probably text, which I cannot read, fails Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Georgia. NVO (talk) 06:45, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:21, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Seem not be realistically useful for an educational purpose Mys 721tx (talk) 07:51, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:22, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Seem not be realistically useful for an educational purpose Mys 721tx (talk) 07:51, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:22, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
A higher resolution version of this image had already been uploaded at File:New bus station at Skipton - geograph.org.uk - 1403991.jpg --JD554 (talk) 07:52, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:22, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Seem not be realistically useful for an educational purpose Mys 721tx (talk) 08:11, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:22, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
File:Ernst_Fuchs-Schönbach_-_Zeitungsartikel_Eröffnung_einer_Kunstausstellung_in_Viechtach,_Gareis_Trio,_16.8.1972_kleiner.png
[edit]
This is just a copyrighted newspaper article. No permission (the "permission" quoted is not applicable). FA2010 (talk) 08:29, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:22, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
It is a demo drawing to show another user. It is incomplete and contains misleading info. Overjive (talk) 09:02, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
I uploaded a fixed version of this drawing with a new file name: Transformer_flux_leakage.gif. Overjive (talk) 09:33, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
I uploaded my Transformer_flux_leakage.gif file to form a corrected revision of Transformer_flux.gif, which is used in many articles. Now both Transformer_flux_preliminary_mod.gif and Transformer_flux_leakage.gif are nominated for deletion. My next time will go smoother. Overjive (talk) 21:16, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:23, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Fictional flag. 84.61.170.156 09:27, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Löschen Out of scope, not used anywhere, and has no foreseeable use. Appears to be someone's fantasy flag. Courcelles (talk) 18:25, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:23, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Fictional flag. 84.61.170.156 09:27, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
- Löschen Out of scope, not used anywhere, and has no foreseeable use. Appears to be someone's fantasy flag. Courcelles (talk) 18:26, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:23, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Derivative work: photo of banner Anatoliy (talk) 10:04, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
- Banner has been created by fans and has no artistic value. What part of photo is non-free? --PavloFriend (talk) 22:24, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- When painters draw the picture they has copyright for this picture and it is non-free.--Anatoliy (talk) 22:41, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- No, I think it is impossible to define authors of paintings from Category:Ultras. How many authors does such thing as File:Tifo San Siro.jpg (or File:Wisła Kraków w Łodzi.jpg, File:Ultras Wisła Kraków.jpg) have, for example? --PavloFriend (talk) 22:54, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- When painters draw the picture they has copyright for this picture and it is non-free.--Anatoliy (talk) 22:41, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted.
Just because a work is large, or has many authors, does not mean that it does not have a copyright. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:24, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
The user http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Soumit_ban is not the owner of the image. He released the image under public domain, but it was originally published by me here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kedarnathji-mandir.JPG
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:28, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
source for all images needed 217.186.23.191 11:32, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:29, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
source for all images needed 217.186.23.191 11:33, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:29, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Steve Montador.jpg. TaraO (talk) 14:52, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Same problem with :
--TaraO (talk) 14:54, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Other ice hockey related images from by Bridget Samuels/BridgetDS
- File:Martin St-Louis 10-2010.jpg
- File:GabrielLandeskogSweden.jpg
- File:Mattias Ritola.jpg
- File:Zherdev-flyers-2010f.jpg
- File:Zherdev-flyers-2010a.jpg
- File:Zherdev-flyers-2010q.jpg
- File:MikeRichardsFlyers.jpg
- File:StevenStamkosMovember.jpg
- File:JayRosehill.jpg
- File:FredrikSjostromTML.jpg
- File:KeithAulieTML.jpg
- File:NazemKadri.jpg
- File:TomasKaberleTML.jpg
- File:MikhailGrabovskiTML.jpg
- File:ThomasVanek.jpg
- File:ClarkeMacArthurLeafs.jpg
- File:Ryan O'Marra.jpg
- File:Anders Lindback.jpg
- File:Chris Mueller.jpg
- File:BryanBickell.jpg
- File:St. Louis player.jpg
- File:Alexander Steen - St. Louis Blues.jpg
- File:Chris Porter - St. Louis Blues.jpg
- File:Kyle Clifford2.jpg
- File:David Backes2.jpg
- File:Brad Winchester - St. Louis Blues.jpg
- File:Willie Mitchell2.jpg
- File:St. Louis 5356.jpg
- File:Jonathan Quick2.jpg
- File:Alex Pietrangelo2.jpg
- File:St Loius Blues player5.jpg
- File:Tyson Strachan 2011-01-13.jpg
- File:Phil McRae 2011.jpg
- File:Vyacheslav Voinov (Manchester Monarchs).jpg
- File:EricStaalHurricanes.jpg
- File:TomasKopecky.jpg
- File:Ryane Clowe 2011.jpg
- File:Adrian Aucoin2.jpg
- File:KrisVersteeg.jpg
- File:Sami Lepisto 2011.jpg
- File:Martin Hanzal.jpg
- File:IMikkel Bodker.jpg
- File:Kyle Turris 2011.jpg
- File:Lauri Korpikoski 2011.jpg
- File:Ekman-Larsson 2011.jpg
- File:Kyle Wellwood Sharks.jpg
- File:Lee Stempniak Coyotes.jpg
- File:Ray Whitney Coyotes.jpg
- File:Ryan Smyth Kings.jpg
- File:Brad Richardson 2010.jpg
- File:Dan Girardi 2011.jpg
- File:Brian Boyle 2011.jpg
- File:Ryan Callahan 2011.jpg
- File:Todd Ford Caps.jpg
- File:Bruno Gervais 2011.jpg
- File:Travis Hamonic NYI.jpg
- File:Jack Hillen.jpg
- File:Kyle Okposo.jpg
- File:Nathan Lawson.jpg
- File:T. J. Oshie 2011-03-03a.jpg
- File:HenrikLundqvistRangers.jpg
- File:Jason Strudwick.jpg
- File:Logan Couture 2011.jpg
- File:Ryan Reaves.jpg
- File:Jean-Philippe Levasseur.jpg
- File:Mike Weber Sabres.jpg
- File:Nate Gerbe Sabres.jpg
- File:Derek Stepan.jpg
- File:Brandon Prust Rangers.jpg
- File:Bryan McCabe 2011.jpg
- File:Wayne Simmonds2.jpg
- File:Daniel Carcillo.jpg
- File:KevinShattenkirkBlues cropped.jpg
- File:Jason Arnott.png
- File:Tyler Sloan.png
- File:Blue Jackets players.jpg
- File:Marty-turco-2011.jpg
- File:JonasGustavssonTML.jpg
- File:Hedman & Stamkos.jpg
- File:Carl Gunnarson.jpg
- File:Jakub Voracek 01182011.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
This is a devastating blow to the ice hockey project but I don't see any way that we can keep these so the sooner we get them all identified and removed the better. There are still lots more (upwards of 500 in all photos) according to a search of BridgetDS (but I'm out of time today). There are also several baseball and basketball images that I don't know if they qualify as well because the original discussion was about the NHL and AHL restrictions on her press pass.--Leech44 (talk) 16:29, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
here are some more:
- File:Mike Smith Tampa.jpg
- File:Tim Connolly 2010.jpg
- File:Ian White Carolina.jpg
- File:Dana Tyrell.jpg
- File:Pavel Kubina Tampa 2010.jpg
- File:Jamie McBain.jpg
- File:Blair Jones.jpg
- File:Keith Aulie.jpg
- File:Mike Grier.jpg
- File:David Savard.jpg
- File:Mathieu Perreault.jpg
- File:BrooksLaichPractice.jpg
- File:BrooksLaichCapitals.jpg
- File:D. J. King.jpg
- File:Matt Generous.jpg
- File:Brandon Segal.jpg
- File:TylerMyersSabres.jpg
- File:Jason Garrison.jpg
- File:Alain Goulet.jpg
- File:JohnKlingberg.jpg
- File:MarcusSorensen.jpg
- File:DeanEvason.jpg
- File:LudvigRensfeldt.jpg
- File:JohanGustafsson.jpg
- File:Ville Leino.jpg
- File:LukeSchennTML.jpg
- File:BradenHoltbyHeadShot.jpg
- File:Kevin Klein.jpg
- File:Shea Weber 2011.jpg
- File:Semyon Varlamov 03.jpg
- File:Semyon Varlamov 02.jpg
- File:RyanJohnsonHawks.jpg
- File:Jamal Mayers.jpg
- File:Ty Conklin St.Louis.jpg
- File:AnzeKopitarKingsGame.jpg
- File:DionPhaneufLeafs.jpg
- File:Roman Polak.jpg
- File:Tyson Strachan.jpg
- File:Matt D'Agostini.jpg
- File:Willie Mitchell Kings 2011-01-15.jpg
- File:Jaroslav Halak 2011-01-13a.jpg
- File:Kyle Clifford.jpg
- File:Jeff Petry.jpg
- File:Liam Reddox.jpg
- File:Linus Omark Oilers.jpg
- File:B. J. Crombeen 2011.jpg
- File:DavidBackesBlues.jpg
- File:St. Louis 5148.jpg
- File:BarrettJackmanBlues.jpg
- File:Ryan Reaves St. Louis Blues.jpg
- File:Nikolai Khabibulin 03.jpg
- File:Nikolai Khabibulin 02.jpg
- File:Nikolai Khabibulin 01.jpg
- File:Andrei Loktionov (Los Angeles Kings) 01.jpg
- File:Andrei Loktionov (Los Angeles Kings) 03.jpg
- File:Andrei Loktionov (Los Angeles Kings) 04.jpg
_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_03.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_04.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Still more listed in the search--Leech44 (talk) 20:41, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:33, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Photography of a model, so it's a derivative work. It's probably copyrighted. Giro720 (talk) 15:03, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:33, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
there is much to doubt that this photo was taken by the uploader. no source is given from where this photo is taken, nothing about the original photographer is known so that we can't know if this photo is free for us to use or not. Julius1990 (talk) 15:10, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:33, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Unlikely to by own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:34, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FOP in Saudi Arabia. 84.61.170.156 16:19, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:34, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused equivalent to File:Nitroglycerin.svg, but has charges floating in odd positions. Fixing it would make it a literal dup in same-format. DMacks (talk) 16:27, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
- Keep The charges in the other file are right between the bonds. Pretty bad. --Cwbm (commons) (talk) 20:34, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
- Could you clarify the difference that you are seeing and why there is a benefit to having this difference as an equivalently-high-quality image? The only major things I see (apart from slightly different default rendering size) are meaningless differences in the position of the minus associated with the single-bonded O on the left nitrate and the position of the plus associted with the N of the right nitrate. The former makes the diagram in that region more confusing/congested (having the charge overlap the bond rather than being out in open space) while the latter is just arbitrary (in both images the positive is overwriting a bit of a bond). The minor things I see are that the charges in general are further from the atoms, making it less clear that they are actually intimately associated with them. I just tried redrawing this image using the ACS diagram standards (the explicitly recommended way to draw chemical structures on commons as far as I can tell) and it has charges "close" like in the replacement I mention. Even the creator of this image himself says that they are equivalent. DMacks (talk) 20:52, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
The charges should not overlap with the bonds which they do in the image you want to keep. --Cwbm (commons) (talk) 21:08, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
- I'll fix that (both images have this problem). Both images are also weak XML, in that they are a single path for the whole image...makes any sort of tweak difficult, so I'll redo from scratch. DMacks (talk) 12:47, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
- Keep --Ragimiri (talk) 15:26, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Ed (Edgar181) 13:01, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Low resolution unused, and incorrect reaction arrow (should be resonance not equilibrium). Replaceable by File:Nitrous-oxide-2D-VB.png and File:Nitrous-oxide-2D-VB.svg DMacks (talk) 16:38, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
- Löschen The image uses arrows in a way that is contrary to convention. Since there are accurate and higher quality replacements, this file should be deleted. ChemNerd (talk) 17:21, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:34, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Seems poster, and if it is then it's a copyvio. Bill william comptonTalk 16:55, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: 18:20, 19 August 2011 by Cirt, closed by Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:35, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
COM:DW - in a legal world where Omega used the copyright on its globe logo to prevent parallel imports (see en:Omega S.A. v. Costco Wholesale Corp.), this photo is probably also an infringement on their copyright. Pieter Kuiper (talk) 17:14, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:35, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
File:Flag of Andalusia (simple).svg is pre-existing SVG of the Andalucian flag without the Coat of Arms. ~ Fry1989 eh? 17:49, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:35, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Personal unused out-of-scope picture. P199 (talk) 18:07, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:35, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
This diagram is a duplicate of Transformer_flux.gif, and there are no links to this file. Overjive (talk) 18:37, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:35, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
no FOP in France. derivative work. Amada44 talk to me 19:59, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:36, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
equivalent to File:1,2,3-tris-nitrooxy-propane.svg Ragimiri (talk) 20:32, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Kommentar Commons:Deletion requests/File:1,2,3-tris-nitrooxy-propane.svg is the other keep/delete option, in which the nom of this one is the uploader of that one. DMacks (talk) 21:00, 19 August 2011 (UTC)- Keep one of them if they are the same and merge one name to the other.--James Heilman, MD (talk) 17:56, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Ed (Edgar181) 13:01, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
The artistic rendition may be "own work" but I'm sure the original photo is not. Derivative of copyrighted work. P199 (talk) 20:37, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:36, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Personal out-of-scope photo. P199 (talk) 20:38, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:37, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Personal out-of-scope photo. P199 (talk) 20:39, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:37, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Personal out-of-scope photo. P199 (talk) 20:39, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:37, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
The artistic rendition may be "own work" but I'm sure the original photo is not. Derivative of copyrighted work. P199 (talk) 20:42, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:37, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Personal art work, out of scope. P199 (talk) 20:43, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:37, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
What on earth is this? Is the image in any way useful? P199 (talk) 20:47, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
- It's a lolcat. Delete, unused persobal doodles, no big deal. NVO (talk) 06:58, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:37, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Promotional content. Image is not useful in for educcational purposes. GeorgHH • talk 21:36, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Löschen very obvious! This was taken from the internet. --A.Ceta (talk) 09:56, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:38, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
This appears to me to be a derivative work of the software on the screen photographed, and therefore, can't be released by the uploader as free. Courcelles (talk) 21:36, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
- It's used on the English Wikipedia, which allows non-free files in some circumstances. I have copied the image there. Quadell (talk) 12:09, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:38, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
No Freedom of panorama, especially for artwork like statue in Lebanon Hoangquan hientrang (talk) 14:44, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
- Löschen No FOP In Lebanon for modern art unless the artist has been deceased for 70 years. This is modern art, so its not possible here. Street vehicles, aircraft and trains are free from FOP problems since they are utilitarian objects while street views are also OK. But this image focuses on the statue which makes it not permissible on Commons due to the lack of FOP in Lebanon. --Leoboudv (talk) 08:00, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
- But when was the statue made, and by who? That's the only way we can determine whether it is PD or not, simply claiming no FOP doesn't make this a copyvio. Remember, the statue was built to commemorate events that happened in the very beginning of the last century, so it could easily be PD. Also, it should apparently be death of author plus 50 years, not 70. FunkMonk (talk) 18:17, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
- Löschen As it says in Italian in the image description, the statue was inaugurated on March 6, 1960. It is the work of w:it:Renato Marino Mazzacurati (1909 - 1969), as confirmed e.g. by [1]. Lupo 13:00, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- That settles it, then, do we have any images of the square where the statue would be "de minimis"? FunkMonk (talk) 06:21, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- Don't know. But in any case on all the images used at en:Martyrs' Square, Beirut, it is not "de minimis". Lupo 06:55, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- Seems like most images in the category of the square should be removed as well then. FunkMonk (talk) 07:04, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- Don't know. But in any case on all the images used at en:Martyrs' Square, Beirut, it is not "de minimis". Lupo 06:55, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- That settles it, then, do we have any images of the square where the statue would be "de minimis"? FunkMonk (talk) 06:21, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: No FOP in Lebanon, undelete in a few more decades :( russavia (talk) 22:04, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
keine Verwendung 62.214.25.49 16:23, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
- Keep obviously in use - and even if not this is no reason for deletion}} --Saibo (Δ) 01:58, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
- Keep In use. And per what says Saibo~, keine problem. Tm (talk) 06:04, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Massively in use.--Prosfilaes (talk) 07:12, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
- Keep No valid rationale given for deletion. Betty Logan (talk) 19:14, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Ed (Edgar181) 19:28, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Logo copyright protected according to the homepage (disclaimer) of the soccer club [2] Miho (talk) 21:52, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - too simple for copyright. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 21:55, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Kept. russavia (talk) 22:15, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Nonsense. This shows not really spasticity. GeorgHH • talk 21:54, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons:Project scope Ed (Edgar181) 19:29, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Doubtful author ship claims. TinEye found 33 results ([3]) GeorgHH • talk 22:25, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. Yann (talk) 20:12, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
I don't see how it gets from Google Images to a free license. It's apprently gotten from a high school website, www.nnhs65.com, and I'm not sure what right they had to use it. Bbb23 (talk) 23:22, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
- Kommentar - it is likely {{PD-US-no notice}} (looks like publicity material). /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 17:46, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Unclear copyright situation High Contrast (talk) 19:08, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
Although this image came from an NSF site, there is no evidence there that it is PD-Gov. The NSF site says:
- "With the exception of NSF logos, permission to use NSF graphics is granted on a case by case basis. Some are public domain, some are created by NSF contractors, and some are used by NSF with specific permission granted by the owner. Therefore, with the exception of the NSF logos provided, photos and illustrations found on the NSF web site should not be reused without permission."
That's pretty clear that we need permission, or at least more information, to use this image. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:58, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Ezarateesteban 20:16, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Is there really a need for a penis? 71.237.170.76 18:07, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
- Keep No reason given to delete. Also Commons:Not_censored#CensorshipCommons is not censored and its categorized in Category:Testicular size. Tm (talk) 02:38, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
- Löschen as per COM:NUDITY. There are plenty of such images already. --P199 (talk) 17:08, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: not needed, not in use in projects, stop pennis Ezarateesteban 20:19, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
I don't think a family album counts as "publication", therefore copyright would I assume be life of author + 70, and perfectly possible we are still inside this window if the guy died in 1924. -mattbuck (Talk) 23:12, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
- Keep It seems to me that the photo was published with the caption in 1924, and that this print was then included in a family album. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:54, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
- I see it somewhat differently - to me it looks like the caption was added after the image was scanned from an album. -mattbuck (Talk) 00:55, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
- The black border also indicates that this was published 1924, the death year of the subject. This has all the appearances of a Catholic Sterbebild. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 17:43, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
- I see it somewhat differently - to me it looks like the caption was added after the image was scanned from an album. -mattbuck (Talk) 00:55, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
Kept: very improbable to not have been published at least in 1924 Jcb (talk) 22:30, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
Unclear source and authorship information, and no sign that the legitimate copyright holder approved the stated license. The source is stated to be Rafael Calventi, who is apparently an architect, and the author is variously stated to be Ricardo Briones or Rafael Calventi. The uploader's username bears no resemblance to either of these names, and it's not clear who Briones is or who actually took the photos. Three different cameras and three different scanners were used.
- File:Libro "Arquitectura Contemporánea en República Dominicana".jpg
- File:Palacio de los deportes de Santiago de los Caballeros.jpg
- File:Interior de la Residencia Mastrolilli .jpg
- File:Palacio de los deportes de Santiago de los Caballeros..jpg
- File:Monumento a la Restauración.jpg
- File:Monumento a la Guerra de Restauración de la República Dominicana..jpg
- File:Residencia Mastrolilli..jpg
- File:Residencia Mastrolilli .jpg
- File:Torre Libertador.jpg
- File:Interior del auditorio del Banco Central de República Dominicana..jpg
- File:Banco central, interior..jpg
- File:Palacio Deportes Santiago.jpg
- File:Banco Central de la República Dominicana.jpg
- File:Banco Central 01.jpg
- File:Rafael Calventi 01.jpg
—LX (talk, contribs) 13:41, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:40, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Same reason as the previous nomination. Instead of commenting on that, the uploader chose to add more photos with the same problem.
- File:Lateral edificio Palic.jpg
- File:Patio residencia Mastrolilli.jpg
- File:Fachada Mastrolilli.jpg
- File:Torre Libertador (detrás).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
—LX (talk, contribs) 14:18, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. Jameslwoodward deleted those files: Reason: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source. --High Contrast (talk) 08:42, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
The photo depicts the costumes for ja:秘密戦隊ゴレンジャー (en:Himitsu Sentai Goranger) when they were featured in a now defunct museum's exhibition hall, which would make the photograph a derivative work. There are also derivatives of this image at File:Red Ranger.jpg, File:Yellow Power Ranger.jpg, File:Pink Ranger.jpg, File:Green Ranger.jpg, and File:Blue Ranger.jpg, which should also be deleted. The photo should have never been released to the public domain in the first place, and it should have also never been transferred to the commons. —Ryūlóng (竜龍) 18:54, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. What is copyrightable about these costumes? They are too simply designed to have anything copyrightable, i.e. this is a "useful item". There is nothing copyrightable about a plain helmet, a plain spandex suit with simple stripes, plain gloves, plain boots, and functional items on the belt. If this were a later sentai with more complex helmet and suit designs, it might be a different story, but this sentai's costumes are too simply designed to be eligible for copyright. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:01, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
- A costume is not a "useful item" because it has no use. I have also never heard of a costume being "too simply designed". Each helmet has its own design. Each cloth (not spandex) suit is unique, and the 5 shaped logo on the belt and on the boots show that that this is not "simple" and can be eligible for copyright. This is still a derivative work, and as described in this section, it's still not allowed regardless of the nature of the image. The original designs were made by Shotaro Ishinomori and they are still in his copyright.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 23:58, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
- These are not toys - this is clothing we're talking about. I still contend that the useful value of the clothing and lack of separatable copyrightable items makes these ineligible. SchuminWeb (Talk) 16:04, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
- It is not just "clothing". It is a costume being worn by a mannequin. There is no utilitarian value for such a costume and I still do not see the lack of copyrightability of the various aspects of these costumes.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 17:43, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
- These are not toys - this is clothing we're talking about. I still contend that the useful value of the clothing and lack of separatable copyrightable items makes these ineligible. SchuminWeb (Talk) 16:04, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
- There is also Commons:Village pump/Archive/2011/07#Revisiting the costume issue to consider.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 00:49, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
- A costume is not a "useful item" because it has no use. I have also never heard of a costume being "too simply designed". Each helmet has its own design. Each cloth (not spandex) suit is unique, and the 5 shaped logo on the belt and on the boots show that that this is not "simple" and can be eligible for copyright. This is still a derivative work, and as described in this section, it's still not allowed regardless of the nature of the image. The original designs were made by Shotaro Ishinomori and they are still in his copyright.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 23:58, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
- Kommentar Please notify an author, en:User:MykReeve. --M5 (talk) 12:18, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
- MykReeve has been AWOL for 6 months.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 17:44, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
Kept: per our costume custom Jcb (talk) 14:58, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Nuremberg Trial photographs
[edit]- File:Walter Greiling.jpg
- File:Hilar Giebel.jpg
- File:Bernd v Brauchitsch.jpg
- File:Helge Auleb.jpg
- File:Johann Gietler.jpg
- File:Wilmar Hager.jpg
- File:Ruehmer Dr K.jpg
- File:Albrecht Focke.jpg
- File:H.Rinn.jpg
- File:Letsch.jpg
- File:H.Kuehnen.jpg
- File:Jaedicke.jpg
- File:F.Popp.jpg
- File:W.v.Tippelskirch.jpg
- File:Laermann.jpg
- File:GOverbeck.jpg
- File:Radunski.jpg
- File:Lenner.jpg
- File:Hahnenbruch.jpg
- File:Meerwald dr Willy.jpg
- File:Erich Darre (SS).jpg
- File:W von Hoven.jpg
- File:Schmid-Lossberg H.jpg
- File:Ohler Paul.jpg
- File:Michel Elmar.jpg
- File:JoEntzian.jpg
- File:Ulm Otto.jpg
- File:FriedhelmDraeger.jpg
- File:NasseArthur.jpg
- File:Heinrich Emmendorfer.jpg
- File:K.Schumacher.jpg
- File:Wilhelm Bonatz (SS).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
A forum post isn't proof that these are US Army photographs. – Adrignola talk 21:18, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - these photos were taken for the War Crimes trials at Nuremberg, trials that were mostly run by US Federal employees; guards seen in court room photos were typically US military police; there is no reason to doubt the statement given in the source that these photos were taken by US Army photographers. But these photos would be free in any case. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 21:39, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
- Keep ~ same like Pieter Kuiper --Trollhead (talk) 22:01, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
- Keep ~ same like Pieter Kuiper - all witnesses at Nuremberg Trials > see here: archives.gov. Date Published: 1977 --Schreiben (talk) 09:19, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
- Löschen Not only because I have studied History but: The Nuremberg Trials were held by the Allied forces of World War II, the Soviet Union, Great Brittain, France and the United States. The organisation was made together, all activities were communicated within the victorious four. And because each party wanted to documentate this trial themselves as well, many actions were done twicely or even oftener. Like this it is with this photos of the prisoners or witnesses. If this bunch of photos were made by the US, France, Brittains or the Soviets cannot be said without a very good attribution of the author. And only photos of the US Army are in the public domain. Neither of the Brittains, French or of the Soviets. As long as there is veriable source in which it is written that these photos came from a US employee this files cannot be rested here on Commons. This (archives.gov. Date Published: 1977; brought by User:Schreiben) and Peter Kuipers words are reliable sources. So, delete the files until it is proven that they are by US service memebers. ---A.Ceta (talk) 09:33, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - as far as I can see the only problem would be if the photos were taken by a French photographer as COM:PD#France states that the French government has used professional photographers who keep the copyright of the images. If they image was taken by a British employee, they would be PD as Crown copyright is only 50 years (COM:PD#Crown_copyright) and if they were Russion it would be PD too (see Template:PD-RU-exempt). However, this is moot as the link provided by Schreiben shows the people in the images were subject to US control. --JD554 (talk) 14:51, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - Without a reasonable doubt, all of these photos were taken by US Army photographers on behalf of the Office of the U.S. Chief of Counsel for the Prosecution of Axis Criminality (OUSCCPAC, May 1945 - Oct. 1946) or its successor organization, the Office of the Chief of Counsel for War Crimes (OCCWC, Oct. 1946 - June 1949). They are held on microfilm in the National Archives Collection of World War II War Crimes Records, Record Group 238, specifically in section 238.3.4 Records of the IMT trial, subheading Photographs (826 images) (...defendants, witnesses,... 1945-46) and in section 238.4.1 General records (for the 12 subsequent trials), subheading Photographs (1,822 images) (..., defendants, witnesses, ... and courtroom views for each of the 12 cases). I cannot verify the claim of user A.Ceta to have studied history somehow, somewhere, but I would be very surprised if it was a graduate level class on the war crimes trials in Europe post-second world war. The IMT-organisation in Nuremberg was exclusively American as far as mundane tasks such as prisoner detainment, records handling, evidence keeping and security was concerned. The NMT (12 subsequent trials), from which the majority of these shots stem, was an exclusively American organization down to the judges and prosecutors. No French, Russian or British personnel was involved in an official capacity in the 12 NMT trials. Somehow, that detail seems to have eluded our learned historian. These are official mug shots from Nuremberg, hence they were taken by OUSCCPAC/OCCWC personnel. That they were uploaded by someone on a murky website without giving proper attribution does not change that fact. Together with Schreiben, I co-authored the featured article Einsatzgruppen-Prozess on one of the 12 subsequent trials. In the course of this, I entered into correspondence with the leading historian an the Einsatzgruppen trial. I can ask Prof. Earl to verify some of these pictures as being of NARA providence next time she is down in DC. But it seems a waste of time as this is such a clear-cut case. --Minderbinder (talk) 05:45, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
- Keep There is no doubt: These photos were taken by persons working with US State Institutions. Everyone who studied German history especially history of the so called “Third Reich” and the young Bundesrepublik – I did such studies – knows that very well. --Atomiccocktail (talk) 16:50, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Kept - Jcb (talk) 22:58, 4 September 2011 (UTC)